Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
MISSING 13TH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION
In my humble opinion; the neglect of the “Original Organic Constitution dated1787”, is evidence of our demise and corruption in the courts, to wit, I see little wecan do about it, especially due to the modification and omissions of the “missingThirteenth Amendment”. We can attempt legal remedy in the courts, but what doyou expect a corrupt court to do except protect it's own position. We the People mayvery well need to resort to brute force to take back what is ours or give it upcompletely, if the courts should disregard our attempt to restore the “Republic forwhich it stands”. . .what is next and who will lead the charge? Rod Class? To date I have not heard of him winning in court with his excellent works. He is truly making a valiant effort,and I commend him on his brilliant fight on “THEIR” turf, where judges refereeand attorney (lawyers, counselors at law) preside over the “common man” . . .The only place where a man can set himself apart is on the battlefield, where thetrue strength of mind and body conspire to preserve ones own beliefs and survival;anything else is a fiction created by legislators, attorneys, congressmen, and thosewho would benefit from titles of nobility at the expense of your rights and freedoms. 
The Original Thirteenth Amendment
Ratified March 12, 1819The Founders held an intense disdain and distrust of "Nobility" as a result of a longhistory, during Colonial times, of abuses and excesses against the Rights of Man and theestablished Common Law and Constitutions by the "Nobility", and therefore placed inthe new Constitution two injunctions against acceptance of Titles of Nobility or Honor or emoluments from external sources. The Revolutionary War for Independence was primarily waged to eliminate these abuses and excesses of the "Nobility" and the"Monied Classes" from the life of the Nation, recognizing the Equality of all men.As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitutionas originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendment was proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to setoneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunitiesnot available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespreaduse of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used tofurther the causes and positions of "Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.
As noted in the discussion in Article 1 of the Constitution, the originalThirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon anyperson holding or accepting a Title of Nobility or Honor, or emoluments fromexternal powers by making that person "cease to be a citizen of the United
1
 
States" and "incapable of holding any Office of Trust or Profit under the UnitedStates". This Amendment was proposed, properly ratified, and was a matter of record in the several States archives until 1876, by which time it was quietly, andfraudulently deleted, never repealed, during the period of Reconstruction after theCivil War and the presently acknowledged Thirteenth Amendment wassubstituted. The original records of theoriginal 13th amendment were thought to be destroyed at the time of theburning of the capitol during the War of 1812, but have since been found in thearchives of the British Museum, the national archives and in the archives of several of the States and territories. The fact of its existence had been lost tomemory until, by chance, researchers discovered in the public library at Belfast,Maine an 1825 copy of the U. S. Constitution. Subsequent research shows that itwas in the records of the ratifying states and territories until 1876, the last to dropit from record was the Territory of Wyoming after 1876. The most intriguingdiscovery was the 1867Colorado Territory edition which includes both the "missing" ThirteenthAmendment and the current 13th Amendment, on the same page. The current13th Amendment is listed as the 14th Amendment in the 1867 Colorado edition. –See Images CO1868-1, CO1868-2, CO1868-3, CO1868-4, and CO1868-5.Located on this site;http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html Amendment on the same page. The current 13th Amendment is listed asthe 14th, the current 14th amendment is omitted, and the current 15thAmendment is in proper place. See Images WY1876-1, WY1876-2, WY1876-3- See Ref. "Thirteenth Amendment Publication Table"For further discussion and the history of the Original ThirteenthAmendment see "Demon of Discord, Ratification and Suppression of the OriginalThirteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States."On December 3, 1860, the month after Lincoln was elected, PresidentBuchanan asked Congress to propose an "explanatory amendment". It was to beanother 13th Amendment, to eradicate and cover-up the deletion of the OriginalThirteenth Title of Nobility and Honour Amendment. This proposed amendment,which would have forever legalized slavery, was signed by President Buchananthe day before Lincoln took office.Under the Constitution of 1787 all sworn judges and officers are properlyseated and are de jure Officers properly functioning in proper Offices.Under the Constitution of 1871 all sworn judges and officers are
not
properly seated and are de facto officers improperly functioning in"Mob Rule" fictional offices, under 
vi et armis,
under the corporate state of Washington, District of Columbia, a ten mile square (actually, a 68 squaremile) Foreign Country, whose states are Guam, Puerto Rico, American
2
 
Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc., etc.THE MOST SIGNIFICANT difference between (1) the Original,Organic, Constitution
for 
the united States of America adopted in 1787,and (2) the Constitution adopted for the
Act of 1871
”, being theConstitution
of 
the United States of America, is the obvious changes inthe Amendments, such changes being, not subtle, but extreme andcontrary. Secondarily, the Preface to the Original Organic Constitution for the united states was, exactly that, a Constitution (contract)
for 
the newlyformed states of the Republic. The latter (1871) Constitution
of 
(belongingto) the United States is a corporate charter for the now
defunct
federalgovernment.These changes, on the surface, may seem insignificant, however,once the definition of the “changed” word (term) in question is examined,you’ll find a MAJOR, yes, even catastrophic to society, difference. Pleasepay close attention to the next two (2) brief statements.From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1
st
Edition, 1891 (active in the timeframe of the “Act of 1871”), the definition of the word “for” is; “For. InFrench Law. A
tribunal.
 
Le for interieur 
, the interior forum; the tribunal of conscience.” (Emphasis added.)From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1
st
Edition, 1891, the definition of theword
“tribunal”
is; “tribunal. The
seat
of a judge ; the place where headministers justice; a judicial court; the bench of judges.”Logic concludes that if a judge (or, any/all other officer(s)) has
not
taken an Oath to uphold the Original, Organic, Constitution
for 
the unitedStates of America, he is
UN-SEATED
!! Remember, the latter (1871edition) Constitution is not “for” the Union of States, but rather “of”(belonging to a possession of). Also, keep in mind, that the latter Constitution was initiated as a
Charter 
for a Commercial Corporation , anenterprise for gain and profit!We know (from history) that the latter Amendments to theConstitution are different than the earlier Amendments. The
original
document, at Amendment 13, specifically denies any holder of Title of Nobility (T.O.N.A., Titles Of Nobility Act) to any access of the Public Trust,Citizenship, etc., while the “superimposed” document prevents privateownership of slaves and the actions of involuntary servitude atAmendment number 13.Thus, we are observing some vast differences, originating well after the established fundamentals of law had been in place for over onehundred years. Other differences of a similar nature have effectively
3
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more