Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOTICE NOTHING HAPPENED. THAT IS BECAUSE ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS
SCREEN IS THAT YOU ENTER AT LEAST 3 CHARACTER LETTER IN THE NAME FIELD IN ORDER TO
SEARCH. IT WOULD TAKE FOREVER TRYING TO GUESS NAMES. WE WANT TO SEE ALL
“CERTIFICATE OF TITLE” TRANSACTIONS WITHIN A SPECIFIC DATE RANGE. TRY CLICKING
HERE INSTEAD…
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
ENTER THE DESIRED DATE RANGE & MAKE SURE THE DOCUMENT TYPE SAYS “CT”
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
NOTE: THERE ARE ALMOST 1,200 (POST FORECLOSURE) CT’S ISSUED FROM JAN 2010
THROUGH APR 2010. HERE YOU WILL FIND 1st DIRECT NAME & 1st INDIRECT NAME
(GRANTOR/GRANTEE BUT THEY ARE NOT REFERRED TO AS GRANTOR/GRANTEE IN PUBLIC
RECORDS- Hmmm). NEXT, SELECT A FILE BY CLICKING ON THE LINK TO A NAMED PARTY.
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
NEXT - SELECT “VIEW IMAGE” AND THE CT WILL APPEAR (NOTE CASE# AT BOTTOM LEFT OF
THE SCREEN). YOU CAN SKIP DIRECTLY TO THE COURT CASE SEARCH NOW THAT YOU HAVE
THE CASE# BUT I RECOMMEND TAKING A MOMENT TO LOOK AT THE RECORDED CERT. OF TITLE
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
STEP 6 – WRITE DOWN (OR CUT & PASTE) THE CASE NUMBER. WE ARE GOING BACK TO THE
MAIN PAGE TO PERFORM A COURT CASE SEARCH
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
CONTRATULATIONS – YOU ARE NOW IN THE DOCKET FOR THIS FILE. NOW SELECT “REGISTER
OF ACTIONS” TO VIEW & DOWNLOAD COMPLAINT, EXHIBITS, MOTIONS, AFFIDAVITS, ETC.
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
HERE’S THE COMPLAINT – PLAINTIFF IS A TRUST; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF ___________. PROMISSORY NOTE & MORTGAGE TO SAND CANYON CORPORATION, FKA OPTION
ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A CA CORPORATION. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE TRUST ACTUALLY EXISTS AND THAT THE
PERSONS CLAIMING THE AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT THE TRUST ACTUALLY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO. #3 COUNT 1,
PLAINTIFF OWNS AND HOLDS SAID NOTE & MORTGAGE.
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
ITEM #8 COUNT 1 DECLARES PROVISION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES. ITEM #23 OR MORTGAGE STATES; “AS USED IN THIS
SECURITY INSTRUMENT AND THE NOTE, “ATTORNEYS’ FEES” SHALL INCLUDE ANY ATTORNEYS’ FEES AWARDED BY AN
APPELLATE COURT, THAT’S PRETTY INTERESTING! THERE’S A TYPO ON ITEM #10 & PLAINTIFF DOES SEEK A DEFICIENCY
JUDGMENT. #13 ON COUNT 2 STATES THE ACTION IS TO REESTABLISH A PROMISSORY NOTE (RECALL ITEM #3 COUNT 1, THEY
SAID THEY WERE HOLDING THE NOTE) SO WHICH IS IT? ITEM #15 COUNT 2 STATES THE NOTE HAS BEEN LOST OR
DESTROYED – HMMM... WHEREABOUTS CANNOT BE DETERMINED & PLAINTIFF HAS NEITHER KNOWLEDGE OF WHEN SAID
NOTE WAS LOST AND/OR DESTROYED NOR ANY KNOWLEDGE AS TO THE MANNER OF LOSS OR DESTRUCTION. BUT THEY HAVE
IT, BUT THEY DON’T… OR THEY DID, BUT THEY DON’T REMEMBER HOW OR WHEN. CONFUSED YET?
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
HERE IS THE PART OF THE MORTGAGE (ITEM #23) THAT TALKS ABOUT ATTORNEYS FEES. MANY MORTGAGES (ESPECIALLY
FANNIE/FREDDIE/MERS) I HAVE READ SHOW THIS VERY SAME LANGUAGE.
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
HERE’S THE NOTE. MY QUESTION IS THIS, WHY TALK ABOUT ‘LOST’ NOTE AND THEN TURN AROUND AND SUBMIT AN EXHIBIT?
YOU CLAIM TO HAVE NO IDEA WHEN YOU CAME INTO POSSESSION OF THE NOTE OR IN WHAT MANNER IT WAS LOST YET YOU
HAVE IN YOUR POSSESSION A ‘CERTIFIED TRUE COPY’ OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE. MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHO IS SAND CANYON
CORPORATION AND WHAT IS THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO DEUTSCHE BANK? DID ANY PARTY ISSUE SECURITIES THAT YEAR?
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
AT SOME POINT YOU WILL NEED TO GO BACK TO STEP 3 & 4 TO SEARCH FOR ANY ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE (OR MULTIPLE
ASSIGNMENTS) AND OTHER “OPEN & UNDISCHARGED” LIENS OF RECORD. IF THERE WERE PREVIOUS “OPEN” MORTGAGE
LIENS ON THE PARCEL, SEARCH FOR PROPER DISCHARGE OF THE MORTGAGE (OR MORTGAGES). *4CLOSUREFRAUD’S
ASSIGNMENT LOOKUP TOOL CAN BE FOUND BELOW. *4CLOSUREFRAUD SHOWS HUGE POTENTIAL ISSUES THAT MAY COME
INTO PLAY REGARDING THE NAMES AND THE IDENTITIES OF THE PARTIES RECORDED ON THE ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE.
GOOGLE “ROBO-SIGNER” FOR MORE INFO
http://4closurefraud.org/2009/10/18/foreclosure-fraud-guide-to-looking-up-public-records-for-
fraud/
stopGOVTwaste’s Docket & Title Lookup Tool_v1
THE IDEA IS TO SEE WHAT THE COMPLAINT SAYS AND MATCH THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES
WITH THE NAMES AS THEY APPEAR ON THE MORTGAGE AND NOTE. DO ADDITIONAL PARTIES
APPEAR FROM NOWHERE? ARE ANY PARTIES OMITTED? CAN YOU CLEARLY ESTABLISH A
CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF THE MORTGAGE? HOW ABOUT THE NOTE? DO THE ENDORSEMENTS (IF
ANY) ON THE NOTE MAKE SENSE? ARE THERE ANY CRAZY ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE
INSTRUMENTS RECORDED?
STOP_GOVT_WASTE@HOTMAIL.COM
-THANK YOU!