Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Melvin v. Holder Petition for Investigate Allegations of Criminal Acts of Judge, federal U.S. Attorneys = Extortion, Attempt Blackmail, DEA officers’ Attack and Terrorization.

Melvin v. Holder Petition for Investigate Allegations of Criminal Acts of Judge, federal U.S. Attorneys = Extortion, Attempt Blackmail, DEA officers’ Attack and Terrorization.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18 |Likes:
Published by pamela_melvin7904

More info:

Published by: pamela_melvin7904 on Dec 07, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINAWESTERN DIVISIONCIVIL NO. 5:10-CV-464-DPAMELA MELVINPlaintiff,vs.PETITON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United StatesAttorney General of the UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICADefendant. ________________________________ 
I.
 
INTRODUCTIONA.
³In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiledif it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent,omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by itsexample. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law, it invites every man to come a law unto himself.It invites anarchy.´(United States v. Olmstead 277 U.S. 438 (1928).By Justice Louis Brandeis
 
22. In this civil action, plaintiff seeks an order requiring the defendant, United StatesAttorney General Holder, to investigate her allegations of criminal misconduct committed byfederal employees of the federal courts, including but not limited to Judge Louise Flanagan andthe Clerks of District Court and the Court of Appeals, Dennis Iavarone and Patricia Connor;employees and legal counsels of the Social Security Administration and the Veterans¶Administration; employees of the Drug Enforcement Administration; andUnited StatesAttorneyGeorge Holding and his assistants Rudy Renfer and Edward Gray. Plaintiff alleges thatthese individualsintentionally committed acts and conspired to commit acts against her that werenot only violations of the United States Constitution but were also violations of federal criminalstatutes including 18 U.S.C.§ 241; 18 U.S.C.§ 242; 18 U.S.C.§ 245; 18 U.S.C.§ 2071;18U.S.C.§ 1001; 18 U.S.C.§ 2701.3. Because the acts plaintiff alleges in this petition were committed against plaintiff  by federal employees and individuals whom the Department of Justice has exclusion jurisdiction,and plaintiff asserts that the acts were committed against her because of her race, plaintiff is petitioning the court for an order requiring the United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, toinvestigate her allegations and afterward, act according to his findings.4. Within the Department of Justice, are two Divisions that exist for this purpose --the Public Integrity Section and the Civil Rights Division?5. The Public Integrity Section (PIN) has exclusive jurisdiction over and investigatesand prosecutes allegations of criminal misconduct on the part of federal judges and elected andappointed federal, state and local officials. This exclusive jurisdiction also exists over individualswho are supervised by the federal judges and elected and appointed federal, state and local
 
3officials who participated in the criminal conspiracies and acts alleged in this petition. PINoversees the federal effort to combat corruption through prosecution of individuals at all levels of government.6. The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice works to uphold the civiland constitutional rights of all individuals, particularly some of the most vulnerable members of our society. The Division prosecutes hate crimes and crimes committed in violation of federalcriminal statutes that were designed to protect the civil rights of individuals.
Parties
7. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the United States and of Cumberland County,State of North Carolina. In 2006, she filed civil action no. 5:06-CV306-Fl against SSA and itsCommissioner alleging that SSA violated her constitutional right to appeal SSA¶s adversedecisions, that SSA failed to provide in writing information regarding SSA¶s adverse decisionsand that SSA failed to afford her opportunity to hearings and recoup-hearing before withholding benefits as was required by the regulation and codes of the Social Security Act.8. In April 2007, the case was dismissed with the court ordering Commissioner Astrue to proceed to expedited administrative reviews of plaintiff¶s appeals. Commissioner Astrue refused to comply with the order. In August 2007, SSA reported to plaintiff that SSAhad neither her written appeals nor the court order of April 2007 in its record. On May 26, 2009, plaintiff submitted to the federal district court the documents required to file civil action no.5:09-CV0235-FL alleging damages against SSA for failing to maintain its record as required by5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a (e) (5) and (g) (1) (C), the Privacy Act¶s maintenance provision, and damagesagainst the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->