30 November 2010
VADEA E-BULLETIN
Vol. 6
November 1
st
saw the launch of the Seymour Centre’s Arts Education program for 2011. To coincide with theevent a forum and feedback session on the Draft Shape Paper for the Arts (DSPA) was held. Presenters included:- Professor John O’Toole, ACARA Lead Writer for the draft Shape Paper- Linda Lorenza, ACARA Senior Project Officer-Arts- Jay McPherson, Board of Studies Inspector Creative Arts- Deidhre Wauchop, Curriculum Manager, Creative Arts K-6, Department of Education and Training andACARA Curriculum Advisory Panel member- Mathew Clausen, President Australian Teachers of Media New South Wales and Drama teacher atLoreto Kirribilli- Colleen Roche, President Drama New South Wales.Seeing this lineup one would have to agree that the event was not to be missed, given the fact that most ofthe presenters are the
movers and shakers
in the development of the Shape Paper. Unfortunately the event gaveme the feeling I was
crashing
someone else’s party. Although it was referred to as an
Arts Education Launch
therewasn’t anything that really related to the Visual Arts.
I did have to ask myself
“If you are holding a forum on the Arts Shape Paper with the lead writer (who has done everything possible to state the major benefit of the Shape Paper is that it is all arts inclusive) wouldn’t you go out of your way to make sure that all 5 artforms are catered for in your program?”
It seemed not.The main reason I had attend the event was for the presentation from the lead writer, Professor JohnO’Toole, to find out why he was committed to overturning accepted curriculum practice. It was for this reason I washoping he and Linda Lorenza, would be able to sell me on the Draft Paper. As a young teacher, who hopefully hasmany years of teaching before me, I needed them to make me believe that this is a 21
st
century curriculum, it will bebeneficial to my students and yes, I will enjoy teaching the content and structure of what has been proposed.Unfortunately they did nothing of the sort. Professor O’Toole seemed to lose his thread and presented with no clearunderstanding of the contemporary school environment. There was collective jaws dropping when he made theremark,
“Creative teachers are more intuitive when it comes to teaching the arts and will therefore have a better ability to teach across their disciplines.”
I felt insulted to think that anyone who deems themselvescreative could then walk into a classroom and teach what I teach. What of professionalism and subject knowledge?This notion of intuitive teaching will foster no understanding of practice or discipline in any of the artforms. Everydiscipline will lose out here!Jay McPherson noted that the NSW Board of Studies will be seeking extensive feedback on the draft
Arts Shape Paper
. The BOS will be consulting with primary teachers during term 4 and in term 1 2011 they will beconducting face to face meetings with secondary teachers in the Arts. The BOS also has an online survey that canbe completed.
Please ensure you have your say:
http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/surveys/arts-draft-shape.html
Personally, I felt the event was summed up by Matthew Clausen, who chaired the question and answersection, He said: ‘Can I have any other questions from
someone other
than a Visual Arts Teacher?’
A question thatleft me feeling convinced the ‘inclusive nature and connectivity of the arts’ may be something unattainable,even for those pushing for it.
Add a Comment