Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Hampson 2000.pdf

Hampson 2000.pdf

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5|Likes:
Uploaded from Google Docs
Uploaded from Google Docs

More info:

Published by: Matias Ceballos Guzman on Dec 09, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/01/2015

pdf

text

original

 
 
This document contains text automatically extracted from a PDF or image file. Formatting may havebeen lost and not all text may have been recognized.
To remove this note, right-click and select "Delete table".
 
 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2000,
20 
(23):8932–8942 
 
Cannabinoids Encoding for Short-Term Reveal the MemoryNecessity in of RatsHippocampal Neural
Robert E. Hampson and Sam A. Deadwyler 
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and Center for Neurobiological Investigation of Drug Abuse,Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina 27157 
The memory-disruptive effects of 9-tetrahydrocannabinol ( 9-THC) and the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 (WIN-2) wereassessed in rats exposed to varying doses of each drug ( 9-THC,0.5–2.0 mg/kg; WIN-2, 0.25–0.75 mg/kg) during performance of a delayed nonmatch to sample (DNMS) task. Cannabinoids af-fected performance in a dose delay-dependent manner, withWIN-2 showing a potency more than four times that of 9-THC.These effects on DNMS performance were eliminated if thecannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141617A (Sanofi Re-search Inc.) was preadministered, but doses of the antagonistalone had no effect on performance. Simultaneous recordingfrom ensembles of hippocampal neurons revealed that bothWIN-2 and 9-THC produced dose-dependent reductions in thefrequency (i.e.,“strength”) of ensemble firing during the samplephase of the task to the extent that performance was at risk for errors on 70% of trials as a function of delay. This decrease inensemble firing in the Sample phase resulted from selectiveinterference with the activity of differentiated hippocampal func-tional cell types, which conjunctively encoded different combi-nations of task events. A reduction in ensemble firing strength didnot occur in the nonmatch phase of the task. The findingsindicate that activation of CB1 receptors renders animals at riskfor retention of item-specific information in much the same man-ner as hippocampal removal.
Key words: cannabinoids; memory; hippocampus; neural en-sembles; encoding; dose dependence; agonists/antagonists
The precise role of the mammalian hippocampus in the processingof memory has evolved considerably since initial reports some 40years ago (Scoville and Milner, 1957) showing retention deficits inhumans after damage to the medial temporal lobe and relatedstructures (Milner, 1972; Zola-Morgan et al., 1986; Warrington andDuchen, 1992; Mishkin et al., 1998). Early studies in animalsshowed that lesions of hippocampus impaired performance in delaytasks (Correll and Scoville, 1965; Olton and Feustle, 1981; Rawlins,1985; Parkinson et al., 1988; Raffaele and Olton, 1988). However,later studies demonstrated that many of these deficits resulted fromretrohippocampal damage, and performance was not impaired byibotenate lesions confined to the dentate gyrus and CA1 and CA3subfields (Jarrard, 1993; Rawlins et al., 1993). In rodents, it is alsoclear that hippocampal lesions impair spatial short-term memory(Angeli et al., 1993; Cho and Jaffard, 1995). We have recentlyshown that selective hippocampal removal impairs performance of a spatial delayed nonmatch to sample (DNMS) task in rodents(Hampson et al., 1999a). Similar but completely reversible memory

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->