Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Weekly Peak - November 12, 2010

The Weekly Peak - November 12, 2010

Ratings: (0)|Views: 30|Likes:

More info:

Published by: derailedcapitalism.com on Nov 12, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Abigail F. Doolittle | abigail@peaktheories.com
November 12, 2010
The Weekly Peak 
In Praise of Bernanke’s Fed and QE2
I have a smile on my face right now. I clearly lack the proper qualifications and edifications to take on the titled task but nonetheless I shall attemptto do so in my own way.First,
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is to be applauded
for being a decisive leader who has been able to act on his apparently deep academicknowledge around financial and monetary crisis. While it is easy to accuse him of dropping dollars from the sky or acting outside of the Fed’sbounds, the ultimate outcome of his unusually active brand of monetary policy is unknown at this time.What is more known, however, is that had Mr. Bernanke not acted so aggressively in 2008 and 2009, it seems rather certain that the financialsystem would have fallen off of the top of its debt mountain and its partial or complete collapse would have brought about a severe depression.Had a more timid person been at the helm of the Fed at that time, there is a chance that we would still be suffering from that depression today.Surely the person who guided us away from that most frightening cliff has the sense to continue steering us away from the edge even if themethodology is unconventional and disputed by many
even if we end up falling eventually. To state the obvious but perhaps overlooked, untilwe’ve fallen, we have not fallen and this is something we should not take for granted, in my view.Second,
the entire Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is to be applauded for acting as a team
under Mr. Bernanke’s guidance insuch uncertain times. I continue to believe that the dissenting opinions of the various officials are dropped in an artfully timed manner that speaksto a highly strategic and coordinated effort.It is in this dissent that the Fed is able to gauge the reaction of global leaders and investors to its potential actions while leading them to itsdecided-upon strategy slowly but surely. Also in this dissent is the Fed’s telegraphed ability to shift course subtly or dramatically by simplyemphasizing one opinion over the others until it becomes the new strategy.This flexibility is genius in a way because the Fed is never truly tied to one brand of monetary policy and while this reflects the structure of the Feditself, Mr. Bernanke’s Fed in particular seems to be stretching it successfully to its fullest capacity.All of this stretching, however, comes with the safety net of Mr. Bernanke’s aggressive stance toward both monetary policy action and, as we haveall learned rather recently, communication.And this brings us to QE2. It may come wrapped in the package of $600 billion, but
QE2 is about psychology
.The heart of the problem or the disappointing pace of the economic recovery is slow-moving money and even a possible liquidity trap. The latter isa situation in which the central bank by definition can do little to stimulate the economy since rates are near zero and additional liquidity will onlyadd to the existing swamp.As I’ve been writing since March, the Federal Reserve is painfully aware of this situation. As I wrote in August, the Fed acknowledged thisawareness on August 10 in admitting there’s a problem – “the pace of recovery in output and employment [had] slowed in recent months” – and inmore tacitly admitting there’s little to nothing that the Fed can do about it by making a token gesture to reinvest the principal payments from itsexisting portfolio of agency and agency mortgage-backed securities.The traditional weapon of choice or lowering the federal funds rate was out. Pumping excessive liquidity into the system would more surely bringabout a liquidity trap and a swamp of slow-moving money. Lowering the rate paid on excess bank reserves would target the slow-moving moneyissue most directly by potentially providing banks with an incentive to lend but incentive does not equal the thing itself and especially in the face of a poor demand picture.The only remaining option that I saw back in August was good old-fashioned jawboning. In other words,
the Fed’s only real weapon to helpstimulate the weak economy was psychology
.If the Fed could somehow create an overall improved confidence in the economy, it may have a shot at getting money and credit moving againsuch that some of that slack would be eaten up while spurring spending, and, if all of the stars aligned, somehow help with abysmal private sectorhiring and a very weak overall employment picture.
Peak Theories Research LLC
The Weekly Peak
November 12, 2010
Please see important disclosure statements at the end of this document.
Well, Mr. Bernanke chose something much better than jawboning. He chose its uptown cousin called
.And he did so well before August by setting the stage in late July in talking about the “unusually uncertain” times and then reinforcing that viewwith the aforementioned downbeat assessment from the August FOMC meeting. In so doing, Mr. Bernanke provided himself with a bottom tolaunch from on the spring of another potential round of quantitative easing or what was dubbed QE2.Specifically, Mr. Bernanke said, “Should further action prove necessary,
policy options are available to provide additional stimulus
.”Remembering the rather positive effect QE1 had on the stock indices and commodities in 2009, investors started to play opposite Mr. Bernanke’sbluff by bidding up stocks and commodities on the back of an implicitly-Fed supported decline in the dollar. Investors did this while looking pastthe fact that such money-pumping was unlikely to do little to stimulate the economy itself while also looking past the fact that QE2 was not adefinite and if it did occur, its specifics were unknown.However, it was the Fed’s September 21 statement and its pledge “to
provide additional accommodation
if needed to support the economicrecovery” that moved investors into full rally mode.Without spending a penny or committing to a particular plan around another round of quantitative easing, Mr. Bernanke’s communication causeddouble-digit percentage gains in stocks, gold, silver, and oil along with many other commodities between his August speech and the actualannouncement of QE2 on November 3.Not bad for three words and behind it Mr. Bernanke’s mastery of psychology and with it
a psychology of wealth and confidence
thepsychology required to get the economy moving more quickly again
.In addition, Treasury yields moved to early 2009- and, in some cases, record-low levels by early October when by mid-October the price of thesesecurities started to fluctuate and even decline as judged by the 10-year’s yield moving above 2.70% from below 2.40% before the November 3QE2 announcement. And this brings us to an interesting point.While one of the goals of QE2 is to lower borrowing rates, the mere anticipation of QE2 caused yields and thus rates to drop to absurdly low levels.This goal, then, was achieved pre-QE2.As I wrote yesterday and while I don’t have the math to back it up, it seems to me that there’s little absurdly low rates will do to stimulateborrowing activity in a weak economic environment beyond what historically low rates might do. And so, if the 10-year’s yield moves up from itscurrent 2.65% to say 3.0% or even 3.25% on the relatively benign inflation risk introduced by the monetary part of QE2, borrowing rates will moveup slightly but will remain historically low while the Fed may succeed in moving away from disinflation and avoiding deflation.And so it seems that everything Mr. Bernanke could have hoped to have achieved by actually buying Treasury securities was achieved by simplycommunicating its possibility. The Fed planted the QE2 seed and investors did the rest.Rates are down with room to move up modestly while still remaining low, the stock market and other risk assets have been bid up creating a senseof prosperity, and the dollar’s decline may help with U.S. exports while introducing a touch of real world inflation through more expensive imports.
The critics of QE2 are many
though with the critiques ranging from currency manipulation to asset bubble promotion here and abroad to moralhazard to runaway inflation to skepticism over the wealth effect.While each of these points is valid, I think
QE2’s many critics miss
what I have been writing about here or
.Trying to determine the exact effect of the stock market’s rise or even QE2 itself on GDP is interesting but stoking life into an economy on the brinkthrough monetary policy is as much about art as it is science. When traditional policy is no longer an option, I think it becomes a matter of creating the aforementioned psychology of wealth and confidence to induce, potentially, increased corporate and consumer spending. It is aboutcreating an environment of certainty in which both corporations and consumers are going to be willing to borrow and spend while banks will bewilling to lend.Such a sensibility cannot be captured by math and without it, the economic recovery cannot be supported nor can price stability be sustained.In other words,
this is about restoring complete confidence to a system that was shaken to its core by the worst financial crisis in a century
andin the face of fiscal paralysis.While it’s unknown how such confidence is re-established or how long it takes, it seems that Mr. Bernanke has been successful in reigniting thissort of a psychology and one that may have a chance of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy if the spark truly takes hold.
Peak Theories Research LLC
The Weekly Peak
November 12, 2010
Please see important disclosure statements at the end of this document.
It is that or the stoking and maintaining of such a sensibility that QE2 must now achieve. In turn, it
spur bank lending, corporate and consumerspending, price stability, and, in almost non-causal fashion, hiring. That its actual mechanisms provide for complete flexibility of action by the Fedto find the exact balance between what are objectively non-excessive liquidity injections and communication is not only clever but is likely to helpkeep this newly relit fire going for at least a little longer.The real challenge, however, is keeping it lit so that it won’t get blown out when the next iteration of the world’s 30-year borrowing binge likelycomes back to make another visit. Irrespective of the result of that seemingly impossible fight though, I think Mr. Bernanke and his team are to bepraised for doing everything that is sensible to support the economic recovery today.
Sam’s Stash, Gold, and the S&P
 Briefly on
after writing on the topic in a rather disjointed manner yesterday, I think Treasury yields will move up modestly in the near-term as prices decline and in the face of the Fed’s upcoming buying of these securities. As was implied above, I think the Fed will not be againstsuch a movement since rates will still be low while with a lining of a slightly higher expectation for inflation.I believe this sort of upward movement in yields will come as a result of: (1) an unwinding of the “invest in what the government’s investing in”trade with current yields offering investors virtually nothing, (2) the precedent of QE1 would suggest yields are likely to move up on the prospect of potential inflation risk, and, (3) rational investors are unlikely to remain in securities that offer no real return for long.Turning to the
, I continue to believe that the dollar index will move lower than last week’s 75.63 before moving significantly lower orpotentially higher.My belief is based on the
confirmed Descending Triangle
in which the dollar index is caught and this particular pattern carries a target of about
.Something else is going on here, however, and it’s the something that prompted me to write on the dollar index on Tuesday and that appendage tothe right of the chart only it’s not the Rising Wedge I thought it might have become. Rather, I believe it may be a bearish pattern that will causesome of you to laugh – at me – but rather than reveal its name today, I’d like to watch it develop another day or two.Its target is about 73 and found around the support/resistance band put in between April and July 2008.Looking at the precious metals, I don’t have anything to say as is usual since I simply watch in awe as
simply trade up.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->