DOJ - Brief - 03-24-2005 1d

Request for Formal Investigation
Air Web Communications & C&A Vs. Time Warner

03-24-2005
Cataldi & Associates -- Proprietary and Confidential -- Version: 1d
Air Web Communications
Page: 1 of 201
03-24-2005
Request for formal, criminal, antitrust investigation; investigation and discovery

Prepared for the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice - New York City
(prepared without the aid of legal counsel)
Regarding the matters arising out of the provisioning of the dedicated lease line interconnecting
Air Web Communications facilities located at 60 Hudson and 620 Isham:
Cataldi & Associates, Inc. (d/b/a Air Web Inwood, Air Web Communications)
and Mr. James A. Cataldi, Mr. Vincent J. Cataldi, Dr. Horace A. Cataldi PhD – Chem. Engr.
Vs.
Time Warner Cable of New York City - Commercial Services d/b/a Road Runner Soho - Commercial Services, located at, or
th rd
conducting operations out of AOL - 7 floor at 120 East 23 Street, NYC, and their implicated and controlling affiliates, including,
ServiceCo’s d/b/a Road Runner Soho, Road Runner, or Road Runner Holding (VA), AOL Holding (VA), AOL/TWC and others.
Cogent Communications, Comm. Telex Co-location Facility
NY-NJ Wholesale Internet provider Tenancy Location @ 9th Floor (rack)
Carrier-Class Cross-Connect 60 Hudson - 620 Islam
Cataldi & Associates, Inc.

Telex VOIP Fabric 2516 East Menlo Boulevard. Wholesale e-commerce, Internet &
Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 53211
National & International local and international phone
SIP 2.0 Telephone exchange interconnectivity
Time Warner Cable Meet-Me Room & Patch Panel
of New York City Semi-annual Conventions
620 Isham Street, New York 10034

Secure-Redundant Discount Telephone Provisioning
An Air Web Communications Initiative
Self-managed dedicated leased line Tomorrow’s premier value-added Point-to-Point Leased-Line Project
communications provider.
03-24-2005
Page: 2 of 201
Table of Contents
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL COMPLAINT.............................................................................................................................. 3
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 2: REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION AND DISCOVERY ................................................................................................................. 7
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 3: COMPLAINT SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 8
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 4: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS SUMMARY................................................................................................................... 16
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 5: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS BREAKDOWN.............................................................................................................. 17
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 6: RESTRUCTURE TRANSACTIONS - ELIMINATE ANTI-COMPETITIVE EFFECTS.................................................................. 20
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 7: AIR WEB TIME WARNER AGREEMENT SUMMARY............................................................................................................... 21
Field Code Changed
CHAPTER 8: KEY TIME FRAMES ................................................................................................................................................................... 22
APPENDIX (A) - DOCUMENT CHANGE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 31 Field Code Changed

Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (B) - IMPACT ON NYC TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS..................................................................................................... 33
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (C) - LEGAL ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................................................................................ 34
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (D) - CATALDI & ASSOCIATES, NEW YORK CITY BUSINESS HISTORY................................................................................. 37
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (E) - LETTERS OF INTENT........................................................................................................................................................... 40
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (F) - AWC UPTOWN WIRELESS BUILD....................................................................................................................................... 41
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (G) - NEIGHBORHOOD-PORTAL SERVICE OFFERING............................................................................................................. 43
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (H) - RATES AND FEES.................................................................................................................................................................. 44
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (I) - PARTIES IDENTIFIED .............................................................................................................................................................. 45
Field Code Changed
ST
APPENDIX (J) - ANALYSIS OF ‘TWC COVER LETTER’ – AUGUST 31 2004 ............................................................................................... 47
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (K) - COVER LETTERS FROM DR. HORACE CATALDI AND MR. JAMES CATALDI................................................................... 50
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (L) - BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOUND ON INTERNET ...................................................................................................... 57
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (K) - COMMPORTAL: SOURCE CODE FOR WIRE FRAUD #2 ..................................................................................................... 61
Field Code Changed
APPENDIX (L) - DOWNLOAD-SPEED TEST - SOURCE CODE FOR WIRE FRAUD #1.................................................................................. 65
03-24-2005
Page: 3 of 201
Chapter 1: Introduction to Federal Complaint

In our judgment, over the past 14 months, Time Warner Cable of New York and others including “ServiceCo” d/b/a “Road
Runner” or “Road Runner Holding” (TWC), engaged in criminal conduct, including at least one felony, against Air Web
Communications (AWC), a division of Cataldi and Associates, Inc. (C&A).
Directly arising from or inextricably linked to this criminal predatory conduct, TWC committed a series of successive
discriminatory, antitrust and exclusionary acts against AWC and C&A, which relate to Time Warner (Time Warner/AOL), and
“ServiceCo d/b/a Road Runner or Road Runner’s Holding” (SC) unlawfully maintaining or extending Time Warner’s subsidiary’s
monopoly power, and SC’s market power (pre-existing AOL Merger arrangement) in “Local Internet Access, Service and
Content” and “Digital TV Network and Local Access, Operations and Programming”. Time Warner and SC also attempts to
illegally dominate the newly emerging “New York State Telephone” and “Wireless” Markets.
We believe that TWC violated the Sherman Act, unlawfully maintaining monopoly power in the above referenced markets in
AWC’s Region by stalking, legally entrapping (by relying on forgeries and mail fraud and interstate wire artifices) then denying
AWC reasonable access to, (and yet billing out for, now over $75,000.00 and on-going) network facilities over which TWC has a
monopoly. AWC seeks to provide internet access, telephone and related wireless network (and wireless programming and
entertainment) operations and services in competition with TWC, and that our service packages are superior in price and
performance to TWC's competing services. However, because AWC's market entry and service offerings pose a real threat to
TWC's monopoly power in the Local Internet Access and Telephone Markets in the TWC Regions which AWC attempts to enter,
TWC has engaged in a wide variety of unlawful, exclusionary and anticompetitive acts which rely on or arise from criminal and
fraudulent acts, with the intent and inevitable effect of injuring, thwarting or eliminating AWC as an actual or potential competitor.
TWC’s malicious behavior is detrimental to AWC, and residents and workers of New York City, Southern New York State, and
Northern New Jersey.
TWC controls the facilities which TWC legally entrapped AWC into, however refuses to give promised access. TWC could have
granted AWC access to these facilities and, indeed, promised to do so. AWC and TWC entered into an interconnection
agreement, as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. But, TWC acted with the intent to maintain and extend its
monopoly power and position in the above referenced markets, and continues to legally entrap AWC into a fraudulent
interconnection agreement, billing AWC for fraudulent services (denial of service at 15 sites) and deny AWC access to promised
parts of TWC’s network that AWC requires to provide its services. We have identified numerous ways TWC has engaged in
anticompetitive conduct; much of our case goes well beyond duties imposed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and TWC's
failures to meet them. As a result of TWC's actions, AWC alleges, "competition in the relevant markets has been injured”, AWC
has been damaged, and TWC continues to dominate these markets to the detriment of consumers and competition. We contend
that this course of conduct violates Section 2 of the Sherman Act at a minimum.
Because the antitrust and exclusionary conduct and associated discriminatory behavior is directly arising from this criminal
conduct or inextricably linked to this criminal conduct, we believe that AWC’s allegations against TWC should be considered as
'freestanding antitrust claims' outside the coverage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Thus, although we are not precisely
clear as to the standard that would apply to AWC’s complaint, we believe that our criminal antitrust claim should not be
dismissed, and a formal DOJ Criminal Antitrust investigation should commence because our claim is not inextricably linked to the
claims under the “Telecommunications Act of 1996” in our judgment, and therefore should be "'divorced from the 1996 Act
context'" and be “freestanding". We believe that AWC’s antitrust claims are not "barred by the 1996 Act as construed and applied
in the Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Goldwasser v. Ameritech Corp., 222 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2000). AWC seeks
damages, and injunctive relief.
(NOTE: Regarding the claims against SC , Road Runner Commercial Services are clearly, directly and 100% secretly (with
100% denial on the part of TWC) involved and inextricably linked to the case, as we have strong circumstantial evidence that TW
or Time Warner Telecom is closely implicated in the case. In our reasoned, informed judgment, after extensive analysis of the
two wire fraud artifices (along with an extensive amount of other evidence) we are confident that SC is directly involved, and
therefore the claims against SC should be “divorced by 1996 Act context” and “free standing”, even if Time Warner Cable of New
York’s “direct antitrust claims” are found to be barred by the 1996 Act), in our judgment.)
03-24-2005
Page: 4 of 201
Result of 8 months of intense in-house investigation
After 8 months, our in-house investigation worked to collect, organize, analyze and document a compelling case (with over 300
meg of core-data, and several giga bits of supporting data, much of which is not yet analyzed); compelling enough to persuade
us to request a formal investigation, and request immediate injunctive relief demanding that TWC be compelled to deliver
interconnectivity to 60 Hudson, according to, or superior to, the terms contractually obligating AWC and TWC:
1. Individuals representing TWC and its’ controlling affiliates (and others), participated knowingly, willingly, and collusively to
profit, or would have benefited substantially from TWC’s gross misconduct (as stated herein or which may be
determined through an investigation), with reckless disregard to the laws designed to protect and promote competitive
markets, competition, customer welfare, customer benefits or customer surplus.
2. TWC committed these criminal acts (identified herein) against AWC, and subsequently additional acts to cover-up the
initial crimes, and/or attempt to legally protect TWC from these criminal acts:
o with intent and effect to impose unreasonable restraint of interstate trade and commerce
o as an immediate and direct consequence of these acts are knowingly harming New York City’s Consumers and
Free Competition, in violation of sections of:
 Sherman Acts
 Clayton Acts
 Uniform Commercial Code
 Other regulatory violations
3. TWC cold-call contacted AWC with aggressive marketing, stalking, and so these acts are malicious and egregious.
4. TWC’s criminal acts against AWC, were conspired, premeditative, planed and organized.
5. TWC coordinated a cover-up and other on-going acts to destroy evidence of the criminal acts against AWC, thus prevent
the free-standing nature of our claim.
6. TWC relied on mail, e-mail, telephone, residential digital cable TV network, Competitor-owned or operated
networks/operation centers, and data centers in several states – and wire fraud artifices, thus felonies in an interstate,
federal venue.
7. TWC, through criminal, unethical or illegal actions and inaction, on the part of its employees, officers and affiliates,
committed exclusionary acts, and criminal exclusionary aided and assisted others in predatory efforts against AWC, to
successfully obtain moneys relying on two false and misleading wire artifices.
8. TWC illegally conspired to illegally share AWC trade-secret information positioning TWC affiliates to compete with AWC.
9. TWC coordinated efforts between organized groups of people (in various companies) to illegally increase artificial market
barriers, market power, concentration and duration.
Forgeries and Mail Fraud, Wire frauds and illegal provisioning and fraudulent billing
TWC Criminal conduct against AWC and C&A included:
 Document forgeries (official client copies forged after signing, Feb 10 2005 TWC states ‘no originals exist’, and ‘what
is the difference?’) and mail fraud, (and fax).
 Illegal provisioning and fraudulent billing of service, un authorized activation of service not in accordance with Order
 Two wire artifices to obtain money(s) and legally entrap AWC (Road Runner Update-Server and CommPortal)
We believe that the service as provisioned and validated by TWC, was solely intended to derive benefit in a manor substantially
similar to the definition of wire fraud and support, facilitate or was inextricably linked to the discriminatory, antitrust and
exclusionary acts, as expressed herein, and as amended through a formal criminal antitrust investigation. The most serious of
TWC’s criminal acts committed against AWC, in our opinion, from which the antitrust exclusionary acts arose, fall into two groups:
1. Document forgeries and mail fraud: Forgeries of “legal execution documents” / Service Order Forms and alleged
attached terms and conditions, and attachments which are currently active in “full force”.
2. Wire Fraud: TWC Road Runner / AOL wire-artifice employed to obtain money and to deceive AWC into accepting
fraudulent service unfit for our use, and entrap and legally bind AWC through AWC’s formal ‘service acceptance’.
3. Illegal provisioning and fraudulent billing of service:, no authorization to initiate service, not in accordance with Order
03-24-2005
Page: 5 of 201
TWC and its affiliates engaged in continuous criminal activities between February and August 2004, and they continue cover-up
operations currently, insisting AWC place ‘new’ service order requests, using the internet, for services already contractually
committed. In our judgment to deceive and entrap AWC into Accepting ‘unauthorized services’ which were only half provisioned,
and completely unfit for AWC requirements. The apparent main objective of the forgeries was to facilitate a second signing of
Service Order Forms and then clean-up legal exposure to the initial fraudulent acts; however this backfired on TWC, as described
below.
The clear objective of the wire frauds was employed to obtain money and legally bind AWC through deceptive artifice which was
designed to falsify ‘user acceptance’ test results (first wire fraud), or SLA (service level agreement) ‘statistics’ (second wire
fraud), to give the illusion that the un-authorized, half provisioned service, installed at 620 Isham Street was actually operational
th
as guaranteed in the March 25 Forged Client Copies: Attachment A, Section 4 (see appendix - General Description Of Services:
ENET and ELINE).
The second forgery hides evidence of the first forgery, with regard to specifying ENET and ELINE as a carrier-grade service
(99.999% and 99.99%). The two frauds were employed by TWC in an attempt to demonstrate that the TWC service provided to
th th
AWC is in accordance with the description of the forged sections (March 25 forgery) of the February 26 documents.
th
NOTE: Last copy of the paperwork was received on February 10 2005, see James Cataldi cover letter
th
1) Forgeries: official client copies delivered formally by fax and mail are forged on two occasions in 2004, March 25 , and
st th
August 31 . (March and August copies are different). Received a copy of the March forgery again on February 10 2005 by
hand (copy came from Sales Rep’s files at formal meeting, Manager made copy against advice of TWC legal counsel).
TWC also employed grossly misrepresentative e-mails, e-mail attachments, and telephone calls to support the
th th
misrepresentations made in Attachment A, Section 4, of the March 25 Forgery of the client copy of February 26 Order
Form and Terms & Conditions documents, with regard to the grade, quality, or availability of service to be expected with
ELINE and ENET services. AWC signed two Order Forms in June, thus superseding the February Order Forms, also signed.
 Illegally and fraudulently “legally bind” AWC with discriminatory exclusionary terms, then deny AWC access to
TWC network, (while TWC continues to bill AWC for service being denied (15 locations; distributed denial of
service in our judgment), over promised network segments for carrier grade Interconnection between 60
Hudson and 620 Isham, as required.
 After AWC signed documents and without AWC consent or knowledge TWC swapped out TWC carrier grade
th
interconnection service “interconnection agreement by forging the February 26 Order Form (TWC stated in
Feb 10th 2005 meeting: original no longer exists, when we demanded to see our file) with consumer grade
Road Runner Service. Swapped out service employed AOL and Road Runner infrastructure in some cases
operating out or being registered in V.A., (and in other aspects) by altering legally enforce documents and lying
about what was to be delivered, (not denying what AWC ordered or delaying).
2) Wire Fraud: (Phone, Internet, Cable-TV Fraud) Two successive (Download-Site and CommPortal), fraudulent, Service-
Level-Agreements (SLA) ‘user-acceptance testing & verification’ artifices which were specifically custom-built, and owned by,
or utilized programmers (CHEUNG) from Road Runner, and was hosted by and utilized network resources from AOL V.A. or
over networks (RRMA) and with registrants who identify themselves as Road Runner Holding : RR6-DOM (network traces.).
TWC designed, developed and deployed these two wire artifices, specifically and solely to deceive AWC into believing that
TWC delivered what AWC ordered, and to legally bind or commit AWC through the legal trap of service provision acceptance
(and commence billing). The two wire (internet / intranet) artifices were hosted at COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_NYC_RR.COM
and also supported by www.ams-server.com.
03-24-2005
Page: 6 of 201
Horizontal and Vertical Foreclosures

In our judgment, TWC’s predatory activities involved both horizontal and vertical foreclosure strategies including nine major ‘Bait
& Switch’ operations. TWC focused on switching AWC out of Telex, a world class carrier neutral co-location facility and POP
located at 60 Hudson and into a competitor owned and operated facility which is implementing discriminatory practices and
standards manipulations.
The wire artifices and the unauthorized fraudulent internet service provisioned at 620 Isham Street, appear to directly link to our
primary competitors, America on Line and Road Runner from facility locations and over network “circuits” which change with time.
Additionally our competitors appear to have directly supported the wire frauds.
These fraudulent acts lie at the heart of, and are the vehicle through which TWC intended to:
1. Implement Antitrust Exclusionary Acts

2. Protect TWC from the legal consequences of the criminal acts
We believe that TWC acted with reckless disregard towards consumer welfare, benefits and surplus, in order to:
1. Maintain or extend market power duration

2. Maintain or increase concentration of market power
We believe that TWC must have perceived AWC was too significant a threat to their market-power in the following Time Warner
Cable of New York’s existing markets and emerging Markets:
1. Internet Access Provider (IAP), Internet Service Provider (ISP), Internet Content Provider (ICP)
2. New York State, National and International Telephone
3. Cable TV programming (Franchised Monopoly)
a. Pay-per-view programming
b. Movies and other Programming on demand
c. High Definition TV
These predatorily acts thwarted AWC’s ability to operate profitable neighborhood telecommunications networks in New York City,
and to sell next generation network products and services in “business to business”, “business to consumer”, and “consumer to
consumer” markets, using a one-Stop-Shop customer-service franchise-model:
1. Local Content Originator

2. Carrier – neutral communications co-location and network operator
3. Neighborhood Wireless Network
4. Internet content, service, access provider
5. Local & International Telephone - SIP 2.0 VOIP
a. Audio
b. Multimedia
6. Neighborhood Portal & market niches
a. Network Computer Gaming
b. School & Retail
c. e-Commerce
d. Transaction Portal
e. Multimedia Phone
f. Advertising
Arising from TWC’s intentional market foreclosure, all New York City consumers are denied the right to choose from a multiplicity
of innovative, interoperable, state-of-the-art network products and services. AWC’s near-wholesale-priced, network complements
interoperate with both TWC’s network (Optical Digital Ethernet) and AWC Wireless open-systems, standards-compliant
networks (M1 and 802.11); both incumbent and entrant networks.
03-24-2005
Page: 7 of 201
Chapter 2: Request for Investigation and Discovery
We respectfully request the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, in New York City, investigate this matter to
determine whether criminal acts and other regulatory violations were committed, and if any antitrust exclusionary acts were
inextricably linked to these criminal acts. And to determine if the antitrust acts arising out of document forgeries, mail and wire
fraud activities and other associated gross misconduct are considered a free standing antitrust claims or whether these claims
are still inextricably linked to the claims under the 1996 Act'". And if the acts are “divorced from the1996 Act context" and
“freestanding", then to finally to determine what competitive impact in New York City, Southern New York State, and Northern
New Jersey these acts may have caused this past year and in the near term.
03-24-2005
Page: 8 of 201
Chapter 3: Complaint Summary
We identify the following exclusionary acts which we believe are free standing acts, not covered in the coverage of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996:
1. Excessive restrictions of trade

2. Antitrust “tying” to competitors products
3. Discriminatory Policies and Practices:
a. Pricing
b. Standards-Manipulation
c. Interconnection to TWC network
d. Network Edge Device Selection, installation, configuration
e. Gross Misrepresentations, and Misconduct - verbal, electronic, written
f. Sub-standard Service-Provisioning
g. Little or no separation between:
1. TWC Business Services Unit, Road Runner, and AOL
2. TWC infrastructure and infrastructure of affiliates which are AWC’s main competitors: Road Runner, AOL
3. Other TWC business units directly competing with AWC
4. Other business units within TWC relying on TWC affiliates who are AWC’s main competitors
5. Other Business units associated with New House Networks, with controlling interests in Time Warner
Entertainment and Time Warner Telecom
TWC’s actions (and inaction when action was the appropriate good faith response), have the following immediate specific non-
recoverable adverse impact on AWC’s market entry attempts:
1. Consume 14 months of critical time to market

2. Deny AWC the ability to be first to market with new, improved, more cost effective and beneficial service offerings and
first to secure “air wave” rights by repeatedly thwarting AWC from acting on the in-house efforts
3. Deny AWC carrier-grade “quality” connectivity to the AWC tenant location in the TELx Facility at 60 Hudson required to
enter and successfully compete in the New York City and surrounding area Markets by eliminating or substantially
reducing the following AWC network benefits:
a. Abundant supply of carrier-grade, standards-compliant, complement suppliers
b. Wholesale rates and volumes
c. Cost effective cross connections “to interconnect to other carriers or communications providers which reside at
the TELx co-location facility to pick up carrier grade internet, telephone (local , national and international
exchange) and e-commerce services (i.e. SWIFT, CHIPS)
d. Scalable, cost-effective operations support-services: and facility infrastructure and technical support services
e. Access to other consumer markets
4. Financially and legally bind and encumber AWC for years:
Obligate AWC to pay additional $500,000 (about $540,000 in total) for fraudulent service
“unfit for use”, in part relying on the following:
a. General
1. verbal and written misrepresentations
2. vague, dishonest, misleading and duplistic communications, correspondence and documentations
3. multiple contractual fraud (post signing forgeries)
4. wire artifice
5. intimidation (most serious case involved threat of Union Men were in the area)
6. wire (download site and communications service portal)
7. service fraud (ENET, ELINE)
8. trade secret theft
b. Specific
1. Discriminatory and excessively restrictive language including the 100% early termination charge on AWC’s
Service Order Forms, based on a comparison of the Order Forms AWC See Equitable Life of the US
documentation included in this document packet. Note: signed a contract by the same people in the business
unit, under the name Road Runner Soho- Commercial Services.
2. Bankrupt AWC, preventing AWC’s Market Entry in New York City.
03-24-2005
Page: 9 of 201
3. Obtained $12,000.00; which AWC pre-paid in good faith June 2004, with the understanding that TW would
honor the verbal promises, and in particular accommodate 38 points of contention (first reference to Feb 26
st
order being ENET was August 31 2004. (Road Runner content, resources or network in hiding, TWC has
denied upwards near 100 times).
4. Billing AWC $90,000.00 past due (plus $12,000 pre-paid) for 8 months of non-existent services. (1/5 of total
contract so far) AWC did not authorize, consent to an activation date, nor issue a P.O. AWC issued
numerous legal notices, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth, to TWC in via e-mail last year
th
starting our extreme dissatisfaction. $90,000 quoted on February 10 2005, by TWC Legal Counsel. Later in
rd
the same meeting (at 120 east 23 street), the Marketing Manager, stated in essence “that since we had
never used the service we would not be charged”. When Cataldi (AWC) asked if AWC could also get our
down payment back the answer was ”Yes”. However after negotiations broke down, over the past week, the
billing department called, at the same time we were not sent a bill for about one month (we assume that the
offer was taken away).
5. Obtained $12,000.00; which AWC pre-paired in good faith June 2004, with the understanding that TW would honor the
verbal promises, and in particular accommodate 38 points of contention (first reference to Feb 26 order being ENET was
st
August 31 2004. (Road Runner content, resources or network in hiding, TWC has denied upwards near 100 times).
6. Make available to others as well as illegally act upon & benefit from AWC’s trade secrets and proprietary documents,
and initial test traffic, as well as AWC field testing results, R&D lessons learned, strategic and tactical risk management
plans and other insider knowledge. We have collected evidence of our business plans being implemented on specific
web sites. We believe that our plan or parts or our plan is being implemented and being acted on by at a regional and
national level as well as a local level after TWC shut down our 2004 uptown wireless build initiative. We believe that the
following had access to our business plan are now implementing components of the AWC business plan:
a. New House Network Stockholders common to Time Warner Entertainment

b. TW Telecom or Time Warner Telecom
c. Road Runner Holding
d. Netifac (co-location cross connects)
e. Time Warner Cable of New York – Private Networks.
f. Time Warner Cable (Stanford Conn.)
g. Time Warner Cable of New York and New Jersey – Business Services
h. NY Connect
i. SohoWare
j. Road Runner Soho – Commercial Services
7. Diminish AWC name-recognition and reputation, and harm the reputation of AWC’s associates and principals for future
attempts to enter the market. Discourage small businesses from entering the market, or attempting to receive fair and
open access to the TW network, or access to the internet, or access to TELx.
TWC’s predatory behavior has successfully barred AWC market entry into New York City and surrounding markets and thus
preventing AWC from implementing it’s ’s proprietary 2004-2009 business plan which was tested and refined over the past 5
years:
1. AWC conducted an extensive research / analysis effort in:
a. financial models: sensitivities and forecasts
b. legal (FCC), regulatory and court precedent
c. medical-health and mitigated RF transmission level strategies
d. highly integrated vertical, horizontal and emerging (new) markets
e. competitive landscape
f. surveys/analysis: area/neighborhood(s) RF interference / bandwidth utilization requirements
g. technical and needs requirements
2. AWC documentation development:

a. strategic community relations
b. extensive plan development and testing
i. long term strategic and short term tactical
ii. financial / business (5 year)
iii. marketing / sales
03-24-2005
Page: 10 of 201
iv. technical
v. medical/ health
vi. legal/ regulatory compliance/ mitigated RF initiatives : FCC rulings
vii. neighborhood economic redevelopment / revitalization
c. core competence/ best practices and standards development:

i. dealing with service continuity
ii. signal strength requirements vs. RF capacity
iii. speed vs. security
iv. interference and echoes and other site survey/ operational parameters
under every conceivable environmental condition
3. AWC implemented formal Technical and Process Research & Development initiative
d. feasibility, security, business continuity, disaster recovery, distance/capacity tests
e. trials and pilots
4. AWC established commitments with:

f. customers and prospects (Business to Consumer and Business to Business)
g. equipment supplier with quota commitments (transmitters-antenna configuration) with FCC certification
authorizing unlicensed operation in 802.11 and M1
h. technical expertise and world class human resources
i. obtaining roof right’s for transmitters and other related equipment
j. investors and investor prospects
Criminal & Anti-Trust Violations: after an extensive investigation & analysis our investigation determined that TWC employed the following:
1. Seven (7) different ‘sounds-like’ ‘Bait & Switch’ schemes (Time Warner said one thing, did another, or changed what they
said, or made a play on words)
2. Fraudulent representations grossly-mislead apparent authorization, timing, nature, or other implications regarding:
a. AWC received an entirely fraudulent service, with none on the salient benefits were promised and relied at contract
signing verbally.
b. no AWC authorization or consent for key service activation stages:
i. SLA (service level agreement guarantee)
ii. Street Cut (cut at Isham and Seaman)
th
iii. Fiber Pull (lateral connection/attachment at 207 and Seaman Avenue, Northern Manhattan)
iv. Provisioning (pursuant to Orders)
v. client approved test and turn up
vi. successful compliance testing – resolution of non-compliance
- resolution of non-compliance -can’t even agree what we ‘bought’ and ‘TWC’ sold
c. ‘Pre-Paid Only’ Status as per contract, and yet TWC is still billing $9K/mo., 7 months after TWC alleges that Service
was activated (an allegation we dispute).
d. On going fraudulent billing: The contract states that the cut-off date could be no later then 67 days past due, AWC pre-
paid 30 days, so last date of billable service could be no later than 97 days after Service Activation (no activation date).
After 97 Days TWC should have suspend the account.
After extensive negations and TWC ‘concessions’ (38 points of mutually recognized contention).
e. Due Date (actual legally Binding Date), with no legitimate or authorized Activation or Service Date?
f. AWC disputes the actual first day of billing, AWC disputes what is being billed for specifically.
g. Specific contract terms changed through forgeries.
h. We challenge exactly what are the legitimate ‘Terms and Conditions’ legally ‘in-force’ today.
i. We demand to know who had authority and signed off on:
i. Sign -up & trap AWC from the cold-call start.
ii. swap dedicated leased lines with Road Runner and AOL or assets of other TWE affiliates
iii. TWE affiliates internet-monitoring of, or traffic analysis of AWC or clients
iv. Circuit design appears to have changed several times over the past year without AWC consent
Who authorized, performed and for what purpose
v. AWC principal Cataldi residential and commercial services attached to same network. We suspect extreme service
fraud - Seaman Avenue Residential Fiber Optic cable-TV network, AOL network, Road Runner network.
03-24-2005
Page: 11 of 201
j. AWC private traffic circuitously traverse headquarters of Time Warner, Road Runner, AOL in V.A.
th
3. After signing TWC “adds” additional document (Attachment D) to the “February 26 2004 legal execution document set: With
no reference to Attachment D, as other attachments do. Dedicated Leased Line Service Order Form, Terms and Condition
document, Attachment A, Attachment B, Attachment C”. Without consent from or knowledge of AWC, TWC is claiming that
th
TWC sent the ENET attachment on February 26 2004.
4. We were not made aware of any Attachment D: Additional Terms and conditions for ENET customers. To the best of our
th
knowledge, there was no attachment D present on February 26 2004”. A day or so later we are offered free internet, so we
did not understood that TWC would state that AWC actually purchased ENET, which is actually Road Runner in hiding, on
our judgment. Yet that is now what TWC (See cover letter)
th th st
5. Forges AWC’s only copy of Legal execution documents on March 25 , 26 , August 31 2004, without knowledge or notice,
th
or consent for TWC changes in any of the language associated with AWC signatures on February 26 2004, see Official
th
Client Copies sent formally to AWC at 620 Isham on March 25 by both Fax and by Private carrier.
6. Bait & Switch’: attaching Superior Technical Specifications to greatly Inferior Service (by design) (from carrier grade TELx
interconnect (the quality required to provide services solid enough to provide a real alternative to the current telephone and
cable operators,) to consumer grade Road Runner third party ISP).
th –
See March 25 Official Client forgery copy Attachment A, Section 4.
7. Execution Document Language (order forms and legally attached (or claimed to be)
terms and conditions and attachments;
a. Violates: 1) Uniform Commercial Code , 2) ‘Rule of Reason’, and 3) NYC Monopoly Franchise Agreement
b. Imposes excessive restrictions to interstate trade and commerce
c. Grants unreasonable Unilateral Rights to TWC
1. any/all rights TWC deems necessary to protect network or business
2. cancel relationship or modify terms, pricing or level of service, within 30 days without need for cause
3. excessive, unreasonable access to AWC traffic and information, citing Patriot / Homeland Defense Act
a. to collect monitor, analyze and share
b. to filter, modify, or remove content
c. TWC grants it’s self the right to access:
1. Public and private web sites
2. E-mails
3. Web severs
4. Network traffic
5. Client computers
6. Air Web facilities and server farms
d. Sets up legal basis for TWC to obtain moneys under fraudulent artifice
e. Sets up legal basis for TWC to Impose Discriminatory Policies to:
1. Increase artificial barriers to New York City market entry
2. Eliminate or significantly reduce AWC network effects and potential network effects
3. Act upon our Trade Secrets, including possibly setting up or supporting “dummy” competitors
8. Discriminatory - Fraudulent Business Practices

a. Illegally swapped out what was being offered. It changed from ’lease-line interconnectivity’ into Road Runner’s Internet
Service Provider with out notice or consent.
b. Fraudulent billing practices used in conjunction to forged and discriminatory service terms imposed on AWC by TWC,
and false, deceptive representation and two fraudulent wire artifices
03-24-2005
Page: 12 of 201
9.Discriminatory Standards – Degrading Manipulations

a. Standard of promised Service - from Open System Interoperability Standard to proprietary Nortel-standard
b. Quality, Grade and Priority of service offered (not be confused with the network itself (swapped from Highest to Lowest)
c. Grade, Quality, and Network Element to carry service (not to be confused with the actual service being offered)
(swapped from state of art to antiquated technology)
d. Reliability of service promised (from Highly Dependable to Completely-Unreliable)
e. Level of Ethernet Service (swapped from Level 3 carrier quality to a Level 1 Layer which is exclusively used to support
end-consumer quality) Level 1 is not appropriate to support Carriers like AWC.
f. Term of Service (from 2 separate 5 year term contracts, which would be run back to back giving AWC coverage for 10
th
years, TWC ended the contract eight months before it started, after February 26 2004 when AWC signed the contracts
giving TWC unreasonable and excessive control and access to all aspects of the contract in any manner TWC
determines without cause in no more than 30 days.
g. Service Level Agreement Guarantee (from detailed, verifiable Measurements assured, to ‘total lack of documentation as
to what was actually offered’)
10. Eliminated benefits associated with tenancy at Telex: 60 Hudson Street:

Cross Connection Access enabling AWC to pickup a multiplicity of near-wholesale priced complements; this is a physical
connection to hundreds of Suppliers and Consumers of Wholesale Carrier-Grade complements from Tenants residing at the
TELx facility, where there is a nominal one-time charge, to hook-up with any other TELx tenant, regardless of the bandwidth.
11. Thwarted AWC business, technical, engineering, operations, risk management, and market-entry plans:
a. Lost ability to:
i. Manage sunk costs during market entry phase
ii. Maintain technical environmental consistency
iii. Maintain business continuity
iv. Act on offer to join Telex with privileged-access to carrier class resources:
1. security
2. fire suppression
3. power, surge and backup resources
4. technicians
5. telecommunications equipment resources sharing, and operations management
6. cross connects (patch panels in “meet me room”) (this is how AWC connects to the outside world)
7. standards compliant cross connects (to local, national, international carriers, other tenants)
8. cost effective cross connects: inter-city, intra-city
9. privileges associated with being a Telecommunications Wholesale exchange member

a. wholesale rates
b. knowledge
c. right to interconnect to carriers & other telecommunications providers using Telex carrier tenants
d. right to attend semi-annual conferences, (mini telecommunications stock exchange)
12. Inadequate-Circuit Design and Provision-Design

Through selection of equipment, and the method of its attachment to the network, TWC insured that AWC can not provide
full duplex, two-way, real-time, SIP 2.0 multimedia applications, which is at the heart of our internal communications protocol
architecture. TWC selected seriously an inferior or ill-suited Client Adaptor, a Network Edge Device.
13. Discriminatory installation, configuration and provisioning of client equipment at 620 Isham
The requirements necessitate that AWC be on a private UNI header, which will encapsulate AWC from the other traffic on
TWC’s network. However instead of being on private LAN (encapsulate us) TWC placed us on a public shared LAN
(ENET), where our traffic has the same multicast membership as other Road Runner users. We were to have an isolated
circuit.
Inadequate selection by TWC of client-equipment at 620 Islam, supports multifamily dwelling – not wireless neighborhood
This is not a carrier grade Edge Device, even if it were provisioned in good faith.
03-24-2005
Page: 13 of 201
14. Need two fiber-optic cables attaching AWC to TWC network, only one pulled, only one fiber attached
TWC intentionally employs discriminatory practices to minimize AWC potential-effect through network architecture-design, as
the service can only run in half duplex. Further there is no backup-line if the primary line goes down. Only one fiber was
laterally attached, connected to the main fiber line running down Seaman Avenue, therefore the 620 Islam service can never
run in full duplex as our SIP 2.0 multimedia-telephone services and communication applications require.
th
Carrier-grade interconnection requires two separate, dedicated, fiber-optic cables running from 207 Street and Seaman
Avenue terminating at 620 Islam Street, into the Media-Dependent-Adaptor, which connects the OM 1200 ESM, the client
equipment or network edge device selected and installed by TWC despite AWC technical objections.
TWC’s Service Level Guarantee requires one dedicated gigabit channel down-stream running over one cable, and a second,
separate fiber-optic cable supporting a separate, dedicated, gigabit up-stream only channel. Further TWC design didn’t take
advantage to the 2 buffer design, or the 12 strand cable that was installed.
15. Inadequate Client Network Edge Device

Selection of Near-side network device into AWC tenancy area as Service Order AWC approved requires that TWC select an
inferior or ill suited Client Network Edge Device, (TWC’s equipment installed on 3rd floor of 620 Islam). Even if configured to
maximum settings, this network edge-device is intended to support only a multi-family dwelling or mute tenant dwelling, not a
minimum of thousands of users. (60 Hudson Telex tenancy-location equipment was never installed or provisioned)
16. No adequate Security: does not support required network security measures:
a. authentication - supports lowest authentication protocol
b. privacy - there is no privacy protocol supported
17. Inadequate Device to Network interface: network-to-network interface (NNI) - back panel
a. TWC installed only ½ of the connectivity physically. TWC should have pulled two fiber cables from 215 and Seaman
Avenue to 620 Islam; however TWC only pulled one cable.
b. Each Cable should have had a permanent speed of one gig in one direction, either up or down.
c. Therefore we are missing ½ or what we need so all the traffic from all our users can only go up or down at the same
time. This is not workable. We are missing a dedicated up channel down channel, because TWC omitted 12 strands.
18. Inadequate Media Dependent Adaptor. network-to-network interface (NNI) - back panel
This is the device that attaches the client’s network device to the fiber network. TWC pulled only one wire, so the network
attachment can only have one wire, whereas two are required. one, not two way communications. (GE not GT)
19. Copper User interface not Fiber-Optic user-to-network interface (UNI) - front panel
The interface is Copper based Ethernet 10 /100, while TWC promised Fiber Optic Ethernet Level 3 Interface was required
20. RJ 45 Cat 5: user-to-network interface (UNI) - front panel

These ports are only capable of supporting 10 / 100 Meg bi-directional data rate (cat 5 - full duplex). These ports actually only
support 10 meg commit rate, while we are being provisioned with 100 meg commit rate (not 1,000 Meg cat 6 or optical like
Sonnet), the commitment rate should only be set to 10 Meg, not 100, therefore there is only 10% of the required throughout
capacity allocated. However there are 25 to 30 IP addresses per port per Service Order Agreement; therefore there is only
th th
1/25 to 1/30 of 10% of required capacity of the edge-device. (OM 1200 ESM).
These accounts are aggregated, even though all the IP addresses (account) are colliding into a single port per service order
agreement, because TWC gave AWC an inadequate edge-device instead of edge router. TWC does not permit AWC to re-
aggregate the individual IP addresses into a single circuit or account, and therefore there are excessive collisions into the
front panel port and we have no 100 meg point of presence only up to 3.4 half duplex per individual IP.
TWC supplied Equitable Life with a router, will not supply AWC such a router. The proper provisioning should have been 2
100 Meg non-aggregated IP addresses over 1 gig cat 6 ports or optical Sonnet.
21. Half duplex – Media Dependent Device selected in lowest quality, only supports half duplex (GE not GT)
03-24-2005
Page: 14 of 201
22. Decision not to allow AWC to inspect the settings of the client-network edge-device: on the OM 1200 ESM on the near side
of the network. Nortel recommends client access to the device manager for client verification of the SLA matrix, in addition to
inspecting service parameters and conditions using RMON and STMPV3. TWC employed two wire frauds on the network
with the first wire frauds hosted out of VA when AWC should have, according to Nortel, TWC’s network vendor, viewed (not
modify) the settings in the OM 1200 and run test routines (continuity tool) RMON and STMPV3 (on near-side of the network)
which would certify the SLA matrix guarantees.
23. Discriminatory, inadequate, deceptive device network settings and services associated with SLA
a. Near-side
b. Far-side
c. In-path between the near and far side of the network
d. There are no clear service demarcations between the near-side, far-side, and in-path aspects of the network which is
how they are implementing the wire and service fraud.
24. Decision not to allow AWC client-management of the near-side network edge-device, which is client’s ability to self -manage
the settings and event alarms and traps of Operta Metro 1200 Edge System Module
a. Mapped typed services / transparent domain provisioning
b. Collected statistics, including billing support
c. Programmatically changed QoS (dynamic band-width management control 8011.Q), or priority within our service space
25. General problems concerning the Install, configuration and provisioning in 620 Isham Edge-Device
All services must be non-aggregated; they delivered both service orders aggregated. All services must be non-aggregated
to support 100 megabit point of presence for each SLA we signed. Also there is no way to re-aggregated them without a re-
aggregation device such as Nortel recommended, therefore we have separate IP addresses which have only up to 3.4 meg
half-duplex which can’t even support our slowest service offerings nor SIP 2.0, State of Art VOIP, for distribution of audio and
multimedia over internet and intranet and also used for enhanced security applications.
26. TWC also employed the following antitrust strategies to degrade service quality and network-traffic throughput efficiency
coming in and out of the 620 Isham Street AWC facility:
a. Manage security applications, based on standards compliant extensions
b. Support 8011.Q (vLAN) Virtual LAN provisioning and management
c. Support 8011.1x circuit security
d. Support 8011.1i packet security
e. Support CBC DES and HMAC security
f. Disallow multiple-standards compliance
27. Specific significant problems associated with Install, configuration and provisioning resulting in among other TWC antitrust
strategies further degrading service quality and network-traffic throughput efficiency coming in an out of the 620 Isham Street
AWC facility through:
a. TWC employed a very in-efficient transmission design; it is extremely low performance capabilities. TWC configured the
smallest possible size of user transmission data packets (most inefficient possible circuit), which can be configured in
Optical Ethernet Network Device. TWC is using only an eight character user-data transmission-packet, there is more
overhead than data being transmitted.
b. Service provisioning has an known commitment rate; extremely low priority, burst rate and bust duration
c. Excessive port traffic-congestion and contention
d. Excessive dropped octets or packets (due to C above)
e. Excessive security exposure
03-24-2005
Page: 15 of 201
28. Other significant problems associated with Install, configuration and provisioning:
Result in other TWC antitrust strategies which further degrade service quality and network-traffic throughput efficiency
coming in an out of the 620 Isham Street AWC facility through:
a. No client service termination equipment at client tenant-location at 60 Hudson for either service
b. No clearly defined service demarcation at between:
rd
1. TW Telecom – property sheet for June 23 Service Order Form (and possible infrastructure)
2. AOL – Network Traces identify AOL infrastructure
3. Road Runner – Both Wire Frauds source code indicates, Network Traces, and AWC Attachment
4. third party providers – Level 3.com
5. Time Warner Cable – the group directly competing in our market spaces, (Bus Services sharing info)
6. TWC Business Services – the unit who approached us
7. Road Runner Soho – same people d/b/a with Equitable Life Assurance Co. of U.S., same time
8. Time Warner Network in Manhattan and Time Warner Data Center in Queens
9. Time Warner Data Center in Queens and VA, Rochester NY, and national internet traffic
10. Metro Ethernet Optical Ethernet Layer II and tier I Internet service provider
c. No Transparent Domain Continuity Test – Attempted to substitute Nortel Recommendation for SLA verification – not
using CommPortal Internet, Metro Ethernet (wire) Fraud Artifice
d. No client QOS setting specified or documented by TWC, instead TWC is employing CommPortal Internet, Metro
Ethernet (wire) Fraud Artifice
e. Unspecified Mapping from TxQ to Client 8011.q setting; unspecified serv.dif. point through TxQ mapping,
f. No RMON Stats specified by TWC as Nortel recommends which sets up the opportunity for a wire fraud, scam, and
‘ComPortal’ wire fraud artifice.
g. No STMP v3 Stats specified by TWC as Nortel recommends which sets up the opportunity for a wire fraud, scam, and
‘ComPortal’ wire fraud artifice.
h. TWC is prohibiting AWC from configuring problem event alarms that contact us when there is on the raising or falling
edge of any condition which resolves to an integer value – this is the NORTEL device vendor’s recommended way
i. No Transparent Domain Index Number specified - this is a problem: TWC is hiding: – Network to Network Interface
exclusive encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
j. No Multicast Address Specified - this is a problem: TWC is hiding: – Network to Network Interface exclusive
encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
k. No entries in Forwarding Database specified - this is a problem: – Network to Network Interface is hiding: – Network to
Network Interface exclusive encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
l. No emergency response plan - specified - this is a problem: – Network to Network Interface is hiding: – Network to
Network Interface exclusive encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
m. No backup cut-over capacity specified - this is a problem: TWC is hiding: – Network to Network Interface exclusive
encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
03-24-2005
Page: 16 of 201
Chapter 4: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS SUMMARY
TWC engaged in the following Bait & Switch operations:.
1. From Carrier Grade (SONNET) Open Systems Telecommunications Standard which we require to be able to inter connect,
or interoperate between other carriers, networks, or different parts or segments of our network, or external networks, and
equipment manufactures – To proprietary Nortel Standard, (Metro Ethernet), which therefore has significantly diminished value.
Further TWC delivers only a consumer grade interconnection to AWC (Optical Ethernet Level One), making this for all practical
purposes unfit for our market entry requirements.
2. From Highest Quality Service Level Guarantees (were promised detailed SLA matrix on multiple occasions) involving
highest performance like the amount of time it takes to have a signal return from the far end of a network (end to end return time
under 50 milliseconds); this is the speed required for critical communication requirements), with 100% accessibility of service,
security, elite service and support To Lowest Quality, no honest Service, with no adequate security, un-reliable, significantly
diminished, inconsistent throughput and response times etc., making this for all practical purposes unfit for our market-entry
requirements.
3. From high-quality TWC network components used to provide service, like segments, elements, and the allocation of
resources available To lowest-quality network components implemented into the ‘circuit design’ (Design Record Layout) with
discriminatory access to network resources, making this for all practical purposes unfit for our market-entry requirements.
4. From State-of-the-art fiber optic network, “Dual Self Healing Sonnet Rings” - To lowest quality fiber feeds terminating with
copper-wire and copper-cables RJ-45 Cat 5 connectors (front panel: 10/100). This technology is as worthless as a $30 LinkSys
router, for all practical purposes; making this for all practical purposes, unfit for our market entry requirements.
5. From 99.999% network availability, delivered to our premises and 99.999% available for each port - Quoting Government
th
Guarantee (see March 25 forgery of Client-Copy of Attachment A - Section 4) - To significantly diminished network availability,
in conjunction with, what appears to be intentionally-discriminatory scheduled daily outages, apparently ‘scheduled’: routinely with
one hour daily downtime episodes between 6:00 and 7:00am, making this for all practical purposes, unfit for our market entry
requirements.
6. From carrier-grade dedicated-leased-line interconnecting 620 Isham with 60 Hudson - To a completely different service
th
(ICP – internet content provider), fraudulently sating that AWC ordered ENET (see ‘August 24 Cover Letter’), making this for all
practical purposes unfit for our market entry requirements as we are being denied access to 60 Hudson and all its benefits
(‘Service Swap’).
7. From a carrier-grade transport, ‘Level 3’ Optical Ethernet Transport, which is the layer or level used to communicate
efficiently between telecommunications-common carriers - To a ‘consumer-grade Optical Ethernet ‘Layer 1’ Transport” (OLE1).
This is the communications level used for consumer grade services which deliver programming to household consumers, making
this for all practical purposes unfit for our market entry requirements.
8. From the high-priority Tier 3 ISP (internet access provider) which is required to feed internet wholesalers (Tier 3 Internet
Access) - To level3.com which is a Tier-1 Internet Service Provider (third-party, Tier 1 ISP re-aggregation service),
discriminatorily implemented with the lowest priority (only up to 3.4 Meg/sec before excessive port traffic contention, only half-
duplex). This low quality internet service is what Road Runner is providing to low-end, household consumers, not
telecommunications service providers, making this for all practical purposes unfit for our market entry requirements. Note: this
service was to be an optional free service provisioned on the dedicated transport to/from 60 Hudson.
03-24-2005
Page: 17 of 201
Chapter 5: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS BREAKDOWN
Time Warner Cable gross misbehavior and gross misrepresentations involved nine major ‘Bait & Switch’ operations (Swaps).
1. Location Swap (Z Location- the far end of the circuit)- From 60 Hudson to Wood Side Queens
st
a. First moved to Hub B, 61 street, Manhattan
b. Then moved to 60 Hudson
c. Then said there was no Z Location, said service terminates in an internet cloud, “the Z location is a moot point”
d. Finally moved to Hub C, Wood Side Queens
2. Product Swap From 2 - 100 meg dedicated lease line connecting 60 Hudson
To 45 x 3.4 meg (max) non-aggregated consumer-grade “Road Runner Accounts” (Internet Service Provider not interconnectivity)
a. Started as a Carrier-Grade Dedicated leased-line connecting tenancy locations at 60 Hudson Street and 620 Isham, at
February signing
b. Then became the same Dedicated leased line interconnect, but with free Tier 3 internet service optional, two days after
signing. Thereby enabling AWC to pull Internet out of 60 Hudson through one of many cross connects, or any other
service AWC wished to bring out of 60 Hudson to the 620 Isham street transmission facility / private co-location. The
other services do not have to support an internet protocol.
c. Then upgraded to $9K monthly with a second service order, at up to 15 sites in New York City, interconnecting to 60
Hudson, providing 200 meg (shared across all the sites). However the second order was only to be activated after AWC
required and requested the second 100 meg. Both parties also agreed with a third order, for $6K monthly for an OC12,
(622.05 meg), again first 100 meg out of 60 Hudson was to be sharable among the 14 additional sites along with the first
200 meg as describe above.
d. Then became ENET (Road Runner in hiding.
st th
e. Then by August 31 (see cover letter) TWC incredulously misrepresents that the service contract signed on Feb 26 by
th
AWC and signed on March 11 by TWC, was always ENET (Road Runner in hiding), with no mention of 60 Hudson,
also no mention of any additional sites, or the third order, much less that the second 100 meg was to be activate only
after 100 meg out of 60 Hudson had reached capacity.
3. Bandwidth Swap – from carrier grade 100 meg, To 3.4 meg low priority, low end consumer grade
From two sets of 100 meg full duplex non aggregated high priority dedicated leased lines interconnecting 60 Hudson and
other AWC sites activated - To 2 sets of up 3.4 meg half duplex shared accounts or 45 IP addresses being forced into 2 RJ
45 cat 5 copper 10 /100 ports :
a. 30 accounts - ENET coming out of an internet cloud (This is Metro Ethernet)
b. 25 accounts – ELINE internet protocol – totally unusable connection to 60 Hudson, because the 60 Hudson
interconnect must be independent of the internet thereby enabling AWC to carry any telecommunications products
whether they support internet protocol or not. (also internet protocol will be inferior to the level 3 Sonnet transport
layer promised.) (This is Metro Ethernet)
c. no mention of OC12 (622.05 meg)
4. Price Swaps, among other problems, TWC is denying AWC access to ENET service at 60 Hudson and 620 Isham, with or
without the Internet “hand-off” as promised, thus TWC is effectively charging $7,750 monthly for service which was “free”,
(because we were to have ability to support non ENET service offering additionally, as we stated above.) By TWC
attempting to remove 60 Hudson Street interconnectivity as the June ENET Order Form requires, TWC is only enabling
AWC to receive tier I internet connectivity, thus requiring AWC to order separate line to 60 Hudson. This effectively swaps a
free internet connection service option on the dedicated leased line to 60 Hudson, originally offered to aid our market entry,
into a Road Runner only service at a $270 per month for each 30 low end consumer grade road runner accounts,
discriminatorily provisioned, when finally actually provisioned, (note: tenancy location at 60 Hudson is not provisioned as
required in the June Orders.)
As TWC had access to many of our internal top secret documents, we are confident that TWC fully understood and planed
service knowing that AWC can’t support more that 60 users at the same time, best case, however more like 30 users at a
time most reasonable case, (with out an un acceptable degrading of response time) and only for the lowest end AWC
consumer offering which AWC planned to charge under $10 for this class of service.
03-24-2005
Page: 18 of 201
th
5. Document Swap (3) variations of ‘what we signed’ on February 26 2004, 2 forgeries, each with a specific objective
a. E-mailed non forged copy sometime around February time period – this version is where AWC identified 38 problems (deal
breakers) with the February paperwork. These 38 points became the 38 points of mutually accepted contention between
AWC and TWC, and from which AWC negotiated aggressively towards resolution during the first 3 weeks of March 2004
b. Fax and mailed March 25 legal package containing cover letter and forged document set. Also hand delivered a printout at
th
meeting on March 26 (Minus Attachment D: which references the ENET – the Road Runner service swapped in when
TWC swapped out the dedicated leased line to 60 Hudson as we are contesting. The first official inclusion of Attachment
st
D is in the August 31 forgery item c below, however we did receive a copy of Attachment D by e-mail, and based on this
e-mailed copy of Attachment D, we state that section F of Attachment D was dropped out without notice)
1. Terms and conditions document

th rd
a. TWC changed duration term from 3 year (Feb 26 order) or 5 years (June 23 order) to 30 days
b. TWC removed prohibition to resell by dropped section 2a
2. Attachment A: General Description of Services – TWC forged Section 4, Gigabit Ethernet section and section 5, Metro
Ethernet services, ENET, ELINE as looking like Sonnet or Gigabit Ethernet and removed Gigabit Ethernet heading
thus removing Gigabit Ethernet as a service option.
3. Attachment D: TWC forged this Attachment by removed prohibition to resell ENET (Road Runner in Hiding) by
st th
dropping or removing section F, by August 31 officially, however we saw in the March 26 printout hand delivered un
officially that section F which appeared in the e-mail copy section a above (February time period) was missing by
th st
March 26 however was not formally included until August 31 .
4. Air Web Communications Attachment – not included. This document which was to be TWC’s response to the 38 point
of mutually contested problems. Point 6 of 10 points in the AWC attachments admits the Road Runner service is
hidden in the ENET offerings because TWC states AWC right to re-brand Road Runner. This became a major battle
ground issue, and was one of the blunders of TWC which started to expose TWC antitrust policies against AWC.
5. Added Marketing copy photocopies of various offerings.

st
6. Mailed August 31 Final Forgery. This forgery was contained a full legal document package including Cover Letter,
st
From the August 31 cover letter alone AWC identified 31 points which prove or support our case, See Appendix I,
along with other documents like design layout record, which like almost all TWC documentation supports our case.
a. Terms and conditions document
 initial term still forged through the inclusion of the end date of the initial term inserted, August 31 2003, being
th
about 8 months prior to AWC signing February 26 , however TWC secretly (after the fact) makes the start
th
of the contract March 11 2004.
th
 prohibition to resell still removed as in the March 26 forgery faxed and mailed to 620 Isham
b. Attachment A: back to the same state as the e-mailed copy delivered in February
 re-worked Gigabit Ethernet
 Metro Ethernet services
 Sections 4 and 5: ENET, ELINE
c. Finally formally included Attachment D - TWC still removed prohibition to resell by dropping section F
d. Air Web Communications Attachment – not included
e. Added layout design record and other misc. documents.
th
7. February 10 2005 copy, a copy of our paperwork on file, the appeared the same (language) as copy from March
th th
25 ; however we obtained another copy of the March 25 2004 in person, in front of witnesses, from the files of Durso at
the meeting. Hickey his boss, made copies against the advise of the TWC legal counsel
6. Technology Swaps From Fiber Optic Dual Sonnet Self Healing Sonnet Rings to Optical Ethernet Layer 1 -
Copper RJ 45 cat 5 10/ 100 half duplex ports, discriminatorily half provisioned.
7. Circuit Design and implementation Swap; The Design and implementation is so different from what TWC represented with
respect to the design and implementation, that this is in our judgment actually Service (Wire) fraud. Both the design and
implementation which should have been simply and exclusively encapsulating 60 Hudson and 620 Isham, (or the other 14 AWC
sites in the future) is constantly changing on an inter-state internet level. Changed at least 4 times since June 30, 2004 – without
client consent as required by terms and conditions document. And based on this we believe that perhaps the use of the internet
03-24-2005
Page: 19 of 201
e-mail (to AWC hotmail, and yahoo accounts) and the telephone which were used in conjunction with the forgeries, and 2 wire
fraud artifices also are a form of Fraud by wire. (although not as obviously egregious)
8. Term of Service Contract Swap - 5 years back to back was converted to 30 by inserting end date of the initial term.
03-24-2005
Page: 20 of 201
Chapter 6: Restructure Transactions - Eliminate Anti-Competitive Effects
1. TWC to provision 60 Hudson dedicated leased line to 620 Isham (and other 14 sites) with 3 orders as stated herein as
promised, as per specification requirements as a telecommunications VAR carrier re-selling enhanced internet access,
rd
as well as pursuant to the June 23 Service Order Agreements.
2. Deliver on June service order agreements pursuant to terms and conditions incorporation 38 points of contention.
3. AWC must agree or formally authorize the Service Date, Provisioning Date and Due Date.
st
4. TWC must deliver on promised AWC roof rights, on Hub B, (61 street) to provide laser backup interconnect, with hot
st
standby support, in the event the TWC Fiber lines fail which interconnect 61 street and 620 Isham.
5. TWC must request that AWC give Notice to Authorize Change in Service Provisioning Parameters, in the form of
change consent.
6. TWC must permit AWC to co-manage both AWC near-end and far-end network edge devices, 60 Hudson and 620
Isham, as well as placing server at any data center where ISP hand off occurs. (clearly defined service demarcations)
7. All TWC Edge Devices of a quality and provisioned as carrier grade.
8. TWC must enable AWC to implement the following:

a. state of the art security: authenticity and privacy protocols
b. dependable, reliable environment which can be verified and validated through internal AWC or external audits.
c. exclusive use of IPs (or access to IPs) providing true encapsulated connectivity. (if using Nortel Ethernet must
encapsulate NNI, if using Sonnet by other means)
9. Circuit Design Layout Record which is TWC’s technical “circuit design master form” which must exactly match the June
Service Order Forms (TW Telecom appears to be directly involved with the Order Form) and must incorporate our
requirements, must incorporate 38 points negotiated in March over phone and brought out of the AWC tenant location
th
on the 9 floor at the 60 Hudson.
10. Ethernet Internet or Internet Connectivity must be interconnected with a Level 3 transport “circuit” accessing a Tier 3
Internet Service Provider interface, support per use billing, client managed QoS bandwidth control, and state of art
security over superior TWC network assets and superior to the Cogent Communications offer delivered to AWC on
February 26, 2004.
11. Circuit up time performance must be guaranteed 99.999% network availability and 99.99% port availability (See Section
th
4, Attachment A, March 25 Forged official client copy)
12. TWC must deliver on all three service orders as promised
13. TWC must deliver on promise to provide up to 15 locations point-to-point lines connection to 60 Hudson
14. AWC must receive substantive, timely accurate documentation and specificity a verifiable Service Level Agreement or
SLA matrix, and an escalation policy in accordance with generally accepted carrier quality practices, standards and
guidelines.
15. Need a proper foundation and prove legal enforceability to attach and legally bind AWC to the February – April 2004
Terms and Conditions, ATTACHMENT A, B, C, D. Especially Attachment D which is exclusively dealing with ENET
(Road Runner in hiding).
16. June 23rd, 2004 AWC Attachment needs to be modified and legally included.
17. TWC must roll back the billing, compensation or service credit to make us whole.
03-24-2005
Page: 21 of 201
Chapter 7: Air Web Time Warner Agreement Summary

Cataldi & Associates, Inc (C&A), the parent company of AWC, is a legally adjoined party in the Air Web / TWC dispute; C&A
provided $12,000 in June 2004. C&A, thus performed on the contract in good faith; with the promise that TWC would act in
good faith by:
1. providing 3 separate service order commitments

2. for 5 to 10 years
3. with 822.05 meg
4. at $15,000 to up to 15 sites
5. over SONNET dedicated lease line “circuits”
6. as per requirements
7. in addition to incorporating 38 points of Mutually Acknowledged Contention, into new terms and conditions document as
negotiated during March 2004.
th
In March TWC legally represented, through its March 25 forgery of Official Client Copies of execution documents (faxed and
mailed), we were promised:
1. Top priority, non-aggregated services

2. Optical Gigabit Ethernet Private Line grade service
3. With Superior Authentication and Privacy Protocols
4. With Bit Error Rate (BER) < 1X 1012 for Gigabit Ethernet
5. Port Availability of Availability of 99.99%
6. Network Availability of 99.999%
One month after, then 2.5 months after we signed the February contract TWC is still representing the functionality, with the intent
th
of misrepresenting what TWC technology was being employed to service AWC in the “Durso-May 7 2004 e-mail sent to AWC.
TWC’s initial service offer was made to AWC last February. This offer was made in response to a verbal Request For Proposal
issued by TELx of 60 Hudson, on behalf of AWC, to secure a long term contract providing a dedicated leased line (or point to
point or 2 point service) linking the tenant locations at 60 Hudson Street and 620 Isham, pursuant to our business and technical
requirements as a Enhanced or Value added Communications Carrier for New York City, for a minimum of 5 years. AWC acted
on TWC’s response to a Request for Proposal issued by TELx co-location facility, under a simple straightforward contract, with
specific Service Level verifiable grade and performance guarantees.
th rd
The dedicated leased line service was ordered on two successive occasions, first on February 26 then again on June 23 as
per TWC’s instructions. AWC unilaterally performed on the contract in good faith with a prepayment of $12,000 also in June
2004, after AWC principals believed that we had worked out our areas of mutually acknowledged contention during the first 3
weeks of March 2004.
Over the spring and Summer TWC offers to AWC became more attractive and in hind sight probably not credible.
1. starting Sonnet Grade and Standard
2. then optional free carrier grade client managed internet access
3. then expanded capacity up to 822.05 meg available at a guaranteed rate $16,000 monthly
4. finally expanding the 60 Hudson Street connectivity at up to 14 other AWC transmission hubs within New York City, (155
meg to secondary sites)
5. three times price value of others pursuant to revenue sharing offer we assume, (however we never acted on or followed up
with any additional questions as to why TWC would support AWC if AWC market entry was detrimental to AWC as
th rd
indicated in the March 26 meeting at 120 East 23 street, NYC
Cataldi & Associates Vs. Time Warner
January 26, 2005 -- Draft Version -- DOJ Brief 211.d NYC
Cataldi & Associates Inc. Page: 22 of 201
NYC, Milwaukee Air Web
Communications
Chapter 8: Key Time frames

1. Before February 26th
AWC resource to be managed out our tenancy location at Telex
TWC promised that AWC would be able to manage 822.05 Meg per second of 60 Hudson Street connectivity across the 15 sites
in New York City starting with our 620 Isham Street Facility. TWC offered to provide assistance over the next ten years, as AWC
built up service offerings and distribution networks feeding out of one of the main co-location facilities in the world.
Assistance was to start with a 12 mile dedicated leased line to AW to 620 Isham Street. AWC intended to utilize the dedicated
leased line for the purposes of distributing value-added services available out of 60 Hudson to 620 Isham Street. Air Web after
value-adding and enhancing the service feeds, intends to broadcast re-branded and “original branded” services over AWC’s new
Optical / Radio Neighborhood “Web”.
Initial Contact
The initial contact made by TWC to AWC to AWC, was over the telephone, in response to a verbal request for proposal, on the
part of the Telex group, as per our requirement for tenancy was carrier class affordable connectivity from 60 Hudson were we
could pickup up cogent feeds and the feeds of other tenants of Telex.
2. First Offer – February 2004 Signing

th
On February 26 2004, TWC and AWC / C&A entered into a simple straight forward dedicated leased line contract. This contract
th
was to provide premium network elements to provide an encapsulated circuit between AWC tenant location on the 9 floor at 60
Hudson and AWC tenant location on the 3rd floor at 620 Isham Street, exactly as per the telephone based discussions, with both
the northern and midtown Time Warner Representatives.
th
The actual offer to sign paperwork on February 26 2004 was a complete surprise offer. TWC verbally walked us through
straightforward terms for a dedicated leased line from the TELx facility to 620 Isham. We signed contract with TWC
representative, who tagged along with our formal tenant welcome tour at the TELx Facility by senior TELx Staff, which was
attended by Cogent Communications Senior East Cost Wholesale manager John Keegan, who arranged for our tenancy at
TELx.
First Offer Straight forward, and Simple

The contract was to provide dedicated leased line (one line per order) to encapsulate 620 Isham and the Co-location Facility on
th
the 9 floor of 60 Hudson initially. The Service contract, operations, emergency escalation process and service was to be simple,
straight forward, and verifiable. TWC guaranteed that the dedicated leased lines service would be Client managed from the
following aspects:
a. 100 Meg full duplex, dedicated leased line

b. Encapsulated service
c. Carrier grade network edge devices both ends
d. Carried over SONNET technology
e. Was to be approx 12 miles
f. Connecting 620 Isham with 60 Hudson street
g. For $8,000 monthly
h. Highest Security
i. Client managed or co-managed network edge devices
j. Client Controlled QOS which manage bandwidth control
k. Client manages dynamic virtual circuit within our encapsulated dedicated circuit
l. Support 100% 2.0 SIP VOIP compliant and 802.11.1i
th
m. Offered optional free internet - by February 28
n. March 25th First Forgery indicated that ELINE /ENET were 99.999% network available, and 99.99% port available
th
3. February 26th and March 11 - during which TWC secretly did not signed the Feb contract until 2 weeks later.
th
a. February 26 2004, Service Order Agreement’s signature may have been transferred
b. TWC imposes document language which is discriminatory and possibly illegal, document is well suited to enable or
protect TWC during AWC foreclosure activities.
c. TWC moves AWC account into pre-existing Good Shepherd School TWC account, without our prior knowledge.(AWC
620 facility is located on parish property)
Communications
d. First TWC represented to AWC over the phone that the contract was for dedicated two point leased line (point to point
line) out of 60 Hudson, with free ENET optional, Out of 61 Street and other key “bait and switch” issues.
e. Then TWC represented to AWC over the phone, that the contract was for ENET $8,000 monthly, Out of 61 Street along
with swapped issues.
f. TWC misrepresented what was being Sold, out of where
1. AWC ordered ENET or internet, in February 2004 when in fact AWC ordered a dedicated leased line out of 60
Hudson, linking in 620 Isham Street.
st
2. Z location (other side of the wire) on the February service order form indicates that the service is coming out of 61
Street.
th
4. March 11th and March 25
During which we though that we were both acting in good faith to resolve ‘The 38 Major Problems” identified in the e-mailed
th
representation of the February 26 contract
th
March 25 , 2004 Forgery copy of execution documents sent in full package– This copy was faxed and mailed (by massager),
used to trick AWC into signing new Order Form in June, however backfires on TWC, when TWC uses actual Feb order form, not
the forgery of the Feb Service Order Form. Note: different from e-mailed copy used by AWC and TWC to negotiate 38 points
during first 3 weeks of March 2004.
rd
5. March 26th and June 23
during which TWC was attempting to get AW to sign new documents in order to shed legal responsibilities of earlier forgeries.
The new documents would supersede; previous documents burdened with a list of forgeries, fraud and other felonies; lied about
everything relating to digging up the street, pulling fiber etc.
th
6. June 23rd to June 29
during which TWC completely misrepresents virtually everything relating to what we would be receiving, and the terms and
conditions under which we would receive these services & support. (Between July 2004 to current TWC implemented two wire
fraud schemes)
th
7. March 15- June 30
During which period TWC designs, tests and activates circuit design without notice or authorization, with no legal basis. We are
very concerned with original design and its possible use. We never consented to any dates, authorized any key installation
events, like street cut, fiber pull. Did not request any Activation Date.
AWC is not legally obligated to pay for any service as Time Warner did not get approval on any of these Dates:
a. Activation (same as service date)
th
b. Effective – we were discriminated against when compared to Equitable Life, see March 25 Fax)
c. End Term – this was slipped in both the March and August forgeries)
d. Provisioning- this dates were talked about a lot, but do not appear to have any real significance
e. Test & Turn-up this dates were talked about a lot, but do not appear to have any real significance
f. Street-Cut – Uptown Facility One Landlord: Local Parish approved not AWC
g. Fiber-Pull Uptown Facility One Landlord: Local Parish approved not AWC
th
h. Installation – this is a total deception, not the ELINE service was activate on June 24 without notice or consent release
i. Desired (this is used to link to the right for TWC to select a due Date)
j. Due (this is the hidden real date)
rd th
(By June 23 2004, AWC signed two Service Orders which supersede the February 26 2004 contracts. These Service Orders
restored AWC into our tenancy locations at the TELx facility at 60 Hudson pursuant to the technical specifications expressed in
th
March 25 forgery)
Communications
th
a. We believe that Execution documents are not legally enforceable because official AWC’s client copies (March 25 2004
was forged after we signed them, and before TWC delivered them to us, using FAX and registered mail (private carrier):
th
 February 26 Service Order Form
th
 February 26 Terms and Conditions Document, Page 1 (section 2a dropped) and page 3 was modified by adding
an end date for the initial term, forcing contract to 30 day term with ability for TWC to change terms and conditions
and prices at will.
th
 February 26 Attachments A-C sent. Terms and Conditions Document Page 1 and 3 modified, Attachment A,
sections 4 and 5 modified.
b. TWC did permit AWC to not perform on Attachment B when AWC requested when we tried to subcontract NORTEL
c. Attachment D not referenced in terms and conditions document, as other 3 attachments, was slipped it in.
d. TWC commented to but did not perform on any of the 38 points.
e. We challenged what was actually included in either the Feb or June Contract Signings.
rd
f. We believe that only June 23 Service Orders and associated “Circuit Design Records” that remains in full force.
rd
g. Only attachment included in the June 23 , and therefore only attachment legally in force.
h. The circuit design layout record, the technical specification document TWC uses to design the circuit, is not in
accordance with our user requirements specifications, TWC’s representations, nor does it satisfy the service order
rd
agreements we signed on June 23 2004 and we have formally rejected service provisioning after conducting extensive
acceptance testing.
rd
1. By June 23 2004, TWCNYC committed to, however did not provide the following to AWC:
2. Two successive orders of 100 Meg of secured connectivity linking 60 Hudson and 620 Isham (one service with
optional internet of a grade level 3, not tier one ISP).
3. In June AWC testing indicated that the 100 Meg of non-aggregated
service, as testing showed that download speeds at 140,000 bites (only 3x dial up) not 100 Meg, 66.5 t1(s).
4. Carrier grade service network service and edge device
5. Client management of service edge devices
st
6. Level 3 connectivity of intranet, not a tier 1 (as August 31 TWC cover letter states)
7. optional on first 100 meg of connectivity to 60 Hudson (as stated in item one above)
th
8. Optional Internet feed would be a level 3, Superior to Cogent Communications Offer, (delivered Feb. 26 2004),
nd th
9. Prepared for 2 100 meg promised in the June 30 contract (would be turned on upon written request)
10. Prepared for OC12 service promised in 2005
11. service level guarantees would be verified by client with quantitative, detailed performance reports and user
initiated audits
12. 99.999% network availability
13. 99.99% port availability
1. Dedicated leased line service expanded bandwidth through three separate, successive orders (first 9 months)
TWC agreed to provide 3 separate, isolated, encapsulated dedicated leased lines between 60 Hudson to 620 Isham Street. TWC
assured that the connectivity would be scalable, through the 3 orders, up to 822.05 Meg full duplex. TWC also guaranteed that
AWC would receive (however the August 31 TWC cover letter states with unbelievable claims that AWC signed a contract in
th
February 26 2004 for internet because wanted was a tier I Internet service provider coming out of TWC’s Regional Data Center
in Wood Side Queens).
a. Highest levels of service, security and support, ensuring highest grade and quality consistent with Sprint and Verizon
1. Highest Practices and Standards
2. Carrier Class Interconnectivity Connectivity
3. Premier Customer service
4. Hot standby built into the Sonnet technology
Communications
b. Tiered Metered Billing Statistics collection and storage capability, so we can implement and integrated pay per use billing
system in the future
c. Specific and quantitatively verifiable Service Level Agreement Guarantees supporting our formal technical needs profile
specification and environmental support requirements, which would assure the highest levels of non interruptible
services for our customers
d. Term 5 minimum, with option to extend to 10 years
e. Fixed monthly rate of $15,000.00 guaranteed
f. Option for revenue sharing, (TWC never showed interest, so we removed it from the table, TWC indicated if they were
interested in the future, if we survived they would re-examine the issue, we thought nothing of it at the time)
g. Clearly defined service demarcations or boundaries (as recommended by Nortel and Cisco); in AWC tenancy location at
both 60 Hudson and 620 Isham street.
As AWC needed more connectivity between its primary New York City Facilitates, TWC would process each of 3 service orders.
The plan collectively and incrementally builds up capacity of the feed from Hudson to Isham, to a minimum total capacity of
822.05 Meg managing 3 dedicated lease lines.
2. Master Service was to be in three separate, successive service order agreements:
a. 100 meg 2 point to Tennant area at 60 Hudson (with internet)

b. 100 meg 2 point to Tennant area at 60 Hudson (with out internet)
c. 622.05 meg (OC12) 2 point to Tennant area at 60 Hudson (with out internet)
3. Service was to be in available in up to 14 separate locations over the first 1.5 years
After AWC executed the second of three contracts, TWC promised 14 additional client managed/or co-managed dedicated
leased line activations, between 60 Hudson and other locations in Manhattan over the first 1.5 years, for minor setup fees. We
signed two of three contracts negotiated, all terminating out of 60 Hudson Street.
Starting September 2004, Time Warner committed to the 14 additional sites “new build schedule”. Time Warner committed to
connect these14 additional sites, with ‘Test & Turn-up’ of each of the 14 additional “feeder lines” about every 6 weeks. Each
new site was to be spaced in line of sight approximately 1.5 miles apart, to support AWC’s optical free-space backhaul
transmitters.
The main or primary dedicated leased line is to connect our 620 Isham Street and Telex facilities. This dedicated leased line, will
indirectly connect with the other 14 additional lines, through the Telex facility.
4. Overview of TWC’s service offering

We believe that TWC with intent set up to deceive us into believing that we were contractually guaranteed to receive the
dedicated leased line service which:
a. would connect us to 60 Hudson with a carrier grade line
b. has service levels consistent with the technical specifications describing both the grade and quality of the service
consistent with “TWC’s Optical Ethernet Private Line Service offering, not TWC’s Metro Ethernet service offering, in the
th
documentation provided in the March 25 Faxed forgery. In the fax TWC clearly states that Metro Ethernet Service really
a “LAN”, not a 2-point - single standard dedicated lease line.
We require the dedicated lease line support at a minimum, the following:
a. Connecting two client managed or co-managed, carrier-grade network edge-devices

b. Require support hot-standby cut-over service or handoff capacity when TWC service goes down
c. Dedicated Lease Line Service must:
1. have clearly defined service-demarcations at customers facility
2. be in accordance with the specific and client verifiable Service Level Agreements (SLA)
3. be provided for a 5 to 10 year duration
st
4. include roof-rights at TW Hub B, located on 61 Street for connection to hot-standby AWC owned “backhaul-line”
Communications
:
5. July 1 through 11th - during which we were attempting to work with TWC even though they had activate service under
deceptive circumstances
a. (By July TWC is employing Wire fraud and intimidation legally traps us into payments of $540,000 and lock us into a 5
year commitment for services unfit for use.
b. User Acceptance testing showed that TWC delivered 150,000 bit data rate, or 3x dialup, not TWC promised 100
megabit, w full duplex, on order one.
-
6. July 10th to August 30th during which it became clear that we were being deceived – TWC Attempted the Two Wire Frauds.
7. August 31st to present - the last and final document a forgery or not a forgery? I believe it is a good contract)
nd
a. Time frame when TWC delivered to AWC 2 , last and final forgery. TWC also used intimidation tactics to get us to
rd
accept service, and then later attempted forced access to box, and finally refusal to deliver on June 23 contract. We
believe to hide or destroy evidence, relevant to support our case.
st
b. August 31 , 2004 Forgery copy of execution documents sent in full package. This copy was mailed (by massager). This
th
copy is different from the March 25 2004 copy only with regard to describing General Description of Services, section 4
and 5 matching the technical specifications of ENET and ELINE, which we used, when signing the June order forms.
Remember TWC gave us the Feb circuit, again in June by mistake, (if we remove the grade and quality issues).
8. Research during this time frame indicated the following:

a. We believe LAN was or is the same LAN being delivered to Cataldi at the residence at 49 Seaman Avenue
b. AWC does not have exclusive access to IP addresses and associated services we are being billed for.
c. TWC appears to be internally resolving IP addresses as .COM with TWC DNS Servers.
d. Should have only four static IP addresses.
e. 620 Isham service appear to have been placed on the Seaman Avenue Fiber Optic Digital Video Service.
f. TWC is controlling Internet In-path node routing with our national traffic.
g. TWC is or was deliberately bringing our national traffic through northern New York State, down into Manhattan, then out
to Virginia. (going through our competitor’s nodes very slowly)
h. ELINE and ENET, which are to be isolated, fault-isolated circuits. (primary and secondary)
i. Appears as if portal SLA verification reporting was disabled.
j. Nortel recommends running a “continuity tool” (client testing tool) in the client network edge device. (near side)
k. Dedicated Lease Line appears to go down over 7.5 hours per week minimum, w/ low priority and burst duration
l. Evidence relating that top speed is only half duplex 3.4 Meg, with excessive port collisions.
m. Listings of Virtual Circuits associated with IP addresses assigned to AW, strongly indicates
n. Massive deception, as well as a massive inter-state “circuit” and/or “circuit’s deception and over restrictions.
o. Recently added new last node, without consent.
p. DNS Service – direct path from both Milwaukee and NYC dramatically faster than what TWC pushes AWC through AOL
and Road Runner.
q. Level 3.com is headquartered in Co. and this is where AWC tests from mid west stated to enter the Cloud.
r. TWC is building up the “Cloud”, without consent, we believe to hide node locations or ownership.
s. Recently, in several cases last two nodes same node, (node is linked to it’s self).
t. Strong evidence that hidden node is the second node.)
u. TWC made several changes with out consent. (we tracked three major change in August, October)
v. Strong evidence that the following are involved:
w. TWC, Soho, Road Runner Commercial Services, Road Runner (RRM), Road Runner Holding LLC, RR-
COMMERCIAL-NYC-4, ROAD-RUNNER-1, America Online, Inc., AOL Transit Data Network, Time Warner Telecom,
Nortel, Cisco/TAC, ‘BigBrother.com’, ‘Routermon.net’, Level 3 Communications, Inc., ‘Level3.com’, unknown.level3.net’,
Others in Nebraska-Colorado, Virginia, New York, New Jersey.
9. November – December - Air Web Business Plan: We are concerned with Information on Internet, central to our business,
shared in confidence with TWC appears to be acting on AWC TRADE SECRETS and implementing the Air Web
Business Plan as their own, with focus power-users (users who require a lot of resources allocated to them) like network
computer gamming, wireless and on local origination
a. Time Warner Cable (www2.timewarner, or www3.timewarner.
b. NY Connect - NYCT.net - - looking for VARS to implement our Business Plan only in NYC
c. SohoWare - looking for VARS to implement our Business Plan only in NYC
d. Time Warner Southern Tier (TWST.com)
1. Business Plan to produce local information
Communications
2. focus in ’Around Town, Current Events, and local news, local weather’
3. educational focus, gamming focus
th
e. TWC July 9 press release Stamford Press Relations on TWCable.com
f. Current activities involving the following entities:
1. TW Cable
2. And the in ISP link associated with Hudson Valley link
Time Warner Southern Tier (national dialup)
Communications
[Page 28 is Intentionally Blank]

Communications
Chapter 9: Predatory Billing Assessment

inextricably linked to two wire frauds, document forgeries, and mail fraud
Service Authorization
 non-Road Runner or AOL monitored
 No P.O. requested or sent
 Hickey (marketing manager) guaranteed user would setup VLAN not Time Warner
 No service description or any other information
 looks like the bill is not computer generated, rather printing out of a spread sheet
 No Street Cut on Isham date approved by Client, the Parish (facility one landlord) approved, not AWC, We took pictures
 No Fiber Dig date approved by Client, the Parish (facility one landlord) approved, not AWC, We took pictures
 No Fiber Pull date approved by Client, the Parish (facility one landlord) approved, not AWC, We took pictures
 th
No Fiber Splicing at 207 Manhole date approved by Client, was done at night, not allowed to take pictures.
 No Service Activation date approved by Client, We took pictures
 No Provision date approved by Client, total Sting Operation
 No Test and Turn-up Service date approved by Client.
 Service never mutually accepted by Client
 Never delivered service compliant June 23 Service Agreement or SLA service to Client
 Did not wait for user validation / verification test harness with standardized test bed
 No informed of service activation date intent in writing, or verbally
 No circuit review or approval
 No required SLA (as required by both Vendor and Client)
Service Functionality
 No commitment rate specified
 No priority, burst rate or burst duration specified
 No adequate Authentication Protocol
 not-aggregated
 not to be over subscribed
 not secured
 not client managed
 Not documentation provides to client
 Billed for two services, not one. (was to activate only second after Air Web’s Customers consumed first 100 meg non-aggregated, non-shared, secured,
dedicated point to point, user self managed, user bandwidth
 Time Warner Cable has still has yet to Provision either services at client tenant-location at 60 Hudson
 No client service termination equipment at client tenant-location at 60 Hudson for either service
 No Security Protocol
 No Transparent Domain Continuity Test
 No Mapping from TxQ to Client 802.11.q setting
 No client QOS setting specified
 No duplex setting specified
 No RMON Stats specified
 No STMP v3 Stats specified
 No assurance to UNI – NNI exclusive encapsulation for 100% customer separation of traffic
 No Transparent Domain Index Number specified
 No Multicast Address Specified
Communications
 No entries in Forwarding Database specified

 No cooperation what so ever in providing any escalation protocol
 No acceptable emergency response plan: calling one person ever 15 minutes on escalation list is not a procedure
 No salient specifics have ever been answered
Circuit & Numeric Consistency

 Wrong setup fee.
 Wrong monthly charge.
 Wrong amount received.
 Taxes were to be included. (wholesaler do not pay taxes)
 Not in accordance with June Service Order Agreement
 Service not in accordance with legal representation of service specifications would be: See March 25th Fax and printed “what you signed copies”, March 26th
printout (of what was signed) for ENET and ELINE services, and how it changed Aug 31 st.
 SONNET not Metro Ethernet Optical Ethernet layer one
 non-aggregated service not aggregated service
 Level 3 service, can’t become leve3.com, a tier one IPS
 not Road Runner and AOL staff and facilities, and monitoring and re routing operations supporting us
 not shutting down service daily between 6:00 am and 7:00 am
 Circuit design record not in accordance with February or June Service Order Agreement
th
 Earliest Activation Date could not be before the 9 of July.
Communications
APPENDIX (A) - Document Change Summary

Change points of official copies of Client Copy of Execution Doc Signed 2.26.04 changing in March and August
TERMS AND CONDITIONS adds Aug1, 2003 end date / Initial Term,
TWC removes section 2a, with AWC knowledge (part of 38 points of mutual contention), however never resigns nor does AWC or C&A as
required by New York Law).
ATTACHMENT A Hides Gigabit Ethernet Private Line title (in documents represented as exact copies to be used during formal Doc Reviews)
nd rd
(these change before and after the 2 and 3 sets of copies of contracts signed in February 26/march 11, 2004, however Attachment A is
different between March 25, 2004 and August 31, 2004.
ATTACHMENT B Promises that sub contractor(s) only on request/ then denied when AWC requests (Nortel to install Client Premise
Equipment)
ATTACHMENT C Clause in Section B has no legal basis because refers to a line, however Metro Ethernet [admits service provisioned is really
a (“LAN”), a LAN is not a 2-point - single standard TWC configuration] ELINE and ENET service are actually LANs, according to May 25, 2004
fax.
Therefore attachment C, appears to have been developed for 2-point (the only configuration TWC offers).
For purposes of this Attachment C, a Service Interruption shall be deemed upon the date/time of TWC‘s receipt from Customer of notice of the
unavailability of such Affected Circuit and the issuance of a TWC trouble ticket or upon the date/time TWC detects a Service interruption (“Notice
of Dedicated Leased Line Unavailability”). A period of Service unavailability shall commence upon Notice of Dedicated Leased Line
Unavailability and conclude upon the date/time of service restoration. (“Period of Service Unavailability”).
ATTACHMENT D Additional Responsibilities (Section F Removed, after negotiated 38 points /Air Web Attachment, point 2.
AWC ATTACHMENT promised, e-mailed, represented as Legally Attached. Not the same list James Hickey refers to when he – In a past e-
mail, misrepresents, THAT we agreed that there were only 16 points of mutual contention. There are really 38; Hickey represents 10, which are
different from the 16 he mentions. Only reference TWC made to Road Runner. It is not Road Runner, but we can re-brand Road runner.
Version A – Document Package (E-mailed Customer Copy Contract(s) signed) Working 38 Points
1. No Initial Term End Date.

2. Section 2a Terms and Conditions (agreed to our demand, but never resigned the document: Relating to Reselling)
3. (Ref. in AWC attachment 10 points, problem because never changed the Tax section, as AWC are resellers)
4. Section F Attachment D - Conditions (agreed to our demand, but never resigned changed document: Relating to reselling what we
believe is really Road Runner
5. Gigabit Optical Ethernet Private Line Service /Dedicated, & Point-to-point - Metro Ethernet
6. Gigabit Ethernet / Technical Specifications /referenced under Gigabit Ethernet
7. February 26/March 11: Service order Agreement (E-mailed)
a. No reference to ENET
b. (Only two point configuration is Gigabit Ethernet)
c. Location a Good shepherd school
d. Location Z (Hub B) 61 street (80 blocks or so from 60 Hudson)
e. No Service Date (also required for Due Date and Provisioning Dates)
f. No document status
g. No circuit ID(s):
h. Contact was School Principal
i. Box Checked Internet
Communications
Version B – Document Package (Hand delivered – still original staples intact)
Initial Term: End Date: (August 1, 2003) Not in original Feb signing or and new copy not attached to June 23 SOAs/. Contract term is only
month to month not 60 months. Still never discussed nor was any document re-signed.
Section 2a Terms and Conditions are still dropped
AWC attachment 10 points, specifically number 2. Permits re-branding, Road Runner.

Still contains the Tax section
No Attachment D
1. Attachment A OCN Technical Section (As TWC was representation technically as our service being carried over SONNET)
2. Attachment A: No “Gigabit Optical Ethernet (Private Line Service)” Tile Reference,
a. But still has dedicated, & Point-to-point references
b. Gigabit Optical Ethernet Private Line – Technical Specifications /referenced
c. Under ENET, ELINE, ESAN and ELAINE
d. (Should be labeled what it really is, METRO ETHERNET)
e. Not attachment as promised AIR WEB ATTACHMENT
f. (Ref. to not using ROAD RUNNER name)
g. (Page order is totally out of order, within and between documents, added marketing copy)
3. June 23/24 Service Order Agreement A - Faxed to 620 Isham

h. Reference to ENET in other Line
i. (Only two point configuration is Gigabit Ethernet)
j. Location A Good shepherd school
k. Location Z: AWC at 60 Hudson (June Circuit Design Z location is Hub C, in the first SOA, location Z is Hub B)
l. No Service Date
m. No document status
n. No circuit ID(s):
o. Contact was moved from the site contact, to Cataldi, and home office phone
p. Box checked intranet then 100
q. Checked Internet Box
r. No Terms and Conditions Attached (as required)
4. June 23/24 Service order Agreement B - Faxed to 620 Isham

s. (Only two point configuration is Gigabit Ethernet)
t. Location A: Good Shepherd School
u. Location Z: AWC at 60 Hudson
v. No Service Date, as required
w. No document status (should be required)
x. No circuit ID(s):
y. Contact was to Cataldi, and home office phone
z. 12. Box checked intranet then 100
aa. No Terms and Conditions Attached (as required)
Version C – Document Package (FAX to 620 Isham)
Initial Term: End Date: (August 1, 2003) Year prior

Section 2a Terms and Conditions are still dropped Tax section still not changed
No Attachment D (Section F Attachment D)
Attachment AN OCN Technical Section (As TWC had been representations about our service being carried over SONNET)
Attachment A: No “Gigabit Optical Ethernet (Private Line Service)” Tile Reference, But still has dedicated, & Point-to-point references. Gigabit
Optical Ethernet Private Line – Technical Specifications /referenced
Under ENET, ELINE, ESAN and ELAINE - (Should be labeled what it really is, METRO ETHERNET
no attachment as promised AIR WEB ATTACHMENT
(Ref. to not using ROAD RUNNER name)
(page order is totally out of order, within and between documents, added marketing copy)
Version D – Document Package (Overnight Mail August 31, 2004)
Attachment A reworked
Communications
Appendix (B) - Impact on NYC Telecommunications Markets
AWC specializes in design and development of state-of-the-art “last mile” technology deployments, with service offerings which
are substantially superior in price and performance to Time Warner’s competing services.
th
The Company was uniquely positioned to enter the New York City network market on July 4 2004, with standards complaint,
interoperable transmission networks and support systems, (and expansion plans), designed to deliver significant cost and
process efficiencies, over the near and long term. Our Field tested architecture supports:
1. Automated real-time Enhancement Processing
2. Management of high traffic applications and bandwidth loads on network
3. Optimizes security, robustness, convergence potential and legacy systems management objectives
4. Aid in management of sunk costs required for market entry
Central to the company’s proprietary technology plan we have developed a process specifically designed to support our tenancy
at 60 Hudson Street TELx facility enabling us to process and apply value add process, product and service “over 100 separate
real time “feeds” from fellow TELx tenants “just in time processing”.
Key Market Impact Issues:

1. Open standards compliant
2. Near-wholesaled prices
3. Secure and reliable
4. Interoperate across
a. All product offerings and versions of offerings
b. All service lines
c. wide variety of technologies
1. Optical Ethernet platforms
2. Sonnet platforms
3. Across disparate network segments and elements
The principals of AWC anticipate solid financial performance achievable within a short period of time. In the medium term, we
expect to achieve a minimum of 80Xs RIO, before plant capitalization projecting:
1. modest penetration and saturation levels

2. with realistic market and loans assumptions
3. consolidating revenue streams into off-setting or hedged cash flows
4. with minimal sunk costs (not tied revenues)
AWC market entry focuses on the following areas:
1. Modify habitual Information consumption and transaction processing of large user populations
2. Employ traditional and untraditional bandwidth management strategies and associated mechanisms to handle
a. major security attacks
b. unacceptable response times during peak load times
c. denial of service episodes
3. Developing neighborhood communications networks so Today’s consumers are positioned to become tomorrows
suppliers or producers
Communications
Appendix (C) - Legal Environment
Sherman Antitrust Act, 15, U.S.C. Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal: penalty

Every contract, combination in the form of … or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states …, is declared to illegal.
Every person who shall make any contract or engage in combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a
felony….
Price selection of customers:
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price
between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved in such discrimination are
in commerce, where such commodities are sold for … or resale within the United States … and where the effect of such discrimination may be
substantially to lessen competition or to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person
who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them. Provided that noting here
contained shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in differentials which make only due allowance for differences
in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold
or delivered.
Sherman Act 15 U.S.C. 2 Monopolizing trade a felony: penalty

Every person who shall monopolized, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other … or persons, to monopolize, or combine
any part of the trade or commerce among the several states, shall be deemed guilty of a felony.
Payment for services or facilities for processing or sale

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of anything of value to or for the benefit of a
customer of such person in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or
through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold
or offered for sale by such person, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers
competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.
Furnishing services or facilities for processing, handling, etc.

It shall be unlawful for any person to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity brought for
resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities
connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all purchasers
on proportionally equal terms.
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to, or assist in, any transaction of sale,
or contract to sell, which discriminates to his knowledge against competitors of the purchaser, in that, any discount, rebate, allowance, or
advertising services charge is granted to the purchaser over and above any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge available
at the time of such transaction to said competitors in respect of a sale of goods of like grade, quality, and quantity; to sell, or contract to sell,
goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the united States for the purpose of
destroying competition, or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States, or to sell or contract to sell goods at unreasonable low
prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating competitor.
3 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C 14 Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of competitor
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods,
wares merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale within the
United States, … or fix a price charged therefore, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or understanding
that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities of a
competitor or competitors of the lesser seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement, or
understanding may be to may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C 19 Interlocking directorates and officers

No person shall, at the same time, serves as a director or officer in any two corporations … that are engaged in whole or in part in commerce;
and by virtue of their business and location of operation, competitors, so that the elimination of competition by agreement between them would
constitute a violation of any of the antitrust laws; If each of the corporations has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than
$10,000,000 as adjusted pursuant to paragraph (5) of this subsection.
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 24 10. Liability of directors and agents of corporation

Whenever a corporation shall violate any of the penal provisions of the antitrust laws, such violation shall be deemed to be also that of the
individual directors, officers, or agents of such corporation who shall have authorized, ordered, or done any of the acts constituting in whole or in
part such violation, and such violation, constituting in whole or in part such violation, and such violation shall be deemed a misdemeanor, …..
Communications
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 25 Restraining violations

The several district courts of the United States are invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this Act, and it shall be the duty
of the several United States attorneys, in respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to
prevent and restrain such violations. Such proceedings may be by way of petition setting forth the case and praying that such violation shall be
enjoined or otherwise prohibited. When the parties complained of shall have been duly notified of such petition, the court shall proceed, as soon
as may be, to the hearing and determination of the case; and pending such petition, and before final decree, the court may at any time make
such temporary restraining order or prohibition as shall be deemed just in the premises. Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any
such proceeding …require that other parties should be brought before the court …..
13. Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq., as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
This Act establishes the Federal Communications, which is responsible for regulating the common carrier communications of the telephone
industry, radio and television broadcasting, and other communications businesses, Under Section 402(a) of the Act, the Antitrust Division,
representing the United Stats, is automatically a party respondent in most appeal from FCC common carrier and rule-making actions. The stated
purposed of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was to encourage competition over regulation in the telecommunications markets.
14. Cable Communications Policy Acts of 1984 and 1992, 47 U.S.C. 521 – 559
Congress also intended to promote competition over regulation in passing the 1984 and 1992 Cable Acts. These Acts reduced the level of
regulation in the cable industry. Under the Acts, the FCC is given authority to approve transfers of cable television relay service licenses.
Although the parties are not immunized from challenge under the antitrust laws, governmental entities are immune from claims for damages
under any federal law for conduct related to the regulation of cable services after October 2, 992.
15. Fraud by wire, radio, or television [Wire Fraud], 18 U.S.C. 1343

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or
fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in
interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned no more than five years, or both.
AWC Assessment of Legal Environment

We believe that Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Act Remedies are enforceable to protect AWC and affected customers and future
of telecommunications and network entertainment and business services in New York City, Northern New Jersey and Southern
New York State, because AWC is a direct party to the Antitrust and exclusionary conduct which we allege to have identified and
which are not solely arising non-performance on the contract, or arising in significant part to non-performance. Therefore we
believe that the case is a strong case for antitrust activity because AWC’s exclusionary actions arise from criminal acts and
fraudulent and gross misrepresentations on the part of TWC, not out of non-performance of the duties of the 96 communications
act. Because the antitrust and exclusionary conduct and associated discriminatory behavior is directly arising from this criminal
conduct or inextricably linked to this criminal conduct, we believe that AWC’s allegations against TWC should be considered
'freestanding antitrust claims' outside the coverage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Thus, although we are not precisely
clear as to the standard that would apply to AWC’s complaint, we believe that our antitrust claim should not be dismissed, and a
formal DOJ Criminal Antitrust investigation should commence because our antitrust claim is not inextricably linked to the claims
under the “Telecommunications Act of 1996" and, in our judgment, should be "'divorced from the 1996 Act context'" and should
be “freestanding".
1. “The 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act passed by Congress”, which forbids contracts, schemes, deals or conspiracies to
restrict trade including discriminatory practices, abuse of market power and excessive control
2. The 1911 Supreme Court finding that Standard Oil was in violation of the 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act because of
excessive restrictions to trade, called the rule of reason, forcing bankruptcy of competitors.
3. The Clayton Antitrust Act in 1914, explicitly condemns commercial practices like Price discrimination, exclusive
commercial relations and incestuous boards.
4. The telecommunications Act of 1996 does not preclude application of the antitrust laws to exclusionary conduct by an
incumbent provider of local telecommunications services.
a. The 1996 Act Expressly Provides: That 96 Act Creates No Antitrust Immunity
b. The Regulatory Framework of the 96 Act Creates No Basis for Implied Antitrust Immunity
i. Implied Antitrust Immunities Are Disfavored and Strictly Limited
ii. There is No Clear Repugnancy Between the Sherman Act and the 96 Act
5. Antitrust acts solely arising from failure to perform duties in the 1996 Act
i. may be protected by the courts
Communications
ii. we believe the forgeries using mail fraud and FAX, and the wire frauds (using TW residential fiber optic
plant, and other network elements, and segments, in conjunction with internet, nodes, routers, data
centers, and gross misrepresentations primarily over the telephone, supported by e-mails, and 3
meetings in person lie at the heart, are the vehicle through which the acts were committed, and from
which they arose.
6. We believe that AWC’s antitrust claims are not "barred by the 1996 Act as construed and applied in the Seventh Circuit's
recent decision in Goldwasser v. Ameritech Corp., 222 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2000).
Communications
APPENDIX (D) - CATALDI & ASSOCIATES, New York City Business History
Authorized Technology Vendor of (Citicorp: 1985-present); (General Electric: 91-present); (Deutsche Bank – 98-9/11/2001) First AT&T
Information Systems VAR: 1981- 83 non-Bell Labs or Western Electric affiliate. Over 25 years in the field, operation technology businesses, and
in conducting R&D and practicing in multi disciplinary fields of finance, telecommunications and software intensive hardware systems.
Accumulated extensive experience in requirements analysis, design and development, deployment and operations support including training of
mission critical production systems. Acquired expertise in C, C++, JAVA-SWING; Databases: Oracle, Sybase, and Wireless: 802.11 a/b/g;
Specification Development; Expert Systems (AI); private R&D in elemental logical structures.
Performed extensive work involving quantitative analytical modeling of financials/ sensitivities (origination, valuation, corporate forecasting, and
operational risk management). Involved in all aspects of the product development life cycle (waterfall, modified waterfall and MIT RAD and
Microsoft RAD), with enhanced expertise in risk management (theory and practice).
Include correspondence and meetings with Mr. Ken Williamson, head of NASA’s 3,600 Software Engineers At the Marshal Space Flight Center,
Huntsville, Al. (Advanced Stealth Anomalies Detection Models) –1993- and Formal Invitations from the senior advisor for high performance
communications and computers for the White House (Clinton Administration: Dr. Levy) to speak on proprietary fractal software models based on
advanced stochastic quantum geometry: theory and problem application –1992. Conducted extensive work in Mathematical Methods of Artificial
Intelligence and Autonomous Systems and in developing and refining business planning, long-term strategic planning, short-term tactical
implementation, business process re-engineering, risk mitigation. Developed theoretical expertise and practical problem application experience
in Optical Ethernet Layer II generally.
Bankers Trust: BT Alex Brown, Deutsche Bank Real Estate 1998-2002 - Vendor
Deutsche Bank: Private Capital Asset Management and Corporate Investment Bank
th
25 floor of 130 Liberty Plaza New York
Front office mission critical systems developer and corporate liaison: Rapid Applications System Developer contract awarded in 1998; and
awarded contract for secured mobile/remote wireless network supporting conference for (Bankers Trust Corporation) in Global Conference for
Senior Management in Boca Rotan, Florida in 1999; and Annual Global Conference Germany in 2000 (Deutsche Bank).
Responsible for comprehensive project management of front office systems in global business operations center supporting in house senor
management and support staff. Primary duties included business process renewal, requirements gathering, specification development, system
development, testing (validation and verification testing involving both forward and reverse engineering test suite protocols), rollout, daily
operations and problem recovery support and custodial, operations training. Efforts included porting project of CERD and CERD Investor to
SQL Server WEB-based system, deployed in SQL Server, utilizing Apache Server, XML (DOMs), Java (JDBC, SWING), Applets in IEE5, in
Microsoft Windows, NT Service Pack 6 Environment. Consistently out performed and out delivered client expectations, delivering rock solid
products, in high-pressure business environments. Routinely delivered defect free systems or failure recoverable in live business production
environments, establishing the highest business confidence in underlying production systems, production and backup data, and activity,
security, and data state change logs.
T. Rowe Price (Baltimore) Technical Auditor: Front & Back Office Systems
Conducted comprehensive enterprise level audit of the nightly processing of the book: front office and back office system and communications
architectures and typologies) of the sides of the T. Rowe business (equity and loans), with the view of optimizing / simplification (complexity
reduction) Reported to the Technology Director. Problem Domain: Migrated from mainframe to client server (Sybase). 20% of the data and
system migration had been completed; however 80% of the nightly time had been completed.
Conducted reverse engineering using a formal unified throughput degradation test harness for metric analysis, assessment, verification, and
implementing validation protocol, implementing proprietary solutions set in accordance or superior to the Advanced Hallstead Algorithm for
Complexity Reduction Problem Domain (for Real Time Trading, equity and loan (and loan participations) embedded multitasking applications).
Project deliverables consisted of qualified and quantified audit reports, and standardized certified record notations and establish Goals and
Success factors was to made recommendations, establish benchmarks and architectural process improvements in the following:
communications, code database DDL and DML Queries and algorithms, development life cycle processes.
Brooks Brothers Inc. 1996 – 1997

Senior systems C/C++ analyst, architect and programmer primarily responsible for the development of an Oracle Server (7.3.2) "Data port" for
migrating CICS COBOL mainframe data processing to a RISC 6000 AIX 4.1.2 (UNIX) platform. The Data port (based on Logical Calculus and
written in C++ for AIX 3.1 and Pro C 2.2.2), processes daily financial feeds from the company's international cash register operations for
redistribution to other in-house UNIX systems. The systems are designed as an Interface CASE TOOL, providing (near) real time setup of
interface requirement specifications (eliminating need to re-program and test interfaces). The AI Data port provides a flat-file (ASCII, EBCDIC)
inter-process communications facility utilizing rule-based translation (physical & logical) to the Oracle DBMS. The System lexically scans and
processes a 14 mg flat file (approx. 2.5 million fields) with a CPU time under 1 second. (Project expectations: 10 minutes), and interfaces are
setup in minutes (not days).
Communications
Securities Industry Automation Corporation (SIAC) 1995 - 1996

Senior-systems analyst, programmer, and user trainer of heterogeneous data bridge for collection from 6 disparate systems, using 8 gateway
interfaces, and 26 data import paths. The gateway operates as an information concentrator, collecting, and organizing & standardizing
training/continuing education activities of NYSE and AMEX employees. The System generates departmental reports in lotus and DB format for
distribution to the senior SIAC management and departmental heads.
Goldman Sachs Corporation, Investment Banking Division 1995

Debt model analyst in GS in-house transition team, with interim responsibility for analyzing GS Whitehall Street Fund Debt & Valuation Models,
in preparation for outsourcing to external off-site Rapid Applications- Development (R&D) team from M.I.T.. These closed-end real estate models
(Oracle 7.1, UNIX) calculated cash flow & IRR as ownership percentages on asset, partnership and general fund levels. Responsible for
intensive analysis of 50 K of code and preparing SQL DML API "Wrappers" (views).
Cataldi & Associates - G.E. Capital Corp Initiative – 1994

Senior systems analyst, architect and programmer responsible for developing a cash flow modeling system (Windows 3.1, PowerBuilder 3.0,
C++/C DLLs, Oracle 7.0), supporting DBMS migration / data consolidation efforts involving real estate holdings. The system was broken down
into the following:
Cash flow Engine: Server generates financial forecasts based on pattern recognition algorithms.
Forecast Models: Ten year Standard Prorate/Cumulative Balance by Real Estate property type
Intelligent Agent: Server hunts for data migration / consolation problems in property DBMS.
The Fund for the City of New York, Inc. -The Ford Foundation - 1994 - 1994
Programmer on platform migration/ porting project. Compiler upgrade project (Turbo DOS C to Visual C++) involved building a "Wrapper"
around a self optimizing scheduling system (MFC, DDEML, ODBC).
G.E. Capital Corp., Capital Markets Group, 1992 - 1993 - Vendor

Lead architect - programmer/analyst of three cash flow modeling tools, providing quantitative analytical time series analysis of RTC/FDIC S&L
real estate portfolios (forecasting, valuation, risk mitigation). These tools unified the portfolio analysis process for large, diverse pools of mortgage
backed securities, rolling up cash flows, & drilling down sensitivities providing NOI, ROI, IRR, etc..
 Programmer of a financial data feed to Cash flow "Valuation" models.

 Architect/ lead programmer of a financial analytical modeling engine providing time-
series analysis and cash-flow modeling of multiple portfolio pools, reducing the
property DBMS & spreadsheet processes down to a simplified, unified, process.
 Developer of a business formula translator tool for real-time conversion of 3D Lotus & Quattro spreadsheets to financial models.
Costal Bend Council of Government Agencies - 911 Case Tool - 1993 – 1995
Developer of a CASE Tool, providing core services to Emergency Response System supporting processing of 911 emergency calls throughout
South Texas.
Private Bank, Citibank, N.A. - 1992 – 1993 - Vendor

Responsible for a Decision Support System for the Private Bank, in the area of investment management strategies. The LAN based system (C,
C++, ODBC SQL, and Sybase 10) provided a unified analytical platform for strategic analysis/ management of depositors with personal assets
exceeding $10 million.
Bristol Myers Squibb, Co. - 1991 – 1992

Programmer of a Novel-LAN based clinical trials pipeline (Paradox, C/Paradox Engine) providing operations & logistical support facilitating the
coordinated reporting of trial activities, in over 120 countries. Also developed GUI-based object repository, (C, Paradox), providing senior
management intuitive access to BMS's Corporate Enterprise Model (KnowledgeWare I-Case) of global operations.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey - 1990 - 1991
Senior programmer/ programmer analyst of the Structural Integrity Information Management System (SIIMS), providing quantitative analytic
modeling of load bearing structural defects and safety related conditions, for the bi-state agency's interstate rail and road transportation
structures and facilities. The system analyzed the George Washington Bridge and 175 St. Terminal; and 42 St. Bus Station; and Lincoln and
Holland Tunnels; and 3 Outer Gothels Bridges; and Path Train tunnels, ramps and bridges. SIIMS provided an analytic platform supporting a
standardized periodic infrastructure inspection process, analyzing qualitative and quantitative readings of defects, thermal displacements and
stress conditions. This network-based Expert System, was designed to track, correlate and predict the issues comprising the Federal Audits and
Major Work & Capital Programs.
Consumer Bank, Chemical Bank, 1989 - 1990
Chairman's Project Initiative

Communications
Architect and programmer of two DBMS. These systems provided senior management with time-series statistical analysis of back office
problem-resolution efforts involving customer requested activities, associated with the chairman's "Committed to Service" project.
Branch Unified Management Processes

R&D of a high capacity quantitative analytical modeling and data entry system, providing a time-series statistical analysis of customer traffic,
service demand, and resource utilization patterns and response times, in 254 area consumer branches in Tri-State area.
Citicorp, N.A., 1985 - 1991 - Vendor

North American Investment Bank, N.A. (Citibank NA), Specialized International Finance, Exotic International Products Divisions, Citibank
International Investment Bank, S.A. (CIBSA), Latin American Investment Bank, S.A., CitiTrust, Bahamas, Ltd.
Senior programmer/ analyst responsible for developing five Intelligent Document Generation Systems supporting Citicorp’s TWd derivative
trading floor operations (currency swaps). These 'Expert Systems' streamlined the secondary distribution efforts (highly structured swaps,
forwards & options) of Third-World debt and other international debt/ obligations & multinational loan syndication participation. Systems provided
real-time analysis of customized, multi-lingual, multi-party swap environments, preparing and tracking documentation and related
correspondence (pre & post trade, execution) for active deals to internal team, participants and referenced or affected parties. The systems
modeled the deal making environment preparing defect-free contracts, exhibits, schedules, consents and notices.
4.1.17: Videotext Industries, 1978 - 1983

President, founder of a Videotext (on line dissemination of text and graphics) Computer Service Bureau, headquartered in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. Business specialized in “Local Origination Databases, starting with extensive market and technical field trials, pilot programs and
service prototypes. Operated a Computer Service Bureau provided local information and communications to area computer owners (phone –
modem based subscribers). In-house team developed collection and publishing processes to automate publishing of locally originated content.
Other Projects included building Internet-like services for Chicago, and Cities in Texas and California in 1981 for Group-W Westinghouse.
Premier Public Sites, including Shopping Malls and Anchor Stores, like Gimbel’s Brothers – Midwest.
Communications
Appendix (E) - Letters of Intent
Conservatory Sailboat Rentals
1586 First Ave., 3A

New York, NY 10028
(917) 796-1382
18 November 2003
James A. Cataldi
President and Chairman of the Board
AWC
Dear James,
I am so looking forward to AWC future presence in Midtown Manhattan and Central Park. I am excited about awarding AWC Computing and
Communications, a Cataldi and Associates initiative, an exclusive contract to supply wireless Internet access for my business, and model
boathouse Portal service. It is my intention to subscribe as a commercial customer, and begin renting out PDAs and laptop computers as a
source of revenue to supplement my existing model sailboat rental business. I plan to make use of the exciting capabilities of the Wi-Fi
technology to enhance the customer’s experience. Moreover, I am looking forward to AWC helping me publish and host my first web site.
Having a web presence will profoundly contribute to marketing my business, especially to tourists planning a visit to the area.
Very Truly Yours,
Ron McKechnie
President
Summerstage
In Central Park
18 November 2003
James A. Cataldi
President and Chairman of the Board
AWC
Dear James,
I am very interested in AWC Wi-Fi Hot Spot technology and how it will serve the needs of Summerstage. Your wireless video production and
Internet broadcasting services would greatly expand and enhance the impact of the productions being presented at Summerstage. I look
forward to talking with you further about this.
Best Wishes,
Charlie Phynes
Director of Partnership Marketing
Communications
Appendix (F) - AWC Uptown Wireless Build

AWC uptown wireless builds – AWC Year planning/ testing/ R&D:
AWC principals have spent years (9-12-01) in preparation: product-development / market-sales/health-medical/legal research, planning (tactical
and strategic), technical research, technical field trials, fund raising, recruiting, training, engaging in initial direct sales and marketing campaigns
and programs, and in supporting the community schools, and out-reach programs.
Air Web Inwood Service, AWC operation

AWC is a value-added broadband Internet, intranet e-commerce and telephone provider; and a state-of-the-art wireless-network owner/service
operator, (and communications laser VAR) managing laser and wireless communications infrastructures on a neighborhood wide basis in target
geo-markets.
In conjunction with the network operations, AWC will operate chain of one-stop-shop, full-service, retail outlets, providing two complementary
multi-lingual service lines to area consumers (AWC) and businesses (Video Mart) linking the following:
1. Area residents and visitors; small and home businesses
2. Local and national merchants, product distributors, service providers and advertisers
3. Key industries, institutions and organizations
4. Outdoor and recreation facilities; transportation hubs and navigational waterways
AWC provides enhanced Internet connectivity, wireless Metro Area Networks, Grid Computing, and neighborhood-centric Portals, The
Company’s carrier-class technology provide a superior alternative to traditional telecommunications “last mile” common carriers. AWC wireless
networks are more convenient, accessible and versatile than services offered by today’s telephone, cable or satellite companies over traditional
copper, fiber optic, or direct by satellite links. AWC wireless networks are more secure, reliable, and comprehensive than other “Wi-Fi Hotspots”.
AWC Offerings are transmitted over a state of the art Neighborhood-based High-Speed, High-Security, Heterogeneous, Interoperable (including
Cat 6 compliant), High-Capacity Communications System. This system transmits at the FCC legal limit of 36 Dbi for “point to multi-point
communications”, in the FCC unlicensed 2.4 and 5.8 Giga hertz bandwidths, on 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g channels. Services availability is
7 by 24, 365 days a year, relying on advanced telephony, security and wireless technology, in-house level-3 fiber optic and (M1 & FCC 15 multi-
gigabit long range communications lasers and radios), Cat 6 ultra-high density routers, power generators, Expert Systems (AI) and primary
regional co-location facilities like TELx.
AWC’s business provides wireless and wired services as mobile and fixed location Internet and intranet based services.
1. Secured roaming and wire-free networking: A) M1 backhaul, M1 optical neighborhood “Web”, and B) neighborhood 802.11 a/b/g
2. Telephony: local, national, international, internet, neighborhood multi-media telephone, H.323 videoconferencing
3. High speed - broadband internet connectivity - optical, cat 6, radio 802.11
4. Portal Enhanced e-mail, SIP 2.0 video chatting, SIP 2.0 video conferencing/ Voice Mail
5. Neighborhood-centric information portal / intranet gateway
6. Interactive gateway portal : A) Retail/advertising/transaction processing, B) Gaming, educational, clubs, non-profit etc.
7. Neighborhood transaction portal
8. Managed personal, business and institutional web site hosting
9. Computer and resource time sharing
10. Desk-top applications servers, high end peripherals
11. Secured private / shared disk storage
12. High end color printers, video studio
13. Remote metering and tele-monitoring (smoke, fire, gas and panic)
14. High speed video broadcasting (programming)
15. Intruder / theft video surveillance
Competitive highlights included the following:
1. State-of-the-art, standards based services

2. Wireless retail service at wholesale prices
3. Comprehensive neighborhood-centric content
4. inter-operable, scalable, backward compatible technology
5. Load balanced and managed roaming network
6. Highest security, reliability and availability
7. Non-over subscribed telephone resource availability
8. Non-over subscribed Internet connectivity
AWI Digital-Phone highlights:

1. Service delivered over a regular wire (RJ 45 Cat line) or over the air/wireless.
2. Supports P.O.E., so we pay for the power to the telephone, or wired or wireless routers in our customer’s homes.
Communications
3. Supports migration of client’s existing phone number (Primary Number) with them, so they can keep your old number.
4. Any telephone (no special telephone needed) Simply plug into a telephone converter box; Cisco Analog Phone Adaptors
5. Includes free extras: like voice mail, caller id, etc.
6. Non-over subscribed Neighborhood Intranet connectivity
7. Full service, one stop shop retail outlets
8. Elite customer care and technical help desk support
AWI Services Offering

AWC offers two complementary state-of-the-art, locally originated lines of service; AWC Consumer targets the consumer / residential sector.
“VideoMart” targets the business / Institutional sector.
Air Web Inwood Consumers

AWC offers a wide range of tailored plans. Services offerings are:
1. Available in NYC area homes/apartments; streets; playgrounds, parks and ball fields; and on navigational waterways
2. Broken down into twelve tiers of communications, informational, interactive and transactional services
3. Offered through a wide range of tailored plans.
Secured connections are to be made directly from:

1. AWC transmitters to radios installed in laptops, PDAs, tablet devices, etc...
2. Mobile subscribers in vehicles or on watercrafts link indirectly to the AWC Broadcast Towers, through secured mobile repeaters,
mounted on the subscriber’s vehicle or watercraft.
AWI for Business - VideoMart

VideoMart is a point-of-purchase merchandising, point-of-presence advertising service which takes electronic signage and enhances customer
welfare benefits and network surplus to the next level. VideoMart delivers powerful audio-visual services to new prospects and repeat shoppers
in retail settings in premium real estate or high traffic public access locations, tied into national cooperative advertiser media campaigns in
magazines, newspapers, commercials and Internet sites. Point-of-purchase and point-of-presence media wall, Touch-sensitive terminals
merchandizing information centers, Cross-traffic visual impact centers, High definition flat panel displays, Medium/short range intelligent wireless
transmissions services. VideoMart enables area business, retailers and merchandisers, national suppliers, local sponsors and national
advertisers’ to provide customer service in even the most inaccessible high traffic location, at fractions of the cost of traditional billboard signage.
VideoMart provides flexible visual impact capability - from the “ma and pa” stores to large department store chains, malls and shopping centers
can afford to participate. VideoMarts kiosks housing graphically appealing electronic signage, printers and touch-sensitive terminals increased
customer service, reinforcing trademark, logo identification, and product/service need association.
Communications
Appendix (G) - Neighborhood-Portal Service Offering
Informational Centers
Around Town/Neighborhood
Calendar Walking / Emergency Pictures & Stories Past and Present
Sports Schedules & Reports News Community Services Current Weather & Forecasts
Transportation Road & Rail Historical Sites/Museums Welcome Wagon - Who just moved in?
Consumer Electronics “Baby Sitting” Services Language Translation Services
Special Events Government Restaurants
Problems/Emergencies Parking & Car Washes Snow Shoveling
Job Postings/Work Wanted Church/ Synagogue Services Ethnic Service Businesses & Retail
Lost and Found Street Maps Home Maintenance
Virtual Yard Sales “Second Hand Items” Parkland / Waterfront Better Business
Restaurants Neighborhood Watch Victim Services
Childcare/Companion Services Hometown Tours Complaints
Sites and Sights Clubs & Organizations Museums
“Cultural –Historical” Bakers and Butchers Park Sites and Sights; Events
Clothes Shopping Home Cleaning Services Local Publications
Barber & Beauty Parlors Apartment Broker & Real Estate Agents
Pets Rules and Regulations
Transactional Centers
Pizza/ Italian Foods Delivery Dry cleaning AW Drug Store Shopper
Chinese Food Delivery Laundromat AW Home Business Directory
Hispanic Food Delivery AW Food Shopper AW Pet Shop Shoppe
Car Services AW Bodega Shoppe AW Technology Best Buys & Help
Interactive Centers
Class Room Neighborhood Mail 911 Fire
The Game Master Neighborhood Chat & Chat Rooms 911 Police
Neighborhood Schools 311 non-emergencies Talk to your local Politician
Gateway Centers
Phone neighborhood Local Neighborhood Regional
Internet Network National
VideoMart Local International
Communications
Appendix (H) - Rates and Fees
Wireless Client Radio Rental Neighborhood Portal Service – continued

A type radio $7.49 standard $12.00 high end
B type radio $4.49 standard $07.00 high end Transactions (portal cash crédit)
G type radio $7.49 standard $12.00 high end $.25 crédit up to 30 per week
/ after 30 $.50 $0.99 monthly
Game Server (100 meg network)
Client Telephone Adaptors Rental State of the art) $39.99 monthly
Option a $15.00 down $15.49 monthly prize money, sponsored double purse + $39.00 monthly
Option B $115.00 down $07..49 monthly
Option C. $149.00 down $00.00 monthly Secure Over-the-Air Computer Networking
$0.99 roaming (per device) $4.99 monthly
extended roaming (per device) $9.99 monthly
Telephone services
Local $03.99 monthly Secure Over-the-Air “virtual” drives $0.99 monthly
Regional $07.99 monthly (per 100 megabit)
National $17.99 monthly Shared neighborhood “Desktop” $4.99 monthly
International (plus $0.2 per minute) $17.99 monthly (most popular Windows applications)
Video Surveillance (per camera – camera separate) $9.99 / $150 full motion
Internet monthly
1 Megabit $07.99 monthly Technology Support Level One $9.99 monthly
2 Megabit (Verizon $34.95 up to 1.5 Meg) $10.99 monthly
3 Megabit (Time Warner $44. up to 2.5 Meg) $14.99 monthly
5.5 Mégabit $23.99 monthly Other Services
7 Mégabit $44.99 monthly Medium Priority $09.99 monthly
15 Mégabit $88.99 monthly High Priority $19.99 monthly
24 Megabit $160.99 monthly Highest Priority $29.99 monthly
(How alone Consumer feel during peek load times)
Video Chat Electronic Mail Level One $0.49 monthly

Neighborhood (multimedia) $7.99 monthly Electronic Mail Level Two $4.99 monthly
One on one $0.00 monthly Ultra High Security (Radis Server) $6.99 monthly
Chat rooms $0.00 monthly (Note: using 802.11.1x and VPN included in standard service)
Monitoring (fire, smoke) $8.99 monthly
Neighborhood Portal Service Personal Web Site $8.99 monthly
Information $0.99 monthly Voice Mail $0.09 monthly
Interactive $0.99 monthly
Technology Support Level Two $19.99 monthly

Technology Support Level Three $29.99 monthly
Activate Service Wire Service $19.99 monthly
Activate Service Wireless Service $19.99 monthly
Activate Service Wire roaming Service $19.99 monthly
Install client radios $19.99 monthly
Install client telephone $19.99 monthly
Install client wired adaptor $19.99 monthly
Purchase a new Security card and Id $50.00 monthly
Communications
Appendix (I) - Parties Identified

Account Id: 8150210020040602:
Portal ID: 8150210020940402

Circuit ID: AIRNMENTEL001/AIRNMEL1001
CommPortal Account: 219 at COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_NYC_RR.COM
Host: 24,29,112,9.COM
Server: NYCMNYC_RC_RTR1_NYC_RR.COM
Implicated Interfaces: Gigabit Ethernet11 /3.4 802.Q VLAN, Intnum: 30, Intallias: Air Web
Gigabit Ethernet1/5, Gigabit Ethernet 5/1, Gigabit Ethernet 5/2
LANs: VLAN 001, VLAN 1002, VLAN 1003, VLAN 004, VLAN 1005
Network Edge Device: OM 1200 EMS: P05, GE-Media Dependent Adaptor: NNI
Configuration and Transparent LAN Services

Provisioning of Mapped Service Typed Ports: UNI #1 and UNI #2
30 IPs - Metro Ethernet Internet: LAN Connections assigned
28 IPs - 2-point (point-to-point) Metro Ethernet LAN Connections
AWC router was assigned 24.29.112.10 -Time Warner Cable to use 24.29.112.9
24.39.144.00, 24.39.144.01, 24.39.144.02, 24.39.144.03, 24.39.144.04, 24.39.144.05, 24.39.144.06, 24.39.144.07, 24.39.144.8,

24.39.144.9, 24.39.144.10, 24.39.144.11, 24.39.144.12, 24.39.144.13, 24.39.144.14, 24.39.144.15, 24.39.144.16, 24.39.144.17,
24.39.144.18, 24.39.144.19, 24.39.144.20, 24.39.144.21, 24.39.144.22, 24.39.144.23, 24.39.144.24.
24.29.112.8, 24.29.112.9, 24.29.112.10, 24.29.112.11, 24.29.112.12, 24.29.112.13, 24.29.112.14, 24.29.112.15, 24.29.112.15, 24.29.112.17,
24.29.112.18, 24.29.112.19, 24.29.112.20, 24.29.112.21, 24.29.112.22, 24.29.112.23, 24.29.112.24, 24.29.112.25, 24.29.112.26, 24.29.112.27,
24.29.112.28, 24.29.112.29, 24.29.112.30
Adversarial Parties:
Evidence collected indicates that the following entities are involved with this case: Time Warner Entertainment LLC, AOL/Time
Warner, Time Warner Cable , TWC, Time Warner Business Services, Time Warner – Soho, d/b/a Road Runner Commercial
Services,, Road Runner (RRM), Road Runner Holding Company LLC, RR-COMMERCIAL-NYC-4, ROAD-RUNNER-1,
ServiceCo, America Online, Inc., AOL Transit Data Network, Time Warner Telecom or TW Telecom, Nortel, Cisco/TAC, d/b/a
‘BigBrother.com’, ‘Routermon.net’, Level 3 Communications, Inc., d/b/a ‘Level3.com’, d/b/a unknown.level3.net’, Verizon,
SohoWare, NY Connect.
Non-culpable Parties:
1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the US: Part of our discriminatory analysis is based on comparing TWC’s practices
with Equitable Life and TWC’s practices with AWC. See portions of Equitable paperwork sent, we assume by mistake in
th
the March 25 Fax. Also the same people we are dealing with at TWC represent themselves as TWC Commercial
Services to AWC, however represents themselves as Road Runner Soho Commercial Service to Equable Life.
2. Cogent Communications; AWC’s wholesale carrier grade Internet supplier
3. Uptown Catholic Diocese Schools: tower rights and Space in exchange for revenue sharing and technology support
4. TELx and TELx tenants: Co-location facility; technical resources, complement suppliers and network interconnections to
other networks and carriers
5. Light Point and Sonic: M1 optical Sonnet compliant long range laser providers; used to build primary backhaul lines
interconnecting AWC neighborhoods
6. Omniplex: short range Sonnet compliant laser provider ; used to build out neighborhood “optical webs”
7. Cisco:
Communications
8. wire and wireless telecommunications Equipment and administration software Provider
9. Telephony Equipment Provider; SIP Server, SIP Gateway, SIP IPBX, SIP PBX, Call Manager
10. Security equipment Provider
11. Systems Software Provider
12. NBC Weather Bug: Provider of Equipment and services supporting neighborhood weather stations tied into educational
programming.
Communications
Appendix (J) - Analysis of ‘TWC Cover Letter’ – August 31st 2004

st
On August 31 2004 TWC sent a package containing all the legal documentation related to our case. A cover letter was sent in
this package, along with the forgery of the terms and conditions document, and attachment A and attachment D. Attachment D
was not present in the documents which we signed in February 2004.
The Cover letter substantially supports our case against TWC from the following points of view:
st st
1. August 31 Cover Letter states that AWC ordered ENET in February 2004, (out of 61 street)
a. But Telex found TWC for AWC, to fulfill a dedicated leased line (2 point or point to point) requirement from 60 Hudson to
620 Isham street
th
b. TWC attended formal tour at Telex facility, 9 floor: 60 Hudson,
c. we signed 2 point contract at end of tour
th
2. stated in the May 7 e-mail that:
a. TW network was over Sonnet
b. Needed to request connection out 60 Hudson.
th
3. stated in the Attachment A and May 7 e-mail that ENET and ELINE were Sonnet or Gigabit Ethernet grade, as per
specification (same spec as Sonnet)
4. TWC stated that ENET does not have a z location,

st
a. but Feb Service Order Form does have a z location (61 street)
b. but June Service Order Form does have a z location (60 Hudson)
rd
5. June 23 Service Order Form checked internet, intranet, and other boxes, and typed in ENET, but the Feb service Order
Form checked internet, his should mean that there is a connection to 60 Hudson with Ethernet, but TWC says we ordered
st
ENET out of 61 in Feb 2004.
a. and there is a connection to internet
b. and there is a Service called ENET
th
c. ENET and ELINE according to March 25 Attachment A forgery indicate
d. the network reliability is 99.999% Gigabit Ethernet grade, as per specification (same spec as Sonnet)
e. port reliability 99.99% Gigabit Ethernet grade, as per specification (same spec as Sonnet)
6. States that only changed amount, term to 60 months, and setup fee
a. but March and Aug client forgery of terms and conditions show that the term was forged to 30 days
b. that the setup amount does not match the bill
c. and the many other points on the Feb and June ENET Service Order Forms are different
d. Therefore there are not only not 3 items changed between Feb and June ENET Service order Agreements as TWC
states.
7. Since TWC states that AWC ordered ENET in February 2004, TWC is therefore not stating that we:
a. ordered the wrong specification
b. Wanted a connection to 60 Hudson, (had the case focused more on the type of connection promised, not tie AWC to
Road Runner class of service. Which would only support 100 users for $9,000 of connectivity), which comes to $900 per
account, per month.
c. That we are having a problem with what the specifications were to be.
d. AWC ordered ELINE, (which would have been their only reasonable defense to mitigate much of our case), this
statement that AWC ordered ENET in Feb 2004 is not supported by any evidence
e. ordered a dedicated leased line service, the only one they offer.
8. TWC is that are stating that we wanted to purchase road runner’s third party tier one IPs,
9. Look at the Air Web Communications Attachment; This states that AWC has the right to re-brand Road Runner.
th
10. Look at the May 7 2004 e-mail, which stated that we need to request a connection to 60 Hudson, however we met TWC at
th th
the Telex facility at the end our tenancy tour, when we signed execution documentation on 9 floor on February 26 2004.
Communications
11. That 2 services were installed, there should have been only one service installed at a time.
12. The service is installed; however there is no connection in the tenant location at Telex, therefore the service is not installed.
13. ELINE was installed first; however TWC was to activate ENET first. TWC was to activate the second order which was ELINE
after we requested it in writing. ENET was to be Ethernet to 60 Hudson and optional internet service for no extra charge.
14. ELINE was to be a dedicated leased line, not a dedicated fiber connection
15. ENET is a dedicated fiber connection that provides Internet, this is not true.
16. Z location is Woodside, but the order form specifies 60 Hudson, tenant location
17. Internet Access Provider assigned to AWC is only a tier one IPS, was to be an offer superior to Cogent’s Offer, Level 3 (free
of change option).
th pre paid
18. If the billing started on June 30, (look at legal TWC Lori letter) prepaid then AWC needed to Pay again on July 30 , not
th
Aug 12, 2004, pre-paid. We prepaid good faith before June 30 2004. If TWC started billing on June 30 2004, then AWC
th th
should have been obligated to again pre-pay 30 days in advance on July 30 2004, not August 12 2004. If Invoicing starts
th
on August 12, 2004, then service needed to start on July 12 2004.
19. NOTE AWC gave final rejection on Aug 12, 2004, over the phone.
th
20. Indicates that Terms and Conditions is in same condition signed in February 26
th
21. That both the ENET and May 7 e-mail shows ELINE the same price, making it easy to swap service we ordered in
th
February 26 2004, (dedicated lease line) with what TWC gave us (ENET).
th rd
22. Indicates that AWC had requirements meeting (March 26 ), however only delivers road runner accounts (3 party Road
Runner tier one IPS, over optical Ethernet layer one user to network interface), not optical Ethernet layer 3 to level 3 IPS).
This discriminatory action therefore disables all but our slowest service offerings. Making our service promises not
deliverable. Only slowest services, slower than road runner’s slowest service can be offered with non-aggregated road
runner accounts, and if then only 2 or 3 user tops will be happy sharing one of 30 to 47 Road Runner Accounts (what we
rd
were really sold) (Road Runner’s 3 party tier one IPS), only if not power users.
23. Indicates that service does not traverse the Road Runner Network, this is not true
24. Prices quoted not match bills sent out
25. Design Layout Record DLR for both ELINE and ENET don’t match the Order Forms
26. Shows that one of the connector types is very low standard
27. User to Network interface should be an Optical Carrier class interface is only a wire cat 5 RJ 45.
28. TWC is providing list of carriers at 60 Hudson, but we were at 60 Hudson before TWC moved our service out of 60 Hudson
to TWC regional Data Center. TWC was on AWC official Telex tenancy welcome tour in February 2004, when TWC
presented paperwork at end of tour, and needed no help developing a competition model against TWC. TWC is supporting
our case, that they attempted to deny benefits associated with 60 Hudson tenancy, and related charges in part admitting the
following:
29. knew that we wanted more than just internet
30. we wanted to carry tenant services at 620 Isham.
31. Make reference to a service center, and an escalation list; however there is no agreement on any aspect of the service,
connection, problem definition, or emergency resolution plan.
Communications
Note that the August forgery was different from the March forgery in that the technical description for ENET and ELINE were
restored to the accurate technical specifications August Attachment A. Note both the March and August forgeries made the
service 30 days not 60 month and dropped prohibition to resell service.
We signed June 23rd Service Order Forms.

Communications
Appendix (k) - Cover letters from Dr. Horace Cataldi and Mr. James Cataldi
March 21, 2005
Steven Tugander
US Department of Justice
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3630
Anti-Trust Division
New York City, NY 10278
Dear Mr. Tugander:
Permit me to introduce Cataldi & Associates; the better to assure you that C&A's James Cataldi's bid to enter the competitive
communication market as Air Web Communications is a very serious one, with realistic very high expectations for both marketing
and financial success. This optimism is based on Air Web's well reasoned business plan which is a natural evolution of a
business plan for another company previously owned by C&A's, Videotex Industries (1979 through 1986) which offered many
consumer services resembling some available today on the Internet and commonly accepted.
Videotex Industries comprehensive plan ** (with extensive documentation and recordkeeping) is the outgrowth of four and 1/2 in
years research in marketing, technologies, engineering, site locations (large department stores, malls), sales and financial
projections, software development, kiosk design, investor interest, inter alia.
C&A, in the 1980s, competed with several joint ventures of large newspaper syndicates, telephone companies, Teleprompter
(cable networks), etc. with field demonstrations, for a niche in the retail business which was perceived as a large market for
Videotex type services. As President, James headed up marketing efforts during this feasibility phase. Unfortunately, the
brightest ideas of the communications industry were trumped by the inadequate power of computers of the era, and one by one,
everyone dropped out of the competition -- except the cable companies who won the franchise wars, but they never acted to
perform and comply with their promises.
Our appointment as AT&T-IS's (Information Systems) first value-added rep (VAR) was a source of valuable experience. Our
experience with ATT was actually enjoyable and strictly on a handshake basis. Unhappily, the happy experience with ATT did
not prepare James for his encounter with the sharpies of Time Warner, years later.
In time James moved to Inwood, established himself as a consultant in the financial world, acquiring extensive experience in
business modeling, and wireless communications. All this ended when his last client, a large international bank next to the World
Trade Center was destroyed when the Towers came down.
Looking around for an appropriate challenge for his unique set of experiences, he recognized one in his own, starting to-stir
neighborhood, Inwood. Air Web Communications is born in enterprise, with challenges eminently matched to James'
experience.
The rest of the story is sketched in James's account, attached.
Sincerely,
Dr. Horace A. Cataldi - PhD Chem. Engr.

Cataldi & Associates Inc. - President
2516 E. Menlo Blvd.
Milwaukee, WI 53211
414-332-6786
** This VideoText Industries Business Plan is at the corporate headquarters and available for inspection
Communications
March 21, 2005
Steven Tugander
US Department of Justice
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3630
Anti-Trust Division
New York City, NY 10278
Dear Mr. Tugander:
Over the past month I, James Cataldi, contacted TWC on behalf of Air Web Communications and Cataldi & Associates, Inc.. I
communicated with them both over the phone and in person, primarily to seek a reasonable solution to our mutual problem. We
rd
started direct communications , first by phone on February 3 , 2005 and then in a meeting at Time Warner Cable’s offices
rd th , th
located at 120 East 23 street, on the 11 floor on February 10 2005, and then again over the phone until February 19 2005.
Having completed our in-house investigation, we took this step to communicate with Time Warner because we needed to be
sure of our charges against Time Warner Cable. Our in-house investigation and the case we developed against Time Warner
Cable and its affiliates, clearly shows, in our judgment, that Time Warner Cable repeatedly committed regulatory, criminal and
antitrust violations against Air Web Communications, a division of Cataldi & Associates, Inc..
This attempt to communicate with Time Warner was our final attempt to resolve issues by restructuring the AirWeb/Time Warner
transactions, in order to unwind anti-competitive effects, and eliminate antitrust-exclusionary market-barrier impact against Air
Web Communications and NYC. Our second objective for communicating with Time Warner was to test our theories and
charges, by confronting Time Warner Cable directly, in order to observe their reaction and collect any additional information or
evidence regarding the anti-trust case against Time Warner Cable.
Below we summarize the main points that we developed over these past 2.5 weeks. Everything which we observed, heard, or
collected as hard evidence, completely supports our understanding of actual events and thus supports our case, and we found
nothing which did not support our case.
Additionally, Time Warner Cable, two weeks in a row, last week and again this week, completely ignored what it promised to do,
and therefore we see only a continuing pattern of obfuscation; Time Warner does not follow up on promised action, not even to
return phone calls.
This week we setup a meeting for tomorrow, but Time Warner Cable refused to confirm the meeting. Over the past two plus
weeks, Time Warner Cable “officially” asked to be sent a new ‘request for service’, and have it sent by e-mail ASAP (however this
does not necessarily apply to the Sale Rep, Durso, as his primary objectives and personal goals appear to be different). To that
end, they appeared to be willing to say anything to get such a communications from Air Web Communications. We are confident
that Time Warner Cable is still not acting in good faith, as the following points show:
1. We received two initial responses from Time Warner Cable on our voice mail. The first response was from the TWC
sales representative “Durso” calling from home (he said that he was working out of his home). The second response
was from his boss, the Business Unit’s Marketing Manager, James Hickey. From the recorded messages, it appears
that Hickey did not realize that Durso also had contacted us.
2. In the initial phone conversations, TWC appeared very interested in meeting in order to re-start a process which would
allow Time Warner to unwind problems with the AWC service-provisioning which we contracted for through several
signed documents in 2004.
3. TWC left several voice mail messages over the past two weeks which supports our case including two calls from the
billing department asking for roughly $90,000.00, while James Hickey calls and says billing is a mistake since obviously
we are not and have not been using service of any sort. (These taped phone messages are preserved and available)
Communications
th rd
Last Meeting: 10 February 2005 at TWC offices: 120 East 23 street - Main Point
1. The VP of Business Services Bob, the unit’s lawyer Lori, the Marketing Manager Jim Hickey, and the account-rep David
Durso attended the noon meeting. Including me, AirWeb was represented by three individuals.
TWC attempted to frame the meetings’ objective ‘to give us what ever we wanted’, acting as if they were extremely
worried and didn’t understanding what we want; only in hindsight does it appear that TWC wanted (needed) AirWeb to
request a new service (requirement specification) in some formal delivery method, ultimately e-mail. This February
TWC is attempting to cancel the old transaction, (paying out nothing on a $90,000 bogus bill) and starting over. This is
extremely compelling and strongly supports our case. Although we are not certain, we believe that this was essentially
only a tactical trap to evade legal consequences of the existing legal documents. We demand services at least as
“good”, and with terms that are at least as “good” as we were contractually promised.
th th
The February 10 2005 meeting, was the first time TWC attempted to lie about what was ordered on February 26
2004. The lawyer stated that AWC had ordered ENET (Road Runner Commercial Services), and they all acted as if we
would agree that we had ordered internet (ENET) from day-one, yet we argued strongly at the time.
During the entire meeting TWC made no reference to any past history or Time Warner Cable misconduct. Every time we
attempted to bring up such matters they changed the subject, asking us what we ‘Wanted, or Needed, or Required’.
They were lying to me about even the very service we ordered (it was not ENET) - which supports our document fraud
case, yet I believed that there was no hope that TWC would begin to act in good faith.
Something else also bothered me, on the surface, this current TWC position seems an unwise legal position, as they
th
could have simply avoided the issue. TWC was attempting to impose a superseding order, June 24 Effective Date,
th th
even though TWC carried forward the February 26 – March 11 Effective Date Terms and Conditions and Exhibits into
th
the June 26 Order (one of two). Why create such a complicated legal mess without good reason, I reasoned.
2. Time Warner did not want to discuss anything old, and we did not want to give away too much either. All TWC wanted
to know is what we wanted, what we needed, what we required now; over and over, and ultimately again by E-mail.
3. Time Warner Cable tried to control the meeting, and act as if they had called the meeting with an objective; we did the
same, so there were two simultaneous meetings, in essence, our meeting and their meeting.
We made it clear to Durso that we were meeting for the express purpose of restructuring the transaction, to unwind the
anti-competitive impact without assistance from regulatory enforcement. All the TW participants acted and looked guilty
to me, from the beginning to the end, and as we collected more information and evidence, all began to understand what
we understood and were headed for; all Time Warner people seemed increasingly concerned and very worried.
4. TWC refused or ignored several direct, specific requests for Time Warner to produce documentation of the current status
of the AirWeb account; nor would they give us a bill, nor a description of service-state. TWC also refused to provide the
required SLA matrix (Service Level Agreement guarantees), as promised many times over the past year.
TWC refused to offer any explanation of why we may have misunderstood the true nature of the service, provisioning, or
contractual obligations. Additionally, all Time Warner Cable people attending the meeting of 02-10-05 avoided all
references to the past; including stating that they did not understand ‘the monolog’ (our description of the past) and only
asked what we require, need, or want. Time Warner Cable had one apparent goal: to get AWC to send an e-mail
requesting that a New Service begin, and requesting Discontinuation of the existing service.. The V.P of the group
stated that he did not care what it said, “it could be just a few lines long."
5. Through the entire meeting, all the TWC people acted guilty, and very suspicious, in our opinion, not willing to talk about
anything in the past, as if we had an audience and they were hiding the truth from the audience such as TW superiors;
superiors or legal. This is the only way that the meeting makes any sense, as they cut us off every time we tried to bring
up any charges from the existing situation, or history.
 Instead of discussing the past, all the TWC people repeatedly stated, around 20 times, that they did not know what
we required. There was no reference to not what we signed, or were contractually committed to. In hind sight it is
clear that TW really wanted or needed was for us to send them a description of what we wanted, or needed, or
required, in order to somehow compromise our case.
Communications
 Based on the past 3 weeks we have come to believe this a strategic tactic to void the old transaction shell, and
evade all legal scrutiny, responsibility and liability, including destroying evidence or altering records or evidence.
6. TWC Lawyer (in the January 2005 meeting) specifically stated that AWC had ordered ENET. This is not the case – We
ordered 2-point Gigabit Ethernet Fiber with Sonnet technical specifications, interconnecting our two tenant locations
between 60 Hudson and 620 Isham in Manhattan, NYC.
TWC lawyer stated (same meeting) that everybody gets the same contract. Not True, our paperwork is uniquely
discriminatory and predatory, it is neither normal for an ISP nor is it normal for a business customer. We have hard-
copy proof: a copy (e-mailed to us by mistake) of what “Equitable Life” signed with the same TWC people, in the same
time period, under the name, Commercial Services – Road Runner Soho; not “Time Warner Commercial Services”:
a. therefore this is not true, as the evidence shows: see “Effective Date” language placed in the first paragraph of
th
the February 26 Terms and Conditions document, as compared with the Equitable Life contract language.
b. this shows that the lawyer is not accurate, and to the contrary, the AirWeb Language is highly discriminatory.
7. TWC lawyer attempted to state that there are only two possible situations, either we are happy or unhappy with the
service as provided. Realistically, at this point, the AirWeb/Time Warner situation has very little to do with the actual
service, it has to do with illegal regulatory, criminal and antitrust activities performed with malice and forethought.
8. TWC lawyer stated that everybody gets the same contract; however we have proof that this is not the case, even if you
ignore the facts regarding the contract forgery. We believe that we have uniquely discriminatory language in our Terms
and Conditions, and believe we can prove it was fraudulently inserted after the contracts were signed. In response to
our question regarding contract language in our ‘contracts’, which is obviously different than the ‘Equitable’ contract
language, the TWC lawyer stated she “did not change the language after AWC signed it”, but that is not what we asked.
th
9. TWC lawyer fought hard not to permit AWC to leave with a copy of the March 25 forgery (the original document and yet
new to us). She tried to take documents away after it was presented and we started to point out in detail the forged
changes within this new document; and we matched up the ENET order form, with the order form TWC claims was our
th
ENET order (February 26 2004). NOTE: There was no Attachment D (ENET).
th
10. TWC lawyer acknowledged the 67 day past due date was being ignored since Oct 7 2004, and that as of last week the
billing s was still ongoing; now over $90,000 claimed due for non-existent services.
11. TWC claims that No original documents remain, and thus our documents become the best ‘originals’ in existence, if
Time Warner is to be believed. We, on the other hand, have maintained careful records and documented each identified
conflicting or varying aspect of the case. TWC refused to provide any original documents, stating that they don’t exist.
Time Warner also stated that there was no difference between copies and originals. This made us more confident
th
about our belief that the actual February 26 2004 order form is also a forgery (as well as supporting our entire case).
th
12. We obtained a new, different, additional copy of the March 25 forgery which was handed to us from the personal file of
st
rep Durso This is different from the August 31 copy.
 We were allowed to keep this document, only after we demanded that they call the police.
 Additionally, the TWC lawyer first refused to hand over the contract for our inspection, however the sales manager
gave it to us for study, at which time the lawyer asked the manger if he knew what he was doing, and was he
completely sure he understood the possible implications of his action. As of last week there were two different
copies of the same Terms and Conditions, and now this new document established that actually there are at least
three (3) versions of the “Contract” we signed only once.
 We now have three copies, of the same forged technical specifications of the TWC Metro Ethernet services.
13. Early in the meeting lawyer stated that AWC owed $90, 0000 because they didn’t know what we didn’t “like” about our
service, or something close to that.
 Later in the same meeting the marketing manager stated that since there were no tape recorders present, and it
would not leave the room, that he would admit that AWC would not be charged as AWC had not used any service.
 When I asked if the pre-payment money would be returned, the manager stated 'Yes’.
Communications
14. Sales rep stated that TW Telecom was a client; however TW Telecom is a controlling affiliate, 48% owned by TWC. TW
Telecom is the company on the property sheet of the Order Form used for June Orders, and we believe also the
February order form. The AirWeb order form appears to come from the TW Telecom document library. Also TW
Telecom appears to be in our network logs as a hostile intruder.
Saturday Phone call to TWC Sales representative’s home
1. We communicated privately with the TWC sales rep, calling him at his home, and the rep calling back from his personal
cell phone while he was at his mother-in-laws house. It was at this time that I informed him that we were preparing to
formally file a request for criminal anti-trust investigation and we detailed some of the key points of our case against
TWC. I analyzed the TWC sales representative’s reaction very carefully: he behaved very nervous and was very
serious, and very concerned/ worried. In direct response to my stating that perhaps I should not be bothering him at
home, (although as the voice mail shows, he invited me to do so, and left the phone number), Durso clearly responded
by stating that our antitrust case was not frivolous and that he understood that we were very serious.
2. Durso also stated that even though TWC understood that AWC had approached the DOJ, they did not yet understand it
was an antitrust case. So what was TWC worried about if this is true. We believe much of our case is still hidden; part
of the TWC case which we suspect, however can’t proof, may in fact be true, including a strong and compelling motive,
as well as what exactly was provisioned, who would benefit, and how.
When I directly asked TWC sales rep “Durso” to cooperate with our federal investigation, and we would request “Whistle
Blowers” status protections, I was surprised by his response. His response was: “Would they have to know”. I assume
‘they’ was Warner. We assume this meant that possibly Durso was afraid of Time Warner retaliation.
3. However DURSO asked me to wait, and give TWC one last chance (“paraphrased”), because he strongly believed that
TWC would give us what we required, thus AWC did not need to file a complaint with the DOJ. I reminded Durso that
TWC would have to unwind the anti-competitive and exclusionary impact of transaction towards a zero sum gain. He
acknowledged and assured that he understood exactly what we required, and had never been confused on this issue.
4. I told TWC rep (Durso) that we would file if there was no good-faith-effort on the part of TWC before Friday 5:00 pm. In
response to that, (or soon thereafter), TWC representative Durso stated that if we filed “all hell would break loose”.
Sunday Phone call to TWC Sales representative’s home
1. I stated that we would not comply with Time Warner’s verbal request for AirWeb to re-order a new service, and
specifically request discontinuation of the service as currently provisioned, as we were concerned it is only a legal trap
to void the entire fraudulent contract transaction.
2. I stated that we wanted what had been promised, not what had been delivered.
3. TWC rep (Durso) stated that he knew that we required, (starting with an OC 12), this supported our concern about a
bad faith objective for TWC insisting upon a document sent to them through formal delivery method, like e-mail.
4. TWC rep promised to call back on Monday.
Thursday Phone call to TWC Sales representative’s office phone
1. TWC never called, however. In fact there were no calls or contact until we called Thursday late afternoon. As the Friday
deadline was almost upon us.
2. Sale rep (Durso) claimed that TWC was waiting for AWC to call and again he requested that we send an e-mail
describing what our new order requirements were. I suspect that he never communicated the true nature of the
weekend (Sat and Sunday) calls to his superiors. Additionally, from the meeting we believe that Durso is not directly
involved, nor has he been for some time.
3. TWC rep (Durso) stated that in his judgment, TWC still wanted to work issues out, and would get back to us on Friday.
Communications
4. When we call, TWC rep (Durso) states that the “Competition thing is not a problem anymore”, and that “it is off the table
now”. He was speaking very nervously and was concerned about what he was saying, it appeared to us.
5. TWC rep, Durso stated that there were a lot of circuit drawings around, (implying schematic drawings of our area), and
that he could sent out drawings which would show us that we would really get what we thought we were getting. He also
stated that we could have access to a fractional OC 48. We believe that this was not available last year. We believe
that it is also suspicious in many respects.
Friday Phone call to TWC Sales representative’s office phone
1. I left a stern message about 800 am, requesting a plan unwinding the anti-competitive and exclusionary impact.
2. Rep Durso leaves message with one of our consultants, which supports our case, in our judgment.
3. On two different calls to two different AWC people, TWC sales representative Durso stated that his e-mail to AWC had
been returned and that “they were mad”, implying TWC people were mad at him. We tested our e-mail accounts, by
sending ourselves a message, they were not returned, and therefore we believe Time Warner filtered Durso’s outbound
email to AirWeb, but Durso did not know this (same rep we discussed DOJ immunity in exchange for fully cooperating
with the investigation).
4. On Friday Rep Durso stated that he was not permitted to speak to us anymore. He added that he had no idea what the
Time Warner lawyer and his manager Hickey intended to do (as if he really wanted to work things out but was in trouble
for sharing too much, or he had no power or authority in this matter anymore).
Friday Phone call to TWC Marketing Manager’s office phone
1. As our last attempt to give Time Warner every opportunity to correct the AirWeb problem without requiring outside help,
we contacted Hickey, the Business Services Marketing Manager. He attempted to make us wait one week to give us a
quote. This exactly one year to the day since we signed the original contract. When we mentioned that we could not
pass over that date, he appeared to fully understand what we were talking about.
2. Again he tried aggressively to get us to send a formal e-mail request, and dictated to us what we were to say. “AWC
requests the following ……” Both these last two points are a serious concern to us.
3. I reminded TWC that the only service, in accordance with our requirements, and as was contractually obligated through
th
the March 25 forgery, was the OC 12. TWC manager Hickey stated that the price would go up from the 2004 $6,000
quote; because the original offer was bundled with two services that we wanted no longer.
However, this is not the case; as we told Hickey, Time Warner swapped in ENET, indicating Internet connection was
optional and free of charge with the connectivity to 60 Hudson. Our entire case is built around Metro Ethernet,
embodied in the first two orders which TWC is attempting to hide and now to run from.
4. Marketing Manager Hickey admitted that only one wire was pulled for AirWeb service as currently provisioned, and the
service obviously was provisioned half duplex.
5. Finally Market Manager Hickey promised to confirm, before weekend, a tentatively scheduled meeting on Wednesday
th
however he did not call back. We believe that TWC attempted to stall in order to delay our filing until after February 25
2005, in order to exceed the statute of limitations.
Communications
More proof of our case against TWC which we collected last week
1. Before meeting, the “Portal” (Wire Fraud #2) was still up, and working as usual. This indicated that the circuit was active
although still going through V.A. and AOL and Road Runner headquarters.
2. After the meeting TWC pulled down the Portal, however left the IP addresses (IP banks up). If the Portal was truly linked
to the AWC services, then the Portal would be up if the Service was up.
3. Next, one of the two banks (ranges of IP addresses) went down. (Service Order One)
4. Then the next IP bank went down. (Service Order Two) Except for 4 IP addresses.
5. We found press release around same time TWC starts to bill us for service.
The Press Release states that in California TWC is in Wi-Fi.
6. We found press release released around same time TWC starts to bill us for service.
The Press Release states that in Texas TWC is an ISP (internet service provider).
7. In February 7 2005, a TWC and Nortel joint press release quotes same V.P. we are dealing with, crediting him to be the
VP of Commercial Services of Time Warner Cable of New York and New Jersey. We knew of him as TWC Business
Services and Road Runner Business Services, now he is TWC Business Services of New York and New Jersey.
8. TW Telecom quoted $750 for 10 Meg and 6,600 for gigabit Ethernet. Based on this TWC over charged, however TWC is
now indicating that the quote for the OC 12 (622.05 Meg) will go up even more. This seems discriminatory pricing.
In closing we are confident that there is much more to our case which we trust a formal investigation will expose. We also believe
that we are essentially accurate about our observations and conclusions, aside from interpretation of law; we had no legal review
or assistance. Through our versions over the past 8 months, we have never wavered from the truth, and any analysis or change
in opinion or viewpoint came through the introduction of more information; and as stated above, there is more that we are not yet
alleging because we can’t yet prove it to ourselves, beyond a reasonable doubt. Likely, much of it will be proven true however.
Immediate problems: TWC Denial of contractually promised Service, & illegal Terms and Conditions
We have a major client, CUNY, City University of New York, who we need to deliver service to as well as other major clients and
partners. We need the service agreed upon contractually and explicitly, under the “original” terms and conditions specified before
the contract language began to change.
As over 1 year has passed, with 4 separate, and independent attempts to arrive at even a compromise agreement, and in light of
Time Warner Cable and its’ affiliates actions (and inaction) most recently, we request and require immediate injunctive relief.
Therefore we respectively request a formal investigation into regulatory and criminal matters relating to Time Warner’s antitrust
behavior against AirWeb and NYC. As damages continue to grow, and with the ability to recover from Time Warner’s actions
and inactions becomes less realistic, we need Time Warner Cable to honor its’ contractual obligations, with respect to service we
mutually contracted for, and to do so immediately, while we sort through the investigation and its’ conclusions.
We need a court ordered injunction against Time Warner Cable and all others involved with them in Wireless markets, where we
can show a clear relationship of antitrust impact. Also, we demand that TWC provide AWC with the service we require, at a price
which is fair and reasonable under the circumstances, with a zero sum gain. Time Warner must not be allowed to profit from this
behavior.
Most respectfully,
Mr. James A. Cataldi

Air Web Communications - President
49 Seaman Avenue, Suite A1
NYC, New York 10034
212-569-1723
Communications
Appendix (L) - Background Information found on Internet
Background information found on the internet (found searching with search engines)
 In its memorandum of understanding, Time Warner stated that it would open its networks to ISPs. But there's no
law against saying one thing and doing another because the regulators did not make it legally binding.
 Despite Time Warner’s repeated and insistent assurances it wants to and will provide open cable Internet access
to competing Internet service providers, it three-year contract agreements is saying another thing entirely. (as did
AWC, however we see Time Warner attempting to deliver AWC tier I consumer grade, and never treated AWC as
a IPS. In our judgment, we approached the market in a way Time Warner did not anticipate.)
 The open access debate for cable Internet services has been under intense scrutiny since February, when Time
Warner (NYSE:TWX) and America Online, Inc., released its open access memorandum of understanding, in order
to appease Federal Communications Commission officials overseeing the merger.
 In return for issuing the MOU, Time Warner and AOL (NYSE:AOL) officials asked regulators not to make the
document legally binding as a condition to the merger.
 Secret services: Because of a non-disclosure agreement signed with Time Warner, ISPs have been reluctant to
provide details of the agreement terms. (AWC’s only non-disclosure was in the form of press releases and public
announcements.)
Source for the following: internetnews.com (obtained a copy of one of these confidential agreements and the terms
imposed. According to the contract, there are a lot of stipulations that smaller ISPs say will make it almost impossible to
offer competing cable Internet services, as the open access memo stated earlier this year.
This section is edited, not for intent:
 IPS prepays $50,000

 Is required to pay, 75 percent of subscription revenues would go to Time Warner. Also
 the cable provider is demanding 25 percent of any cable-access advertising, web hosting and e-commerce
revenues
 Time Warner advertisements placed on the top of every ISP home page.
 Time Warner will send the monthly bill direct to the customer, giving the ISP the appearance of an unnecessary
middleman.
 Time Warner sets the termination policy, enforcing its standards on every ISP that participates.
 for every cable television subscriber who opts to receive the competing ISPs Internet service
 Time Warner gets $30 of that monthly rate.
 And if the ISP doesn't subscribe .5 percent of its potential customers, Time Warner can terminate the contract
after one year.
 Imagine all the people
Stephen Heins, NorthNet Internet Service marketing director, said Time Warner officials knew full well no ISP
would ever sign such a contract.
 "We've heard the ongoing public relations soft and cuddly (statement), 'Yes, we're working on open access' from
Time Warner, but the reality of the term sheet speaks for itself," Heins said. "In fact, they've left nothing on the
table for ISPs."
 We understand this is no free lunch," Heins continued, "and we aren't trying to steal their cable from them. We
just want a wholesale revenue stream to provide overall solutions to high-speed Internet access, and whoever
provides the best tech support, services and prices, wins."
 To date, the FCC has maintained cable access is not within its purview, and matters like the cable debate were
more suited for the Federal Trade Commission and the market regulating itself.
 But the AOL/Time Warner deal underscores the increased presence converging technologies will play in the not-
to-distant future. While not commercially available, the technology to provide cable telephony services is certainly
possible. When that service becomes available down the road it might be too late for the FCC, who has authority
over telecommunications regulation, to step in and correct the mistakes made.
 Dave McClure, president of the U.S. Internet Industry Association, said in an interview open access was never
Time Warner's intention from the beginning, and the FCC is doing little to prevent the merger from happening.
Communications
 "Time Warner was never looking for small ISPs to use their cable service," McClure said. "They will carefully
select the largest two or three providers to become their marketing partners. It was never about providing open
access, because Time Warner doesn't want that.
 "The sad part," McClure continued, "is that consumers will not be able to decide between competing services,
because they'll all be Time Warner using a different name."
 Ask not what your Telco can do for you
McClure said the FCC won't do anything to rock the boat, and that ISPs and consumers should look to the
Federal Trade Commission for help.
 "We're very dissatisfied with the FCC, and it’s clear that we're going to have to go to the FTC for any help in this
matter," McClure said.
 But the FCC has been taking a close look lately at the two companies, and may be having second thoughts to a
quick merger approval.
 Earlier this year, Time Warner cut off Disney-owned ABC-TV for 48 hours over a contract dispute. And last month,
a preliminary proposal from the European Commission rejected the AOL/Time Warner merger on the grounds it
would stifle competition.
end of edited section
Related articles
FCC Investigates High-Speed Internet Service Roy Mark
[September 29, 2000] The critical issue is whether or not the FCC should require open access to cable and other high-
speed systems.
Who Needs the Money? Patricia Fusco

[September 20, 2000] The former Bell companies complain that reciprocal compensation is costing them billions of dollars
per year. There's no right or wrong, just different ends of a copper wire.
The FCC's Insecurity Patricia Fusco

[September 15, 2000] Thursday's monthly meeting of the FCC was supposed to include a discussion of the "open access"
cable issue. It failed to even open up the debate, let alone deliver a national broadband policy.
Internet Telephony: America Is Waiting William Kennard

[September 14, 2000] Remarks by FCC Chairman William E. Kennard at the Voice Over Net Conference, September 12,
2000, Atlanta, Georgia. Key themes include the myth of the level playing field, the importance of the nascent VoIP
industry, and a plea that the competitors behave better than the incumbents.
Time Warner Admits Mistake Jim Wagner

[August 11, 2000] Time Warner Friday announced it had reached a settlement with SBC Communications. SBC had found
evidence that a Texas office of Time Warner was asking local employees to scout out the SBC network.
Can Open Access Overcome Cable Pain Threshold? Patricia Fusco

[June 2, 2000] Why has a White House Memo on Open Access been buried for a year? The memo is a detailed
technological piece that illustrates how complex open access is for both cable companies and independent Internet
service providers.
Fighting Incumbents in an Election Year Patricia Fusco

[June 1, 2000] While Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) such as Covad and Rhythms fight legal battles just to
do business, incumbents (ILECs) such as SBC spend billions to change the shape of their networks to render written laws
useless, and government agencies require 270 days
Time Warner: (underlined sections are areas of particular interest) Looking at the background environment with Time
Warner with regard to equal access, we see that there is a compelling evidence of a wide spread practice, however AWC
case has some unique elements which make the AWC case a worthy case for prosecution. The following section also
speaks to the motive, and to what extent AWC represents a threat to Time Warner’s long standing policy about saying
one thing and doing another thing.
Communications
Iron-fisted Cable Access Term Sheet for ISPs — continued
11. Billing and Customer Service

TWC will invoice the customers to which it sells the Service. ISP shall have the option to invoice customers to which it
sells the Service, or to have TWC invoice such customers at a monthly billing charge payable by ISP of $.50 per Service
subscriber invoiced. The invoicing party will remit payment to the other party for the other party's share of subscriber
revenues no later than 30 days after the end of month in which such revenues were received revenues from Service
customer. If a TWC invoiced customer pays only a partial payment, the payment will be allocated proportionately among
the Service and other TWC services, with TWC remitting twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount allocated to the Service
to ISP (subject to minimum payments as set forth herein. TWC will have sole discretion over Subscriber termination
policies, including without limitation for non-payment. ISP will remit to payment to TWC for TWC's share of Ancillary
Revenues no later than 30 days after the end of the month in which ISP received such revenues. This is TWC and
ServiceCo motivation to stop AWC and C&A.
The Definitive Agreement will define "Tier I" and "Tier II" issues. Each party will handle any Tier I calls or emails directed
to it, with a handoff to the other party if necessary. ISP will handle Tier II customer service, except that TWC will handle
Tier II customer service for those aspects of the service and facilities TWC is responsible for providing. So we were
treated as end users not souring internet connectivity, as we were a tier one, coming over level 2 (interfacing to a level 1
copper connection)
12. Local Franchise Requirements

ISP will agree to abide by the terms of any local franchise obligation regarding the provision of the Service on the TWC
cable systems that, in TWC's judgment, are applicable to it, including, without limitation (x) charging and remitting to TWC
for payment to local franchise authorities (or, if directed by TWC, paying to franchise authorities directly) the applicable
franchise fee on the Service when sold by ISP; and (y) complying with any customer service, disclosure, quality of service
and other requirements (including providing subscribers with copies of the privacy policy); and (z) the provision of the
Service to persons, places or institutions without charge. TWC will provide ISP with notice of such requirements and the
parties will cooperate on such compliance matters.
13. Privacy
Each party will comply, and assist the other in complying, with all applicable laws and regulations respecting collection,
use, disclosure and protection of subscriber information. TWC shall use reasonable efforts to comply with ISP's customer
privacy policies, provided however that to the extent ISP's privacy policies are inconsistent with, and in some way a
limitation on TWC's current or anticipated business uses of such information, ISP agrees to take whatever action
necessary to modify its policies with respect to conform with TWC's business objectives.
14. Customer Policies and Procedures

The parties will agree upon policies and procedures to be maintained by each of them with regard to the customers, for
the benefit of each other and the customers. Areas will include, without limitation, (i) acceptable use policies; (ii)
procedures to enable each party to take advantage of the notice and takedown provisions of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act; (iii) procedures for other takedowns of posted content and denial of service; (iv) response to subpoenas; (v)
response in emergency situations; and (vi) minimum standard service terms, including limitations of liability for the benefit
of both parties.
15. Video Streaming- Telephony

Video streaming and telephony will be permitted as part of the Service, subject to the following provisions:
The Service will not include any local telephony services requiring special gateways, powering, software or equipment, or
that otherwise could cause TWC to be subject to regulation as a common carrier of telecommunications services by any
state public utilities commission, the FCC or otherwise, or other adverse regulatory consequence.
TWC will not be required to provide QoS support for telephony or video streaming for the Service QoS may be provided
upon request and at an additional cost.
Communications
To the extent ISP wishes to offer any functionality as part of the Service which: (a) is outside the scope of the Network
Architecture; (b) requires an Operator acquire equipment or software or implement a change in the way the Operator
processes, TWC shall have the right to approve such new functionality , provided however that in the event TWC
approves such functionality, ISP will be obligated to reimburse for TWC its direct, out-of-pocket costs in implementing
such new functionality.
16. Term
With respect to each Operator, three years from launch of the Service by such Operator.
17. Responsibility
Subject to any restrictions and exceptions specified in the Definitive Agreement, ISP will have control over and
responsibility for all content, applications, functionality and services included in the Service, except that TWC will have
control over and responsibility for the portion of the Service allocated to the TWC local service.
18. Subject to Pre-existing Obligations

Any Definitive Agreement which the parties may reach will be subject to TWC's compliance with pre-existing obligations,
including those with ServiceCo LLC d/b/a/ Road Runner, as described in the Memorandum of Understanding dated
February 29, 2000 between AOL and Time Warner (the "Pre-Existing Obligations").
20. Confidentiality
ISP agree to keep the Term Sheet, any of the terms set forth herein, and any discussions with respected to the
contemplated arrangement confidential, and ISP agrees not to disclose such information to any person except employees
or agents of ISP with a need to know in connection with services they provide to ISP. Each party agrees not to make any
press release or public announcement mentioning the other party's name or identity without such other party's express
written consent. The provisions of this Section 21 are intended to be binding.
Communications
Appendix (k) - CommPortal: Source Code for Wire Fraud #2

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<TITLE>403 Forbidden</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY>
<H1>Forbidden</H1>
You don't have permission to access /pages/ on this server.<P>
<HR>
<ADDRESS>Apache/1.3.29 Server at commportal.nebiz.rr.com Port 443</ADDRESS>
</BODY></HTML>
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLE
<html>
<head>
<title>RR Commercial Portal</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css">
</head>

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0>
<table border=0 width=770 align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr height=14px><td></td></tr>
<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

<script type="text/javascript" src="javascript/overlib.js"></script>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript">

</SCRIPT>
<table width=768 align=center cellspacing=0 bordercolor=636563 style='border: 1px solid'>
<tr>
<td width=161 bgcolor=4A6D9C valign=top rowspan=2>


<script language="javascript">

</script>
<body onload=preload();><div id="overDiv" style="position:absolute; visibility:hidden; z-index:1000;"></div>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i>Welcome Airweb Airweb</font></i><br>
<a class=menu href=/index.php><font color=B5CFE7>Home</a> ::
<a class=menu href=logout.php><font color=B5CFE7>Log Out</a>
<br><br></center>
<div id="tencompsnyc">
<a href='#' onclick="showhide('menu219outline',menu219sign); return false;"><img id="menu219sign" src="images/plus.gif" align="absmiddle" border=0></a>
<a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=summary&account=219">
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<div id="menu219outline" style="visibility:visible;position:relative;display:none;">
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle><font color=FFCF00>></font>
<font size=1 color=FFCF00>Availability</font>
Communications
<br>
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=traffic&account=219" onmouseover="return
overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
<img src=images/l.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219" onmouseover="return
overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
{
document.layers["menu219outline"].display='block';
document.layers["menu219sign"].src='images/m.gif';
}
{
document.all["menu219outline"].style.display='block';
document.all["menu219sign"].src='images/m.gif';
}
{
document.getElementById("menu219outline").style.display='block';
document.getElementById("menu219sign").src='images/m.gif';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
<td bgcolor=CECFCE>&nbsp</td>
</tr><tr>
<td width=608 height=700 valign=top bgcolor=CECFCE>

<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Availability</title>
<p align=right><font size=1>current as of: Mon Aug 30 13:12:26 2004</font></p>
<table align=center width=100% border=0>
<tr><td align=center colspan=4><h2><b>24.29.112.9</b></h2></td></tr><tr><td valign=top align=right>
<a href=/index.php?menuaction=a_detail&account=219&hostname=24.29.112.9>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:1:{i:0;s:7:"100.000";}&color=a:1:{i:0;s:5:"green";}&title=Past 24 Hours - 100%' border=0>
</a>
</td><td valign=middle>
<img src=/images/green_1.png align=middle> - 100.000%<br>
</td>
<td valign=top align=right>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:1:{i:0;s:7:"100.000";}&color=a:1:{i:0;s:5:"green";}&title=Past Week - 100%' border=0>
</a>
<img src=/images/green_1.png align=absmiddle> - 100.000%<br>
Communications
</td>
</tr><tr>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:1:{i:0;s:7:"100.000";}&color=a:1:{i:0;s:5:"green";}&title=Past 4 Weeks - 100%' border=0>
</a>
</td>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:2:{i:0;s:6:"08.540";i:1;s:6:"91.460";}&color=a:2:{i:0;s:5:"green";i:1;s:5:"white";}&title=Past 52 Weeks - 100%' border=0>
</a>
<img src=/images/white_1.png align=absmiddle> - 91.460%<br>
</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan=4><br><hr></td></tr>
</table>
<center><font size=1>Click on the graph to show details</font></center>
<table align=center width=90%>
<tr><td colspan=7><hr></td></tr>
<tr>
<td><img src=/images/green_1.png align=middle>ok</td>
<td><img src=/images/yellow_1.png align=middle>attention</td>
<td><img src=/images/red_1.png align=middle>trouble</td>
<td><img src=/images/purple_1.png align=middle>no report</td>
<td><img src=/images/clear_1.png align=middle>unavailable</td>
<td><img src=/images/blue_1.png align=middle>offline</td>
<td><img src=/images/white.gif align=middle>n/a</td>
</tr>
</table>
setTimeout("window.location.reload();",60000);
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr>
<tr><td colspan=2 height=20 bgcolor=CECFCE bordercolor=636563 style='border-top:1px solid;'>
<center>
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto:sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC sysadmins</a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_ABAILABLE
Communications
Appendix (L) - DownLoad-Speed Test - Source Code for Wire Fraud #1

The download Test & Turn-up Operation was a Road Runner Operation, to hide the true nature of the service.
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_CPU
<title>24,29,112,9.cpu</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 11:48:47 CET 2004 [24.29.112.9]
</pre><pre>&green: System uptime: 158 days, 18:13:35 (hh:mm:ss)
</pre><pre>&green: CPU usage: 0% (thresholds: yellow=50%:red=90%)
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>System description:
</pre><pre>-------------------
</pre><pre>Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
</pre><pre>IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-PK9SV-M), Version 12.2(14)SX1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
</pre><pre>TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
</pre><pre>Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
</pre><pre>Compiled T
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>The following interfaces are known to this host (via SNMP):
</pre><pre>(use subcommand use-ifalias in hosttype section (for RFC 1573 capable router/switches)
</pre><pre> or use interface-name command for static configuration)
</pre><pre> 1: "GigabitEthernet1/1" - we think this is the far side
</pre><pre> 2: "GigabitEthernet1/2" - we think this is the far side
</pre><pre> 3: "GigabitEthernet1/3"
</pre><pre> 17: "GigabitEthernet5/1" - We think this is us.
</pre><pre> 18: "GigabitEthernet5/2" - and this is our second port
</pre><pre> 19: "Vlan1" - This may be able to go 100
</pre><pre> 20: "EOBC0/0"
</pre><pre> 21: "Null0"
</pre><pre> 22: "unrouted VLAN 1"
</pre><pre> 25: "unrouted VLAN 1005" - We think this is us.
Communications
</pre><pre> 27: "Loopback0"

</pre><pre> 28: "GigabitEthernet1/3.2-802.1Q vLAN subif"
</pre><pre> 30: "GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif" does not support if_err – We think this is us.
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>This device supports SNMP RFC-1573
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre><div align="center">
</pre><pre><center><PRE>
</pre><pre><font color="teal" size="1">router information generated by RouterMon 1.0i (Herzig 08/11/2001) (Linux
2.4.26 i686)
</pre><pre>see http://www.routermon.net for details and copyright</font>
</pre><pre></center>
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>Status unchanged in 31.01 days
</pre><pre>Status message received from 24.29.108.158
</pre><center>
<a href="javascript:void(null);" onclick="window.close();">
Close
</a>
UPDATE-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM (SECTIONS OF THE SOURCE CODE WHICH SUPPORT OUR CONTENTION THAT
ROAD RUNNER WAS OR IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN HIDING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SERVICE ATTEMPTED TO
BE PROVISIONED. We believe ):
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_IF_LOAD
</pre><pre><td>GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif (#30) [Air Web]</td>
</pre><pre><td>1000 MBit/s</td>
</pre><pre><td>90%:95%</td>
</pre><pre><td>&green output bytes/s=19 (0.000%)</td>
</pre><pre></tr>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre><font color="teal" size="1">router information generated by RouterMon 1.0i (Herzig 08/11/2001) (Linux 2.4.26 i686)
</pre><pre>see http://www.routermon.net for details and copyright</font><html
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_IF_LOAD
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
Communications
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<link rel=File-List href="./premium-test_files/filelist.xml"> -Sound a lot like Premiere
<title>RR Premium D/L Test Page</title> - Sounds a lot like Road Runner Premiere Down Load Test Page
<o:Author>lcheung</o:Author> - Looks a lot like Cheung I? working for Road Runner is person working directly on Air Web Communications
Project
<o:LastAuthor>lcheung</o:LastAuthor>
<o:Revision>1</o:Revision>
<o:TotalTime>6</o:TotalTime>
<o:Created>2004-07-22T15:16:00Z</o:Created> - August 22nd at 3:16 Cheung Start Deception/ Why can’t TWC simply give up Transparent
Domain Continunity Results
<o:LastSaved>2004-07-22T15:22:00Z</o:LastSaved> - Looks like it only took 6 minutes.
<o:Company>RoadRunner</o:Company> - it means that Road Runner is directly working on AWC Stuff, this is totally unacceptable.
<o:Version>9.6926</o:Version> - Why Version 9?
<p class=MsoBodyText>RR Premium D/L Test Page</p> - Sounds a lot like Road Runner Premiere Down Load Test Page, but Road
Runner is not to be working directly on any specifics about AWC project with out violating mutually understood understanding, that no way Road
Runner could be directly involded.
<a href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/97mb_test_file.mov">Download 97 MB Test File</a> - Update-

Server.nyc.rr.com and AMS-Server.nyc.rr.com both are interchangable. We believe that TWC “provisioned” a Tranparent LAN Services, Mapped typed
Services Port, maybe on VLAN-1. We believe that TWC planned to us this file, which Mr. David Durso, indicated should not be downloaded to “the
server”.
<a href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/421mb_test_file.avi">Download 421 MB Test File</a>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM AND UPDATE-SERVER.COM ARE THE SAME (OR ONE IS COPIED OFF OF THE OTHER)
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM (SECTIONS OF THE SOURCE CODE WHICH SUPPORT OUR CONTENTION THAT ROAD
RUNNER WAS OR IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN HIDING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SERVICE ATTEMPTED TO BE
PROVISIONED. We believe GigE 1/3.4):
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
<title> Road Runner Software Updates </title>
</head>
{
window.open('http://help.rr.com/sslpwd/ptEmailValidation.asp','MainPTWindow','height=500,width=700,left=100,t
Communications
op=100,location=no,menubar=no,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=no,toolbar=no');
}
-->
</script>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="550">
<tr align="middle">
<td colspan="2"><img alt="Road Runner" src="images/logo.gif" align="center" border="0" width="294" height="94"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="right"><img alt="Road
Runner User" src="images/people2.jpg" align="right" border="0" default="default.asp" width="178" height="184"></td>
<td valign="top"><br>
<font size="3" face="arial,helv,helvetica" color="#6699cc">Authenticate
Web Access</font>
<p><br>
<font face="arial,helv,helvetica">
</p>
<form NAME="LogonUserForm" METHOD="post">
<table BORDER="0" width="280">
<tr>
<td width="81">
<p align="left"><font color="#000066">User ID:</font></p>
</td>
<td width="185"><input NAME="UserID" SIZE="14" style="LEFT: 59px; TOP: 1px"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="81">
<p align="left"><font color="#000066">Password :</font></p>
</td>
<td width="185"><input TYPE="password" NAME="Password" SIZE="14"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="81"></td>
<td width="185">
<p align="left"><br><font color="#000066" size="3" face="arial,helv,helvetica">Forgot
your password?<BR>Click <a href="javascript:openPTWin();">here</a></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<input TYPE="submit" NAME="ACTION" VALUE="Logon" METHOD="POST"> <input TYPE="submit" NAME="ACTION"
VALUE="Cancel" METHOD="POST"></p>
</form>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
Communications
</body>
</html the latest Road Runner

software. To download an application, click its name
below. When your Web browser asks whether to save or open
the file, save it to your hard drive. Once the file has
finished downloading, double-click it to install the
application. </font></td>
</tr>
<td valign="top"><a
href="http://update-server/pub/swdownload/Win95/Explorer/ie5setup.exe"><font
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
ROAD RUNNER HELP; SO THIS IS COMING OFF OF A MAJOR UTILITY SITE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Road Runner Help & Member Services Site Selector</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<SCRIPT LANG="javascript">

</SCRIPT>
Communications
<link rel="STYLESHEET" type="text/css" href="text3.css">

<STYLE>
BODY {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
background-color: #493543}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 width="606" align="center" height="321" background="/images/siteSelector.gif">
<TR>
<TD>
<table cellpadding=3 width=606 border=0>
<tr valign="top">
<td align=left width="1"> </td>
<td align=left>
<p><span class="purpleBigText">Choose Your Provider, State, and City</span><br>
<span class="purpleText"><br>
Note: You may receive an error if cookies are not enabled.<br>
         View <a href="#" onClick="window.open('/notes/ohd-
cookie.htm','myWindow','width=350,height=600,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,status=no,toolbar=no,resi
zable=yes,left=200,top=0,screenX=200,screenY=0');return false">information
on enabling cookies</a>.</span> </p>
<p><span class="bodyText">Click <a href="rrwhotext.asp">here</a> if
you are experiencing difficulties with this page.</span></p>
<form name="myForm" method="post" action="rrwho_email_phone.asp">

<input type="hidden" name="PR" value="/asp/main_contentwell.asp">
<input type="hidden" name="entity" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="affName" value="">
<p align="left">
<SELECT NAME="provider"
onChange='javascript:populate_states(this.options[selectedIndex].value)' class="bodyText">
<OPTION VALUE = "-1">Select your Provider</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE = "Time Warner">Time Warner</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE = "Bright House Networks">Bright House
Networks</OPTION>

<OPTION VALUE = "Insight">Insight</OPTION>
</SELECT>
Communications
<select name='state'
onChange='javascript:populate_cities(this.options[selectedIndex].value)' class="bodyText">
<option>Select your State</option>
</select>
<select name='city' class="bodyText">

<option>Select your City</option>
</select>
<input onClick=cookieTest() type=button value=Go! name="button"

class="bodyText">
</p>
</form>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
END OF HELP_RR.COM
HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-RRWHO-EMAIL-PHONE—ASP

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Road Runner Help & Member Service Site Selector</TITLE>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="text3.css">
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>


</SCRIPT>
<STYLE>
BODY {
background-color: #493543;}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<form name="frm" method="POST" action="rrwho_email_phone.asp">
<br>
<br>
<table align=center cellpadding=7 width=710 border=0 background="/images/siteSelectorEmailPhone.gif" height="660">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="20" rowspan="6"> </td>
<td align=left width="597" valign="bottom" colspan="3">
<p>
<span class="purpleBigText">
Customize Your Help & Member Services Site</span>
<p><span class="purpleText">
To display customized content for your specific operating system
and browser, follow the steps below:</span></p>

<input type="hidden" name="doing" value="login">
<input type="hidden" name="visits" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="entity" value="134">

<input type="hidden" name="affName" value="IN-Columbus">
<input type="hidden" name="skipped" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="login" value=1>
<strong><span class="purpleHeading">
Step 1: Enter your Master E-mail Address or Home Telephone Number</span></strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="12"> </td>
<td width="250">
<strong><span class="purpleText">
Communications
<nobr>Master E-mail Address:</nobr></span></strong><br>
<input type=text name="email" size="30" value="" class="bodyText">

</td>
<td>
Home Telephone Number:</span></strong><br>
(
<input type=text name="areacode" maxlength="3" size="3" value="" class="bodyText">
)
<input type=text name="exchangeno" maxlength="3" size="3" value="" class="bodyText">
-
<input type=text name="lineno" maxlength="4" size="4" value="" class="bodyText">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">
<strong><span class="purpleHeading">Step
2: Select your Operating System and/or Browser</span></strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>
<span class="purpleText">
<b>Operating System:</b></span><br>
<select name="selectOS" class="bodyText">

<option value="select_os">Select Operating System</option>
<option value="Windows" >Windows</option>
<option value="Macintosh" >Macintosh</option>
</select>
</td>
<td>
<b><span class="purpleText">
Browser:<br></span></b>
<select name="selectBrowser" class="bodyText">

<option value="select_browser">Select Browser</option>
<option value="Internet Explorer" >Internet Explorer</option>
<option value="Netscape" >Netscape</option>
</select>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
Communications
<td colspan="2">
<span class="tinyPurpleText">Information
provided is confidential, is used only for Road Runner business
and will not be distributed.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<input type="button" value="Submit" name="btnSubmit" onClick="checkForm('submit');"
class="bodyText">

<input type="reset" value="Clear Form" name="btnReset" class="bodyText">

<br>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p align="center">
<a href="JavaScript:onClick=checkForm('skip');"><img border="0"
src="/images/skip_button.gif" width="237" height="41"></a>
</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
<blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>
</blockquote>
</BODY>
</HTML>
END OF HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-RRWHO-EMAIL-PHONE—ASP
HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-GETPAGE-ASP-ASP-NETWORKSTATUS-ASP-MEMSERV
<HTML><HEAD><Meta name="save" content="favorite">
<TITLE>Help & Member Services</TITLE>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" TYPE="TEXT/JAVASCRIPT">


</SCRIPT><STYLE>
BODY {margin-top:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;}
Communications
.defaultnavClass { position:absolute; top:100px; left:400px; visibility:hidden; z-index:3; }
.selfhelpStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.suppservStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.memservStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.servaddStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.techalertStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.helpextStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.faqDropDown { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10pt; }
.faqDropDownText { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color:#333399; font-size:10pt; }
.formTextSearch { text-transform:uppercase; font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#000000; font-weight:normal;

font-size:7pt; text-decoration:none; }
</STYLE>
<SCRIPT>
var isNetscape4 = (document.layers) ? 1 : 0;
if (isNetscape4) {
//if (isNetscape4 && (window.print)) {
document.write("<STYLE>.subchannelLink { font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica,
sans-serif; color:#ffffff; font-weight:normal; font-size:7.5pt; text-decoration:none; }</STYLE>")
}
else {
sans-serif; color:#ffffff; font-weight:normal; font-size:7pt; text-decoration:none; }</STYLE>")
}
</SCRIPT>
</HEAD>
<BODY onload="showNavigation('memserv')" bgcolor="#ffffff" leftmargin="0" rightmargin="0" topmargin="0" bottommargin="0"

marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH="100%" HEIGHT="100%" CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN=3 width="100%">

Communications
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="Javascript">

</SCRIPT><TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH="100%" CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>
<TR BGCOLOR="#493543">
<TD WIDTH="100%">
<TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH="100%" CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>
<TR>
<TD width=230>
<font color=white><img src="/images/header_92.gif" border=0 align="left"></font>
</TD>
<TD height="32" BGCOLOR="#493543"> </TD>
<td>
<A HREF="http://www.rr.com"><IMG SRC="images/g_rr_home.gif" BORDER=0 align="right"></A>
</td>
<TD align=right width="202">
<A HREF="asp/main_contentwell.asp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_hms_home.gif" BORDER=0 align="right"></A>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
<TD>
<A HREF="http://www.rr.com"><IMG SRC="/images/g_rrlogo.gif" BORDER=0 WIDTH=92 HEIGHT=54></A>

Communications
<A HREF="http://help.rr.com"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helplogo.gif" BORDER=0></A>
</TD>
<TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="middle" height="50" BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
function searchGO() {
if
(document.helppage_search.search_type[1].checked) {
window.open('http://january.rr.com/html/search.cfm?m=' + 92 + '&query=' +
escape(document.helppage_search.search_contents.value), 'rrSearchWin');
//window.open('http://www.rr.com/html/search/sitesearch.cfm?searchstring=' +
//window.open('http://rr.looksmart.com/r_search?search=0&comfrom=iacs-search&isp=acs&key=' +
}
else {
document.location =
'/asp/search.asp?ncid=' + 92 + '&keywords=' + escape(document.helppage_search.search_contents.value);
}
}
</script>
<form name="helppage_search"
action="javascript:searchGO()" method="post">
<table width="100%" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0>
<tr>
<td width=45><span class="formTextSearch"><b>Search</b></span></td>
<td width=205><input class="formTextSearch" type="text" name="search_contents" size=20>
<input type="button" value="GO" class="formTextSearch" onClick="searchGO()"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan=2><span class="formTextSearch">

Communications
<input type="radio" name="search_type" value="0" checked>HELP.RR.COM
<input type="radio" name="search_type" value="1">RR.COM
</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</TD>
<TD colspan=2 ALIGN=right><nobr>
<A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity" ><IMG SRC="/images/chatbanner.gif" ALT="Click here for

24 hour Tech Support Chat" WIDTH=325 HEIGHT=55 BORDER=0></A> </nobr></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD BGCOLOR="#977965">
<TR>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><a href="javascript:showNavigation('selfhelp');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('selfhelp')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_selfhelp.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="selfhelp"></a></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('suppserv');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('suppserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_support.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="suppserv"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('memserv');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_member.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="memserv"></A></TD>
Communications
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('servadd');openPopUpWin('server','','');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('servadd')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_server.gif" BORDER="0" NAME="servadd"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('techalert');openPopUpWin('tech','','');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('techalert')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_tech.gif" BORDER="0" NAME="techalert"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A

HREF="javascript:showNavigation('helpext');openPopUpWin('helpext','http://help.rr.com/getpage.asp?/asp/networkstatus.asp,me
mserv','');" onmouseover="showNavigation('helpext')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_helpext.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="helpext"></A></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<div id="defaultnavDiv" class="defaultnavClass"><div id="defaultnav"></div></div>
<div id="selfhelpDiv" class="selfhelpStyle">
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/top_faqs.asp,selfhelp">Top FAQs</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/table_of_contents.asp,selfhelp">Help Topics</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/search.asp?FormName=TroubleShooter,selfhelp">Knowledge

Base</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/tutorial_index.asp,selfhelp">Tutorials</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/rrmedic_help_topic.asp,selfhelp">Road Runner Medic</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/asp/one_click_fixes_index.asp,selfhelp">One-click Fixes</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="html/additionalresources.html,selfhelp">Helpful Hotlinks</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="html/glossary.html,selfhelp">Glossary of Terms</a>
</div>
<div id="suppservDiv" class="suppservStyle">

Communications
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity,suppserv">Live

Chat Support</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrmail.asp,suppserv">E-mail Support</A>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/faqs/e_contact_us.html,suppserv">Contact Us</a>
</div>
<div id="memservDiv" class="memservStyle">
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="javascript:openPopUpWin('acctmgt','','');">Account Management</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv">Network Status</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://content.rr.com/rr-

plugins/','');">Download Center</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/dial_access_help_topic.asp,memserv">Dial Access</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/php_help_topic.asp,memserv">PHP</a>
</div>
<div id="servaddDiv" class="servaddStyle">
   <a class="subchannelLink"> </a>
</div>
<div id="techalertDiv" class="techalertStyle">
</div>
<div id="helpextDiv" class="helpextStyle">
</div>
</TD>
</TR>
Communications
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="150" height="90%" BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC" ALIGN=left VALIGN=top>
<TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH=150 CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><font size="-2"> </font></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><IMG SRC="/images/g_selfhelp.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/top_faqs.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_topfaqs.gif"

BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/table_of_contents.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helptopic.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/search.asp?FormName=TroubleShooter,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_kbase.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/tutorial_index.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_tutorials.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/rrmedic_help_topic.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_rrmedic.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/one_click_fixes_index.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_one_click_fixes.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/html/additionalresources.html,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helpful.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/html/glossary.html,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_glossary.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><BR><IMG SRC="/images/g_supportservices.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity,suppserv"><IMG

SRC="/images/g_livechat.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrmail.asp,suppserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_e-mailsup.gif"

Communications
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/faqs/e_contact_us.html,suppserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_contact.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><BR><IMG SRC="/images/g_member.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('acctmgt','','');showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG

SRC="/images/g_acctmgmt.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_networkst.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://content.rr.com/rr-

plugins/','');showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_software.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" TYPE="text/javascript">
function noLink(){}
HM_Array1 = [
[150, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
"#FFFFFF", // mouseover_font_color
"#E1D9CC", // background_color
"#493543", // mouseover_background_color
"#951F3E", // border_color
"#E1D9CC", // separator_color
],
["PHP Help","/asp/php_help_topic.asp,memserv",1,0,1],
["PHP Maintenance","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://home-admin.rr.com','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,0]
]
Communications
HM_Array2 = [
[180, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
],
["Dial Access Help","/asp/dial_access_help_topic.asp,memserv",1,0,1],
["Dial Access
Registration","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink_DA','http://dialaccess.rr.com','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,0]
HM_Array3 = [
[180, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
Communications
],
["Business Solutions","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,1],
["Business Solutions Help","/html/business_solutions_help.html,memserv",1,0,0]
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript1.2" SRC="HM_Loader.js" TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="JavaScript:noLink();" onMouseOver="HM_f_PopUp('elMenu2',event)"

onMouseOut="HM_f_PopDown('elMenu2')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_dial_access.gif" BORDER="0"><A></TD></TR>

onMouseOut="HM_f_PopDown('elMenu1')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_php.gif" BORDER="0"><A></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">12:40:29 PM</font></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">HERIIS01</font></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">382802646</font></td></tr></table>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="15" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<TR><TD> </TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="850" ALIGN=left VALIGN=top bgcolor="#ffffff">
<TR><TD><font size="-2"> </font></TD></TR>
Communications

</SCRIPT>
<TR><TD valign=top>
<html>
<head>
<title>Network Status</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<h3><img src="images/g_networkstatus_bar.gif" width="428" height="26"></h3>

<table width="480" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<P>
<span class="blackText"><B>Last Updated</B>: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:40
PM EDT</span>
</P>
</td>
<td align="right">
<B><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('tech','','');">Tech Alerts</A></B>
</td>
</tr>
</table><BR>

<table border="0" cellpadding="2">

<tr>
<td bgcolor="#493543" height="25" colspan="2"><b><font color="#E1D9CC">Status Legend</font></b></td>
Communications
<td bgcolor="#493543" width="230"><b><font color="#E1D9CC">Time Zone Legend</font></b></td>

</tr>
<tr>
<td width="60" align="left">
<span class="redTextBold"><b>Red</b></span>
</td>
<td width="170" align="left">Unplanned
event/outage</td>
<td>
Eastern Standard Time (EST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<span class="yellowTextBold"><b>Yellow</b></span>
</td>
<td align="left">Planned
maintenance</td>
<td>
Central Standard Time (CST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<span class="greenTextBold"><b>Green</b></span>
</td>
<td align="left">Service
operational</td>
<td>
Mountain Standard Time (MST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<b>Closed</b>
</td>
<td align="left">Recently
closed event</td>
<td>
Pacific Standard Time (PST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left"> </td>
<td>
Hawaii Standard Time (HST)
</td>
Communications
</tr>
</table>
<BR>
<table border=0>
</table>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>Account Management</b></font><BR><BR>

<table border="1" cellpadding="2" width="609">
<tr>
<td width="52" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Status</b></td>
<td width="91" height="25"
bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Start Date<br>(EDT)</b></td>
<td width="68" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>End/ETR
Date</b></td>
<td width="160" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Areas
Affected</b></td>
<td width="238" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Notes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><span class="greenTextBold"><b>Green</b></span></td>

<td align="left" valign="top">8/30/2004
<br>12:40 PM
</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"> </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">None</td>
<td valign="top">At this time the network is operating normally.</td>
</tr>
</table><BR><BR>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>E-Mail</b></font><BR><BR>

<tr>
Date</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
Communications
</tr>
<tr>

<br>12:40 PM
</td>
</tr>
</table><BR><BR>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>Internet Connectivity</b></font><BR><BR>

<tr>
Date</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><span class="yellowTextBold"><b>Yellow</b></span></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8/31/2004 <br>1:00 AM</td>

<td valign="top" align="left">NYC</td>
<td valign="top">Road Runner will be conducting Planned Maintenance on the IP
network. Subscribers in the affected area(s) may have no connection to the Internet or latency/slow connectivity during this
maintenance window. Our engineers are working quickly to complete this maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience
this may cause.</td>
</tr>
<tr>

Communications

<td valign="top" align="left">UTOPIA QUEENS</td>
<td valign="top">Road Runner will be conducting Planned Maintenance on the IP
network. Subscribers in the affected area(s) may have no connection to the Internet or latency/slow connectivity during this
maintenance window. Our engineers are working quickly to complete this maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience
this may cause.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="91" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Date
Opened</b></td>
<td width="68" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Date Closed</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="DDDDDD" align="center"><B>Closed
<style>

</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='tab-interval:.5in'>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoBodyText>RR Premium D/L Test Page</p>
<p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span

style='font-size:48.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'><![if
!supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h1><a href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/97mb_test_file.mov">Download
97 MB Test File</a></h1>



style='font-size:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'><a
href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/421mb_test_file.avi">Download
421 MB Test File</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
Communications
</div>
</body>
</html>
END OF PREMIUM TEST ONE

UPDATE SERVER.NYC.RR.COM\SOFTWARE
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express 2.0">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF"

vlink="#0000FF" alink="#0000FF">
<p align="center"><font size="5" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><b>Road

Runner Software Updates </b></font><br>
<br>
</p>
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%">

<tr>
<td><font size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA">Using the links
on this page, you can download the latest Road Runner
</tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p align="center"><br>
</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">

<tr>
<td align="right" valign="top"><NOBR> <font size="2"
face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><b>Windows 95, 98, & ME </b></font><b></NOBR></b></td>
<td valign="top"><a
size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA">Internet Explorer 5.5 </font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" valign="top"><font size="2"
face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><NOBR> <b>Windows NT 4.0 </NOBR></b></font></td>
<td valign="top"><a
Communications
</tr>
<tr>
face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><NOBR> <b>Windows 2000 </NOBR></b></font></td>
<td valign="top"><a
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
href="http://update-server/pub/swdownload/Win95/Explorer/ie60/ie6setup.exe"><font
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
<tr>
face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><NOBR> <b>Macintosh PowerPC </NOBR></b></font></td>
<td valign="top"><a
href="http://update-server/pub/swdownload/MacPPC/Explorer/ie45setup-noproxy.smi.hqx"><font
size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA">Internet Explorer 4.5 </font></a><font
size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><br>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p><font size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"></font> </p>

</body>
</html>
END OF UPDATE SERVER.NYC.RR.COM\SOFTWARE
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM/USERMANAGER/LOGINuSER/ASP
<html>
<head>
<title>Authenticate Web Access</title>

</head>
Communications
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
<script language="JavaScript">

</script>
<tr align="middle">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
Web Access</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="185">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
</form>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
Communications
</html>
END OF AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM/USERMANAGER/LOGINuSER/ASP
COMMPORTAL-NEBIZ.RR.COM/INDEX.PHP/MENUACTION-SUMMARY-ACCOUNT-219
Commportal-nebiz.rr.com.index.php.menuaction.summary.account.219
<html>
<head>
</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align:
bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>



</script>
<center>
<br><br></center>
<a href='#' onclick="showhide('menu219outline',menu219sign); return false;"><img id="menu219sign" src="images/plus.gif"
align="absmiddle" border=0></a>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu
href="/index.php?menuaction=availability&account=219" onmouseover="return overlib('Uptime percentages over four different
periods of time.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=traffic&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);"
onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
<img src=images/l.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu
href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219" onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.', OFFSETX, 20,
OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
Communications
}
{
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Summary</title>
<table align=center width=45% border=1 cellpadding=5 cellspacing=0>
<tr>
<td align=center colspan=2><b>AirWeb</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign=top><font size=1>
Type: dedicatedaccess<br>
TW Division: nyc<br>
Domain: na<br>
</td>
<td valign=top align=right><font size=1>
na<br>
New York City, NY na<br>
na<br>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<center><h2>CURRENT STATUS</h2></center>
<table align=center border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=4>
<tr><td align=center colspan=4><b><u>24.29.112.9</u></b></td><tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
<td><a href="JavaScript:void(null);"
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.conn','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Simple Ping Check. Is the device alive?', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION,
'Connection');" onmouseout="nd();">
conn</td>
<td><img src=../images/green.gif></td>
<td>Status unchanged in 31.08 days
</td>
<td>Last Updated: Mon Aug 30 12:56:53 2004</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.cpu','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('CPU usage as compared to a preset threshold level.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500,
CAPTION, 'CPU Utilization');" onmouseout="nd();">
cpu</td>
</td>
</tr>
Communications
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_err','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Number of errors in packets as a percentage of the total number of packets being passed.
Thresholds predefined.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Errors');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_err</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_load','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('The load is calculated by collecting the number of bytes of interface input and output bytes of each
interface for the time specified snmp-interval. Preset threshold levels, based on percentage reached.', OFFSETX, 20,
OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Load');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_load</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_stat','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Monitors the status of all interfaces on device. (Up or Down?)', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,
DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Status');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_stat</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.latency','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times based on a percentage reached of a predefined threshold level.', OFFSETX,
20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Latency');" onmouseout="nd();">
latency</td>
<td><img src=../images/clear.gif></td>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
<tr>
</tr>
Communications
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
End of COMMPORTAL-NEBIZ.RR.COM/INDEX.PHP/MENUACTION-SUMMARY-ACCOUNT-219
End of Commportal-nebiz.rr.com.index.php.menuaction.summary.account.219
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_CONN
<title>24,29,112,9.conn</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 13:03:03 EDT 2004 24.29.112.9 (24.29.112.9) is alive
(0.46 ms)
</pre><pre>
</pre
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR.CONN
COMMPORTAL_IF_LOAD (BY INTERFACE NAME, INTERFACE # & INTERFACE ALIAS)

<title>24,29,112,9.if_load</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 11:48:47 CET 2004 [24.29.112.9]
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre><div align="left"><b>Table of interface load status (does not show interfaces that
are DOWN ):</b>
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre><table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5">
</pre><pre><TR>
>Interface name</b></TD>
</pre><pre><TD width="20%"><b
</pre><pre><TD width="10%"><b>bandwidth</b></TD>
</pre><pre><TD width="10%"><b>load threshold</b></TD>
</pre><pre><TD width="60%"><b>Interface status</b> </TD></TR>
</pre><pre><TR>
</pre><pre><tr>
Communications
</pre><pre><td>90%:95%</td>
</pre><pre></tr>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre><font color="teal" size="1"> router information generated by RouterMon 1.0i (Herzig 08/11/2001) (Linux 2.4.26 i686)
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre> Status unchanged in 31.01 days

</pre><center>
Close
</a>
END OF COMMPORTAL_IF_LOAD
><pre>Status message received from 24.29.108.158

</pre><center>
Close
</a>
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_IF_ERR (BY INTERFACE)
<title>24,29,112,9.if_err</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 11:48:47 CET 2004 [24.29.112.9]

</pre><pre>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre><div align="left"><b> Table of interface discard and error counter (does not show interfaces that are DOWN):</b>
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre><TR>
</pre><pre><TD width="20%"><b> Interface name</b></TD>

</pre><pre>
threshold</b><br></TD>
</pre><pre><TD width="10%"><b>discard
</pre><pre><TD width="10%"><b>error threshold</b><br></TD>
</pre><pre><TR>
</pre><pre></table>
Communications
router information generated by RouterMon 1.0i (Herzig 08/11/2001) (Linux 2.4.26 i686)
</pre><pre><font color="teal" size="1">

</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre> Status unchanged in 31.01 days

</pre><pre> Status message received from 24.29.108.158
</pre><center>
Close
</a>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_IF_ERR
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_CPU (INTERACES UESED BY HOST 24.29.112.9)
<title>24,29,112,9.cpu</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 11:48:47 CET 2004 [24.29.112.9]

</pre><pre>&green: System uptime: 158 days, 18:13:35 (hh:mm:ss)
</pre><pre>&green: CPU usage: 0% (thresholds: yellow=50%:red=90%)
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>System description:
</pre><pre>-------------------
</pre><pre>Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
</pre><pre>IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-PK9SV-M), Version 12.2(14)SX1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
</pre><pre>TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
</pre><pre>Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
</pre><pre>Compiled T
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>The following interfaces are known to this host (via SNMP):
Communications

</pre><pre> 19: "Vlan1"
</pre><pre> 30: "GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif" does not
support if_err
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><center>
Close
</a>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_CPU
<html>
<head>

</head>


Communications
<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt ='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=traffic&account=219" onmouseover="return
overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,
DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
<br>
Communications
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
document.getElementById("menu219outline").style.display='bl
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
</a>
</td>
</a>
</td>
</tr><tr>
Communications

</a>
</td>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:2:{i:0;s:6:"08.540";i:1;s:6:"91.460";}&color=a:2:{i:0;s:5:"green";i:1;s:5:"white";}&title=Past 52
Weeks - 100%' border=0>
</a>
</td></tr>
</table>
<tr>
</tr>
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLE
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLE24HOURS
<html>
<head>
Communications

</head>

</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>



</script>
<center>
<br><br></center>
<a href='#' onclick="showhide('menu219outline',menu219sign); return false;"><img id="menu219sign"
src="images/plus.gif" align="absmiddle" border=0></a>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<font color=FFCF00>></font>
<font size=1>details</font>
<br>
overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY,
Communications
1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219" onmouseover="return
overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);"
onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Availability Detail</title>
<center><h2>Availability Detail<br>24.29.112.9</h2></center>
<table align=center width=95% cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0 border=1>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp</td>
<td><b>Event Start</td>
<td><b>Event End</td>
<td align=center><b>Status</td>
<td align=center><b>Duration</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Past 24 Hours---></td>
<td>Fri Jul 30 11:07:53 2004</td>
Communications
<td>Mon Aug 30 13:14:49 2004</td>

<td align=center><img src=/images/green_1.png></td>
<td align=right>31d-02:06:56</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLE24HOURS
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLEPASTWEEK
<html>
<head>
<title>RR Commercial Portal </title>
</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-
align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>

Communications
<tr>


</script>

Communications
<center>

<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
Communications
</tr><tr>
<center><h2>Availability Detail<br>24.29.112.9 </h2></center>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp</td>
Event Start</td>
<td><b>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Past 24 Hours---></td>
<td>Fri Jul 30 11:07:53 2004</td>
<td>Mon Aug 30 13:17:53 2004</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto:sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC

sysadmins</a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLEPASTWEEK
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLEPAST4WEEKS
<html>
<head>

</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt= 'Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
Communications
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i> Welcome Airweb Airweb</font></i><br>

<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
Communications
{
}
{
}
{
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>

<center><h2>Availability Detail<br>24.29.112.9</h2></center>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp</td>
Event Start</td>
<td><b>
</tr>
<tr>
Past 24 Hours---></td>
<td>
<td>Fri Jul 30 11:07:53 2004</td>

<td>Mon Aug 30 13:19:24 2004</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
Communications
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto:sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC sysadmins </a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_AVAILABLEPAST4WEEKS
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_TRAFFIC
<html>
<head>
</head>

</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i> Welcome Airweb Airweb </font></i><br>
<br><br></center>
<a href='#' onclick="showhide('menu219outline',menu219sign); return false;"><img
id="menu219sign" src="images/plus.gif" align="absmiddle" border=0></a>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
Communications

href="/index.php?menuaction=availability&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Uptime percentages over four different periods of

time.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);"
onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>
<font size=1 color=FFCF00>Traffic</font>
<br>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Traffic</title>

<tr><td align=center><h2><b>24.29.112.9</b></h2></td></tr> <tr>
<td align=center>
<a href="/index.php?menuaction=t_detail&account=219&hostname=24.29.112.9&server=nycmnyc-rc-
Communications
rtr1.nyc.rr.com&intname=GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web">
<IMG SRC="/cgi-
bin/netGraph.cgi?server=nycmnyc-rc-
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=daily" ALT="24.29.112.9"
BORDER=0>
</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr><td><hr></td></tr>
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto:sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC sysadmins </a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_TRAFFIC
NYCMNYC_RC_RTR1_NYC_RR_COM
<html>
<head>
</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-
align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


Communications

</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i>Welcome Airweb Airweb </font></i><br>
<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>

onmouseout="nd();">Availability </a>
<br>

<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,

DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
Communications
}
{
ock';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Traffic</title>

<tr><td align=center><h2><b> 24.29.112.9 </b></h2></td></tr> <tr>
<td align=center>
<a
href="/index.php?menuaction=t_detail&account=219&hostname=24.29.112.9&serve
r=nycmnyc-rc-rtr1.nyc.rr.com&intname=GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web">
<IMG SRC="/cgi-
bin/netGraph.cgi?server=nycmnyc-rc-
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=daily" ALT="24.29.112.9"
BORDER=0>
</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
Communications
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto:sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC

sysadmins</a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF NYCMNYC_RC_RTR1_NYC_RR_COM
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_TRAFFIC_DETAIL
<html>
<head>
</head>

</td>
</tr>
</table>

<script type="text/javascript" src="javascript/overlib.js "></script>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i>Welcome Airweb Airweb </font></i><br>
<br><br></center>
Communications

AirWeb</a>
<br>

onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>

<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,

DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
document.layers ["menu219outline"].display='block';
}
{
document.all["menu219outline"].style.display='block
';
}
{
document.getElementById("menu219outline").styl
e.display='block';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>

Communications
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Traffic Detail</title>

<tr><td align=center><h2>Traffic Details<br>24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN
subif</h2></td></tr><tr>
!TRACKING BY SERVER&INTERFACE
<td align=center>
NAME&INTNUM&INTALIAS
cgi?server=nycmnyc-rc-
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/netGraph.
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=hourly" ALT="24.29.112.9 -
GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif - hourly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/netGraph.cgi?server=nycmnyc-rc-
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=daily" ALT="24.29.112.9 -
GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif - daily" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
?server=nycmnyc-rc-
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/netGraph.cgi
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=weekly" ALT="24.29.112.9 -
GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif - weekly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
server=nycmnyc-rc-
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/netGraph.cgi?
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=monthly"
ALT="24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif -
monthly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

Communications
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_TRAFFIC_DETAIL
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_LATENCY
<html>
<head>
</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt='Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;' border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>

<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i>Welcome Airweb Airweb</font></i><br> ! SETTING UP

CUSTOM MENU FOR 219
<br><br></center>
Communications
<a href='#' onclick="showhide( 'menu219outline',menu219sign); return false;"><img id="menu219sign"
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=availability&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Uptime percentages over four different periods of time.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY,
1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>
Traffic</font>
<font size=1 color=FFCF00>
<br> ! TRACKING LATENCY BY ACCOUNT NUMBER

href="/index.php?menuaction=latency&account=219" onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times.',
OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Latency</a>
<br>
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
document.getElementById("menu219outline").style.display='
block';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>

Communications
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Traffic Detail</title>

<tr><td align=center><h2>Traffic Details<br>24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif</h2></td></tr><tr>
<td align=center>
! TRACKING BY SERVER AND INTERFACE NAME&

INTNUM AND INTALIAS
server=nycmnyc-rc-rtr1.nyc.rr.com&intname=GigabitEthernet1/3.4-
802.1Q vLAN subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=hourly" ALT="24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif
- hourly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
?server=nycmnyc-rc-rtr1.nyc.rr.com&intname=GigabitEthernet1/3.4-
802.1Q vLAN subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=daily" ALT="24.29.112.9 -

GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif - daily" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
?server=nycmnyc-rc-
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=weekly" ALT="24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-
802.1Q vLAN subif - weekly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
server=nycmnyc-rc-
subif&intnum=30&intalias=Air Web&graph=monthly" ALT="24.29.112.9 - GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q
vLAN subif - monthly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
Communications
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPOTRAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_LATENCY
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_IF_STATS
<title>24,29,112,9.if_stat</title><pre>green Mon Aug 30 11:48:47 CET 2004 [24.29.112.9]
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre><div align="left"><b>Table of interface status (just looks if interface ist up or down):<br>
</pre><pre></b></div>
</pre><pre><TR>
</pre><pre><TD width="20%"><b >Interface name</b></TD>

</pre><pre><TD width="5%"><b>delta</b></TD>
</pre><pre><TD width="10%"><b>Last change</b><br>
</pre><pre>hh:mm:ss</TD>
</pre><pre><TR>
</pre><pre><tr>

</pre><pre><td>9315s</td>
</pre><pre><td> 1000 MBit/s</td>
</pre><pre><td>69 days, 0:03:02</td>
</pre><pre><td>&green Interface is UP</td>
</pre><pre></tr>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre><font color="teal" size="1"> router information generated by RouterMon 1.0i (Herzig 08/11/2001) (Linux 2.4.26 i686)
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><center>
Close
</a>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_LATENCY
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_LATENCY_DETAILS
<html>
<head>
Communications
<title>RR Commercial Portal </title>
</head>

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt= 'Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;'
border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<body onload=preload();>< div id="overDiv" style="position:absolute; visibility:hidden; z-index:1000;"></div>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i> Welcome Airweb Airweb </font></i><br>
<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<img src=images/t.gif align=absmiddle>   <a class=menu href="/index.php?menuaction=availability&account=219 "
onmouseover="return overlib('Uptime percentages over four different periods of time.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=traffic&account=219"
onmouseover="return overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).' , OFFSETX, 20,
OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>

Communications
<br>
<img src=images/l.gif align=absmiddle><font color=FFCF00>></font>
<font size=1 color=FFCF00>Latency</font>
<br>
</div>
document.layers ["menu219outline"].display='block';
}
{
}
{
document.getElementById("menu219outline").style.
display='block';
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>

<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Latency Detail </title>
<tr><td align=center><h2> Latency Detail<br>24.29.112.9</h2></td></tr><tr>

<td align=center>
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/larrd-grapher-custom.cgi? host=24.29.112.9&service=conn&graph=hourly" ALT="24.29.112.9 - hourly"
BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/larrd-grapher-custom.cgi?host=24.29.112.9&service=conn&graph=daily" ALT="24.29.112.9 -

daily" BORDER=0>
Communications
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/larrd-grapher-custom.cgi? host=24.29.112.9&service=conn&graph=weekly"

ALT="24.29.112.9 - weekly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=center>
<IMG SRC="/cgi-bin/larrd-grapher- custom.cgi? host=24.29.112.9&service=conn&graph=monthly" ALT="24.29.112.9 -

monthly" BORDER=0>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
This site and all contents &#169 2004 by <a href=mailto :sysadmins@nyroc.rr.com>NYROC sysadmins</a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_LATENCY_DETAILS
1. END OF PORTAL
2. START OF DOWNLOAD
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<TITLE>403 Forbidden</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY>
<H1>Forbidden</H1>
You don't have permission to access /pages/

on this server.<P>
<HR>
<ADDRESS> Apache/1.3.29 Server at commportal.nebiz.rr.com Port 443</ADDRESS>

</BODY></HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title> RR Commercial Portal </title>
</head>
Communications

<tr><td align=center><a href=index.php><img src=images/header.png alt = 'Road Runner Business Class' style='vertical-align: bottom;'
border=0></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>


</script>
<center>
<font color=CECFCE><i> Welcome Airweb Airweb</font></i><br>

<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=traffic&account=219" onmouseover="return overlib('Bandwidth
Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
Communications

<br>
</div>
{
}
{
}
{
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
</a>
</td>
</a>
</td>
</tr><tr>
Communications
</a>
</td>
<img src='./pages/pie.php?data=a:2:{i:0;s:6:"08.540";i:1;s:6:"91.460";}&color=a:2:{i:0;s:5:"green";i:1;s:5:"white";}&title=Past 52 Weeks - 100%' border=0>
</a>
</td></tr>
</table>
<tr>
</tr>
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_ABAILABLE
2. Download site: The download Test & Turn-up Operation was a Road Runner Operation, to hide the true nature of the
service. COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_COM_CPU
<title>24,29,112,9.cpu</title ><pre>greenMonAug3011:48:47CET2004[24.29.112.9]
Communications
</pre><pre>&green:Systemuptime:158days,18:13:35(hh:mm:ss)
</pre><pre>&green:CPUusage:0%(thresholds:yelow=50%:red=90%)
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>Systemdescription:
</pre><pre>---------------
</pre><pre>CiscoInternetworkOperatingSystemSoftware
</pre><pre>IOS(tm)s72033_rpSoftware(s72033_rp-PK9SV-M),Version12.2(14)SX1,EARLYDEPLOYMENTRELEASESOFTWARE(fc1)
</pre><pre>TACSupport:http://www.cisco.com/tac
</pre><pre>Copyright(c)1986-2003byciscoSystems,Inc.
</pre><pre>CompiledT
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>The following interfaces are known to this “host” (via SNMP):

</pre><pre> 1: "GigabitEthernet1/1" - far side
</pre><pre> 2: "GigabitEthernet1/2" - far side
</pre><pre> 17: "GigabitEthernet5/1" - INTEREST.
</pre><pre> 18: "GigabitEthernet5/2" - and HERE
</pre><pre> 19: "Vlan1" - This may be able to go 100
</pre><pre> 25: "unrouted VLAN 1005" - iNTEREST.
</pre><pre> 30: "GigabitEthernet1/3.4-802.1Q vLAN subif" does not support if_err – INTEREST.
</pre><pre>
Communications

</pre><pre>
</pre><pre></div>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><pre>
</pre><center>
Close
</a>
2. Download site: The download Test & Turn-up Operation was a Road Runner Operation, to hide the true nature of the service.
UPDATE-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM (SECTIONS OF THE SOURCE CODE WHICH SUPPORT OUR CONTENTION THAT
ROAD RUNNER WAS OR IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN HIDING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SERVICE ATTEMPTED TO
BE PROVISIONED. We believe ):
COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_IF_LOAD
</pre><pre><td>90%:95%</td>
</pre><pre></tr>
</pre><pre></table>
</pre><pre>see http://www.routermon.net for details and copyright</font><html
END OF COMMPORTAL_NEBIZ_RR_IF_LOAD
PORTAL
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
Communications
<head>
<link rel=File-List href="./premium-test_files/filelist.xml"> -Sound a lot like Premiere
<title>RR Premium D/L Test Page</title> - Sounds a lot like Road Runner Premiere Down Load Test Page
<o:Author>lcheung</o:Author> - Looks a lot like Cheung I? working for Road Runner is person working directly on Air Web Communications Project
<o:Created>2004-07-22T15:16:00Z</o:Created> - August 22nd at 3:16 Cheung Start Deception/ Why can’t TWC simply give up Transparent
Domain Continunity Results
<o:LastSaved>2004-07-22T15:22:00Z</o:LastSaved> - Looks like it only took 6 minutes.
<o:Company>RoadRunner</o:Company> - it means that Road Runner is directly working on AWC Stuff, this is totally unacceptable.
<o:Version>9.6926</o:Version> - Why Version 9?
<p class=MsoBodyText>RR Premium D/L Test Page</p> - Sounds a lot like Road Runner Premiere Down Load Test Page, but
Road Runner is not to be working directly on any specifics about AWC project with out violating mutually understood understanding, that no way Road Runner could
be directly involded.
<a href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/97mb_test_file.mov">Download 97 MB Test File</a> - Update-

Server.nyc.rr.com and AMS-Server.nyc.rr.com both are interchangable. We believe that TWC “provisioned” a Tranparent LAN Services, Mapped typed Services
Port, maybe on VLAN-1. We believe that TWC planned to us this file, which Mr. David Durso, indicated should not be downloaded to “the server”.
<a href="http://update-server. nyc.rr.com/software/421mb_test_file.avi">Download 421 MB Test File</a>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM AND UPDATE-SERVER.COM ARE THE SAME (OR ONE IS COPIED OFF OF THE OTHER)
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM (SECTIONS OF THE SOURCE CODE WHICH SUPPORT OUR CONTENTION THAT ROAD
RUNNER WAS OR IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN HIDING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SERVICE ATTEMPTED TO BE
PROVISIONED. We believe GigE 1/3.4):
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
</head>
{
00,location=no,menubar=no,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=no,toolbar=no');
}
-->
Communications
</script>
<tr align="middle">
<td colspan="2"><img alt=" Road Runner" src="images/logo.gif" align="center" border="0" width="294"
height="94"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
Road
<td valign="top" align="right"><img alt="
Runner User" src="images/people2.jpg" align="right" border="0" default="default.asp" width="178"
height="184"></td>
Web Access</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="185">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
</form>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
Communications
</body>
</html the latest Road Runner

</tr>
<td valign="top"><a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
ROAD RUNNER HELP; SO THIS IS COMING OFF OF A MAJOR UTILITY SITE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Road Runner Help & Member Services Site Selector</TITLE>

<SCRIPT LANG="javascript">

</SCRIPT>

Communications
<STYLE>
BODY {
background-color: #493543}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 width="606" align="center" height="321" background="/images/siteSelector.gif">
<TR>
<TD>
<table cellpadding=3 width=606 border=0>
<tr valign="top">
<td align=left width="1"> </td>
<td align=left>
<p><span class="purpleBigText">Choose Your Provider, State, and City</span><br>
<span class="purpleText"><br>
Note: You may receive an error if cookies are not enabled.<br>
         View <a href="#" onClick="window.open('/notes/ohd-
cookie.htm','myWindow','width=350,height=600,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,status=no,toolbar=no,resizable=yes,left=200,top=0,screenX=200,screenY=0');return false">information
on enabling cookies</a>.</span> </p>
<p><span class="bodyText">Click <a href="rrwhotext.asp">here</a> if
you are experiencing difficulties with this page.</span></p>
<form name="myForm" method="post" action="rrwho_email_phone.asp">
<input type="hidden" name="entity" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="affName" value="">
<p align="left">
<SELECT NAME="provider" onChange='javascript:populate_states(this.options[selectedIndex].value)' class="bodyText">
<OPTION VALUE = "-1">Select your Provider</OPTION>

<OPTION VALUE = "Time Warner">Time Warner</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE = "Bright House Networks">Bright House
Networks</OPTION>

<OPTION VALUE = "Insight">Insight</OPTION>
</SELECT>
<select name='state'
onChange='javascript:populate_cities(this.options[selectedIndex].value)' class="bodyText">
Communications
<option>Select your State</option>

</select>
<select name='city' class="bodyText">

<option>Select your City</option>
</select>
<input onClick=cookieTest() type=button value=Go! name="button"

class="bodyText">
</p>
</form>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
END OF HELP_RR.COM
HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-RRWHO-EMAIL-PHONE—ASP

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Road Runner Help & Member Service Site Selector</TITLE>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="text3.css">


</SCRIPT>
<STYLE>
BODY {
background-color: #493543;}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<form name="frm" method="POST" action="rrwho_email_phone.asp">
<br>
<br>
<table align=center cellpadding=7 width=710 border=0 background="/images/siteSelectorEmailPhone.gif" height="660">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="20" rowspan="6"> </td>
<td align=left width="597" valign="bottom" colspan="3">
<p>
<span class="purpleBigText">
Customize Your Help & Member Services Site</span>
<p><span class="purpleText">
To display customized content for your specific operating system
and browser, follow the steps below:</span></p>

<input type="hidden" name="doing" value="login">
<input type="hidden" name="visits" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="entity" value="134">

<input type="hidden" name="affName" value="IN-Columbus">
<input type="hidden" name="skipped" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="login" value=1>
<strong><span class="purpleHeading">
Step 1: Enter your Master E-mail Address or Home Telephone Number</span></strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="12"> </td>
<td width="250">
<nobr>Master E-mail Address:</nobr></span></strong><br>
<input type=text name="email" size="30" value="" class="bodyText">

Communications
</td>
<td>
Home Telephone Number:</span></strong><br>
(
<input type=text name="areacode" maxlength="3" size="3" value="" class="bodyText">
)
<input type=text name="exchangeno" maxlength="3" size="3" value="" class="bodyText">
-
<input type=text name="lineno" maxlength="4" size="4" value="" class="bodyText">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">
<strong><span class="purpleHeading">Step
2: Select your Operating System and/or Browser</span></strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>
<span class="purpleText">
<b>Operating System:</b></span><br>
<select name="selectOS" class="bodyText">

<option value="select_os">Select Operating System</option>
<option value="Windows" >Windows</option>
<option value="Macintosh" >Macintosh</option>
</select>
</td>
<td>
<b><span class="purpleText">
Browser:<br></span></b>
<select name="selectBrowser" class="bodyText">

<option value="select_browser">Select Browser</option>
<option value="Internet Explorer" >Internet Explorer</option>
<option value="Netscape" >Netscape</option>
</select>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2">
<span class="tinyPurpleText">Information
provided is confidential, is used only for Road Runner business
Communications
and will not be distributed.</span>

</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<input type="button" value="Submit" name="btnSubmit" onClick="checkForm('submit');"
class="bodyText">

<input type="reset" value="Clear Form" name="btnReset" class="bodyText">

<br>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p align="center">
<a href="JavaScript:onClick=checkForm('skip');"><img border="0"
src="/images/skip_button.gif" width="237" height="41"></a>
</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
<blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>
</blockquote>
</BODY>
</HTML>
END OF HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-RRWHO-EMAIL-PHONE—ASP
HTTP-HELP-RR-COM-GETPAGE-ASP-ASP-NETWORKSTATUS-ASP-MEMSERV
<HTML><HEAD><Meta name="save" content="favorite">
<TITLE>Help & Member Services</TITLE>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" TYPE="TEXT/JAVASCRIPT">


</SCRIPT><STYLE>
BODY {margin-top:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;}
.defaultnavClass { position:absolute; top:100px; left:400px; visibility:hidden; z-index:3; }

Communications
.selfhelpStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.suppservStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.memservStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.servaddStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.techalertStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.helpextStyle { position:absolute; top:110px; left:2px; visibility:hidden; z-index:4; }
.faqDropDown { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10pt; }
.faqDropDownText { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color:#333399; font-size:10pt; }
.formTextSearch { text-transform:uppercase; font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#000000; font-weight:normal;

font-size:7pt; text-decoration:none; }
</STYLE>
<SCRIPT>
var isNetscape4 = (document.layers) ? 1 : 0;
if (isNetscape4) {
//if (isNetscape4 && (window.print)) {
sans-serif; color:#ffffff; font-weight:normal; font-size:7.5pt; text-decoration:none; }</STYLE>")
}
else {
sans-serif; color:#ffffff; font-weight:normal; font-size:7pt; text-decoration:none; }</STYLE>")
}
</SCRIPT>
</HEAD>
<BODY onload="showNavigation('memserv')" bgcolor="#ffffff" leftmargin="0" rightmargin="0" topmargin="0" bottommargin="0"

marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN=3 width="100%">
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="Javascript">

</SCRIPT><TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH="100%" CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>
<TR BGCOLOR="#493543">
<TD WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD width=230>
<font color=white><img src="/images/header_92.gif" border=0 align="left"></font>
</TD>
<TD height="32" BGCOLOR="#493543"> </TD>
<td>
<A HREF="http://www.rr.com"><IMG SRC="images/g_rr_home.gif" BORDER=0 align="right"></A>
</td>
<TD align=right width="202">
<A HREF="asp/main_contentwell.asp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_hms_home.gif" BORDER=0 align="right"></A>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
<TD>
< A HREF="http://www.rr.com"><IMG SRC="/images/g_rrlogo.gif" BORDER=0 WIDTH=92

HEIGHT=54></A>
Communications
<A HREF="http://help.rr.com"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helplogo.gif" BORDER=0></A>
</TD>
<TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="middle" height="50" BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
function searchGO() {
if
(document.helppage_search.search_type[1].checked) {
window.open('http://january.rr.com/html/search.cfm?m=' + 92 + '&query=' +
//window.open('http://www.rr.com/html/search/sitesearch.cfm?searchstring=' +
//window.open('http://rr.looksmart.com/r_search?search=0&comfrom=iacs-search&isp=acs&key=' +
}
else {
document.location =
'/asp/search.asp?ncid=' + 92 + '&keywords=' + escape(document.helppage_search.search_contents.value);
}
}
</script>
<form name="helppage_search"
action="javascript:searchGO()" method="post">
<table width="100%" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0>
<tr>
<td width=45><span class="formTextSearch"><b>Search</b></span></td>
<td width=205><input class="formTextSearch" type="text" name="search_contents" size=20>
<input type="button" value="GO" class="formTextSearch" onClick="searchGO()"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan=2><span class="formTextSearch">
<input type="radio" name="search_type" value="0" checked>HELP.RR.COM

Communications
<input type="radio" name="search_type" value="1">RR.COM
</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</TD>
<TD colspan=2 ALIGN=right><nobr>
<A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity" ><IMG SRC="/images/chatbanner.gif" ALT="Click here for

24 hour Tech Support Chat" WIDTH=325 HEIGHT=55 BORDER=0></A> </nobr></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TR>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><a href="javascript:showNavigation('selfhelp');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('selfhelp')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_selfhelp.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="selfhelp"></a></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('suppserv');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('suppserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_support.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="suppserv"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('memserv');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_member.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="memserv"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('servadd');openPopUpWin('server','','');"

Communications
onmouseover="showNavigation('servadd')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_server.gif" BORDER="0" NAME="servadd"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A HREF="javascript:showNavigation('techalert');openPopUpWin('tech','','');"

onmouseover="showNavigation('techalert')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_tech.gif" BORDER="0" NAME="techalert"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center WIDTH="16.6%"><A

HREF="javascript:showNavigation('helpext');openPopUpWin('helpext','http://help.rr.com/getpage.asp?/asp/networkstatus.asp,me
mserv','');" onmouseover="showNavigation('helpext')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_top_helpext.gif" BORDER="0"
NAME="helpext"></A></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<div id="defaultnavDiv" class="defaultnavClass"><div id="defaultnav"></div></div>
<div id="selfhelpDiv" class="selfhelpStyle">
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/top_faqs.asp,selfhelp">Top FAQs</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/table_of_contents.asp,selfhelp">Help Topics</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/search.asp?FormName=TroubleShooter,selfhelp">Knowledge

Base</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/tutorial_index.asp,selfhelp">Tutorials</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/rrmedic_help_topic.asp,selfhelp">Road Runner Medic</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/asp/one_click_fixes_index.asp,selfhelp">One-click Fixes</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="html/additionalresources.html,selfhelp">Helpful Hotlinks</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="html/glossary.html,selfhelp">Glossary of Terms</a>
</div>
<div id="suppservDiv" class="suppservStyle">

Communications
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity,suppserv">Live

Chat Support</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrmail.asp,suppserv">E-mail Support</A>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/faqs/e_contact_us.html,suppserv">Contact Us</a>
</div>
<div id="memservDiv" class="memservStyle">
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="javascript:openPopUpWin('acctmgt','','');">Account Management</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv">Network Status</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://content.rr.com/rr-

plugins/','');">Download Center</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/dial_access_help_topic.asp,memserv">Dial Access</a>
   <a class="subchannelLink" href="asp/php_help_topic.asp,memserv">PHP</a>
</div>
<div id="servaddDiv" class="servaddStyle">
</div>
<div id="techalertDiv" class="techalertStyle">
</div>
<div id="helpextDiv" class="helpextStyle">
</div>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
Communications
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="150" height="90%" BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC" ALIGN=left VALIGN=top>
<TABLE BORDER=0 WIDTH=150 CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BGCOLOR="#E1D9CC">
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><font size="-2"> </font></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><IMG SRC="/images/g_selfhelp.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/top_faqs.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_topfaqs.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/table_of_contents.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helptopic.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/search.asp?FormName=TroubleShooter,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_kbase.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/tutorial_index.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_tutorials.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/rrmedic_help_topic.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_rrmedic.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/one_click_fixes_index.asp,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_one_click_fixes.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/html/additionalresources.html,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_helpful.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/html/glossary.html,selfhelp"><IMG SRC="/images/g_glossary.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><BR><IMG SRC="/images/g_supportservices.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrchat2.asp?poolname=TW-NYCity,suppserv"><IMG

SRC="/images/g_livechat.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="http://help.rr.com/asp/rrmail.asp,suppserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_e-mailsup.gif"

Communications
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/faqs/e_contact_us.html,suppserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_contact.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><BR><IMG SRC="/images/g_member.gif" BORDER="0"></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('acctmgt','','');showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG

SRC="/images/g_acctmgmt.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv"><IMG SRC="/images/g_networkst.gif"

<TR><TD ALIGN=left><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://content.rr.com/rr-

plugins/','');showNavigation('memserv')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_software.gif" BORDER="0"></A></TD></TR>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" TYPE="text/javascript">
function noLink(){}
HM_Array1 = [
[150, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
],
["PHP Help","/asp/php_help_topic.asp,memserv",1,0,1],
["PHP Maintenance","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','http://home-admin.rr.com','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,0]
HM_Array2 = [
Communications
[180, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
],
["Dial Access Help","/asp/dial_access_help_topic.asp,memserv",1,0,1],
["Dial Access
Registration","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink_DA','http://dialaccess.rr.com','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,0]
HM_Array3 = [
[180, // menu_width
, // left_position
, // top_position
"#493543", // font_color
Communications
],
["Business Solutions","javascript:openPopUpWin('outsideLink','','');showNavigation('memserv')",1,0,1],
["Business Solutions Help","/html/business_solutions_help.html,memserv",1,0,0]
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript1.2" SRC="HM_Loader.js" TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>

onMouseOut="HM_f_PopDown('elMenu2')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_dial_access.gif" BORDER="0"><A></TD></TR>

onMouseOut="HM_f_PopDown('elMenu1')"><IMG SRC="/images/g_php.gif" BORDER="0"><A></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">12:40:29 PM</font></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">HERIIS01</font></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><font color="#E1D9CC" size="-1">382802646</font></td></tr></table>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="15" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<TR><TD> </TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="850" ALIGN=left VALIGN=top bgcolor="#ffffff">
<TR><TD><font size="-2"> </font></TD></TR>
Communications

</SCRIPT>
<TR><TD valign=top>
<html>
<head>
<title>Network Status</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<h3><img src="images/g_networkstatus_bar.gif" width="428" height="26"></h3>

<table width="480" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<P>
<span class="blackText"><B>Last Updated</B>: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:40
PM EDT</span>
</P>
</td>
<td align="right">
<B><A HREF="javascript:openPopUpWin('tech','','');">Tech Alerts</A></B>
</td>
</tr>
</table><BR>

<table border="0" cellpadding="2">

<tr>
<td bgcolor="#493543" height="25" colspan="2"><b><font color="#E1D9CC">Status Legend</font></b></td>
<td bgcolor="#493543" width="230"><b><font color="#E1D9CC">Time Zone Legend</font></b></td>
Communications
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="60" align="left">
<span class="redTextBold"><b>Red</b></span>
</td>
<td width="170" align="left">Unplanned
event/outage</td>
<td>
Eastern Standard Time (EST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<span class="yellowTextBold"><b>Yellow</b></span>
</td>
<td align="left">Planned
maintenance</td>
<td>
Central Standard Time (CST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<span class="greenTextBold"><b>Green</b></span>
</td>
<td align="left">Service
operational</td>
<td>
Mountain Standard Time (MST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<b>Closed</b>
</td>
<td align="left">Recently
closed event</td>
<td>
Pacific Standard Time (PST)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left"> </td>
<td>
Hawaii Standard Time (HST)
</td>
</tr>
Communications
</table>
<BR>
<table border=0>
</table>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>Account Management</b></font><BR><BR>

<tr>
Date</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>

<br>12:40 PM
</td>
</tr>
</table><BR><BR>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>E-Mail</b></font><BR><BR>

<tr>
Date</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
Communications
<tr>

<br>12:40 PM
</td>
</tr>
</table><BR><BR>
<font color="#493543" size="2"><b>Internet Connectivity</b></font><BR><BR>

<tr>
Date</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>

<td valign="top" align="left">NYC</td>
Road Runner will be conducting
<td valign="top">
Planned Maintenance on the IP network. Subscribers in the

affected area(s) may have no connection to the Internet or
latency/slow connectivity during this maintenance window. Our
engineers are working quickly to complete this maintenance.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
Communications

<td va lign="top" align="left">UTOPIA
QUEENS</td>
<td valign="top">Road Runner will be
conducting Planned Maintenance on the IP network. Subscribers in the
affected area(s) may have no connection to the Internet or latency/slow
connectivity during this maintenance window. Our engineers are
working quickly to complete this maintenance. We apologize for any
inconvenience this may cause.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="91" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Date
Opened</b></td>
<td width="68" height="25" bgcolor="#e1d9cc"><b>Date Closed</b></td>
Affected</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="DDDDDD" align="center"><B>Closed
<style>

</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='tab-interval:.5in'>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoBodyText>RR Premium D/L Test Page</p>

<h1><a href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/97mb_test_file.mov">Download
97 MB Test File</a></h1>



style='font-size:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'><a
Communications
href="http://update-server.nyc.rr.com/software/421mb_test_file.avi">Download
421 MB Test File</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
END OF PREMIUM TEST ONE

UPDATE SERVER.NYC.RR.COM\SOFTWARE
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express 2.0">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF"

vlink="#0000FF" alink="#0000FF">
<p align="center"><font size="5" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><b>Road

Runner Software Updates </b></font><br>
<br>
</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%">

<tr>
<td><font size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA">Using the links
on this page, you can download the latest Road Runner
</tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p align="center"><br>
</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">

<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
</tr>
<tr>
Communications
<td valign="top"><a
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a
<tr>
face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><NOBR> <b>Macintosh PowerPC </NOBR></b></font></td>
<td valign="top"><a
href="http://update-server/pub/swdownload/MacPPC/Explorer/ie45setup-noproxy.smi.hqx"><font
size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA">Internet Explorer 4.5 </font></a><font
size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"><br>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p><font size="2" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA"></font> </p>

</body>
</html>
END OF UPDATE SERVER.NYC.RR.COM\SOFTWARE
AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM/USERMANAGER/LOGINuSER/ASP
<html>
<head>
Communications
<title>Authenticate Web Access</title>

</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
<script language="JavaScript">

</script>
<tr align="middle">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
Web Access</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="81">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="185">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
</form>
</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
Communications
</body>
</html>
END OF AMS-SERVER.NYC.RR.COM/USERMANAGER/LOGINuSER/ASP
COMMPORTAL-NEBIZ.RR.COM/INDEX.PHP/MENUACTION-SUMMARY-ACCOUNT-219
Commportal-nebiz.rr.com.index.php.menuaction.summary.account.219
<html>
<head>
</head>

</td>
</tr>
</table>


</SCRIPT>
<tr>



</script>
<center>
<br><br></center>
AirWeb</a>
<br>
href="/index.php?menuaction=availability&account=219" onmouseover="return overlib('Uptime percentages over four different
periods of time.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Availability</a>
<br>
overlib('Bandwidth Utilization (Inbound and Outbound).', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,
DELAY, 1500);" onmouseout="nd();">Traffic</a>
<br>
<br>
</div>
{
Communications
}
{
}
{
}
</SCRIPT>

</td>
</tr><tr>
<title>RR Commercial Portal -- Summary</title>
<table align=center width=45% border=1 cellpadding=5 cellspacing=0>
<tr>
<td align=center colspan=2><b>AirWeb</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign=top><font size=1>
Type: dedicatedaccess<br>
TW Division: nyc<br>
Domain: na<br>
</td>
<td valign=top align=right><font size=1>
na<br>
New York City, NY na<br>
na<br>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<center><h2>CURRENT STATUS</h2></center>
<table align=center border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=4>
<tr><td align=center colspan=4><b><u>24.29.112.9</u></b></td><tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.conn','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Simple Ping Check. Is the device alive?', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION,
'Connection');" onmouseout="nd();">
conn</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.cpu','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('CPU usage as compared to a preset threshold level.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500,
CAPTION, 'CPU Utilization');" onmouseout="nd();">
cpu</td>
Communications
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_err','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Number of errors in packets as a percentage of the total number of packets being passed.
Thresholds predefined.', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Errors');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_err</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_load','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('The load is calculated by collecting the number of bytes of interface input and output bytes of each
interface for the time specified snmp-interval. Preset threshold levels, based on percentage reached.', OFFSETX, 20,
OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Load');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_load</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.if_stat','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Monitors the status of all interfaces on device. (Up or Down?)', OFFSETX, 20, OFFSETY, 5,
DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Interface Status');" onmouseout="nd();">
if_stat</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=ffffff>
onclick="window.open('./pages/showmsg.php?file=24,29,112,9.latency','','width=600,height=500,scrollbars=1,resizable=1');"
onmouseover="return overlib('Roundtrip Ping times based on a percentage reached of a predefined threshold level.', OFFSETX,
20, OFFSETY, 5, DELAY, 1500, CAPTION, 'Latency');" onmouseout="nd();">
latency</td>
<td><img src=../images/clear.gif></td>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
<tr>
Communications

</tr>
</table>
</SCRIPT>
</td>
</tr>
<center>
</center>
</td></tr>
</table>
End of COMMPORTAL-NEBIZ.RR.COM/INDEX.PHP/MENUACTION-SUMMARY-ACCOUNT-219
End of Commportal-nebiz.rr.com.index.php.menuaction.summary.account.219

DOJ - Brief - 03-24-2005 1d

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOJ - Brief - 03-24-2005 1d

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Request for Formal Investigation

Air Web Communications & C&A Vs. Time Warner

Request for formal, criminal, antitrust investigation; investigation and discovery

Cogent Communications, Comm. Telex Co-location Facility

NY-NJ Wholesale Internet provider Tenancy Location @ 9th Floor (rack)

Carrier-Class Cross-Connect 60 Hudson - 620 Islam

Cataldi & Associates, Inc.

SIP 2.0 Telephone exchange interconnectivity

Time Warner Cable Meet-Me Room & Patch Panel

of New York City Semi-annual Conventions

620 Isham Street, New York 10034

APPENDIX (A) - DOCUMENT CHANGE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 31 Field Code Changed

Chapter 1: Introduction to Federal Complaint

Result of 8 months of intense in-house investigation

TWC Criminal conduct against AWC and C&A included:

Horizontal and Vertical Foreclosures

1. Implement Antitrust Exclusionary Acts

1. Maintain or extend market power duration

1. Local Content Originator

Chapter 2: Request for Investigation and Discovery

Chapter 3: Complaint Summary

1. Excessive restrictions of trade

1. Consume 14 months of critical time to market

a. New House Network Stockholders common to Time Warner Entertainment

2. AWC documentation development:

c. core competence/ best practices and standards development:

4. AWC established commitments with:

8. Discriminatory - Fraudulent Business Practices

9.Discriminatory Standards – Degrading Manipulations

10. Eliminated benefits associated with tenancy at Telex: 60 Hudson Street:

9. privileges associated with being a Telecommunications Wholesale exchange member

12. Inadequate-Circuit Design and Provision-Design

15. Inadequate Client Network Edge Device

20. RJ 45 Cat 5: user-to-network interface (UNI) - front panel

Chapter 4: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS SUMMARY

TWC engaged in the following Bait & Switch operations:.

Chapter 5: TWC ‘BAIT & SWITCH’ OPERATIONS BREAKDOWN

1. Terms and conditions document

5. Added Marketing copy photocopies of various offerings.

Chapter 6: Restructure Transactions - Eliminate Anti-Competitive Effects

7. All TWC Edge Devices of a quality and provisioned as carrier grade.

8. TWC must enable AWC to implement the following:

12. TWC must deliver on all three service orders as promised

Chapter 7: Air Web Time Warner Agreement Summary

1. providing 3 separate service order commitments

1. Top priority, non-aggregated services

Chapter 8: Key Time frames

2. First Offer – February 2004 Signing

First Offer Straight forward, and Simple

a. 100 Meg full duplex, dedicated leased line

d. TWC commented to but did not perform on any of the 38 points.

d. Term 5 minimum, with option to extend to 10 years

e. Fixed monthly rate of $15,000.00 guaranteed

2. Master Service was to be in three separate, successive service order agreements:

a. 100 meg 2 point to Tennant area at 60 Hudson (with internet)

4. Overview of TWC’s service offering

We require the dedicated lease line support at a minimum, the following:

a. Connecting two client managed or co-managed, carrier-grade network edge-devices

8. Research during this time frame indicated the following:

[Page 28 is Intentionally Blank]

Chapter 9: Predatory Billing Assessment

 No entries in Forwarding Database specified

Circuit & Numeric Consistency