Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
UAPD v. Schwarzenegger Appellants' Supplemental Reply Brief

UAPD v. Schwarzenegger Appellants' Supplemental Reply Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15,459|Likes:
Published by jon_ortiz
The administration's Dec. 14, 2010 filing to the 1str District Court of Appeal, rebutting UAPD's argument that a California Supreme Court ruling didn't invalidate a lower court ruling that "special fund" department furloughs are illegal.
The administration's Dec. 14, 2010 filing to the 1str District Court of Appeal, rebutting UAPD's argument that a California Supreme Court ruling didn't invalidate a lower court ruling that "special fund" department furloughs are illegal.

More info:

Published by: jon_ortiz on Dec 16, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/16/2010

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->