Contents
Notes on the Text iPreface ii1 DOGMATISM AND “FREEDOM OF CRITICISM 1
1.1 WHAT DOES ”FREEDOM OF CRITICISM“ MEAN? . . . . . . . . . . . 11.2 THE NEW ADVOCATES OF “FREEDOM OF CRITICISM” . . . . . . . 31.3 CRITICISM IN RUSSIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.4 ENGELS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE THEORETICAL STRUGGLE 11
2 THE SPONTANEITY OF THE MASSES AND THE CONSCIOUSNESS OFTHE SOCIAL-DEMOCRATS 16
2.1 THE BEGINNING OF THE SPONTANEOUS UPSURGE . . . . . . . . . 172.2 BOWING TO SPONTANEITY.
RABOCHAYA MYSL
. . . . . . . . . . . . 192.3 THE SELF-EMANCIPATION GROUP AND
RABOCHEYE DYELO
. . . . 25
3 TRADE-UNIONIST POLITICS AND SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC POLITICS 32
3.1 POLITICALAGITATIONANDITSRESTRICTIONBYTHEECONOMISTS 333.2 HOW MARTYNOV RENDERED PLEKHANOV MORE PROFOUND . . 393.3 POLITICAL EXPOSURES AND “TRAINING IN REVOLUTIONARYACTIVITY” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423.4 WHAT IS THERE IN COMMON BETWEEN ECONOMISM AND TER-RORISM? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452