You are on page 1of 73

Bin and Hopper Design

Karl Jacob
The Dow Chemical Company
Solids Processing Lab
jacobkv@dow.com
3/17/00 KVJ 1
The Four Big Questions
■ What is the appropriate flow mode?
■ What is the hopper angle?
■ How large is the outlet for reliable flow?
■ What type of discharger is required and
what is the discharge rate?

3/17/00 KVJ 2
Hopper Flow Modes
■ Mass Flow - all the material in the
hopper is in motion, but not necessarily
at the same velocity
■ Funnel Flow - centrally moving core,
dead or non-moving annular region
■ Expanded Flow - mass flow cone with
funnel flow above it

3/17/00 KVJ 3
Mass Flow D

Does not imply plug


flow with equal
velocity

Typically need 0.75 D to 1D to


enforce mass flow

Material in motion
along the walls

3/17/00 KVJ 4
Funnel Flow

Active Flow
Channel
“Dead” or non-
flowing region

3/17/00 KVJ 5
Expanded Flow

Funnel Flow
upper section

Mass Flow
bottom section

3/17/00 KVJ 6
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping

3/17/00 KVJ 7
Ratholing/Piping

Stable Annular
Region

Void

3/17/00 KVJ 8
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow

3/17/00 KVJ 9
Funnel Flow
-Segregation
-Inadequate Emptying
-Structural Issues

Coarse
Coarse

Fine

3/17/00 KVJ 10
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming

3/17/00 KVJ 11
Arching/Doming

Cohesive Arch
preventing material from
exiting hopper

3/17/00 KVJ 12
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming
■ Insufficient Flow

3/17/00 KVJ 13
Insufficient Flow
- Outlet size too small
- Material not sufficiently
permeable to permit dilation in
conical section -> “plop-plop”
Material under
flow compression in
the cylinder
section

Material needs
to dilate here

3/17/00 KVJ 14
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming
■ Insufficient Flow
■ Flushing

3/17/00 KVJ 15
Flushing
■ Uncontrolled flow from a hopper due to
powder being in an aerated state
- occurs only in fine powders (rough
rule of thumb - Geldart group A and
smaller)
- causes --> improper use of aeration
devices, collapse of a rathole

3/17/00 KVJ 16
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming
■ Insufficient Flow
■ Flushing
■ Inadequate Emptying

3/17/00 KVJ 17
Inadequate emptying
Usually occurs in funnel flow silos
where the cone angle is insufficient
to allow self draining of the bulk
solid.

Remaining bulk
solid

3/17/00 KVJ 18
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming
■ Insufficient Flow
■ Flushing
■ Inadequate Emptying
■ Mechanical Arching
3/17/00 KVJ 19
Mechanical Arching
■ Akin to a “traffic jam” at the outlet of bin
- too many large particle competing for
the small outlet
■ 6 x dp,large is the minimum outlet size to
prevent mechanical arching, 8-12 x is
preferred

3/17/00 KVJ 20
Problems with Hoppers
■ Ratholing/Piping
■ Funnel Flow
■ Arching/Doming
■ Insufficient Flow
■ Flushing
■ Inadequate Emptying
■ Mechanical Arching
■ Time Consolidation - Caking
3/17/00 KVJ 21
Time Consolidation - Caking
■ Many powders will tend to cake as a
function of time, humidity, pressure,
temperature
■ Particularly a problem for funnel flow
silos which are infrequently emptied
completely

3/17/00 KVJ 22
Segregation
■ Mechanisms
- Momentum or velocity
- Fluidization
- Trajectory
- Air current
- Fines

3/17/00 KVJ 23
What the chances for mass flow?

Cone Angle Cumulative % of


from horizontal hoppers with mass flow
45 0
60 25
70 50
75 70
*data from Ter Borg at Bayer
3/17/00 KVJ 24
Mass Flow (+/-)

+ flow is more consistent


+ reduces effects of radial segregation
+ stress field is more predictable
+ full bin capacity is utilized
+ first in/first out
- wall wear is higher (esp. for abrasives)
- higher stresses on walls
- more height is required
3/17/00 KVJ 25
Funnel flow (+/-)

+ less height required


- ratholing
- a problem for segregating solids
- first in/last out
- time consolidation effects can be severe
- silo collapse
- flooding
- reduction of effective storage capacity
3/17/00 KVJ 26
How is a hopper designed?
■ Measure
- powder cohesion/interparticle friction
- wall friction
- compressibility/permeability
■ Calculate
- outlet size
- hopper angle for mass flow
- discharge rates
3/17/00 KVJ 27
What about angle of repose?
Pile of bulk
solids

3/17/00 KVJ 28
Angle of Repose
■ Angle of repose is not an adequate
indicator of bin design parameters
“… In fact, it (the angle of repose) is only useful in the
determination of the contour of a pile, and its
popularity among engineers and investigators is due
not to its usefulness but to the ease with which it is
measured.” - Andrew W. Jenike
■ Do not use angle of repose to design
the angle on a hopper!
3/17/00 KVJ 29
Bulk Solids Testing
■ Wall Friction Testing
■ Powder Shear Testing - measures both
powder internal friction and cohesion
■ Compressibility
■ Permeability

3/17/00 KVJ 30
Sources of Cohesion (Binding Mechanisms)

■ Solids Bridges ■ Attraction Forces


-Mineral bridges -van der Waal’s
-Chemical reaction -Electrostatics
-Partial melting -Magnetic
-Binder hardening ■ Interfacial forces
-Crystallization -Liquid bridges
-Sublimation -Capillary forces
■ Interlocking forces
3/17/00 KVJ 31
Testing Considerations
■ Must consider the following variables
- time
- temperature
- humidity
- other process conditions

3/17/00 KVJ 32
Wall Friction Testing
Wall friction test is simply Physics 101 - difference for bulk
solids is that the friction coefficient, µ , is not constant.

P 101

N
F=µ N
F

3/17/00 KVJ 33
Wall Friction Testing
Jenike Shear Tester

WxA
Bracket Cover

Ring
SxA Bulk Solid

Wall Test
Sample

3/17/00 KVJ 34
Wall Friction Testing Results

Wall shear stress, τ


Wall Yield Locus (WYL),
variable wall friction

Wall Yield Locus,


constant wall friction
ϕ ’
Normal stress, σ

Powder Technologists usually express µ as the


“angle of wall friction”, ϕ ’

ϕ ’ = arctan µ
3/17/00 KVJ 35
Jenike Shear Tester

WxA
Bracket Cover

Ring
SxA BulkSolid
Bulk Solid

Shear plane

3/17/00 KVJ 36
Other Shear Testers
■ Peschl shear tester
■ Biaxial shear tester
■ Uniaxial compaction cell
■ Annular (ring) shear testers

3/17/00 KVJ 37
Ring Shear Testers
Arm connected to load
cells, S x A

Bulk
solid

Bottom cell
WxA rotates slowly

3/17/00 KVJ 38
Shear test data analysis

C fc σ 1

3/17/00 KVJ 39
Stresses in Hoppers/Silos
■ Cylindrical section - Janssen equation
■ Conical section - radial stress field

■ Stresses = Pressures

3/17/00 KVJ 40
Stresses in a cylinder
Consider the equilibrium of forces on a
differential element, dh, in a straight-
sided silo
Pv A = vertical pressure acting from
Pv A h above
τ π D dh

γ A g dh = weight of material in element


dh
(Pv + dPv) A = support of material from
(Pv + dPv) A below

γ A g dh τ π D dh = support from solid friction


D on the wall

(Pv + dPv) A + τ π D dh = Pv A + γ A g dh

3/17/00 KVJ 41
Stresses in a cylinder (cont’d)
Two key substitutions
τ = µ Pw (friction equation)

Janssen’s key assumption: Pw = K Pv This is not strictly true but


is good enough from an engineering view.
Substituting and rearranging,
A dPv = γ A g dh - µ K Pv π D dh
Substituting A = (π /4) D2 and integrating between h=0, Pv = 0
and h=H and Pv = Pv
Pv = (γ g D/ 4 µ K) (1 - exp(-4H µ K/D))
This
3/17/00 is the Janssen equation. KVJ 42
Stresses in a cylinder (cont’d)

hydrostatic

Bulk solids

Notice that the asymptotic pressure depends


only on D, not on H, hence this is why silos are
tall and skinny, rather than short and squat.

3/17/00 KVJ 43
Stresses - Converging Section
Over 40 years ago, the pioneer in bulk
solids flow, Andrew W. Jenike,
postulated that the magnitude of the
stress in the converging section of a
hopper was proportional to the distance
σ of the element from the hopper apex.
r

σ = σ ( r, θ )
This is the radial stress field
assumption.

3/17/00 KVJ 44
Silo Stresses - Overall

hydrostatic

Bulk solid
Notice that there is essentially no stress at
the outlet. This is good for discharge
3/17/00 devices!
KVJ 45
Janssen Equation - Example
A large welded steel silo 12 ft in diameter and 60 feet high is to
be built. The silo has a central discharge on a flat bottom.
Estimate the pressure of the wall at the bottom of the silo if the
silo is filled with a) plastic pellets, and b) water. The plastic
pellets have the following characteristics:
γ = 35 lb/cu ft ϕ ’ = 20º
The Janssen equation is
Pv = (γ g D/ 4 µ K) (1 - exp(-4H µ K/D))
In this case: D = 12 ft µ = tan ϕ ’ = tan 20º = 0.364
H = 60 ft g = 32.2 ft/sec2
γ = 35 lb/cu ft

3/17/00 KVJ 46
Janssen Equation - Example
K, the Janssen coefficient, is assumed to be 0.4. It can vary
according to the material but it is not often measured.
Substituting we get Pv = 21,958 lbm/ft - sec2.
If we divide by gc, we get Pv = 681.9 lbf/ft2 or 681.9 psf

Remember that Pw = K Pv, , so Pw = 272.8 psf.


For water, P = ρ g H and this results in P = 3744 psf, a factor of 14
greater!

3/17/00 KVJ 47
Types of Bins
Conical Pyramidal

Watch for in-


flowing valleys
in these bins!
3/17/00 KVJ 48
Chisel
Types of Bins
Wedge/Plane Flow

L
B L>3B
3/17/00 KVJ 49
A thought experiment
σ 1
σ c

3/17/00 KVJ 50
The Flow Function
c
Time flow function
σ

Flow function

σ 1
3/17/00 KVJ 51
Determination of Outlet Size
c
Time flow function
σ

σ c,t

σ Flow function
c

,i

Flow factor
σ 1
3/17/00 KVJ 52
Determination of Outlet Size

B=σ c,i H(θ )/γ

H(θ ) is a constant which is a function


of hopper angle

3/17/00 KVJ 53
H(θ ) Function

Circular
H(θ )

Square
2

r outlets (L > 3B)


Rectangula
1
10 20 30 40 50 60

Cone angle from vertical


3/17/00 KVJ 54
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
An organic solid powder has a bulk density of 22 lb/cu ft. Jenike
shear testing has determined the following characteristics given
below. The hopper to be designed is conical.
Wall friction angle (against SS plate) = ϕ ’ = 25º
Bulk density = γ = 22 lb/cu ft
Angle of internal friction = δ = 50º
Flow function σ c = 0.3 σ 1 + 4.3

Using the design chart for conical hoppers, at ϕ ’ = 25º


θ c = 17º with 3º safety factor
& ff = 1.27

3/17/00 KVJ 55
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
ff = σ /σ a or σ a = (1/ff) σ

Condition for no arching => σ a >σ c

(1/ff) σ = 0.3 σ 1 + 4.3 (1/1.27) σ = 0.3 σ 1 + 4.3

σ 1 = 8.82 σ c = 8.82/1.27 = 6.95

B = 2.2 x 6.95/22 = 0.69 ft = 8.33 in

3/17/00 KVJ 56
Material considerations for hopper design

■ Amount of moisture in product?


■ Is the material typical of what is
expected?
■ Is it sticky or tacky?
■ Is there chemical reaction?
■ Does the material sublime?
■ Does heat affect the material?
3/17/00 KVJ 57
Material considerations for hopper design

■ Is it a fine powder (< 200 microns)?


■ Is the material abrasive?
■ Is the material elastic?
■ Does the material deform under
pressure?

3/17/00 KVJ 58
Process Questions
■ How much is to be stored? For how long?
■ Materials of construction
■ Is batch integrity important?
■ Is segregation important?
■ What type of discharger will be used?
■ How much room is there for the hopper?

3/17/00 KVJ 59
Discharge Rates
■ Numerous methods to predict discharge
rates from silos or hopper
■ For coarse particles (>500 microns)
Beverloo equation - funnel flow
Johanson equation - mass flow
■ For fine particles - one must consider
influence of air upon discharge rate
3/17/00 KVJ 60
Beverloo equation
■ W = 0.58 ρ b g 0.5
(B - kdp )2.5

where W is the discharge rate (kg/sec)


ρ b is the bulk density (kg/m3)
g is the gravitational constant
B is the outlet size (m)
k is a constant (typically 1.4)
dp is the particle size (m)
Note: Units must be SI
3/17/00 KVJ 61
Johanson Equation
■ Equation is derived from fundamental
principles - not empirical
■ W = ρ b (π /4) B2 (gB/4 tan θ c)0.5
where θ c is the angle of hopper from vertical
This equation applies to circular outlets
Units can be any dimensionally consistent set
Note that both Beverloo and Johanson show that
W α B2.5 !
3/17/00 KVJ 62
Discharge Rate - Example
An engineer wants to know how fast a compartment
on a railcar will fill with polyethylene pellets if the
hopper is designed with a 6” Sch. 10 outlet. The car
has 4 compartments and can carry 180000 lbs. The
bulk solid is being discharged from mass flow silo and
has a 65° angle from horizontal. Polyethylene has a
bulk density of 35 lb/cu ft.

3/17/00 KVJ 63
Discharge Rate Example
One compartment = 180000/4 = 45000 lbs.
Since silo is mass flow, use Johanson equation.
6” Sch. 10 pipe is 6.36” in diameter = B

W = (35 lb/ft3)(π /4)(6.36/12)2 (32.2x(6.36/12)/4 tan 25)0.5


W= 23.35 lb/sec
Time required is 45000/23.35 = 1926 secs or ~32 min.
In practice, this is too long - 8” or 10 “ would be a better
choice.

3/17/00 KVJ 64
The Case of Limiting Flow Rates

■ When bulk solids (even those with little


cohesion) are discharged from a
hopper, the solids must dilate in the
conical section of the hopper. This
dilation forces air to flow from the outlet
against the flow of bulk solids and in the
case of fine materials either slows the
flow or impedes it altogether.
3/17/00 KVJ 65
Limiting Flow Rates
Interstitial gas pressure

Bulk
density

Vertical
Note that gas pressure is less than
stress
ambient pressure
3/17/00 KVJ 66
Limiting Flow Rates
■ The rigorous calculation of limiting flow
rates requires simultaneous solution of
gas pressure and solids stresses
subject to changing bulk density and
permeability. Fortunately, in many
cases the rate will be limited by some
type of discharge device such as a
rotary valve or screw feeder.
3/17/00 KVJ 67
Limiting Flow Rates - Carleton Equation

4v sin α 15 ρ µ
1/ 3 2/3 4/3
2
f f v 0
+ 0
=g
B ρsd 5/3
p

3/17/00 KVJ 68
Carleton Equation (cont’d)

where
v0 is the velocity of the bulk solid
α is the hopper half angle
ρ s is the absolute particle density
ρ f is the density of the gas
µ f is the viscosity of the gas

3/17/00 KVJ 69
Silo Discharging Devices
■ Slide valve/Slide gate
■ Rotary valve
■ Vibrating Bin Bottoms
■ Vibrating Grates
■ others

3/17/00 KVJ 70
Rotary Valves

Quite commonly used to discharge


materials from bins.

3/17/00 KVJ 71
Screw Feeders
Dead Region

Better Solution

3/17/00 KVJ 72
Discharge Aids
■ Air cannons
■ Pneumatic Hammers

■ Vibrators

These devices should not be used in


place of a properly designed hopper!
They can be used to break up the
effects of time consolidation.
3/17/00 KVJ 73

You might also like