Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
20Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
EVIDENCE Syllabus

EVIDENCE Syllabus

Ratings: (0)|Views: 766 |Likes:
Published by saintkarri

More info:

Published by: saintkarri on Nov 06, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/28/2013

pdf

text

original

EVIDENCE ± Prof. R. A. Vinluan | First Semester, A.Y. 2010-2011 Page 1 of 10
UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Law
Diliman, Quezon City
EVIDENCE
Prof. Rogelio A. Vinluan
1st Semester, AY 2010-2011
COURSE SYLLABUS
(2009-2010 Edition)
I.
Admissibility of Evidence
A. Rule 128, Sections 1-4
1. Reyes v. Court of Appeals
216 SCRA 25 (1993)
2. People v. Turco
337 SCRA 714 (2000)
B. Relevance
Rule 128, Sections 3 and 4
1.Bautista v. Aperece
51 O.G. 805 (1995)
2. Lopez v. Heesen
365 P.2d 448 (1961)
3. State v.Ball
339 S.W2d 783 (1960)
C. Competence
Rule 128, Section 3
1. Exclusionary Rules under the 1987 Constitution, e.g.,
a. Sections 2 and 3, Art. III
b. Section 12, Art. III
c. Section 17, Art. III
2. Statutory Rules of Exclusion, e.g.,
a. Section 201, Tax Reform Act of 1997
b. R.A. 1405, Law on Secrecy ofBank Deposits
c. R.A. 4200, Wiretapping Act
i. Ganaan v. IAC
145 SCRA 112 (1986
ii. Salcedo-Ortanez v. CA
235 SCRA 111 (1994)
iii. Ramirez v. CA
248 SCRA 590 (1995)
II.
What Need Not Be Proved
A. Rule 129, Sections 1-4
Rule 10, Section 8
B. Cases:
1. Judicial Notice
a. City of Manila v. Garcia
19 SCRA 413 (1967)
b.Baguio v. Vda. de Jalagat
42 SCRA 337 (1971)
EVIDENCE ± Prof. R. A. Vinluan | First Semester, A.Y. 2010-2011 Page 2 of 10
c. Prieto v. Arroyo
14 SCRA 549 (1965)
d. Yao-Kee v. Sy-Gonzales
167 SCRA 736 (1988)
e. Tabuena v. CA
196 SCRA 650 (1991)
f. People v. Godoy
250 SCRA 676 (1995)
g.BPI-Savings v. CTA
330 SCRA 507 (2000)
2. Judicial Admissions
a. Lucido v. Calupitan
27 Phil. 48 (1914)
b. Torres v. CA
131 SCRA 24 (1984)
III.
Real and Demonstrative Evidence
A. Rule 130, Section 1 and 2
B. Cases:
1. People v.Bardaje
99 SCRA 388 (1980)
2. Sison v. People
256 SCRA 58 (1995)
3. Adamczuk v. Holloway
13 A.2d 2 (1940)
4. State v. Tatum
360 P.2d 754 (1961)
IV.
Best Evidence Rule
A. Rule 130, Sections 2-8;
Rule 132, Sections 25 and 27;
Electronic Commerce Act (R.A. 8792), Sections 5-15;
Rules on Electronic Evidence (REE), Rule 2, Section 1; Rule 3; Rule 4
B. Cases:
1. Air France v. Carrascoso
18 SCRA 155 (1966)
2. Meyers v. United States
171 F.2d 800 (1948)
3. People v. Tan
105 Phil. 1242 (1959)
4. Seiler v. Lucas Film, Ltd.
797 F.2d 1504 (1986)
5. People v. Tandoy
192 SCRA 98 (1990)
6. U.S. v. Gregorio
17 Phil. 522 (1910)
7. Fiscal of Pampanga v. Reyes
55 Phil 905 (1931)
8. Vda. de Corpus v.Brabangco (C.A.)
59 O.G. 8262(1963)
9. Compania Maritima v. Allied Free Workers
77 SCRA 24 (1977)
10. Villa Rey Transit v. Ferrer
25 SCRA 845 (1968)
11. Michael & Co. v. Enriquez
33 Phil. 87 (1915)
12. De Vera v. Aguilar
218 SCRA 602 (1983)
V.
Parole Evidence Rule
A. Rule 130, Section 9;
Art. 1403, Civil Code
B. Cases:
1. Enriquez v. Ramos
6 SCRA 219 (1962)
2. Canute v. Mariano
37 Phil. 840 (1918)
3. Yu Tek v. Gonzales
29 Phil. 384 (1915)
4. Land Settlement & Dev. Corp v.
7 SCRA 750 (1963)
Garcia Plantation
5. Maulini v. Serrano
28 Phil. 640 (1914)
EVIDENCE ± Prof. R. A. Vinluan | First Semester, A.Y. 2010-2011 Page 3 of 10
6. PNB v. Seeto
91 Phil. 756 (1952)
7. Woodhouse v. Halili
93 Phil. 526 (1953)
8. Robles v. Lizarraga Cruz
50 Phil. 387 (1927)
9. Cruz v. Court of Appeals
192 SCRA 209 (1990)
10. Lechugas v. CA
143 SCRA 335 (1986)
11. Inciong v. CA
257 SCRA 578 (1996)
12. Ortanez v. CA
266 SCRA 561 (1997)
VI.
Interpretation of Documents
A. Rule 130, Sections 10-19;
Arts. 1370-1379, Civil Code
B. Cases:
1. Lambert v. Fox
26 Phil. 588 (1914)
2. Capital Insurance v. Sadang
21 SCRA 1183 (1967)
VII. Qualifications of Witnesses
A. Mental Incapacity or Immaturity
Rule 130, Sections 20 and 21
1. People v. De Jesus
129 SCRA 4 (1984)
2. People v. Salomon
229 SCRA 402 (1993)
3. People v. Mendoza
G.R. No. 113791, Feb. 2, 1996
B. Marital Disqualification
Rule 130, Section 22
1. Ordono v. Daquigan
62 SCRA 270 (1975)
2. People v. Castaneda
88 SCRA 562 (1979)
3. People v. Francisco
78 Phil. 694 (1947)
4. Lezama v. Rodriguez
23 SCRA 1166 (1968)
C. Dead Man's Statute
Rule 130, Section 23
1. Guerrero v. St, Claire's Realty & Co.
124 SCRA 553 (1983)
2. Abraham v. Recto-Kasten
4 SCRA 298 (1962)
3. Goñi v. CA
144 SCRA 222 (1986)
4. Tongco v. Vianzon
50 Phil. 698 (1927)
5. Lichauco v. Atlantic Gulf
84 Phil. 330 (1949)
6. Razon v. IAC
207 SCRA 234 (1992)
VIII. Privileged Communications
A. Marital Communications
Rule 130, Section 24 (a)
1. People v. Carlos
47 Phil. 626 (1925)
B. Attorney-Client Privilege
Rule 130, Section 24 (b)
1. Uy Chico v. Union Life
29 Phil. 163 (1915)
2. Regala v. Sandiganbayan
262 SCRA 124 (1996)

Activity (20)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Jantzen Chua liked this
Alyanna Apacible liked this
hevah liked this
iris7curl liked this
iciamadarang liked this
yumiganda liked this
Roland Aparece liked this
Clambeaux liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->