Most
sustainability
communications campaignsand employee engagement approaches are:
THE CONVENTIONAL APPROACH
• The CEO gives a big speech about his commitment to
sustainability, then promptly signs a lucrative deal toproduce unsustainable products
• Publishing articles on the intranet about how much
employees have raised this month for a certain charitybut not mentioning anything about the allegations of unethical conduct in the press
• Celebrating the thousandth mobile phone recycled, but
glossing over the problematic project employees aregossiping about
•
Making token sustainability gestures – covering the visibleside of a roof with solar panels, even if it will generate theleast power – breeding cynicism among employees
• Creating a dedicated team of sustainability experts who
collect data and fill in investors’ questionnaires, but don’tspeak to people in the core areas of the business that canmake a real difference to the company’s sustainabilitygoals (e.g. procurement and marketing teams)
• Dictating which materials engineers should not use and
limiting which kind of products they can make, insteadof asking them to use their skills to come up withinnovative solutions
• Launching a competition for employees to come up with
ideas to cut environmental impacts, but immediatelyruling out most of the ideas as too radical or requiring too much investment, resulting in frustration and apathy
• Inspiring employees to come up with great technical
solutions without making clear to them the acceptablerate of financial return
• Top-down, with little opportunity for dialogue• Celebratory, focusing on sustainability success
stories and glossing over tough challenges
• Emotional (tugging on the heart strings)
not rational and fact-based
• Prescriptive, dictating specific
sustainability measures
• Not relevant to people in different roles
The conventional approach might include articles onsustainability issues in internal magazines and on the
intranet, tips on how to be green and CEO messages
highlighting successes. But however well intentionedthese approaches are, many companies have foundthem ineffective. Perhaps some of these experiencessound familiar:
• Setting sustainability targets for all employees but
failing to link them to the most significant impacts or mission of the business. Lights and computers areturned off at the end of the day and people are printing double-sided, but no real progress is made in cutting the main environmental impacts of the business
• Announcing the company’s sustainability strategy with abig splash and a commitment from the CEO, but then anew CEO comes in with a different view• Communications full of pictures of wildlife on the
verge of extinction and poor children in developing countries, suggesting the company is somehow ‘making a difference’ but failing to mention other negativeimpacts the company may have through its day-to-dayoperations
03
Embedding Sustainability
Interface
RAISE