Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
37 Voluntary Forest-Based Offsets

37 Voluntary Forest-Based Offsets

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6|Likes:
Published by A Wicaksono

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: A Wicaksono on Oct 11, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Introduction: Putting Forest Offsets into Context
Human-induced climate change represents one of the most serious crises know to modern humanity,which has existed in a period of relative climatic stability. While the climate disruptions nowunderway will necessitate some adaptation, priority must still be given to dramatically reducingaggregate greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric greenhouse gas levels, to prevent evenmore environmentally, socially, and economically catastrophic disruptions.
 Thus we encourage companies to focus rst and foremost on both reducing their emissions andencouraging governments to adopt more effective international and national emissions reductionspolicies.
Such policies should include measures to reduce deforestation and forest degradation,which contribute 17% to 25% of greenhouse gas emissions globally and threaten wildlife, water supplies, and traditional communities.
Forest degradation and loss also reduce the planetʼscapacity to sequester the excess carbon dioxide now in the atmosphere.
When addressing your corporate carbon footprint, the primary objective should be to directlyreduce your greenhouse gas emissions, e.g., by developing and adopting new technologies andbusiness practices. After exhausting such emissions reductions opportunities, you may be able to“offset” your remaining emissions by nancing projects that reduce emissions or sequester carbonelsewhere. Voluntary forest-based offset projects can play a positive supporting role in thwartingclimate change. Projects that reduce the logging of primary forests can prevent the signicantemissions associated with forest degradation and outright forest loss. Restoring degradedforests or using certain forestry practices can also increase carbon sequestration and/or reduceemissions. Some projects can also have valuable environmental and social co-benets, includingfor imperiled wildlife and indigenous peoples, while helping to maintain forest ecosystemsʼresilience.However, forest projects can also have serious ecological or social impacts, overstate their greenhouse gas benets, or simply miss opportunities for crucial environmental and social co-benets. Replacing intact wild forests with fast-growing tree plantations or other “managed”forests might look benecial—if one ignores the emissions, habitat destruction, and dislocation of traditional communities that often results. Business-as-usual logging in established industrial forestsis neither ecologically benecial nor the type of additional action needed to slow climate change.To be credible, effective, and appropriate, forest-based offsets need to meet basic principlesand more detailed standards for greenhouse gas accounting and for environmental and socialprotection and co-benets. The principles described below can be used to evaluate the variousoffsets standards now in the marketplace, and could also help in developing more denitivestandards.We urge offsets proponents and participants to support more effective international and nationalemissions reduction policies, and to encourage other businesses to adopt effective and achievablegreenhouse gas reduction goals. Otherwise, the gains from voluntary offsets may be outweighedby unregulated emissions elsewhere. And for forests to help mitigate climate change, emissionsmust be reduced enough to ensure that climate shifts do not jeopardize the forestsʼ own survival.Most existing climate policies also do not adequately address the opportunities (e.g., forestconservation) and risks with forest offsets. If offsets are to play a role in regulatory policy, thenthe policies must: address the basic offsets principles discussed below; place offsets in “closed-loop” accounting systems that ensure national and global emissions are sufciently reduced; andlimit the role played by offsets to ensure direct emissions reductions remain a top priority.
ForestEthics • June 18, 2008 • Roles and Principles for Voluntary Forest-Based Climate Offsets • Page 2
Basic Principles for Voluntary Forest Offsets
Offsetsʼ Role in Comprehensive Climate Strategies:
Companies and other parties should place the greatest emphasis on directly reducing their greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., by reducing their use of paper and fossil fuels) and onencouraging other businesses and governments to adopt more effective climate strategies andpolicies. As a general rule, no more than 20% of an entityʼs carbon footprint reductions shouldcome from forest offsets.Energy companies should not be eligible to use forest projects to offset emissions from fossiluel production, but should instead focus on developing cleaner alternative technologies andcapacity, and reducing their reliance on fossil fuels.
Environmental and Social Priorities:
Top priority should be given to offsets projects that:
Protect forests from deforestation. Avoided deforestation is a top priority and opportunityfrom the perspectives of both slowing climate change and conserving imperiledecosystems.
Protect climatic refugia and other intact forests, habitats for imperiled wildlife, rareecological communities, and connectivity across forest landscapes, particularly in locationsthat will enable species and ecosystems to adjust to and survive a changing climate.
 Protect forest areas and support sustainable livelihoods important to indigenous peoples,and provide equitable remuneration to indigenous peoples with traditional or legal rights tothe site.Secondary priority should be given to projects that:Restore forests to provide habitats for imperiled wildlife, support rare ecologicalcommunities, and provide connectivity across forest landscapes, particularly in locations thatwill enable species and ecosystems to adjust to climate change.Leverage longer timber rotations in forests already under commercial management, toincrease tree size and age, and cumulative soil carbon gains, while reducing frequency of nitrogen fertilizer applications.
Environmental and Social Protections:
Offsets projects should be prohibited or not given credit where they:Would harm old growth forests, imperiled species and their habitats (including species not yetofcially recognized by governments), wilderness and heretofore unlogged forests, and other Endangered Forests.
Involve the conversion of natural forests, grasslands, and other natural ecosystems to treeplantations or other intensively managed forests.
Use non-native or genetically modied plants or other species.
Result in other signicant harmful environmental impacts, e.g., water resource impacts, or impacts to peatlands and other carbon rich soils.Result in signicant offsite environmental impacts.
Harm forest areas important to indigenous peoples and local communities.
Have not documented their acceptance via “free prior and informed consent” by all entitieswith tenure rights to the site, including indigenous peoples.Have not conducted independently veried environmental and social assessments that consider both short- and long-term effects.
ForestEthics • June 18, 2008 • Roles and Principles for Voluntary Forest-Based Climate Offsets • Page 3

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->