T o :
P r o v i n c e o f O n t a
r i o
O m b u d s m a
n G . C a
r l i n o
g c a r l i n o @ o m b
u d s m a n . o n . c a
From:Frank Gallagher 34RiverglenDriveKeswick,On. L4P2P8franklyone@hotmail.com
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within theauthority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b)to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of thelegislature of each province.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law
and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Re: ORHT FILE TNL-67103Your File #189629Dear Gerry Carlino
As you are aware, on June 30 2005 my former tenant Don Wilson committed 2 counts of fraud over $100,000 and 1count of filing false and misleading information over $43,000 at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal which NancyFahlgren presided over.
See attachments dated March 30 2007 to bring you up to speed:Lawyer File # 1:
Copy of my letter to Rick Hennesey ORHT
Lawyer File # 2:
Copy of my letter to Dave Grech, Coordinator-Investigations and Enforcement Unit, MMAH
Lawyer File # 3:
Copy of my letter to Hon. John Gerretsen, Minister of MMAH.All of the above declined to act and are guilty of an offense under s.206 (1) Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and I requestedyour office to look into my concerns.On May 31 2006 I wrote your office (see pages 8 & 9) and June 9 2006 Janet Ortved, Early Resolution Officer wrotethat my complaint doesn’t appear to be with the ORHT whom you have jurisdiction to review decisions. (see page 10)You will note that my May 31 2006 letter is clearly addressing matters concerning the ORHT.
March 30 2007
Lawyer file # 4Canada is founded on PRINCIPLES that RECOGNIZES theSUPREMACY OF GOD and THE RULE OF LAW