Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reprinted with permission from the June 2006 issue of The FABRICATOR®, copyright 2006 by FMA Communications Inc., Rockford, Illinois, www.thefabricator.com.
TEST METHODS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Material properties that have a direct or indirect influence on the forma-
bility and product quality are the ultimate tensile strength, yield strength,
Young’s modulus, ductility, strain-hardening exponent, and the plastic
strain ratio. You can determine all of these parameters by cutting a test FIGURE 4 A specimen pulled to fracture typically exhibits necking, or thinning.
specimen from the blank and performing a tensile test. The following The width and thickness of the specimen decreases noticeably near the point of fracture.
ASTM specifications govern these parameters:
the thickness strain is expressed as et = than the true value. The two primary
• ASTM E8/E8M Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of ln(Lowo/Lfwf). After substituting et sources of errors in width strain meas-
Metallic Materials governs the determination of ultimate tensile strength, into Equation 1 and inverting it to urement are caused by:
yield strength, elongation, and reduction of area. These are measures of duc- eliminate negative values, the plastic • Edge curling (the specimen’s
tility. strain ratio is given by Equation 2. edges curl along the length of the
r = ln(wo/wf )/ln(Lf wf /Lowo) specimen as it is pulled).
• ASTM E111 Standard Test Method for Young’s Modulus, Tangent
Where: • Concentrated stresses (the sharp,
Modulus, and Chord Modulus is used for determining Young’s modulus.
Lf = Final length knifelike edges on the extensometer
• ASTM E646 Standard Test Method for Tensile Strain-Hardening Lo = Original length create highly concentrated stresses
Exponents (n-values) of Metallic Sheet Materials is for determining the Equation 2 enables you to calculate that result in increased localized strain-
strain-hardening exponent. the plastic strain ratio either manually ing at the point of measurement). Both
with a set of calipers or automatically sources of error result in greater width
• ASTM E517 Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio r for strains and higher r values.
with the use of two extensometers—
Sheet Metal determines the plastic strain ratio. Of all the mechanical After each test you need to inspect
one to measure the change in axial
properties determined by a tensile test, the plastic strain ratio is the most the specimen to determine if it is flat.
gauge length and the other to measure
difficult and requires close attention to detail. Errors in the r value persist unless you
the change in width (see Figure 2). If
compensate for the curling. Errors
ASTM Intl., 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 610-832- you use the manual approach, it is
associated with sharp knife edges are
9585, fax 610-832-9555, www.astm.org necessary to measure with calipers the
easily eliminated by installing knife
specimen width and the distance
edges with rounded or flat surfaces at
between gauge marks before testing. the point of contact.
You pull the specimen to a strain less
than maximum force (point D in Other Points to Consider
Figure 3), unload it, and measure the For many materials, the r value
final width and gauge length. remains constant over the range of
If you use the automatic method , plastic strains up to the maximum
you can pull the specimen until it frac-
force applied to the specimen. For
tures (see Figure 4). This enables you some sheet materials, however, the r
to determine the ultimate strength, value varies with the applied axial
yield strength, and elongation in the strain. For such materials, you should
same pull, which saves time and report the as-tested strain level.
money. To calculate the plastic strains Because rolled sheet metals devel-
using the automatic method, you must op planar anisotropy (characteristics
calculate and subtract the elastic that are directional), sample orienta-
strains from the measured strains. tion can be significant to the measure-
ment of the plastic strain ratio.
Errors in Determining Therefore, you must cut test speci-
the Plastic Strain Ratio mens 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90
FIGURE 2 This axial and averaging transverse extensometer attached to a flat If you were to perform an error analy- degrees respective to the rolling direc-
metal test specimen is a typical arrangement for determining the plastic strain ratio.
sis on Equation 2, you would find that tion, and you must report the cut
(Photo courtesy of Epsilon Technology Inc.)
the r value is much more sensitive to direction with each result.
errors in width measurement than Richard Gedney is
errors in length measurement. R val- president of
ADMET Inc.,
ues that are off by more than 40 per-
FIGURE 3 Stress, plotted on the Y axis, is the force divided by the original cross- 51 Morgan Drive,
sectional area of the specimen; strain, plotted on the X axis, is how the metal deforms cent are not unheard of. Furthermore, Norwood, MA 02062, 781-769-0850, fax
under the applied stress. A small amount of stress induces elastic deformation (the the reported values are always greater 781-769-0884, www.admet.com.
region from O to A). As the phrase elas-
tic deformation implies, the deformation
is not permanent; removing the stress
Want more information?
allows the material to return to its origi- • I n t e rested in learning more about metals? See “The stru c t u re of metal” at
nal shape. Between points A and F, the www.thefabricator.com/Metallurgy/Metallurgy_Article.cfm?ID=568.
material undergoes plastic deformation. • Need to know how steels are classified? See “Carbon content, steel classi-
The material actually flows, and when fications, and alloy steels” at www.thefabricator.com/Metallurgy/Metallurgy_
Article.cfm?ID=685.
the stress is removed, the material may
• If you need a quick re f e rence for metallurgical terms, see Principal Metals’
spring back but will not return to its orig-
online glossary at www.principalmetals.com/glossary/list.htm.
inal shape. F is the point of fracture.
Reprinted with permission from the June 2006 issue of The FABRICATOR®, copyright 2006 by FMA Communications Inc., Rockford, Illinois, www.thefabricator.com.