-1-

07-1480-cv (L)The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.

1UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS2FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT34August Term 20075(Argued:

October 24, 2007 Decided: August 4, 2008)6Docket Nos. 07-1480-cv(L) & 07-1511-cv(CON)7-----------------------------------------------------x8THE CARTOON NETWORK LP, LLLP and CABLE NEWS NETWORK9L.P., L.L.L.P.,1011Plaintiffs-Counter-Claimants-Defendants-12Appellees,1314TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL15CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, PARAMOUNT PICTURES16CORPORATION, DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC., CBS17BROADCASTING INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES,18INC., NBC STUDIOS, INC.

1920Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees

2122-- v. --2324CSC HOLDINGS, INC. and CABLEVISION SYSTEMS25CORPORATION,2627Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs-Third-28Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,2930-- v. --3132TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK33LP, LLP, TURNER NETWORK SALES, INC., TURNER CLASSIC34MOVIES, L.P., LLLP, TURNER NETWORK TELEVISION LP,35LLLP3637Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees.383940-----------------------------------------------------x41

-2-1B e f o r e :WALKER, SACK, and LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges.23Appeal from an entry of summary judgment in the United4States District Court for the Southern District of New York5(Denny Chin, Judge). Defendant-Appellant Cablevision Systems6Corporation argues that the district court erred in holding that7its proposed “Remote Storage” Digital Video Recorder system8violates the Copyright Act by infringing plaintiffs’ exclusive9rights of reproduction and public performance.10REVERSED, VACATED, and REMANDED.11JEFFREY A. LAMKEN (Robert K. Kry12and Joshua A. Klein, on the brief),13Baker Botts L.L.P., Washington,14D.C., and Timothy A. Macht (on the15brief), New York, N.Y., for16Defendants-Appellants.1718KATHERINE B. FORREST (Antony L.19Ryan, on the brief), Cravath,20Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, N.Y.,21for Plaintiffs-Appellees The22Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et al.2324ROBERT ALAN GARRETT (Hadrian R.25Katz, Jon Michaels, Peter L.26Zimroth, and Eleanor Lackman, on27the brief), Arnold & Porter LLP,28Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs-29Appellees Twentieth Century Fox30Film Corporation, et al.3132Marc E. Isserles, Cohen & Gresser33LLP, New York, N.Y., for Amici34Curiae Law Professors.3536Henry A. Lanman, Trachtenberg Rodes37& Friedberg LLP, New York, N.Y.,38for Amicus Curiae Professor Timothy39Wu.40

-3-1Solveig Singleton, The Progress &2Freedom Foundation, Washington,3D.C., for Amicus Curiae Progress &4Freedom Foundation.56Carol A. Witschel, White & Case7LLP, New York, N.Y. and Richard H.8Reimer, New York, N.Y., for Amicus9Curiae The American Society of10Composers, Authors & Publishers.1112Michael E. Salzman, Hughes Hubbard13& Reed LLP, New York, N.Y., and14Marvin Berenson, Broadcast Music15Inc., New York, N.Y., for Amicus16Curiae Broadcast Music, Inc.1718David Sohn, Center for Democracy &19Technology, Washington, D.C., Fred20von Lohman, Electronic Freedom21Foundation, San Francisco, Cal.,22Sherwin Siy, Public Knowledge,23Washington D.C., William P.24Heaston, Broadband Service25Providers Association Regulatory26Committee, Jonathan Band PLLC,27Washington, D.C., Julie Kearney,28Consumer Electronics Association,29Arlington, Va., Michael F. Altschul30et al., CTIA–The Wireless31Association®, Washington, D.C.,32Jonathan Banks, USTelecom,33Washington, D.C., Michael K.34Kellogg et al., Kellogg, Huber,35Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel,36P.L.L.C., Washington D.C., for37Amici Curiae Center for Democracy &38Technology et al.3940Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., et al.,41Jenner & Block LLP, Washington,42D.C., Kenneth L. Doroshow & Scott43A. Zebrak, Recording Industry44Association of America, Washington,45D.C., Jacqueline C. Charlesworth,46National Music Publishers’47Association, Washington, D.C.,48Victor S. Perlman, American Society49of Media Photographers, Inc.,