UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMASOUTHERN DIVISIONROGER SHULER )Plaintiff )Pro Se )v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.)THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE )UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA; CAROL GARRISON, )individually and in her official UAB capacity; ) JURY DEMANDSHIRLEY SALLOWAY KAHN, individually and )in her official UAB capacity; DALE TURNBOUGH, )individually and in her official UAB capacity; )PAM POWELL, individually and in her official )UAB capacity; GARY MANS, individually and in his )official UAB capacity; CHERYL E.H. LOCKE, )individually and in her official UAB capacity; ANITA )BONASERA, individually and in her official UAB )capacity; THE BIRMINGHAM POLICE )DEPARTMENT; FICTITIOUS DEFENDANTS )A, B, C . . . )DefendantsINTRODUCTION
1.
Plaintiff
Roger Shu
l
er br
in
gs
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
f
or de
cla
r
at
ory judgme
nt,
equ
ita
b
l
e re
li
e
f,
an
dmo
n
ey d
a
m
a
ges
,
in
s
tit
u
t
ed
t
o se
c
ure
t
he pro
t
e
cti
o
n
o
f
an
d
t
o redress u
nlawf
u
l
acti
o
n
s
a
g
ain
s
t
h
i
m. The su
it
i
s brough
t
t
o se
c
ure
t
he pro
t
e
cti
o
n
o
f
an
d
t
o redress
t
he depr
ivati
o
n
o
f
r
i
gh
t
sse
c
ured by T
itl
e VII o
f
t
he C
ivil
R
i
gh
t
s A
ct
o
f
1964
,
a
s
a
me
n
ded
,
42 U.S. Code 2000
,
e
t
seq;42 U.S. Code 1985
,
42 U.S. Code 1986
,
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
t
hrough 42 U.S. Code1983
,
Ex Parte Young (209 U.S. 123, 1908)
,
t
he Age D
i
s
c
r
i
m
inati
o
n
in
Emp
l
oyme
nt
A
ct
(ADEA) o
f
1967
,
an
d
t
he
law
s o
f
t
he S
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
. The p
laintiff
seeks
c
ompe
n
s
at
ory
an
d pu
nitiv
e d
a
m
a
ges
an
d reques
t
s
a
jury
t
r
ial
.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2.
The u
nlawf
u
l
emp
l
oyme
nt
acti
o
n
s
all
eged here
in
be
l
o
w
w
ere
c
omm
itt
ed by
t
he de
f
e
n
d
ant
s
wit
h
in
Je
ff
erso
n
Cou
nt
y
,
A
la
b
a
m
a
.
Plaintiff
i
s
a
res
i
de
nt
o
f
She
l
by Cou
nt
y
,
A
la
b
a
m
a
.Jur
i
sd
icti
o
n
in
t
h
i
s Cour
t
i
s
c
o
nf
erred by 28 U.S.C. 1331
,
1343. Ve
n
ue
i
s proper
in
t
h
i
s
c
our
t
pursu
ant
t
o 28 U.S.C. 1391
an
d 42 U.S. 2000.
PARTIES
3.
Plaintiff
Roger Shu
l
er (³Shu
l
er´ or ³p
laintiff
´)
i
s
a
m
al
e
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he U
nit
ed S
tat
es
,
o
v
er
t
he
a
ge o
f
nin
e
t
ee
n
ye
a
rs
,
an
d
at
all
ti
mes per
tin
e
nt
t
o
t
he m
att
ers
all
eged here
in,
a
res
i
de
nt
o
f
t
heS
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
. Shu
l
er
i
s
a
f
ormer emp
l
oyee o
f
t
he de
f
e
n
d
ant
.4.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
The Bo
a
rd o
f
Trus
t
ees o
f
t
he U
niv
ers
it
y o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
(³
t
he u
niv
ers
it
y´ or ³de
f
e
n
d
ant
´)
wa
s
t
he p
laintiff¶
s emp
l
oyer dur
in
g
t
he
ti
me per
i
od per
tin
e
nt
t
o
t
h
i
s
law
su
it
.The de
f
e
n
d
ant
pr
actic
ed
it
s bus
in
ess
an
d emp
l
oyed
t
he p
laintiff
at
o
n
e o
f
it
s
faciliti
es
l
o
cat
ed
in
B
i
rm
in
gh
a
m
,
A
la
b
a
m
a,
in
t
he Nor
t
her
n
D
i
s
t
r
ict
o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
. A
t
all
ti
mes per
tin
e
nt
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n,
t
he de
f
e
n
d
ant
emp
l
oyed more
t
h
an
fift
ee
n
(15) peop
l
e
an
d
i
s
t
hus
an
³emp
l
oyer´
f
or T
itl
e VII purposes.5.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
C
a
ro
l
G
a
rr
i
so
n
(³G
a
rr
i
so
n
´)
at
all
ti
mes m
at
er
ial
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
wa
s
P
res
i
de
nt
o
f
t
he U
niv
ers
it
y o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
at
B
i
rm
in
gh
a
m (³UAB´). G
a
rr
i
so
n
wa
s
a
s
tat
e
act
or
f
or purposeso
f
42 U.S.C. 1983
,
42 U.S.C. 1985
,
an
d 42 U.S.C. 1986. G
a
rr
i
so
n
i
s sued
in
d
ivi
du
all
y pursu
ant
t
o 1983
,
1985
,
an
d 1986
f
or
vi
o
lati
o
n
s o
f
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
a
s
f
ur
t
her se
t
ou
t
here
in
. Upo
n
inf
orm
ati
o
n
an
d be
li
e
f,
G
a
rr
i
so
n
i
s
a
f
em
al
e
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he U
nit
ed S
tat
eso
v
er
t
he
a
ge o
f
nin
e
t
ee
n
(19) ye
a
rs
an
d
i
s
a
res
i
de
nt
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he S
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
.
6.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
Sh
i
r
l
ey S
all
o
wa
y K
a
h
n
(³K
a
h
n
´)
at
all
ti
mes m
at
er
ial
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
wa
s V
ic
e
P
res
i
de
nt
f
or De
v
e
l
opme
nt,
A
l
um
ni,
an
d Ex
t
er
nal
Re
lati
o
n
s
at
UAB. K
a
h
n
wa
s
a
s
tat
e
act
or
f
or purposes o
f
42 U.S.C. 1983
,
42 U.S.C. 1985
,
an
d 42 U.S.C. 1986. K
a
h
n
i
s sued
in
d
ivi
du
all
y pursu
ant
t
o 1983
,
1985
,
an
d 1986
f
or
vi
o
lati
o
n
s o
f
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
a
s
f
ur
t
her se
t
ou
t
here
in
. Upo
n
inf
orm
ati
o
n
an
d be
li
e
f,
K
a
h
n
i
s
a
f
em
al
e
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he U
nit
edS
tat
es o
v
er
t
he
a
ge o
f
nin
e
t
ee
n
(19) ye
a
rs
an
d
i
s
a
res
i
de
nt
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he S
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
.7.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
D
al
e Tur
n
bough (³Tur
n
bough´)
at
all
ti
mes m
at
er
ial
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
wa
s Asso
ciat
eV
ic
e
P
res
i
de
nt
f
or
P
ub
lic
Re
lati
o
n
s
an
d M
a
rke
tin
g
at
UAB. Tur
n
bough
wa
s
a
s
tat
e
act
or
f
or purposes o
f
42 U.S.C. 1983
,
42 U.S.C. 1985
,
an
d 42 U.S.C. 1986. Tur
n
bough
i
s sued
in
d
ivi
du
all
y pursu
ant
t
o 1983
,
1985
,
an
d 1986
f
or
vi
o
lati
o
n
s o
f
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
a
s
f
ur
t
her se
t
ou
t
here
in
. Upo
n
inf
orm
ati
o
n
an
d be
li
e
f,
Tur
n
bough
i
s
a
f
em
al
e
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
heU
nit
ed S
tat
es o
v
er
t
he
a
ge o
f
nin
e
t
ee
n
(19) ye
a
rs
an
d
i
s
a
res
i
de
nt
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he S
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
.8.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
Pa
m
P
o
w
e
ll
(³
P
o
w
e
ll
´)
at
all
ti
mes m
at
er
ial
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
wa
s D
i
re
ct
or o
f
t
heO
ffic
e o
f
P
er
i
od
ical
s
at
UAB.
P
o
w
e
ll
wa
s
a
s
tat
e
act
or
f
or purposes o
f
42 U.S.C. 1983
,
42U.S.C. 1985
,
an
d 42 U.S.C. 1986.
P
o
w
e
ll
i
s sued
in
d
ivi
du
all
y pursu
ant
t
o 1983
,
1985
,
an
d1986
f
or
vi
o
lati
o
n
s o
f
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
a
s
f
ur
t
her se
t
ou
t
here
in
. Upo
n
inf
orm
ati
o
n
an
d be
li
e
f,
P
o
w
e
ll
i
s
a
f
em
al
e
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he U
nit
ed S
tat
es o
v
er
t
he
a
ge o
f
nin
e
t
ee
n
(19) ye
a
rs
an
d
i
s
a
res
i
de
nt
citiz
e
n
o
f
t
he S
tat
e o
f
A
la
b
a
m
a
.9.
De
f
e
n
d
ant
G
a
ry M
an
s (³M
an
s´)
at
all
ti
mes m
at
er
ial
t
o
t
h
i
s
acti
o
n
wa
s D
i
re
ct
or o
f
Med
ia
Re
lati
o
n
s
at
UAB. M
an
s
wa
s
a
s
tat
e
act
or
f
or purposes o
f
42 U.S.C. 1983
,
42 U.S.C. 1985
,
an
d 42 U.S.C. 1986. M
an
s
i
s sued
in
d
ivi
du
all
y pursu
ant
t
o 1983
,
1985
,
an
d 1986
f
or
vi
o
lati
o
n
s o
f
t
he Four
t
ee
nt
h Ame
n
dme
nt
a
s
f
ur
t
her se
t
ou
t
here
in
. Upo
n
inf
orm
ati
o
n
an
d
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
UAB-Shuler Complaint
Complaint in Roger Shuler v. University of Alabama Board of Trustees, et al
920
Reads
4
Readcasts
2
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
