Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13
RAUL MOJICA PRADO et aI, SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
14
15 Defendants.
16
17
20
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 30, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., in Department "17 ", 0
21
the above-entitled court located at 1415 Truxtun Avenue, CA 93301, Defendant Raul Mojic
22
Prado will demur to the Complaint on file herein pursuant to California Code ofCivil Procedur
23
1
NOTICE OF DEMURRER
1 Defendant subleased the premises to two unrelated adults who resided in the premise
2 along with the Defendant.
3 2. Further, Defendant demurrer is based on the fact that the complaint failed to state a caus
4 of action, because the complaint was filed prematurely and contrary to the 30/90 da
5 ought to have given/or gave the Defendants; The Plaintiff was required by law to give
6 60-day notice to the subleasor occupants of the said property.
7 3. Plaintiff filed this action contrary to the law by failing to give adequate notice to th
8 none-owner occupants of the property.
9 4. To the extent said cause of action for unlawful detainer is predicated on notice that wa
10 inadequate and contrary to law, it must fail for failure to state a cause of action.
11 This demurrer is made and based upon this notice, the accompanying memorandum of point
12 and authorities, the papers, records and pleadings on file herein and upon such oral argument an
13 evidence as may be introduced at the time of the hearing ofthis demurrer.
14 WHEREFORE, Defendants, pray for relief as follows:
15 (1) That this demurrer be sustained without leave to amend;
16 (2) For judgment in favor of this Defendants;
17 (3) For all costs of suit incurred herein; and
18 (4) For such other and further relief as this court deems just and proper, whether in law
19 or equity.
20
21
Dated: August 16,2010 LAW OFFICES OF LEVI REUBEN UKU
~~--
22
LE~
23
BY_____ __-----------------
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF DEMURRER
5
On Plaintiff filed this action on December 21,2009, Plaintiffs action is based on the fac
6 that it purchased the subject real property at a foreclosure sale, and thus is a foreclosure buyer i
7
possession of a deed upon sale, thereby claiming interest on the said property.
8
purported served via "substitute service" on the occupants a "Notice to Quit" sometimes i
9
December, 2009. Contrary to the said notice, Defendant or its agent was not served with the sai
10
12 The said notice is attached to the complaint as Exhibit "2". The Notice stated three differen
13
periods for the occupants to quit possession as follows: 3 day; 30 day; 60 day and 90 day.
14
It is important to note that the property is occupied by the Defendant and Defendant'
15
subleasor.
16
17 Defendant believes that the notice of 60 or 90 day applied to the' occupants of the sai
18 property, in which case, any unlawful detainer action must be filed at the expiration of the 60 0
19
90 day period. Plaintiff knew that the Defendant subleased the said premises to an unrelate
20
third party. Yet, Plaintiff failed to wait sixty days after the service of the sixty-day notice to qui
21
22
in order filing the instant unlawful detainer action.
23 Plaintiff filed the said action on December 12, 2010 less than the required sixty da
24
notice. The said notice was purportedly posted on December _, 2009.. See, Exhibit "2" to th
25
complaint. See, Code of Civil procedure section 1161 (a)(b)(3).
26
Defendant believes that the complaint fails to state a cause of action as it was file
27
28 prematurely.
3
NOTICE OF DEMURRER
1
ARGUME1W
3
II
5
FAILS TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION
7
A demurrer is a proper vehicle whereupon the Complaint is tested for failure to state a
8
cause of action, as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10. In addition, a
9
demurrer may be properly sustained without leave to amend even if made on the grounds that the
10
complaint fails to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action, or plaintiff fails to show that the
11
12
13
14
15
VII
16
CONCLUSION
17
18
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request that the demurrer be sustained
19
without leave to amend.
20
21
Dated: August 16,2010. LAW OFFICES OF LEVI REUBEN UKU
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF DEMURRER
1
3 PROOF OF SERVICE
4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
17
U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles,
18 California in the ordinary course of business. 'am aware that on motion of the part
19 served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter dates i
20 more than one day after date of deposit for mailing.
21
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, tha
22
the foregoing is true and correct.
23
24
Dated: 8/16/2010
25
Levi Reuben Uku
26
27
28
NOTICE OF DEMURRER