Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Crowd Sourcing: the Pros and Very Few Cons

Crowd Sourcing: the Pros and Very Few Cons

Ratings: (0)|Views: 150 |Likes:
Published by Crowdsourcing.org

More info:

Published by: Crowdsourcing.org on Nov 19, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less


Crowd Sourcing – The Pros and Very Few Cons
Posted by mark.sherrington
There seems to be a debate about Crowd Sourcing. I don’t understand why. I cannot believe anyone is
seriously debating ‘whether’ crowd sourcing a good idea only how best to use it? Of course it is. I first
came across crowd sourcing as a team building exercise we used to use with clients. You’d get a group
of people and give them a scenario. The one we used was where a plane crashes in the middle of a
desert and the survivors are given a choice of options in terms of what they do and what they choose
to rescue from the wreckage, in order to maximize their chance of survival and rescue.
First people had to complete the exercise on their own. Then they worked as a group and their
collective and individual answers were compared to the advice of ‘Survival Experts’. Not quite sure
who these experts were – this was long before Bear Grylls – but the results were always the same. No
individual scored as highly as the group – ever. The collective views of the group were always closest
to, sometimes spot on with, those of the experts.
Like most people, my appreciation of Crowd Sourcing was given a real kick with the publication in
2004 of “Wisdom of Crowds” by James Surowiecki. One of the examples he used made me realize I
had been watching Crowd Sourcing in action every week on “Who wants to be a Millionaire”. The lone
contestant might struggle, but ask the audience and, collectively, they always get it right.
Actually, maybe I’ve skipped a step in my journey? I seem to remember my mum telling me that,
“Two heads are better than one”. Presumably several thousand heads are better than two? But I
think she also told me that “Too many cooks spoil the broth”. Well how many is too many? “Two’s
company, three’s a crowd” I definitely remember her telling me that. So let’s try to pull this together –
more than two is a crowd, a crowd is generally better than one head, but not for making broth.
I reckon there is no debate about whether Crowd Sourcing is a good thing, a useful tool if you can get
your hands on it, but perhaps not for every task or problem.
That last bit is worth a debate. When should you use crowd sourcing, how best should you use it?
Hang on – what exactly do we mean by crowd sourcing? Well, for the answer to that I turned to one
truly excellent, and I think by now universally approved , form of crowd sourcing – Wikipedia. With
just one click I got a very useful explanation of Crowd Sourcing sourced from a crowd.H e re it is:-
I could not have written this better and, more to the point, it would have taken days of research to get
even close. Right away, here are two major benefits – the wisdom of the crowd and Web 2.0 enabled
The Wiki definition is “the act of outsourcing tasks, normally performed by an employee or contractor,
to a large community through an open call”. The term ‘Crowd Sourcing’, Wiki tells me, is a neologism
(a new made up word – thanks Wiki) of crowd and outsourcing. It goes on to tell me that, as with
Wikipedia itself, experts or wannabe experts enjoy helping you solve these outsourced tasks so much
they often do it for free or very little reward.
So wise, fast and really cheap. Come on! Who would not use Crowd Sourcing all the time for
everything? You can use it to build a living on-line encyclopedia, you can use it to source thousands of
designs for, say, T-Shirts and get the same crowd to help select the best. Instead of trying to do all
the development work on a piece of computer software and inevitably butting your one or two heads
against problems you can’t fix (or didn’t even spot) you can get a prototype or Beta version out there
and have an army of willing experts help you perfect it. Brilliant!
I have a marketing bias so let’s look at possible applications for marketing. You could build a platform
where any marketer, any time anywhere could post a problem (or opportunity) they are working on
and ask a crowd for ideas on how to solve it. It could be anything. Maybe you are a bank and you
want ideas for how to persuade the laggards to move to on-line banking. Maybe you need an idea to
unite all your disparate sponsorship properties. Maybe you need some new product ideas, a new brand
name, a fresh idea for a trade conference, some ideas for on-line brand content (the internet is a
hungry beast when it comes to content). Hell, you could even post your latest advertising brief –
would that work? Well it’s not unknown for Ad agencies to bring in some extra free-lancers to help
solve a brief – this way you could get to thousands of free-lancers, amateur or professional.
To make sure that you attracted the experts most likely to have the best ideas, the professionals or
semi-professionals, you probably should offer some kind of reward, a bounty if you like, for the best
ideas. Most of these people just love solving problems and get a certain personal benefit from doing
so, as well as maybe some professional kudos. But it seems only fair to offer some hard cash in return
for the commercial benefit you would get from a great new marketing idea. It would still be cheap and
it would, of course, be the wisdom of the crowd at cyber speed.
We could call it “Idea Bounty – the best ideas get paid”. Forget focus groups and consumer workshops
– if you have a marketing problem get it on our platform and we’ll guarantee that you get great ideas
you can use, all for the cost, as it happens, of less than a couple of focus groups.
This Idea Bounty could be huge – I’ll just check it out on Google, see if anyone else…..Bugger!
Someone has already done it and so far every client has got ideas they both liked and have
successfully used.
In fact, I discover, there are loads more crowd sourcing platforms for marketing, design, innovation,
all manner of marketing needs.
So is Crowd Sourcing the future? Yes – in fact it is the present, the train has well and truly left the
station. This is no fad. It is inconceivable that the genie will get put back in the bottle. More and more
people, for more and more things, are going to use Crowd Sourcing. Get with the programme. Who
says? – a bunch of geeky on-line nerds? Well the late and very great CK Prahalad based his last ever
book on the prediction that crowd sourcing will become the way of doing business – N=1, R=G – and
he was one of the most respected Business Strategists on the planet.
I can’t comment on whether T shirts and Computer Software will only ever be designed by a wise
crowd. I suspect not. But I do believe strongly that not every marketing problem will.
There are occasions when I would not choose to use crowd sourcing. For me it has limitations and I
think there are reasons why a small, closed community can on occasions be better.
1. Let’s start with the obvious. If the marketing brief (problem/opportunity) is highly confidential I
don’t think I want to publicize it to a crowd.
2. What if I am not 100% sure of what the problem is? The advantage of working with a small, well
motivated, closed community – let’s call it an agency/client team- is that you iterate the brief through
working on it together. The brief gets honed, refined and sometimes completely changed. If I am
going to give a problem to the crowd I need to be sure I can express it clearly and with confidence.
3. As a close cousin to this, briefs sometimes have nuances, subtleties, constraints, that are only truly
appreciated by the small team that are working on them. The crowd needs clarity of purpose and
cannot be relied on to wrestle with reams of sub-text.
4. Often you come to trust certain groups of problem solvers. You’ve worked with them before, they
have a great track record. If I have a winning team, why do I want to expand it by inviting in the
crowd? Would I run the risk of undermining confidence? I like working with people I can see and touch
and – as noted above – debate with. Teams perform better with shared purpose built on like and trust
that can only come through physical interaction.
5. Last on my list is a back-handed compliment to crowd sourcing. I accept I am going to get
hundreds maybe thousands of ideas but how am I going to choose the right one? Out of respect to the
community – which is important – every idea has to be given proper consideration. Too much choice is
not always a good thing.
These, surely, are valid reasons for not using Crowd Sourcing? Maybe, maybe not.
1. If you are worried about confidentiality you can disguise the brief.
2. A great way to get insight on a problem is to throw it out there – use the crowd to help you
understand the problem. It’s a lot better than a few focus groups.
3. Yes there are nuances but at some point there must be clarity – when you can summarize it in
100 words or less then throw it out there. If you can’t, keep working until you can
4. Teams are very important – it should ideally be a team decision when and how to use crowd
sourcing. But if the team are so motivated why would they pass up an opportunity to check whether
there might be a better solution?
5. There is something to the “Paradox of Choice” argument but it is possible to put in place a
process to screen and select ideas (Idea Bounty has a range of levels of support for this). Get the
team to help, employ some experts. Ask the crowd to help make the selection. Just roll your sleeves
up – this is a high quality problem, too many good ideas!

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->