Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE: The 2 pages of the post by Orly Taitz are
all that will be shown here. Orly continues to do the very acts and
attacks that she is being sued for in this case and I will not add to the
attack.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=16425
Home
1.4 million people saw this clip, send it to another 1.4 million
Appeal of Carter Case
elections fraud around the country
From reader Carol
Quo Warranto Filed and Served
US state dep is paying to restore mosques around the world
THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers, do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, ESQ, and Dr. Taitz, ESQ has no means of
checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
1 of 14 12/12/2010 12:13 PM
In spite of nearly 500 pages of horrific defamation of my character by Phil... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=16425
2 of 14 12/12/2010 12:13 PM
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110375004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2010
No. 10-3000
v.
Respectfully,
Clerk/AWI
Case Listed for 02/09/2011.
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110375004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2010
_________________________________ORDER________________________________
The foregoing Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, including a request
for relief in the nature of mandamus, is DENIED. Appellees have not demonstrated
entitlement to extraordinary relief in this Court. While the District Court has directed
that all future motions be filed in this Court, it is appropriate for the District Court to
consider this Motion in the first instance. Appellees state that they sent a letter by
facsimile to the District Judge's Chambers. However, this informal request did not
properly preserve or advance their rights. Even assuming that the issues raised by
Appellees in the present Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order are related
to this appeal, an assumption that is not easily made, it is nevertheless appropriate in this
case for the Appellees to first formally apply to the District Court for relief. Accordingly,
the Motion is remanded to the District Court to allow Appellees to file their request in the
District Court. The District Court may then determine whether relief is warranted or
whether the dispute outlined in the Motion actually represents a separate dispute that
should be handled in a separate action in a court with the necessary jurisdiction and
venue.
By the Court,
Enclosed herewith is the certified copy of the order in the above-captioned case. The certified
judgment or order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate and is to be treated in all respects as a
mandate.
Kindly acknowledge receipt for same on the enclosed copy of this letter.
Counsel are advised of the issuance of the mandate by copy of this letter. The certified judgment
or order is also enclosed showing costs taxed, if any.
Marcia M. Waldron,
Clerk
cc:
Philip J. Berg
Neil Sankey
Orly Taitz