Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 56|Likes:
Published by Chris Nash

More info:

Published by: Chris Nash on Jul 26, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 International Partnerships in Large ScienceProjects
July 1995
OTA-BP-ETI-150GPO stock #052-003-01419-0
Recommended Citation:
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment,
InternationalPartnerships in Large Science Projects
, OTA-BP-ETI-150 (Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office, July 1995).
ederal investment in research and development (R&D) has beencrucial to many of the nation’s achievements in basic sciences. Inrecent years, however, budgetary pressures have made it difficultto sustain ongoing government R&D efforts and to initiate newventures. These pressures and the growing international character of scientific research have focused greater attention on the potential con-tributions of international cooperation, particularly for large-scale, long-term science projects.The United States has several decades of experience with internation-al scientific collaborations. Numerous successful small-scale scientificcooperative efforts, largely through bilateral agreements, have been con-ducted. High-energy physics, fusion energy, and space are rich with ex-amples of this type of cooperation. However, U.S. experience in the jointconstruction and operation of large-scale experiments and facilities is farmore limited.This background paper, requested by the Chairman and Ranking Mi-nority Member of the House Committee on Science, reviews U.S. expe-rience with collaborative projects in many different fields and their im-plications for future activities. It assesses the factors that facilitateinternational partnerships in big science projects and those that, con-versely, favor the pursuit of purely national projects. The background pa-per also reviews and identifies several important issues to consider instructuring future collaborations. These include maintaining U.S. scien-tific expertise, setting research priorities, developing mechanisms to en-sure long-term project stability, and safeguarding economic and nationalsecurity interests.In the course of this study, OTA drew on the experience of many orga-nizations and individuals. In particular, we appreciate the invaluable as-sistance of the workshop participants, as well as the efforts of the proj-ect’s contractors. We would also like to acknowledge the help of themany reviewers who gave their time to ensure the accuracy and compre-hensiveness of this study. To all of them goes the gratitude of OTA andthe personal thanks of the staff.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->