Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
No. 10-94
================================================================
 In The
Supreme Court of the United States
---------------------------------
♦
---------------------------------WHITNEY HARPER,
 Petitioner,
vs.MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY; UMGRECORDINGS, INC.; ARISTA RECORDS LLC;WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; SONYBMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,
 Respondents.
---------------------------------
♦
---------------------------------
On Petition For Writ Of CertiorariTo The United States Court Of AppealsFor The Fifth Circuit
---------------------------------
♦
---------------------------------
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOPETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
---------------------------------
♦
---------------------------------T
IMOTHY
M. R
EYNOLDS
 
(
Counsel of Record
)E
 VE
G. B
URTON
 
 A
NDREW
B. M
OHRAZ
 
H
OLME
R
OBERTS
&
 
O
WEN
LLP1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4100Denver, Colorado 80203(303) 861-7000Fax: (303) 866-0200Timothy.Reynolds@hro.comM
 ATTHEW
J.O
PPENHEIM
T
HE
O
PPENHEIM
G
ROUP
, LLP7304 River Falls DrivePotomac, Maryland 20854(301) 299-4986Fax: (866) 766-1678
 Attorneys for Respondents
 ================================================================
COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) 225-6964OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831
 
i
QUESTION PRESENTED
 Whether a defendant infringer of copyrights insound recordings should be precluded from seeking areduction in statutory damages under an “innocentinfringement” defense where there is no dispute thatthe elements of 17 U.S.C. § 402(d) have been met, i.e.,there is no dispute that the plaintiffs placed propernotices of copyright on the published copies of thesound recordings and that the defendant had accessto such copies.
 
ii
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
 Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29.6, Respondents stateas follows:Respondent Maverick Recording Company is a joint venture between SR/MDM Venture Inc. andMaverick Partner Inc. The ultimate parent corpora-tion of both SR/MDM Venture Inc. and MaverickPartner Inc. is Warner Music Group Corp., which ispublicly traded in the United States.Respondent UMG Recordings, Inc.’s ultimateparent corporation is Vivendi S.A., a publicly heldFrench company.Respondent Arista Records LLC is a Delawarelimited liability company owned by Arista Music(formerly BMG Music), a New York general partner-ship, which is not publicly traded.Respondent Warner Bros. Records Inc.’s ultimateparent corporation is Warner Music Group Corp.,which is publicly traded in the United States.Respondent Sony BMG Music Entertainment,n/k/a Sony Music Entertainment, is a Delaware gen-eral partnership owned by Sony Music Holdings, Inc.(98%) and USCO Sub LLC (2%), neither of which ispublicly traded. Its ultimate parent corporation isSony Corporation (Japan) which is publicly traded inthe United States.
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.

    • More From This User

    19 p.
    Capitol v. MP3tunes order on motions for reconsideration
    Ben Sheffner
    134 Reads
    27 p.
    Order on motions to dismiss in Craigslist v. 3Taps
    Ben Sheffner
    270 Reads
    43 p.
    Order on Motions to Amend/Alter Verdict in Capitol v. Thomas-Rasset
    Ben Sheffner
    4570 Reads
    2 p.
    Shepard Fairey Summary Judgment Order
    Ben Sheffner
    1623 Reads
    43 p.
    One 3 Two, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment in AP v. Shepard Fair...
    Ben Sheffner
    2057 Reads
    70 p.
    AP motion for summary judgment vs. One 3 Two, Inc.
    Ben Sheffner
    2538 Reads
    1 p.
    Order Denying Nesson Amicus
    Ben Sheffner
    1206 Reads
    12 p.
    Nesson Amicus Brief
    Ben Sheffner
    1320 Reads
    13 p.
    Defendant's Motion to Reduce Award
    Ben Sheffner
    1573 Reads
    10 p.
    Motion for Injunction
    Ben Sheffner
    1336 Reads
    1 p.
    Jammie Thomas-Rasset Verdict
    Ben Sheffner
    2441 Reads
    2 p.
    Nesson motion for pro hac vice
    Ben Sheffner
    1017 Reads
    135 p.
    Record Labels' appellate brief in Sony v. Tenenbaum
    Ben Sheffner
    2172 Reads
    2 p.
    Order denying motion for reconsideration
    Ben Sheffner
    1041 Reads
    6 p.
    DOJ Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration
    Ben Sheffner
    1676 Reads
    9 p.
    Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration
    Ben Sheffner
    2348 Reads
    4 p.
    Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration
    Ben Sheffner
    1677 Reads
    5 p.
    Mannie Garcia discontinuance
    Ben Sheffner
    856 Reads
    4 p.
    Order moving trial date in Capitol v. Thomas-Rasset
    Ben Sheffner
    899 Reads
    1 p.
    Order relieving parties of settlement talk obligations
    Ben Sheffner
    741 Reads
    3 p.
    Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal
    Ben Sheffner
    1651 Reads
    64 p.
    Order on motion for new trial/remittitur in Joel Tenenbaum case
    Ben Sheffner
    4376 Reads
    4 p.
    Joint motion re settlement
    Ben Sheffner
    1837 Reads
    17 p.
    Order on Motion to Dismiss in Williams v Scribd
    Ben Sheffner
    2462 Reads
    Notes
    Load more