Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Videogame Transcripts

Videogame Transcripts

Ratings: (0)|Views: 49 |Likes:
Published by The Wrap

More info:

Published by: The Wrap on Nov 02, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/28/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR :OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., :Petitioners :v. : No. 08-1448ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS :ASSOCIATION, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xWashington, D.C.Tuesday, November 2, 2010The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 10:04 a.m.APPEARANCES:ZACKERY P. MORAZZINI, ESQ., Supervising Deputy AttorneyGeneral, Sacramento, California; on behalf ofPetitioners.PAUL M. SMITH, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofRespondents.1
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T SORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEZACKERY P. MORAZZINI, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 3ORAL ARGUMENT OFPAUL M. SMITH, ESQ.On behalf of the Respondents 25REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFZACKERY P. MORAZZINI, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 552
Alderson Reporting Company
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
P R O C E E D I N G S(10:04 a.m.)CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: We will hearargument first this morning in Case 08-1448,Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association.Mr. Morazzini.ORAL ARGUMENT OF ZACKERY P. MORAZZINION BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERSMR. MORAZZINI: Mr. Chief Justice, and mayit please the Court:The California law at issue today beforethis Court differs from the New York law at issue inGinsberg in only one respect. Where New York wasconcerned with minors' access to harmful sexual materialoutside the guidance of a parent, California is no lessconcerned with a minor's access to the deviant level ofviolence that is presented in a certain category ofvideo games that can be no less harmful to thedevelopment of minors.When this Court in Ginsberg crafted a ruleof law that permits States to regulate a minor's accessto such material outside the presence of a parent, itdid so for two fundamental reasons that are equallyapplicable this morning in this case.First, this rule permits parents' claim to3
Alderson Reporting Company

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->