Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Perimeter Greater Than Area

Perimeter Greater Than Area

Ratings: (0)|Views: 309 |Likes:
Explores tentatively the relationship between area and perimeter for a rectangle ignoring the units. Author S.Srinivasan email: sahajbrc@gmail.com
Explores tentatively the relationship between area and perimeter for a rectangle ignoring the units. Author S.Srinivasan email: sahajbrc@gmail.com

More info:

Published by: S.Srinivasan ('Chinu'); Renu Khanna on Nov 02, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less



October 21, 2009
Perimeter Greater than Area?
Why does our present title then not make any sense? Firstly we are comparing unequal things, like apples andoranges, or like comparing distance and speed. Obviously you cannot say anything if you are asked which isgreater: distance 100 km or the speed value 200 km per hour?But nevertheless sometimes interesting information can be gained by pursuing useless things. We are alsodoing so to show how elementary questions can be asked and explored at the elementary school level (well, ithelps if children should know graphs).Okay here is the problem: when is perimeter greater than area for a rectangle (PM being measured say in cmunits and area in sq.cm units)? When we say greater we mean numerically greater.[Well, if you want to make “sense” of this kind of question, you may reformulate the problem thus: we havetwo number crunching machines, the perimeter machine and the area machine. You feed positive numbers aand b – into both – then at what point the output from the one will exceed the other? ]Let us take s and t be the sides of the rectangle and PM as its perimeter and A as its area.1)
When s = 1: PM = 2 (length + breadth) = 2 (1 + t). Area is length x breadth = 1x t = t. Now 2 + 2t isalways greater than t. Therefore here PM > A, when s =1.This means whenever you have one of the sides as 1, perimeter will be always (numerically) greater than area.2)
When s = 2: again here PM > area as always 2 (2+t) = 4 + 2t > 2t. This means whenever you have s=2, perimeter will be always (numerically) greater than area, irrespective of whatever value t takes.3)
When s = 3: Here it is bit more curious. PM > A till the other side t is less than 6, and when t > 6, A >PM, that is area is greater than perimeter. When t is exactly equal to 6, that is when t =6, area and perimeter are equal (numerically only, mind you). Here A = PM = 18. This is the first instance whenarea is equal to perimeter for integer values of the sides (s, t = 3,6). For a given value of s, we will call
the t-value
when area becomes equal to perimeter. Or the point when the relation PM > A, becomes the other way around, that is A >PM. Again numerically please let us remember.When s = 4: Till t reaches the value 4, PM > Area. At t = 4, PM = Area. When t > 4, A > PM. When t = 4,Area = PM =16. Now this is the second instance when area is equal to perimeter for integer values of the sides(s, t = 4,4). As far as we know (s,t) = (3,6) or (6,3) and (4,4) are the only instances when A = PM for integer values of the sides. Note the equipoint is t = 4 for s =4. The other integer solutions are,s= 1, t = -2; s =0, t =0; s = -2, t = 1.4)
When s =5: the equipoint is t = 10/3 =3.333…, that is area = perimeter = 15 in this case. When t>10/3, A > PM. When t < 10/3, Area < PM.If you wondered, how we got 10/3, all we did was solve the equation when PM = Area, or: 2 (5 +t) =5t which leads to 3t =10 or t =10/3.5)
When s = 6: we know from (3) above there is an integer equipoint at t = 3. And also therefore when t<3, A < PM and when t > 3, A >PM.6)
When s =7: equipoint is t = 14/5 =2.80.7)
When s = 8: equipoint is t = 2.66.8)
When s =9: equipoint is t = 2.57.9)
When s= 10: equipoint is t = 2.50.You can see the trend: as s increases, the equipoint t (or the point when the relation PM > A, becomes theother way around, that is A >PM) decreases. Does it indefinitely decrease? Or approaches a limit beyondwhich it does not go?
 No t does not decrease beyond a point. It approaches a limit: when s increases, the equipoint t decreases to(or approaches) 2.How do we know this? We write when PM =A,2 (s+t) =stor 2s + 2t = st; or 2s = st –2t = t(s-2). From which we can write t = 2s/(s-2) or t = 2/(1-2/s). From this it is clear when s increases towards infinity, 2/s tends to zero, or 2/s
0.Therefore, t
2.We show this in the graphs below, t is on the vertical axis and s is on the horizontal axis. We have plotted
t = 2s/(s-2
). In the graphs (produced by Wolfram Alpha), x is our s.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->