Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
1Activity

Table Of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
2 THE SOUTH AFRICAN STATE OF CITIES REPORTING PROCESS 2003-2006
2.1 Background: South African Cities Network
Box 1: The South African Cities Network
2.2 Purpose/target audience(s)
2.3 Selecting/ defining cities
Table 1. A classification of 21 key urban spaces/places in South Africa
2.4 Overview of reporting processes
2.4.1 Overview of the 2004 State of Cities reporting process
2.4.2 Overview of the 2006 State of Cities reporting process
2.4.3 Developments post-2006
2.5 Analytical framework
Figure 2: Summarised version of analytical framework used in 2006 report
2.6 Indicators/data
Table 2. Core indicators in the State of Cities reports
2.7 Content of main body of report
Box 2: “Life on the streets” case studies in the 2004 report
2.9 Dissemination
2.10 Impact
3 STATE OF CITIES REPORTING PROCESSES ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD
3.1 Description of State of Cities reporting processes
3.1.1 State of the Cities Reports for the USA (1997-2000)
3.1.2 State of the English Cities (2006)
3.1.3 The State of the World’s Cities
3.1.4 The Review of Scotland’s Cities
3.1.5 State of the Philippine Urban System
3.1.6 State of Minnesota’s Cities Report (2008)
3.1.7 The Association of Washington Cities’ “State of Cities Reports”
3.1.9 The State of Iraq Cities Report
3.1.10 The State of European Cities Report
3.1.11 Other reports/exercises dealing with the state of cities
3.2 Key characteristics of State of Cities Reports
Table 5. Characteristics of States of Cities Reports
3.2.1 Analytical frameworks/ thematic structuring
Figure 3: Analytical Framework for the State of Iraq Cities Report, 2006/200795
3.2.2 Reporting process
3.2.3 Indicators/ data
3.2.4 Selecting/ defining cities
Box 6: Characteristics of an effective State of Cities reporting process
• Purpose/target audience
4.1 Purpose/target audience
4.2 Institutional home
4.3 The reporting process
Box 7: Key considerations in a state of cities reporting process99
Figure 5: Setting the agenda100
Figure 6: Key urban actors and institutions101
Figure 7: Stakeholder Analysis for Participation102
Box 8: Questions for a stakeholder analysis
Table 6. Participation through reference groups and/or workshops
Box 9: Measures of minimum standards for participation
Box 10: Some recommended action for participation:103
Box 12: Some recommended actions to encourage ownership of the SoCR104
Table 7. Design principles
4.4 Analytical framework
Table 8. Comparison of concepts106
Table 9. Suggested intersection of various sectors
4.5 Indicators/data
Figure 8: Policy Indicator Model
Box 13: Indicators and data107
Box 14: Characteristics of Good City Indicators110
Table 10. Recommendations for ‘SMART’ indicators
Box 15: The Need to Build Indicators Capacity
Box 16: Guidelines for collecting good data
Box 17: Reasons for data inadequacy116
Box 18: Lessons learned on local and city data117
4.6 End products
4.7 Summary Report
4.8 Dissemination
Box 22: Some necessary actions for dissemination and monitoring:
REFERENCES
LIST OF INTERVIEWS
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
06 State of the Cities Reporting-Good Practice Guide and Toolkit

06 State of the Cities Reporting-Good Practice Guide and Toolkit

Ratings: (0)|Views: 96 |Likes:
Published by wamacask

More info:

Published by: wamacask on Nov 30, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/12/2012

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 5 to 23 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 28 to 89 are not shown in this preview.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->