Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPEARANCES:
APPEARANCES (Cont'd.):
17 seat. Now I know why you're here. All right. That's -- okay.
25 report and accounting was signed, and then when she started to
1 make payments on her own, Countrywide sent them back and said
2 that they wouldn't take them, because she was in default, and
4 started.
8 Puida about it, and she explained to me that there are three
11 plan.
15 and our carbon copy is to Ken Steidl at the new address where
17 that --
21 subsequent time?
25 property?
8 They're not the first letter that was sent. They're just --
10 letter. That's a letter that they don't have, and now they've
12 prior letter?
15 All of these letters were -- there are three of them, and they
19 in '05.
21 ahead.
24 to represent or offer?
13 two are recreation letters, too. It's not the same -- how do
15 reasons?
22 they allege that they actually sent these letters at one time,
25 that far.
4 said that she was kind enough to lower what she want -- what
7 there. You said that there was a final -- after the Trustee
8 filed its final account and report and a discharge order was --
19 Honor.
7 there might be other payments that didn't get knocked down, and
10 so we could see --
13 that an --
17 THE COURT: I'm not sure what -- all right. Tell me.
19 involve this matter and nine other cases, that this particular
23 settled. Are you now backing off a settlement, or did you ever
2 approval, she did not want it. She didn't want a settlement.
3 She --
19 comfortable standing. Make sure you bend over and talk into
23 comfortable.
25 were never held out to be letters that were sent notifying any
9 prove that they had been sent. They were merely showing what
10 the breakdown was of the PMI and escrow at those various points
11 in time.
20 Why would you -- when did you disclose that these letters were
23 the event?
9 were being sent to him just showing what the case status was at
10 the time the discharge was entered, what the status is now, and
14 want you to be totally candid with me, because I'm going to ask
3 checked his file, and I had told him, well, you wouldn't have,
4 because this was -- these were not sent out. It's just drawing
9 point of the letters was to show what the payment changes were
24 the --
7 Julie Steidl said they never had the acceptance of the debtor.
11 that?
16 issue?
23 the miscellaneous matter, and the issues that were told to the
17 couldn't proceed.
21 consent order here. But I see that we're not even close to
24 Court as to the pending issues. Mr. Ross, did you have any
6 which -- I believe it's 203 with the 293 cases. That was the
15 of issues.
24 information that Your Honor may wish to have from the file.
2 let the one lawyer, and Mr. Ross, you're the man. Go ahead.
10 injunction violation.
15 believes that or knows that these three checks have been lost.
16 Two -- checks have been lost twice. There's been a third check
19 question --
3 mind -- and I'm not as close to it as you, but the two seem to
4 be unrelated.
12 that Ms. Steidl has referenced, what I'd like to bring to the
16 received those letters. Your Honor, the 293 cases are about
24 letter, 2007?
2 then. I'm wrong. I thought it was 2003 and 2005, but maybe
7 Mr. Ross.
1 we believe that the debtor has the right and it really makes
2 sense with what we've -- what the Court has learned today.
6 being told here about these recreations and what the purpose is
9 perception that notices were timely sent. But maybe there is,
14 what escrow was received and payments during the course of the
15 bankruptcy, what was paid out, what difference between the two
16 there may have been. The letters again were never offered as
23 these letters, you couldn't respond. You could not answer, and
24 I can appreciate that, and that's just more reason why there
16 * * * * *
17 CERTIFICATION
22