Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINANCE 101
With Professor Melvyn Teo
Rishit Kataruka| Saurav Ray| Shruti Dixit| Hector Sada
• Conclusion 8
• Recommendations (Buy, Sell, or Hold) 7
• EPS Forecast and Price Forecast 6
• Beta and Sharpe Analysis 5
• Comparison with Competitors (Cumulative Returns) 4
• Financial Ratio Analysis (Liquidity, Solvency, Profitability) 3
• Industry Overview 2
• Company Overview 1
Agenda
APPLE INC - OVERVIEW
Apple Inc. - Overview
Brief history :
– Founded in April 1, 1976 in Cupertino,
California by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniac
Current news :
– Product Launch : iPad in April, 2010
– Product Introduction : New iPhone in August,
2010
Apple Inc. - Overview
Product line :
– Macbook
– iPod
– iPhone
Competitors :
– Microsoft (Operating Systems)
– Dell (Hardware/PCs)
– RIM/Nokia/Samsung (Smartphones)
Company Overview
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weakness
•Strong Brand Image •Product Recalls
•Robust Financial Performance •Patent Infringement
•Focus on R&D
Opportunities Threats
•Smartphones •Intense Competition
•New Retail Stores •Uncertain global economic
•Strong market reaction to the conditions
iPad •Declining PC Sales
•Dependence of specific suppliers
Industry Overview - Technology
Major players
– Hardware/PC’s :
1. Dell
2. HP
3. Fujitsu
4. Sony
– Software :
1. Microsoft
2. Linux
Industry Overview - Technology
Major players
– Music:
1. Creative
2. Sony
– Smartphones :
1. Nokia
2. Samsung
3. RIM
Major industry trends
Rise and spread of the internet
Web 2.0
APPLE INC – FINANCIAL
RATIOS
Financial Ratios (Liquidity)
Current ratio
– Net Current Assets over Net Current
Liabilities
– Measures how “liquid the firm is”
Quick ratio
– Similar to current ratio
– Excludes inventories in the current assets
– More accurate
Current Ratio
Apple
Current Ratio Comparison
5.00 Microso
ft
4.50
Dell
4.00
3.50
3.00
Current Ratios
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation (Current Ratio)
We see Apple’s current ratio start to
improve from 2006
– Slight dip from 2005 to 2006, due to increased
need of funds for R and D
– Apple can cover about 2.5 times of it’s current
liabilities with it’s current assets in 2009
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00 Apple
Microsoft
Quick Ratio
2.50 Dell
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation (Quick Ratio)
Almost the same as the current ratio
Equity Multiplier
– Obtained by dividing total assets and total equity
– Shows a company's total assets per dollar of
stockholders' equity. A higher equity multiplier
indicates higher financial leverage
Debt Ratio
Debt Ratio Comparison
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60 Apple
Microsoft
Debt Ratios
0.50 Dell
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation (Debt Ratio)
Apple saw it’s debt ratio increase from
2007 to 2008 and then fall from 2008 to
2009
– This is because of increased R and D spending
on new products such as the iPhone 3GS and
iPad
– Dropped in 2009 once the iPhone 3GS was
launched
Equity Multiplier
Equity Multiplier Comparison
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
Apple
Equity Multiplier
Microsoft
4.00 Dell
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation (Equity Multiplier)
Apple and Microsoft are both similar and
show lower leverage than Dell
ROE
– Measure of how much sales is generated by one unit of
equity
ROA
– Measure of how much sales is generated by unit of assets
Profit margin
Profit Margin Comparison
0.35
0.30
0.25
Apple
0.20
Profit Margin
Microsoft
Dell
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation (Profit Margin)
Microsoft has highest profit margin
– Doesn’t deal in hardware
– Hence lower inventory and operating costs
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60 Apple
Microsoft
0.50 Dell
ROE
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ROA
ROA Comparison
0.30
0.25
0.20
Apple
Microsoft
Dell
ROA
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation
Dell has the highest ROE of the three
– However this is not necessarily reflective of
good performance
– Much higher level of debt than equity
20
0
10
-5
5
15
0 P
i o
n M d
t i
r ls
o lh i
d iu P
u o f o
c n f d
e l M
s Se N a
o a c
n r b
t n
g e o o
h o
e sl
e r k
N
u e eM dP M
#REF!
n t i 1 sh
v 1 i
3 tl ol
e Ge l M Sn
i B i i l
rio l
oe
i
l i 1 l '
e ln l o
n fl 10 ds
n
d i
0
t rid 0 o
r oo o n sd
o mn BA oo
wp
d i
n ip lw
S d
D
a
y
s
A
p
p
l
e
i
n
t
r
o
d
Historical Cumulative Returns
u
c
e
s
t
h
e
i
P
a
d
Historical Cumulative returns
Apple
– Experiencing radical growth in returns over the
last few years
– Apple product launches always see a huge spike in
stock prices
– Products are highly anticipated and Apple is
always innovating
Forecasted EPS
Forecasted price
Historical EPS
Apple Historical EPS
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
Apple Historical EPS
5.00
EPS
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation
Steep rise in net income over the years
45,000.00
40,000.00
35,000.00
30,000.00
Apple Sales Growth
Sales
25,000.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
0.00
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Explanation
Steep rise in sales
Product innovation