- 3 -
disputes, signing and having Orders filed eighteen minutes before the hearing is setto begin, and that a Judge would act as counsel for the defendants as the onlymeans to see that the defendants win this case.It is further unconscionable that the Courts and their clerks have tampered
with and hindered Plaintiffs‘ ability to prosecute their case and their Right to
ARGUMENT AND CITATION OF AUTHORITIESEXHIBIT 1: The Docket Report
- clearly shows that the last entries prior
Motion for Relief under Rule 60(b)(2),(3),(4), and (6), was on March31, 2009, and July 08, 2009 respectively.
The Docket Report, and History of Documents shows no Exhibits orattachments included with the March 2010 Motion and Brief. Either the Court or
it‘s clerk removed the
―newly discovered evidence‖
, and falsified thedate the Motion was delivered to the Court, so that the claim could be made that
motion was untimely.
FAILURE TO ADDRESS PLAINTIFFS‟ GROUNDS FOR RELIEF
from the United States Postal Service, shows they delivered theMotion and Brief on March 31, 2010; the Docket report shows April 1, 2010 JudgeDuffey claimed that the Motion was untimely, because of a one year statute of limitation, thus the explanation of why the Motion was held until the following daybefore being filed.