C 135/12 EN 13.5.2000Official Journal of the European Communities(2) Annul the Commission’s decision [C(1999) 2539 final](
1
) service stations along the border with Germany) are to betreated as constituting unlawful State aid within theof 20 July 1999 or annul Articles 2 and 3 of the decisionin so far as they provide, with reference to (one of) the meaning of Article 87(1) EC and/or must be repaid by theapplicant(s), and/orin so farasit follows fromthat decisionapplicants, that any amounts received by the applicant(s)pursuant to the temporary arrangements (subsidies for that any amounts which may or must be paid to theapplicant(s) pursuant to the temporary arrangements areservice stations along the border with Germany) are to betreated as constituting unlawful State aid within the correctly classified as constituting unlawful aid for thepurposes of Article 87(1) EC;meaning of Article 87(1) EC and/or must be repaid by theapplicant(s), and/orin so farasit follows fromthat decisionthat any amounts which may or must be paid to the(3) Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.applicant(s) pursuant to the temporary arrangements arecorrectly classified as constituting unlawful aid for thepurposes of Article 87(1) EC;
Pleas in law and main arguments
(3) Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.The pleas in law and the main arguments are similar to thosein Case T-318/99.
Pleas in law and main arguments
(
1
) OJ L 280 of 30.10.1999, p. 87.
The pleas in law and the main arguments are similar to thosein Case T-318/99.
(
1
) OJ L 280 of 30.10.1999, p. 87.
Action brought on 20 January 2000 by Jean Demaeght,Théo Lippert, Ulrike Sinter, John Hambly and KirstenLammar against the Court of Justice of the EuropeanCommunitiesAction brought on 19 January 2000 by Auto- en Carosse-riebedrijf Ambting B.V. and Others against the Com-mission of the European Communities(Case T-19/00)(Case T-15/00)
(2000/C 135/24)(2000/C 135/23)
(Language of the case: French)(Language of the case: Dutch)
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of theEuropean Communities on 20 January 2000 by Jean De-An action against the Commission of the European Communi-maeght, residing in Luxembourg, Théo Lippert, residing inties was brought before the Court of First Instance of theLuxembourg, Ulrike Sinter, residing in Luxembourg, JohnEuropean Communities on 19 January 2000 by Auto- enHambly, residing at Bembridge (United Kingdom) and KirstenCarosseriebedrijf Ambting B.V. and Others, established inLammar, residing in Luxembourg, represented by Jean-NoëlArnhem (Netherlands), represented by G. van der Wal, of theLouis, Greta-Françoise Parmentier and Véronique Peere, of theBrussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at theBrussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at theChambers of A. May, 31 Grand-Rue.offices of Société de Gestion Fiduciaire, 2-4 Rue Beck.The applicants claim that the Court should:The applicants claim that the Court should:(1) Declare the action to be admissible;— annul the decision of the Court of Justice of 18 November1998 not to take any steps to comply with the judgment(2) Annul the Commission’s decision [C(1999) 2539 final](
1
)of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 1998 inof 20 July 1999 or annul Articles 2 and 3 of the decisionCase T-154/96;in so far as they provide, with reference to (one of) theapplicants, that any amounts received by the applicant(s)pursuant to the temporary arrangements (subsidies for — order the defendant to pay the costs.
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
More From This User
Notes
Load more
