why the claim is valid. Failure to prove the claim will be evidence of it being fraudulent and having no basis in fact.The next level of serious authority on your part would be an ‘Affidavit’ and ‘Self-Executing Contract’In this level of response you will get an affidavit notarized as an affidavit is more powerful than adeclaration or statement, which the conditional acceptance is. The affidavit is a sworn statement of your own experiences (you can not include ‘hearsay’ evidence, i.e. hearsay is ‘Bob told me the case worker said….’ because you did not hear the case worker say anything, and is only your experience or your personal beliefs. The affidavit will have to be answered and rebutted with a notarized sworn affidavit or theoppositions’ rebuttal will not have as much authority as your sworn affidavit. Once the Notary puts their seal on the instrument it is in the public record as it is recorded in an agent of the Secretary of States NotaryJournal. The self-executing contract will be a performance contract establishing consequences for non-response to your affidavit. Examples are provided at the end of this document. Now lets look at whether the courts, police and government as we know it has any authority over us andwhat ‘jurisdiction’ (control) is.One has to read and understand the United States Constitution and the California Constitution and have a basis of knowledge about the LAW of the land.First off, what is your status? Are you a subject of a King?, the subject of a Government? the subject of aState?, the subject of your neighbor? Answer each of the above questions to get an idea of what your knowledge about your status is in relation to the entities named.The pilgrims coming to America circa 1700 were ‘subjects’ of the King of England. The King wassovereign. Sovereign means no higher power exists and the sovereign makes the law as stated in theseSupreme Court decisions:"...at the Revolution, the
sovereignty devolved on the people
; and they are truly the sovereigns of thecountry, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves....". CHISHOLM v.GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472. [verified]“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system,
while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people
, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins118 U.S. 356; 6 S.Ct. 1064 (1886) [verified]"
of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign
, are entitled to all the rights whichformerly belonged to the King by his prerogative
." Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167;48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7."It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business....
of this state
do not yield their sovereignty
to the agencies which serve them."California Government Code, Section 11120.[Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act.[verified]"The very meaning of
'sovereignty' is that the decree of the sovereign makes law
." AmericanBanana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.So the King was expelled and we had no Sovereign above us and became common-law freemen/women.Was there any form of law in existence? Yes the States had there own common law procedures. We createda common-law trust the Constitution of the united States, wherein the people were the Grantors,Beneficiaries and the Government employees became the Trustee’s. Their oath of office is there acceptanceof the trustee position and promise to perform.We formed a Republic form of government
, which is ruled by law. Wherever the word Law appears in the Constitution it means Common-Law
. All attorneys at law=
Republican government. One in which
the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people
by the people,either
, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 21 wall. 175,22 L. Ed. 627" Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Ed., p.824.
see 16 Am Jur 2
(pg 449,1998ed.) § 74 Construction with reference to Common Law> “An important canon of construction isthat constitutions must, or at least may, be construed with reference to the common law, although the reverse is not necessarily true,