Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc., etc.THE MOST SIGNIFICANT difference between (1) the Original,Organic, Constitution
for
the united States of America adopted in 1787,and (2) the Constitution adopted for the “
Act of 1871
”, being theConstitution
of
the United States of America, is the obvious changes inthe Amendments, such changes being, not subtle, but extreme andcontrary. Secondarily, the Preface to the Original Organic Constitution for the united states was, exactly that, a Constitution (contract)
for
the newlyformed states of the Republic. The latter (1871) Constitution
of
(belongingto) the United States is a corporate charter for the now
defunct
federalgovernment.These changes, on the surface, may seem insignificant, however,once the definition of the “changed” word (term) in question is examined,you’ll find a MAJOR, yes, even catastrophic to society, difference. Pleasepay close attention to the next two (2) brief statements.From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1
st
Edition, 1891 (active in the timeframe of the “Act of 1871”), the definition of the word “for” is; “For. InFrench Law. A
tribunal.
Le for interieur
, the interior forum; the tribunal of conscience.” (Emphasis added.)From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1
st
Edition, 1891, the definition of theword
“tribunal”
is; “tribunal. The
seat
of a judge ; the place where headministers justice; a judicial court; the bench of judges.”Logic concludes that if a judge (or, any/all other officer(s)) has
not
taken an Oath to uphold the Original, Organic, Constitution
for
the unitedStates of America, he is
UN-SEATED
!! Remember, the latter (1871edition) Constitution is not “for” the Union of States, but rather “of”(belonging to – a possession of). Also, keep in mind, that the latter Constitution was initiated as a
Charter
for a Commercial Corporation , anenterprise for gain and profit!We know (from history) that the latter Amendments to theConstitution are different than the earlier Amendments. The
original
document, at Amendment 13, specifically denies any holder of Title of Nobility (T.O.N.A., Titles Of Nobility Act) to any access of the Public Trust,Citizenship, etc., while the “superimposed” document prevents privateownership of slaves and the actions of involuntary servitude atAmendment number 13.Thus, we are observing some vast differences, originating well after the established fundamentals of law had been in place for over onehundred years. Other differences of a similar nature have effectively
3