You are on page 1of 14

THE IMPACT OF PAST HISTORY UPON PERCEPTION OF

SOUL

Soul movement is a mysterious shifting of energies that can happen on a deep


conscious and unconscious level of being. To perceive or recognise these subtle shifts
and changes of inner energy states, one needs to grow awareness of being. The
wikipedia dictionary describes “being” as:
1. the state or fact of existing,
2. essential nature; self
3. a point of view gradually coming into being, laws in existence for centuries
4. a living thing that has (or can develop) the ability to act or function
independently.

The inner language of being is somewhat foreign to the left brain logical
understandings of mind that are orientated towards doing. How do we discern a fact
from a fiction? How do we recognize the essential nature of the being or beings of
others? How do we see, sense or grasp a point of view that gradually comes into
being? How do we do that? The answer is we cannot, we DO NOT, we can only
remain aware, alert, with inner senses activated and engaged in the present moment.

To see conscious being is an art dependent upon awareness. It is the ultimate creative
state of perceiving via inaction; to see what exists behind all action. Something
happens via being. What is this something that moves and motivates action within the
timeless existence of being? Something develops flowers, reveals itself, opens,
moves and changes us. I suspect this is what Hellinger refers to as “movements of the
spirit mind.”

This essay attempts to outline how we as participants and facilitators in F.C., may
increase our awareness and ability to perceive spirit mind movements; within the
knowing fields that surround us, and in life in general. There are many ways to
increase the inner sensitivity needed to sense soul movement and observe the effects
of phenomenology in these fields. In particular this essay focuses upon “insight” and
“inner-sense” and the instinctive and intuitive pathways available to develop this
within the human being. It also takes a look at obstacles and morphogenic
environmental elements of past history that prevent perception, and our ability to see
and sense in the knowing field.

SUBCONSCIOUS SUPPRESSION OF INNER SENSORY PATHWAYS

Insight and inner-sense describe the ability to sense not only that which is outside the
self, but that which resides and moves within. The first recognition of growing
insight is the realization that “I” am not only the body, nor am “I” the mind; I am
ALSO awareness. Sounds relatively simple in its application, however that ALSO
remains mostly hidden within the morphogenic fields of history; including political,
religious, cultural and educational groups world wide. That ALSO, also represents
the 5% conscious tip of the iceberg that pokes out from the 95% subconscious minds
of all living in those historic fields called past. How does that resonate? “I am
awareness AND I am 95% unaware of whom or what I am!” “I am awareness and
anchored to 5% present and 95% past history?” A morphogenic history that ensures

1
95% of our interior is unknown to us until we dare to look and awareness is able to
see it.

Bruce Lipton Ph.D, is presently furthering epigenetic reality, and the genome, with
ground breaking research acknowledging the influence of history and subconscious
upon present minds.

“The conclusions of the “new” biology provide a radical departure from our
conventional beliefs of how life works. In contrast to the notion that we are
biochemical automations driven by genes, the new insights reveal that it is the mind
that controls the genes, which in turn shape our biology and behaviour. The self-
conscious mind, associated with our individual identity and the manifestation of
thoughts, is guided by our own personal desires and intentions.
While we generally perceive that our self-conscious mind is “controlling” the
show, neuroscience has established the fact that 95% of our behaviour is under the
control of the more powerful subconscious mind. As most of our personal and
cultural problems arise from the fact that behaviours derived from the subconscious
mind are essentially invisible to us, we rarely observe our automated behaviour.” 1.

“The Subconscious mind is simply a “record-playback” mechanism that downloads


experiences into behavioural tapes.” While the self-conscious mind is associated
with creativity, the subconscious mind’s function is to engage previously recorded
programs.” 2

“We have all been shackled with emotional chains wrought by dysfunctional
behaviours programmed by the stories of the past.” 3

This 95% is born out of existential exclusion; the refusal or inability to live
TOTALLY. It is made up of all the unfinished or incomplete moments of expression
we have failed to live “SOULLY” and “WHOLELY”. This 95% is a consequence of
separating or excluding, the totality of living in tune with existential laws and orders
of life. It is born out of suppression and repression of natural impulses that respond to
life every moment. The 95% subconscious, unconscious habitat is weighted by these
accumulated incomplete behaviours of our past.

“Sheldrake has created an intriguing concept of fields in biology. He has postulated


the existence of morphogenic fields that govern the behaviour of species. This type of
field possesses very little energy, but it is able to take energy from another source and
shape it. The field acts as a geometrical influence, shaping behaviour. Morphogenic
fields are built up through the accumulated behaviours of species' members
(Sheldrake 1981, 60)." 4

What we accumulate is history. What we carry is past. These fields are filled with
static, non dynamic imprints and images that are weighted with past memories and
historical references of body and mind. The “non-local”, fabricated organism of these
fields, formed by self coherent past patterning; weigh heavily on present potential for
dynamic exchange of life force in the present. Hence they possess little energy, their

2
content is “stretched thin and expended” by constant repetition of patterns. These
patterns are like waves in the ocean; each wave appearing unique and separate, and
representative of differences (a unit.) These fields are projecting secondary and
entangled intention. The content of these morphogenic fields is “non-essential”,
secondary energy, in the form of past, that inevitably overshadows the “essential”,
primary space, intention and energy of the present, also in the field. The essential
here is like the ocean and is representative of sameness or oneness (unity.) Is this the
third reality Hellinger refers to in the following? Is looking beyond suppression, past
and morphogenic fields the way into this third reality?

UNITY AND DIFFERENCE

“The word unity only makes sense when there is difference. Without difference there
can be no unity for unity is that which brings differences together and binds it.”

“The cosmos or the earth or nature is all unities forged out of difference.”

“The acknowledgement of difference creates this deep unity and it is precisely the
difference, the opposing, intrinsic to this unity, which has the creative effect. The
result of evening out all the difference and distinction is not unity but a unit. A unit
has very little creative energy. It is the opposition with its intrinsic tension that forges
something new, a third reality.” 5

“REMAINING WITH THE ESSENTIAL- Bert Hellinger

The whole plant is contained in the shoot. The assembled energy is there. But the
shoot is small and only takes up a little space. When a whole tree has developed out
of the tiny shoot, this energy is stretched thin and expended.”

“That’s why one works from the principle that only the absolute essentials should be
set up. Then there is far more energy and force available.” 6

If opposition with its intrinsic tension is what forges something new it becomes very
helpful to look into and understand opposition well. Every great warrior knows the
secret of “knowing thy enemy well”, so much so that you become him! If
Morphogenic fields are representative of opposition it is worthwhile taking a closer
look at what forms them. History forms them, mind, language and conceptualizing
memory and experience holds them together.

CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE V’S PERCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE

Is conceptualizing our only form of “doing”, that interferes with “being”? Could these
morphogenic fields of concept be representative of projection? Is concept not driven
by left brain logical and masculine principles of seeking causes? Could projection be
the after effect of lost and separated past moments, seeking to gain connection or
inclusion in the present? Are morphogenic field’s simply holographic fields projecting
the excluded, unseen, incomplete and hidden effects of past moments; that were once
dominated and excluded by the unconscious seeking of causes and the ignoring of
effects? If so, the problem is, that because of separation, the cause/ effect link has
been broken, the dynamism interrupted and the potential for wholeness destroyed. A

3
consequence of such actions is that the field becomes static, and sometimes
impervious to life force. Another consequence is that past is created and carried into
the future. Repression, blind love and separation is what drives this unconscious
movement.

These “non-essential” past patterns containing layers of knowledge and belief, are
caused by the mind continually conceptualizing reality via language, via history, via
past. Conceptual knowledge has dominated perceptual knowledge for hundreds of
years. Even if, on some level, perceptual knowledge recognizes illusion or deceit
within the self or others; conceptual knowledge often attempts to detract from or
cover truth, to ensure so called safe or socially acceptable movement; that does not
disturb the field. In this way the preservation of past is maintained by static and non
dynamic energy movement. The minute conceptualizing is abandoned; the being
becomes available to enter into dynamic energy effects. This availability carries
experiences into living the depths of polar opposites. This is the nature of
totality/wholeness that eventually culminates in possibilities for transformation and
holistic integration. Perceptual knowledge follows “dynamics” with the intuitive and
instinctual look, in the present.

Professor Richard Gregory in his essay Knowledge in Perception and Illusion says:

“It is significant that these, and very many other illusions, are experienced
perceptually though the observer knows conceptually that they are illusory- even to
the point of appreciating the causes of the phenomena. This does not; however show
that knowledge has no part to play in vision. Rather, it shows that conceptual and
perceptual knowledge are largely separate. This is not altogether surprising because
perception must work extremely fast (in a fraction of a second) to be useful for
survival, though conceptual decisions may take minutes, or even years. Further,
perceptions are of particulars, rather than the generalities of conceptions. (We
perceive a triangle, but only conceptually can we appreciate triangularity.) Also, if
knowledge or belief determined perception we would be blind to the unusual, or
seemingly impossible, which would be dangerous in unusual situations, and would
limit perceptual learning.” 7.

Attempts to conceptualize phenomenon logy, reduces the availability of energy


intensity, required for perceptual learning, receptivity, and illumination in the
knowing field.

These acts of reduction are nothing more than acts of repression; attempting to
suppress sensory input and the energetic forces, needed to reveal the totality of each
moment’s polarity of being in the present. Is what we conceptualize actually what we
carry as past? Is conceptualizing an unconscious conservation (repression) of present
energy, which is saved for later in the form of unlived moments that haunt us? Is
conceptualizing our every excuse to justify suppression? Essentially it is instinct and
intuition that is interfered with here, as intellect interrupts.

Seeing in the knowing field and being able to see through the morphogenic veils of
history, requires conscious intention and attention, to remain with only the
“essential”. This level of awareness is created by detached observation, recollection
and intention less centring.

4
DETATCHED OBSERVATION, RECOLLECTION AND INTENTIONLESS
CENTRING.

In the knowing fields of F. C. as participants and facilitators we give ourselves


permission to be, not to do, and simply see. In short we set ourselves up to receive and
consciously observe and hold a space for “effects” to take effect! A consequence of
this permission is relaxation. Out of that relaxation response, a recollecting of
ourselves begins. Energy that was previously invested in “doing”, that was previously
focused upon outer and other environmental, past influences; is now free to drop in to
“being”. This refocuses our connection to inner nature and soul source. We are then
able to connect our centre, to the same outer phenomena that we observe, via the
senses. Recollection attunes us to sensing in the present. Oddly this movement of
connection to centre also begins to separate the present from the past.

This art of separating the past from the present opens the field to all the suppressed or
excluded effects that conceptualizing and causation have excluded. The unlived static
energy held in the field is now allowed to move. Of course it moves to complete its
original moment of polarity, to integrate wholeness; to bring together that which has
been separated. It becomes dynamic again. It also becomes luminous, as the
darkness and shadows of causation (separation), make way for the light (sameness) of
effects. Once this happens there is no longer any need to “carry” anything. In this
way it becomes entirely possible to create an absolute discontinuity with past and
enter into a luminous and very dynamic bright future that only moves forward. This
future however is dependent upon detached observation.

Becoming aware of ones inner world with its many shifts and energy changes causes
detachment, and creates distance from all phenomena we may be presently engaged
in. How does distancing and detachment occur? What do we become distanced or
detached from? As facilitators and participants we may attempt to detach from many
false sympathies, fictions, stories, judgement, projections, identifications and
interpretations; all in an effort to remain open. However what we detach from
remains as one. We detach from the mind. We detach from past and history. In
short, we move from the mind to the inner senses of the present. The effects of this
shift can be experienced right now as you read; if you bring awareness to the fact that
when the mind is engaged in thinking, awareness of sensing disappears. That is, most
people that are in the 5% aware 95% unaware scheme of things, are also in an
“either/or” situation. Either they are in their senses, listening, feeling and looking, or
they are in their heads filled with history, thinking.

This is how distancing from mind, moves energy to the senses. What is recollected in
the process? Energy that was leaking (being projected) to the outside, and the other
(via the mind) is recollected; when atunement to the physical and metaphysical
sensory organs happens. Energy begins to fall in. This movement inwards also
attunes us to something else; what is that which we attune to? Is it the inner energy
movement that rises and falls? Is it the thoughts and physical sensations that vibrate;
or is it the heart beat or pulse of life within? Actually it is all of that and more.

5
Holding an inner posture of awareness, beyond mind, also opens the inner pathway to
soul centre of emptiness. When awareness or consciousness is able to move deep
enough, a settling in the centre or gap of emptiness happens. You will know when
you are there at the centre, in the gap. Here you are overcome with calm, peace,
silence and deep relaxation. All effects of historical perception and intention dissolve
here. All desire to choose, direct, do or change disappears here.

“Modern physics, at every turn, is coming face to face with a reality that goes beyond
our rational ability to describe or understand. In quantum physics, the heart of matter
springs from a "void," an "emptiness", a "quantum soup" that can only be conceived
of in terms similar to the "Ground of Being" of the mystic.” 8

Ervin Laszlo, twice nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and well know systems
theorist and author of about 75 books and 400 papers, uses the “Sanskrit and Vedic
term for “space”, Akasha, he calls this field the Akashic field or A-field. He posits
that the “quantum vacuum” is the fundamental energy and information carrying field
that informs not just the current universe, but all universes past and present.
(Collectively the ‘metaverse.’) “ 9

Laszlo attempts to prove that beyond our personal past patterning and collective
history there exists an even more ancient informational history in the space or void of
nature itself.

"There is a form and level of coherence in the various domains of observation and
experience that involves a quasi-instant transmission of information across space and
time...I present evidence that "nonlocal coherence" is widespread in nature, occurring
in the macrodomain of the universe, in the microdomain of the quantum, as well as in
the mesodomain of life... I show that (i) phenomena of nonlocal coherence are
logically interpreted as the transmission of a non-conventional yet physically effective
form of information termed “in-formation”; (ii) this transmission is the effect of a
universal field in nature; and (iii) the universal in-formation field is the scientifically
identifiable functional equivalent of the fundamental metaphysical element known in
Sanskrit and Hindu metaphysics as Akasha." 10

Laszlos research serves to resurrect and breathe life into the essence of Plato in his
theory of forms.

“PLATO'S FORMS:

Some physicists argue that the laws of nature came into being with the universe. If
that were so, then these laws cannot explain the origin of the present universe,
because the laws would not exist until the universe existed. If these laws existed prior
to the origin of the universe, they become like Plato's perfect Forms that act as
blueprints for the construction of the ephemeral world of our perceptions. In our
search for reality, we must turn to the ancient problem of whether the laws of nature
exist i n an independent Platonic realm. (Plato, pp 456-459)

Plato had a dualistic vision of reality. One was the physical world, fleeting and
impermanent that was caused by the "Demiurge". The other was the realm of Forms
or Ideas, eternal and unchanging, acting as sort of abstract templates for the

6
contingent world of creation. Plato also considered mathematical objects to belong to
this Ideal realm. “ 11

The above understandings highlight how different levels of awareness perceive


different dimensions of past or history. Each level of awareness demands an
individual transformative action plan to facilitate movement into the next dimension.
That transformative action plan seems to include intention less centring and detached
observation. This separates inner being from personal and collective history and
morphogenic fields. This separation happens in the gap and holds the space for soul
movement and connection to happen. Connection to what? Connection to origin?
Connection to original divine blueprints? Connection to a perfect flawless past or
history of truth, Love or God? Connection to the eternal, unchanging template for
creation?

Learning the art of stopping in the gap or void is the way to enhance the ability to see
or perceive wholly and accurately in the knowing field. Distance from what is being
looked at is needed. This is not only true for the physical eyes, but is true for the
metaphysical eyes as well. This is the meaning of gaining perspective in relation to
life. Before detachment (distance), objectivity prohibited whole perception in its
exclusion of subjectivity. This also means detachment from fate itself! Now there’s a
question…………is fate simply history?

Without the gap we remain continuous with personal and collective past history
(including fate) and the present is excluded. A consequence of this exclusion is partial
perception and an inability to perceive a whole picture. Transmissions of soul happen
in the gap. Insight to see soul movement requires conscious alignment of objectivity
and subjectivity in each single moment of looking, in the gap. This facilitates direct
perception to mysteries beyond morphgenic fields and fate itself.

The Wikipedia encyclopaedia defines “chaos (derived from Ancient Greek


Language), as typically referring to unpredictability and is the antithesis of cosmos.
The word itself did not mean “disorder” in classical-period Ancient Greece. It meant
“the primal emptiness, space.” Chaos is derived from the Proto-Indo-European root
ghn or ghen meaning “gape, be wide open:” compare “chasm” (from ancient Greek, a
cleft, slit or gap), and Anglo-Saxon ganian (“yawn”), geanian, ginian (“gape wide”);
see also Old Norse Ginnungagap. Due to people misunderstanding early Christian
uses of the word, it changed to ‘disorder. 12

Understanding of this “gap” has been almost excluded by conceptualizing groups,


following rigid patterns in the morphogenic fields of life.

“PATTERNS OF THOUGHT AND FATE –Hellinger

Rupert Sheldrake described in his books the attributes and effects of morphogenetic
fields, that is, the fields of energy which define particular structures. He told me that,
with family constellations, one can witness morphogenetic fields at first hand.

Sometimes now I reflect on whether his observations might be applied in another


way. Perhaps particular patterns of thought actually define a group to the extent that
they inhibit new insights. Perhaps particular behaviours pertinent to a family also

7
constitute patterns which result from the morphogenetic field of that family. If, for
example, someone has committed suicide, then it sometimes follows that someone in
the next generation will commit suicide too. This may not be simply because they
wish to follow the former family member. A pattern may have been initiated and the
act may be committed in accordance with the pattern rather than with the intention
(subconscious though it may be) of following another.

Sheldrake has observed how, when a new crystal is forming, its form is not yet
predetermined. However, when as second crystal develops out of the first; it models
itself on the pattern of the first. There appears to be already a memory of the earlier
crystal. It seems that the morphogenetic field has a memory. Therefore, the next
crystal in all probability will develop in a similar way to the first. If this repeats itself
many times, a fixed pattern is established. Perhaps patterns of fate reproduce
themselves in the same way.

INTERRUPTING THE PATTERN

The recognition and breaking of such a pattern requires the courage to embrace
something new. A successful interruption is a special achievement. It will not
happen merely by one accepting one’s fate. One must take a step back. Instead of
going with the flow, one must climb onto the banks and look at the river until one
understands its course, recognizes it’s potential and decides what has to be done.” 13

To observe patterns is an art only possible via meditative practice. This includes the
ability to connect object to subject in a single moment of looking.

OBJECTIVITY, SUBJECTIVITY AND INNER-SENSE

Most of us find the art of connecting object to subject very challenging. This is
because our normal powers of observation and sensing remain unaware and only
include one aspect of observing, not two. For example when we watch a movie we
tend to get lost in what we are looking at and forget ourselves. Shopping, working,
communicating, in fact most actions involved in any day involve forgetting ourselves
and inner subjectivity. We are in fact excluded from the present moment. Strange
goings on! Self remembering and self attention to subjectivity brings us back.

Objectivity and subjectivity is the fabric that personal and collective history is made
of. Objectivity (cause) has been the focus of perception for centuries; subjectivity
(effect) is what has been suppressed. This attachment to objective (conceptual) reality
has influenced human perceptions that control biology and behaviour since the
beginning of time. Bruce Lipton in his essay “The Power Of Mind” has the following
to say about perception and history.

“There are three sources of perceptions that control our biology and behaviour. The
most primitive perceptions are those we acquire with our genome. Built into genes
are programs that provide fundamental reflex behaviours referred to as instincts.

8
Pulling your hand out of an open flame is a genetically derived behaviour that does
not have to be learned. More complex instincts include the ability of newborn babies
to swim like a dolphin or the activation of innate healing mechanisims to repair a
damaged system or eliminate a cancerous growth. Genetically inherited instincts are
perceptions acquired from nature.

“The second source of life-controlling perceptions represents memories derived


from life experiences downloaded into the subconscious mind. These profoundly
powerful learned perceptions represent the contribution from nurture.”

“By the time the baby is born, emotional information downloaded from the life
experiences in the womb have already shaped half of the individual’s personality.”

Lipton goes on to present evidence that we in fact “download our perceptions and
beliefs about life long before we acquire the ability for critical thinking. Our primary
perceptions are literally written in stone as unequivocal truths in the subconscious
mind, where they habitually operate for life, unless there is an active effort to
reprogram them”.

“Finally the third source of perceptions that shape our lives is derived from the self-
conscious mind. Unlike the reflexive programming of subconscious mind, the self-
conscious mind is a creative platform that provides for the mixing and morphing a
variety of perceptions with the infusion of imagination, a process that generates and
unlimited number of beliefs and behavioural variations. The quality of the self-
conscious mind endows organisms with one of the most powerful forces in the
universe, the opportunity to express freewill.” 14

These three sources of perception utilize memory of past history. Memory is the
mechanical hardware to play the “freewill” software of intention and attention. The
“mixing and morphing” of objectivity and subjectivity and cause and effect paves a
pathway to successful integration of polarity. The self conscious mind and awareness
facilitate these movements, so that the static, lifeless morphogenic field may reveal its
dynamic luminous nature. That is only possible if we dare to look beyond our very
own objective (cause) and subjective (effect) reality.

The acquired perception provided by nurture overrides instinctual abilities and


without the application of awareness and intention to self-transform, prevents the
growth of intuitive sensitivity. In short it does little to facilitate the development of
inner-sense and insight. Between instinct and intuition is intellect, (the home of
conceptualization.)

HISTORICAL INTELLECTUAL BONDING ADHERING PAST TO PRESENT

The collective history of intellect and mass mind in morphogenic fields is a “wake” of
personal history. This past history trail needs to be left behind and separated from, in
order to move forward. It is Dr. Wayne Dyer that spoke the following words in his
book “10 Secrets To Success”. He is referring to the fifth secret that involved “giving
up your personal history.”

9
“When a speedboat zooms across the surface of the water, there’s a white
foaming froth behind it that’s called the wake of the boat. The wake is nothing
more than the trail that’s left behind. The answer to ‘what is driving the boat?’
is that the boat moves because of present-moment energy generated by the
engine. This is what makes the boat move forward across the water. Do you
think it is possible for the wake to drive the boat? Can the trail that’s left behind
make the boat go forward?” 15

In one way he is right. In another, he is wrong. We all know that the friction and the
drag of the boat is also necessary to move the boat forward. Perhaps he is referring to
the situation of modern minds trying to drive their boats forward into conscious
reality with intellect in the driver’s seat? Or perhaps the wake represents the personal
and collective memory in which we evolve and grow.

Rupert Sheldrake in his essay “Morphic Resonance and Morphic Fields”- An


Introduction says:

“The morphic fields of mental activity are not confined to the insides of our heads.
They extend far beyond our brain though intention and attention. We are already
familiar with the idea of fields extending beyond the material objects in which they
are rooted: for example magnetic fields extend beyond the surfaces of magnets; the
earth’s gravitational field extends far beyond the surface of the earth, keeping the
moon in its orbit; and the fields of a cell phone stretch out far beyond the phone itself.
Likewise the fields of our minds extend far beyond our brains.”

“In the hypothesis of formative causation, discussed in detail in my books A NEW


SCIENCE OF LIFE and THE PRESENCE OF THE PAST, I propose that memory is inherent in
nature. Most of the so-called laws of nature are more like habits.”

“Morphogenetic fields are not fixed forever, but evolve.”

“The resonance of a brain with its own past states also helps to explain the memories
of individual animals and humans. There is no need for all memories to be “stored”
inside the brain.”

“The memory of nature


From the point of view of the hypothesis of morphic resonance, there is no need to
suppose that all the laws of nature sprang into being fully formed at the moment of the
Big Bang, like a kind of cosmic Napoleonic code, or that they exist in a metaphysical
realm beyond time and space.” 16

Is memory what bonds us to the past? It is true we do evolve within the bounds of
memory, to a certain extent. Remaining bonded to biological, genetic, and nature,
nurture memories does seem to ensure continuity with history. However is continuity
with past a spirit mind movement? Or is a movement to spirit a discontinuity, a leap
into the unknown gap of existence? Bonded to the past we often hesitate, hold back
and make excuses for not moving forward. Here we tread water in the wake of the
boat, exposed to the elements of friction, that personal and collective memory dictate.
Whom or what do these memories serve? It is clear they serve survival, growth and
linear theories of evolution. However, do they serve spirit, transformation and

10
transcendence towards higher states of consciousness? Whatever the answer is, it is
neither nature’s instinct nor intuition that carries past pollution into the present; it is
the mind itself, orchestrated and led by intellectual interpretations of memories,
fictions and historical images and hate.

Intellect serves understanding of effects, after the fact, after the moment has passed.
Intellect thrives upon causation, feeds off differences and conceptualizes an otherwise
mysterious movement of cosmos. Its window of perception is small, yet utilitarian in
its service of life. Could it be that it is needed after, and not before the moment of life
happened?

REFERENCES

1, 2, 3 The Power of The Mind – Bruce Lipton. New Dawn No 106


(Jan. Feb. 2008.)

4 Leadership & The New Science; Margaret J Wheatley, 1992.

5,6. No Waves Without The Ocean – Bert Hellinger , 2006

7. Knowledge In Perception And Illusion – Richard Gregory


From Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (1997 352, 1121- 1128
Department of Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory
Road Clifton Bristol.

8. Common Grounds Between Buddhism, Quantum Physics


And The Baha’I Faith – Jack Coleman 1997-05

9, 10. Wikipedia- the free encyclopaedia- Ervin Lazlo

11. Theory of Forms “Plato” – Wikapedia free encyclopedia.

12. Chaos – Wikapedia free encyclopedia

13. No Waves Without The Ocean – Bert Hellinger 2006

14. The Power Of The Mind – Bruce Lipton. New Dawn No


106 (Jan. Feb. 2008)

15. 10 Secrets To Success – Dr Wayne Dyer 2001

16. Morphic Resonance and Morphic Fields- An Introduction


Rupert Sheldrake Feb 2005

NOTES

This article is a tribute to my family and all those that have made way for these
present understandings of soul; including Osho, Hellinger and friends in these

11
extended families. In particular it is a tribute to the bright and creative future that all
psychosis, schizophrenia, bi-polar and other assorted so called mental illnesses ……of
blind love hold in seed form.

Special thanks to Hellinger who passed the following to my previous questions about
mental illness.
Sadhana “What do I do when one of my family members goes psychotic?
Hellinger “Inside yourself you say ‘you are big and I am small.”
Sadhana “What is Paranoia?”
Hellinger “A sentence for you……”I am fine.”

Lots of Laughter and Light to all! Sadhana

12
13
14

You might also like