WHY WAS THE ATONEMENT NECESSARY?Probably no subject in scripture has aroused more questions or provoked morewonderment than the atonement. In every dispensation the Lord has declared that it is thekeystone to the entire plan of salvation. During four millenniums mankind looked forward to it,and, in obedience to God
ʼ
s commandments, sacrificed the first-born of their choicest flocks toremind themselves of its importance. After it occurred, the Lord instructed that the sacrament beinstituted to memorialize the great event and that the emblems be given “in remembrance of hissuffering” and served to the members of the Church whenever they met together. From Adamuntil now, the atonement has been the principal subject of all sacred scripture and true churchritual.It is appropriate therefore, that we study this awe-inspiring event which occupies such aprominent place in the plan of salvation.It was just twelve hours before the occasion of His crucifixion that Jesus of Nazarethretired to the seclusion of His favorite place of prayerful mediation on the slopes of Mount Olivet.The scriptures say He walked off a little way from His disciples and suddenly threw Himselfprone upon the ground. It was nighttime and quiet. From the arboreal labyrinth of GethsemaneHis Apostles heard the heart stirring pleas of the very Son of God as He trembled in mortalanguish before the brink of destiny for which He was ordained and born. “O my Father” He said,“if it be possible, let this cup pass from me!” (Matt 23:39). And, according to Mark, He imploredfervently, “Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me:nevertheless, not what I will, but what thou wilt” (Mark 14:36).How did Elohim respond to this plea? We now know this was a bitter hour not only forJesus but also for His Father. Probably the desperate grief of Abraham when he raised thesacrificial knife to slay his beloved son, Isaac, could only compare in a finite degree with theincomprehensible grief which the Eternal Father must have felt on this dark night as He beheldHis own beloved Son face the ordeal of torture and death. An ordeal which could have beenprevented, of course, but only at the risk of wiping out the whole plan of salvation for the humanrace.Down through the corridors of nineteen hundred years there comes the echo of thosepleading words: “O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me…”The student cannot help asking, “Why wasn
ʼ
t it possible?”INABILITY OF GOD TO SAVE MAN DIRECTLYThe apparent necessity for the atonement demands an explanation. Some may say thatthe atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ was to satisfy “justice.” But whose justice? Justice does notexist except as a concept in the mind. Whose sense of justice had been violated? Manystudents will say the atonement was necessary to satisfy God
ʼ
s sense of justice. But let us thinkthat through. If the Father wanted us to have this experience of the Fall as a means of makingus eligible for exaltation and eternal life, why would it violate His sense of justice to take us backinto His presence afterwards when the school of mortality is completed?Why would the Father demand a vicarious atonement to redeem us from a Fall whichwas His idea in the first place (Moses 4:2)? The scripture plainly teaches that man
ʼ
s coming toearth was part of the Father
ʼ
s plan (2 Nephi 2:22-25). He wanted Adam to fall in order to partakeof the experiences of mortality and provide physical tabernacles for the great family of spiritchildren which He had prepared for this earth. Why, then, could not the Father take us back?Why did Jesus have to “purchase” us through suffering and act as a mediator to get us back?
Add a Comment
deleted_fbuser_1310618517left a comment
susan95left a comment