UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
, ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) No. 1:10-cv-0897-RJL)LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR a/k/a “Larry Sinclair”, )
, ))Defendants. ))
PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO SINCLAIR’S OCTOBER 25, 2010 LETTERRESPONDING TO THE COURT’S OCTOBER 20, 2010 ORDERFOR SPI TO RETAIN COUNSEL
Plaintiffs, Daniel Parisi (“Parisi”), Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC(“WNL”), and White House Communications Inc. (“WCI”) (collectively referred to as“plaintiffs”), hereby reply to the October 25, 2010 letter of defendant Lawrence Sinclair, whichwas written in response to the Court’s October 20, 2010 Order that defendant SinclairPublishing, Inc. (“SPI”) retain counsel by November 15 or show cause why SPI should not besanctioned, including by entry of a default judgment. (Dkt. No. 65). A copy of Mr. Sinclair’sletter is attached as Ex. 1.Sinclair’s letter states that he has attempted to retain counsel to act for SPI to no avail.He writes that neither he nor SPI have the financial ability to retain counsel. Mr. Sinclair statesthat he moved from Florida to Washington, D.C. to obtain counsel and was unsuccessful.Sinclair now resides in Tennessee. His letter does not set forth any reasonable prospect that SPIwill be able to engage counsel to represent it in this litigation by November 15, 2010 or at anytime thereafter.
Case 1:10-cv-00897-RJL Document 75 Filed 11/02/10 Page 1 of 3