Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
20Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Google Answer and Counterclaims v. Oracle (Filed)

Google Answer and Counterclaims v. Oracle (Filed)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 23,707|Likes:
Published by tomkrazit

More info:

Published by: tomkrazit on Oct 05, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/16/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
GOOGLE INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT AND COUNTERCLAIMSCIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279)fzimmer@kslaw.comCHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)csabnis@kslaw.comK
ING
&
 
S
PALDING
LLP101 Second Street – Suite 2300San Francisco, CA 94105Telephone: (415) 318-1200Facsimile: (415) 318-1300SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (
Pro Hac Vice)
sweingaertner@kslaw.comROBERT F. PERRYrperry@kslaw.comBRUCE W. BABER (
Pro Hac Vice Pending)
 bbaber@kslaw.comK
ING
&
 
S
PALDING
LLP1185 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-4003Telephone: (212) 556-2100Facsimile: (212) 556-2222Attorneys for DefendantGOOGLE INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.Plaintiff,v.GOOGLE INC.Defendant.Case No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHAHonorable Judge William H. Alsup
GOOGLE INC.’S ANSWER TOPLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FORPATENT AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT ANDCOUNTERCLAIMSJURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document32 Filed10/04/10 Page1 of 27
 
 
2
 
GOOGLE INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT AND COUNTERCLAIMSCIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
GOOGLE INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FORPATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND COUNTERCLAIMS
 Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) answers the Complaint of Oracle America, Inc.(“Oracle”) as follows:
The Parties
1.
 
Google is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thetruth of the allegations of paragraph 1, and therefore denies them.2.
 
Google admits that it is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with a principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View,California 94043. Google admits that it does business in the Northern District of California.Google denies any remaining allegations of paragraph 2.
Jurisdiction and Venue
 3.
 
Google admits that this action purports to invoke the patent and copyright laws of the United States, Titles 35 and 17, United States Code. Google admits that 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331and 1338(a) confer jurisdiction as to claims arising under the patent laws and claims arisingunder the laws of the United States upon this Court. Google denies any remaining allegations of paragraph 3.4.
 
Google admits that venue is proper in the Northern District of California. Googledenies any remaining allegations of paragraph 4.5.
 
Google admits that this Court has personal jurisdiction over it. Google admitsthat it has conducted and does conduct business within the State of California and within theNorthern District of California. Google denies any remaining allegations of paragraph 5.6.
 
Google admits that it, directly or through intermediaries, makes, distributes, offersfor sale or license, sells or licenses, and/or advertises its products and services in the UnitedStates, in the State of California, and the Northern District of California. Google denies anyremaining allegations of paragraph 6.
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document32 Filed10/04/10 Page2 of 27
 
 
3
 
GOOGLE INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT AND COUNTERCLAIMSCIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 
Intradistrict Assignment
 7.
 
Google admits the allegations of paragraph 7.
Background
 8.
 
Google is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thetruth of the allegations of paragraph 8, and therefore denies them.9.
 
Google is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thetruth of the allegations of paragraph 9, and therefore denies them.10.
 
Google admits that what appear to be copies of U.S. patents numbers 6,125,447,6,192,476, 5,966,702, 7,426,720, RE38,104, 6,910,205 and 6,061,520 are attached to Oracle’scomplaint as exhibits A through G. Google is without knowledge or information sufficient toform a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 10, and therefore deniesthem.11.
 
Google admits that what appear to be copies of certificates of registrationnumbers TX 6-196-514, TX 6-066-538 and TX 6-143-306 issued by the U.S. Copyright Officeare attached to Oracle’s complaint as exhibit H. Google is without knowledge or informationsufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 11, andtherefore denies them.12.
 
Google admits that the Android Platform is an open-source software stack formobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and applications, and that afeature of Android is the Dalvik virtual machine (“VM”), which executes files in the Dalvik Executable (.dex) format, and can run classes compiled by a Java language compiler that havebeen converted into the .dex format by the “dx” tool included with Android. Google admits thatthe Open Handset Alliance, a group of 78 technology and mobile companies, which includesGoogle, makes the information and source code for Android, including the Dalvik VM and theAndroid software development kit (“SDK”), openly and freely available for download at
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document32 Filed10/04/10 Page3 of 27

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->