Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
Remedial Law ReviewUniversity of the Philippines College of LawSecond Semester Yr 2010-2011Prof. TJ HerbosaJurisdictionSubject matter jurisdiction
Allegations of complaint determine jurisdiction
 – 
 – 
 – 
Chavez v. CA GR 125813 Feb 6, 2007Doctrine of non-interference
 – 
 – 
Supreme Court
Philippine Constitution,Article VIIIPower of judicial review
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
Court of Appeals
BP 129, as amended by RA 7902,Sec. 9 and RA 8246Question of law , fact or both
 – 
Court of Tax Appeals
Sandiganbayan
Regional Trial Courts
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
Fort Bonifacio v Domingo GR 180768 Feb 27, 2009RTC acting as Special Agrarian Court
 – 
 – 
 – 
Family Courts
Sunday, November 14, 201011:07 PM
 
 
REMLAW Page 1
 
A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC Rule on AdoptionSummary Proceedings under the Family Code, Title XI, Chapters 1 to 3on separation in fact between husband and wife or abandonment by one of the other and incidents involving parental authority;Chapter 4on Art. 41 (declaration of a spouse as presumptively dead),Art. 51(action of a child for presumptive legitime),Art. 69 (judicial declaration of family domicile in case of disagreement of the spouses),
Art. 73 (spouse’s objection to the profession of the other spouse),
Arts. 96 and
124 (annulment of husband’s decision in the administration and enjoyment of community or conjugal property; appointment of spouse as sole administrator except cases of “incompetent”
other spouse which shall be under Rules 93 and 95)and Art. 217 (entrusting children to homes and orphanages).Madrinan v. Madrinan GR 159374 Jul 12, 2007Yu v Yu GR 164915 Mar 10, 2006
Commercial Courts
Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts/Circuit Trial Courts
Unlawful detainer v. agrarian dispute
 – 
 – 
Barangay Lupon
 – 
CIVIL PROCEDUREOrdinary Civil Actions Rules 1 to 39Rule 1 General Provisions of the Rules of Court
Liberal application
 – 
Rule 2 Cause of Action
Elements of a cause of action -Ceroferr v. CA 376 SCRA 144;Camarines Sur Electric v. Aquino GR 167691 Sep 23, 2008Sufficiency of allegations
 – 
 – 
 – 
Rule 3 Parties to Civil Actions
Real party in interest
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 
 
REMLAW Page 2
 
 
Rule 4 Venue of Actions
Personal action
 – 
 – 
 – 
Rule 5 Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts
Revised Rules on Summary ProcedureSummary procedure
 – 
Estate of Macadangdang v Gaviola GR 156809 Mar 4, 2009; AngelinaSoriente v Estate pf Arsenio Concepcion GR 160239 Nov 25 2009; Sps Edillo v Sps DulpinaGR 188360 Jan 21 2010
Rule 6 Kinds of Pleadings
Answer 
 – 
Rosete v. Lim, GR No. 136051, Jun 8, 2006Compulsory counterclaim
 – 
Financial Builders. V. FPA 338 SCRA 346; Reillo v. San JoseGR 166393 Jun 18, 2009Permissive counterclaim
 – 
Banco de Oro v. CA GR 160354 Aug 25, 2005; Dec 19, 2007Third party complaint
 – 
Asian Construction v. CA 458 SCRA 750; Sy Tiong Shion v Sy ChinGR 174168/179438 Mar 30, 2009Cross-claim
 – 
Torres v. CA 49 SCRA 67
Rule 7 Parts of a Pleading
Sufficient in form/substance
 – 
Sps Munsalado v. NHA GR 167181 Dec 23, 2008Signature of counsel
 – 
Republic v. Kenrich Dev. Do., GR No. 149576, August 8, 2006Verification/Certification
 – 
Madara v. Porillo GR 172449 Aug 20, 2008; Kaunlaran v. Uy G154974, Feb 4, 2008; Sps Valmonte v. Alcala GR 168667 Jul 23, 2008Who can sign w/o sec cert
 – 
Mid-Pasig Land v Mario Tablante GR 162924 Feb 4, 2010
Rule 8 Manner of Making Allegations in Pleadings
Ultimate facts
 – 
Far East Marble v. CA GR 94093 Aug 10, 1993Specific denial under oath
 – 
Filipinas Textile v. CA 415 SCRA 635 No knowledge
 – 
Warner Barnes v. Reyes 103 Phil 602Modes of specific denial
 – 
Gaza et al v. Lim GR 126863 Jan 16, 2003;Actionable document
 – 
Casent Realty v. Philbanking GR 150731 Sep 14, 2007; Malayan v.Regis Brokerage GR 172156 Nov 23, 2007
Rule 9 Effect of Failure to Plead
 No default motu proprio
 – 
Santos v PNOC GR 170943 Sep 23, 2008Failure to appear 
 – 
Monzon v. Sps Relova GR 171827 Sep 17, 2008Remedies of party declared in default
 – 
Gomez v. Montalban GR 174414 Mar 14, 2008Default judgment
 – 
Gajudo v. Traders Royal GR 151098, Mar 21, 2006
Rule 10 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Substantial amendment -PPA v. Gothong and Aboitiz GR 158401 Jan 28, 2008When amendments allowed -Quirao v. Quirao 414 SCRA 430; Bautista v. Maya-MayaCottages, GR 148361, Nov 29, 2005; Marcos-Araneta et al v. CA GR 154096 Aug 22, 2008Conform to evidence
 – 
Cagungun v. Planters Dev Bank GR 158674 Oct 17, 2005
Rule 11 When to File Responsive Pleading
Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday -Alarilla v. Ocampo 417 SCRA 601
Rule 12 Bill of Particulars
When a complaint is vague
 – 
Bantillo v. IAC, GR No 75311, Oct. 18, 1988; Republic v. SBand Marcos, GR 148154, Dec 17, 2007
Rule 13 Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments and Other Paper
Personal filing and service
 – 
Maceda, et al. v. Macatangay, GR 164947, Jan 31, 2006Service by registered mail -Andy Quelnan v. VHF Phil GR 138500, Sep16, 2005; MarcelinoDomingo v CA GR 169122 Feb 2 2010; Sps Belen v. Hon. Chavez, GR 175334, Mar 26, 2008Service upon counsel
 – 
GCP Many Transport v. Principe GR 141484, Nov 11, 2005 Notice of lis pendens
 – 
Sps Vicente v. Avera GR 169970 Jun 20, 2009
 
 
REMLAW Page 3
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more