You are on page 1of 7

Orly Taitz denies reality again.

Even though she possesses a law


license, she still has no understanding of the law. Any layperson can
understand that the Appeals Court decided that this issue was not in
their jurisdiction, it is in Judge Robreno’
s jurisdiction.

DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE: The 2 pages of the post by Orly Taitz are
all that will be shown here. Orly continues to do the very acts and
attacks that she is being sued for in this case and I will not add to the
attack.

It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that you do NOT go to Orly Taitz’ s site as


it is infested with malware and spyware. To go there is at your peril,
as your computer WILL be infected.

This attachment has been extensively disinfected and will be checked


for malware by Scribd before posting.
In spite of nearly 500 pages of horrific defamation of my character by Phil... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=16425

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=16425

Home
1.4 million people saw this clip, send it to another 1.4 million
Appeal of Carter Case
elections fraud around the country
From reader Carol
Quo Warranto Filed and Served
US state dep is paying to restore mosques around the world

Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire


Defend Our Freedoms Foundation – 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100, Rancho
Santa Margarita CA, 92688 – Copyright 2010

World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site


Your donations to the cause are much appreciated.

WHEN THE PEOPLE FEAR THEIR GOVERNMENT,

THERE IS TYRANNY.

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FEARS THE PEOPLE,

THERE IS LIBERTY.

- Thomas Jefferson

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers, do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, ESQ, and Dr. Taitz, ESQ has no means of
checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

In spite of nearly 500 pages of horrific defamation


of my character by Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi, her
mother Dorothy Waddell and the rest of their
accomplices, Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied
their motion for restraining order against me. I am

1 of 14 12/12/2010 12:13 PM
In spite of nearly 500 pages of horrific defamation of my character by Phil... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=16425

free to post this truthful information, showing that


Lisa Liberi, assistant for attorney Philip J. Berg, is
a convicted document forger and thief, who got 8
year prison term in CA in 2008, and who is
currently on probation. The question remains: why
is licensed attorney Berg continuously working with
a convicted forger Liberi and submitting
documents to multiple courts ans viciously
attacking me and other innocent individuals?
Posted on | December 12, 2010 | No Comments

2 of 14 12/12/2010 12:13 PM
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110375004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2010

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT


December 7, 2010

No. 10-3000

LISA LIBERI, et al.

v.

ORLY TAITZ, et al.


(E.D. Pa. No. 2-09-cv-01898)

Present: JORDAN, GREENAWAY, JR. and WEIS, Circuit Judges

Motion by Appellees Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law


Office of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella for an Emergency
Temporary Restraining Order against Appellants, their witness, Geoff
Staples, and anyone on their behalf, requesting the following:

a. Enjoining them from further cyber-stalking, harassment, intimidation


and retaliation, using Appellee Lisa Liberi’s name fraudulently and
illegally; and illegal activities directed at Appellee Lisa Liberi or any
of the Appellees;

b. For the removal and deletion of a website fraudulently set-up in


Appellee Lisa Liberi’s name;

c. The deletion and removal of all Email addresses fraudulently set-up


and any other Email addresses illegally using the name of Appellee
Lisa Liberi;

d. The removal of Appellee Lisa Liberi’s picture from the Internet.

Respectfully,
Clerk/AWI
Case Listed for 02/09/2011.
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110375004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2010

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, including a request
for relief in the nature of mandamus, is DENIED. Appellees have not demonstrated
entitlement to extraordinary relief in this Court. While the District Court has directed
that all future motions be filed in this Court, it is appropriate for the District Court to
consider this Motion in the first instance. Appellees state that they sent a letter by
facsimile to the District Judge's Chambers. However, this informal request did not
properly preserve or advance their rights. Even assuming that the issues raised by
Appellees in the present Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order are related
to this appeal, an assumption that is not easily made, it is nevertheless appropriate in this
case for the Appellees to first formally apply to the District Court for relief. Accordingly,
the Motion is remanded to the District Court to allow Appellees to file their request in the
District Court. The District Court may then determine whether relief is warranted or
whether the dispute outlined in the Motion actually represents a separate dispute that
should be handled in a separate action in a court with the necessary jurisdiction and
venue.

By the Court,

/s/ Kent A. Jordan


Circuit Judge

Dated: 10 December 2010


Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110375037 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2010

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TELEPHONE


CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 215-597-2995
21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE
601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790
Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov

December 10, 2010

Mr. Michael Kunz


United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
James A. Byrne United States Courthouse
601 Market Street
Room 2609
Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797

RE: Lisa Liberi v. Orly Taitz


Case Number: 10-3000
District Case Number: 2-09-cv-01898

Dear District Court Clerk:

Enclosed herewith is the certified copy of the order in the above-captioned case. The certified
judgment or order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate and is to be treated in all respects as a
mandate.

Kindly acknowledge receipt for same on the enclosed copy of this letter.

Counsel are advised of the issuance of the mandate by copy of this letter. The certified judgment
or order is also enclosed showing costs taxed, if any.

Very truly yours,

Marcia M. Waldron,
Clerk

By: Anthony Infante


Case Manager

cc:
Philip J. Berg
Neil Sankey
Orly Taitz

You might also like