Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Going private
Once the control of a company is acquired, the firm is then made private for some time with
the intent of going public again. During this “private period,” new owners (the buyout
investors) are able to reorganize a company’s corporate structure with the objective of
making a substantial profitable return. Some comprehensive changes include downsizing
departments through layoffs or completely ridding unnecessary company divisions and
sectors. Buyout investors can also sell the company as a whole or in different parts in order to
achieve a high rate on returns.
Corporate restructuring
Pros- One positive aspect of leveraged buyouts is the fact that poorly managed firms prior to
their acquisition can undergo valuable corporate reformation when they become private. By
changing their corporate structure (including modifying and replacing executive and
management staff, unnecessary company sectors, and excessive expenditures), a company
can revitalize itself and earn substantial returns.
Cons- Corporate restructuring from leveraged buyouts can greatly impact employees. At
times, this means companies may have to downsize their operations and reduce the number of
paid staff, which results in unemployment for those who will be laid off. In addition,
unemployment after leveraged acquisition of a company can result in negative effects of the
overall community, hindering its economic prosperity and development. Some leveraged
buyouts may not be friendly and can lead to rather hostile takeovers, which goes against the
wishes of the acquired firms’ managers.
An example of a hostile takeover occurred when the PepsiCo acquired the Quaker Oats
Company, an American food company well-known for its breakfast cereals and oatmeal
products. In 2001, PepsiCo, in an attempt to diversify its portfolio in non-carbonated drinks,
primarily acquired Quaker Oats because QO owned the Gatorade brand. Even though this
merger created the fourth-largest consumer goods company in the world, many of Quaker
Oats’ managers were against the acquisition, claiming that such a merger was unlawful and
contrary to the public interest.
Pros- Since this type of acquisition involves a high debt-to-equity ratio, large corporations
can easily acquire smaller companies with very little capital. If the acquired company’s
returns are greater than the cost of the debt financing, then all stockholders can benefit from
the financial returns, further increasing the value of a firm.
Cons- However, if the company’s returns are less than the cost of the debt financing, then
corporate bankruptcy can result. In addition, the high-interest rates imposed by leveraged
buyouts may be a challenge for companies whose cash-flow and sale of assets are
insufficient. The result cannot only lead to a company’s bankruptcy but can also result in a
poor line of credit for the buyout investors.
Management buyout
Economy
Pros- Every leveraged buyout can be considered risky, especially in reference to the existing
economy. If the existing economy is strong and remains solid, then the leveraged buyout can
greatly improve its chances for success.
Cons- On the other hand, a weak economy is highly indicative of a problematic LBO. During
an economic crisis, money may be difficult to come by and dollar weakness could make
acquiring companies result in poor financial returns. In addition, acquisition can affect
employee morale, increase animosity against the acquiring corporation, and can hinder the
overall growth of a company.
Conclusion
There are many advantages and disadvantages concerning leveraged buyouts. First, this type
of agreement can allow many large companies to acquire smaller-sized enterprises with very
little personal capital. Second, since corporate restructuring can take place, the acquired
company can benefit from necessary reorganization and reform. In addition, management
buyout can prevent a company from being acquired by external sources or from being shut
down completely. However, there are many disadvantages imposed by LBOs as well. Often
times, the restructuring can lead a company to downsize and can even result in hostile
takeovers. The high interest rates from the high debt-to-equity amounts can result in a
corporation’s bankruptcy, especially if the company is not generating substantial returns after
acquisition. Lastly, management buyouts can produce conflicts of interest among employees,
executives, and management teams as well as possible mismanagement by the buyout
owners. With the potential for enormous profit, it is no wonder that leveraged buyout
strategies expanded throughout the 1980s and have recently made a comeback in modern
corporate America.
http://www.go4funding.com/Articles/Venture-Capital/Advantages-and-Disadvantages-of-
Leveraged-Buyout.aspx