Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Untitled

Untitled

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4 |Likes:
Published by eurolex

More info:

Published by: eurolex on Nov 30, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/18/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Re:
 Application for compensation under Article 235 EC and thesecond paragraph of Article 288 EC for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Commission Decision C (2000) 453 of 9 March 2000concerning the withdrawal of marketing authorisations formedicinal products for human use containing amfepramone
 Operative part of the judgment
 The Court:
 1.
Dismisses the action.
 2.
Orders Artegodan GmhH to bear its own costs and to pay thoseincurred by the European Commission.
 3.
Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.
 (
 1
 ) OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.
 Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 —Bundesverband deutscher Banken v Commission(Case T-36/06)
(
 1
 )
 (State aid — Transfer of public assets to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale — Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid — Private investor test —Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Serious difficulties)
 (2010/C 100/56)
 Language of the case: German
 Parties
 Applicant:
Bundesverband deutscher Banken eV (Berlin,Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Niemeyer and K.-S. Scholz,lawyers)
 Defendant:
European Commission (represented by: N. Khan andT. Scharf, Agents)
 Interveners in support of the defendant:
Land Hessen (Germany)(represented initially by H.-J. Freund and M. Holzhäuser, andsubsequently by H.-J. Freund and S. Lehr, lawyers); and Land
­
esbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Frankfurt am Main,Germany) (represented by H.-J. Freund, lawyer)
 Re:
 Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005)3232 final of 6 September 2005 relating to the transfer of the Hessischer Investitionsfonds (Hessian Investment Fund) asa silent partnership contribution to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale
 Operative part of the judgment
 The Court:
 1.
Dismisses the action;
 2.
Orders the Bundesverband deutscher Banken eV to bear its owncosts and to pay those of the European Commission, the LandHessen and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale.
 (
 1
 ) OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.
 Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 —Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission(Joined Cases T-102/07 and T-120/07)
(
 1
 )
 (State aid — Aid granted by Germany in the form of a participation and loan guarantees — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market — General aid schemeapproved by the Commission — Concept of a firm in difficulty — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restruc
­
turing firms in difficulty — Amount of aid — Obligation tostate the reasons on which the decision is based)
 (2010/C 100/57)
 Language of the case: German
 Parties
 Applicants:
Freistaat Sachsen (Germany) (represented by: C. vonDonat and G. Quardt, lawyers) (Case T-102/07), MB ImmobilienVerwaltungs GmbH (Neukirch, Germany) (represented initially by: G. Brüggen, and subsequently by A. Seidl, K. Lengert andW. Sommer, lawyers) and MB System GmbH & Co. KG, (Nord
­
hausen, Germany) (represented by: G. Brüggen, lawyer) (CaseT-120/07)
 Defendant:
European Commission (represented by: K. Gross andT. Scharf, Agents)
EN
 17.4.2010 Official Journal of the European Union C 100/37

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->