Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Liberi v Taitz Appellee Brief and Appendice I

Liberi v Taitz Appellee Brief and Appendice I

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 416 |Likes:
Published by nocompromisewtruth
Start Here
Appeals Court
Start Here
Appeals Court

More info:

Published by: nocompromisewtruth on Nov 07, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/31/2011

pdf

text

original

 
NO.10-3000
 __________________________ 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
 __________________________ 
LISA LIBERI, LISA OSTELLA, EVELYN ADAMS, PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ.,LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG and GO EXCEL GLOBALPlaintiffs / Appellees,v.ORLY TAITZ, DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC., et alDefendants / Appellants. __________________________________________________________________ 
BRIEF OF APPELLEES
 __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District CourtFor the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCase No. 09-cv-01898-ECR  __________________________________________________________________ Philip J. Berg, EsquireLAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Ph: (610) 825-3134Fx: (610) 834-7659Email: philjberg@gmail.comPA I.D. No. 09867
 Attorney for Appellees
APPENDICE II and III FILED SEPARATELY
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110340412 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2010
 
i
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
 None of the Appelleese have any parent corporations and no publicly heldcompany, holding 10% or more of the company's stock. Appellees are not awareof any publicly held corporations that are not party to this appeal and that has or have a financial interest in the outcome of this proceeding.
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110340412 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2010
 
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page(s)
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT……………………………………..iTABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………….…ii-iiiTABLE OF AUTHORITIES………………………………………..…………iv-viiCOUNTER STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW………1COUNTER STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES……………………………….2COUNTER STATEMENT OF THE CASE……………………………………..2-3COUNTER STATEMENT OF THE FACTS…………………………….…….3-11SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT………………………………………….….…….12ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………….……12-29I.THE STANDARD OF REVIEW…………………………..…12-13II.THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY DISMISSEDDEFENDANTS JAMES SUNDQUIST AND ROCK SALT PUBLISHING ON JUNE 25, 2009………………….…..14-16III. THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY SEVEREDAND TRANSFERRED THE UNDERLYING CASE…….……16-22IV.APPELLANTS CLAIMS THAT JUDGE ROBRENOREFUSED TO FILE DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OFAPPELLANT LINDA BELCHER IS UNFOUNDED………….22-24
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110340412 Page: 3 Date Filed: 11/07/2010

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->