Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amjad Nazeer1
April 2002
Introduction:
Life of the urban poor is a synonym of unending struggle. Without struggle their very
existence is threatened3. There is a whole range of goods and commodities they have to
make effort for. They have to work hard for their livelihood, settlement, food, health and
several other necessities of life. Knowing the value, they also try to seek useful
information and build social networks. With the lack of any state benefits or social
security their struggle becomes even intensive. In this article, I am describing various
efforts made by the urban poor for their day to day survival. Several means and methods
are mentioned adopted by the poor to make a living and find a shelter. Survival of the
urban poor mainly depends on their own efforts than any governmental support is my
key argument. Absence of any formal policy in most of the poor countries forces them to
find their own ways of survival. The conclusions I am going to draw surround on the
observations about, ‘why and how the urban poor manage their survival themselves and
analysis’ of the nature and form of their efforts.
Background:
Hostile political and economic forces exclude the poor from labour and services sector.
A major shift from labour- to capital-intensive productivity and technological
standardization drive them out of industrial sector too. Low wages, low return and
insecure working tenures push them down to substantial level. Under these conditions,
the poor mostly depend themselves and look out for multiple ways of survival (Salway
1
The Author is a human rights activist and works for an international NGO in Pakistan.
2
Source: A poor man from Armenia, Voices of the poor (World Bank)
3
I realize that urban poor is not a homogenous category. There are layers and strata among the poor. But in
this essay I will generally refer to ‘all the urban poor’ who are struggling for their survival.
Urban poverty has generally increased in third world countries. A massive number of
workers have been retrenched under economic recession or structural adjustment
programmes. Wages have declined and inflation has caused expensiveness. Obviously
the worst victims are the poorest populations of cities (Gilbert 1994: 605-608).
Governments have drawn back subsidies and welfare entitlements on basic goods and
services. With shrinking resources and facilities the poor are forced to help themselves
than placing hopes on any formal institutions (Iglesias 1992; Glewwe and Hall 1992 as
cited in Gilbert 1994:608-609; Ferguson 1992: 62-70).
i) Livelihood efforts:
Being unemployed or under-employed in government or manufacturing sector, the poor
are compelled to create some sort of job for themselves. There is clear evidence from
Latin American and African cities where number of the poor engage themselves into
minor income generation activities. Mostly unskilled and some of the skilled professions
like repairing automobiles or becoming electrician, carpenter, barber or cobbler are part
of the choice (Thomas: 1995: 9-14). Shoe cleaning, day-labouring, street vending,
scavenging, domestic services, petty trading, becoming a porter, coolie or messenger
and even begging are just a few of the activities urban poor adopt to survive (Gilbert
1994: 611-612; Thomas 1995: 17). In Lima for example, selling handprints, sweats and
chocolates, cigarettes, ball pens, cheap trinkets, plastic bags, soaps, mirrors, combs and
4
Conceptually informal work falls in informal sector. Usually it is associated with poverty. But all informal
workers may not be poor and all urban poor may not be (although many do) working in informal sector
(Mead and Morrisson 1996: 1611). Thus my use of the term ‘informal’ and examples taken from informal
sector will be just by default.
Although informal job or micro enterprises also involve enormous effort and competition
but the poor somehow manage it to earn a living. It is the last resort for survival to the
poor. To supplement their food several families have been observed planting vegetables
and fruits in public plots in Nairobi and other African cities (Rakodi and Devas 1993;
House et al 1993; Dasgupta 1992a,b; Drakakis-Smith 1990; Gefu 1992; Fashoyin 1993;
Lautier 1990 as cited in Gilbert 1994: 611-614). Increased involvement of women and
children in to income-generating activities or labour market is another means of coping
with economic crisis (Boyden and Holden 1999; Dagenais 1993; Standing 1989;
Mckayas as cited in Gilbert 1994: 616-621).
For many, risk-taking is part of survival efforts. For instance, out of 600 hawkers in
Snatiago (1987), 87% were working without permit. Despite having applied for one,
established shopkeepers pressurized Municipality not to legalize them. Three-quarters of
them (around 66%) were household heads and 60% were the sole providers of their
family. They always worked under harassment and fear of stock confiscation or
imprisonment by the police (Thomas 1995: 57). Likewise hawking is a main livelihood
source of several urban poor in Nairobi. All of them are unlicensed but on contrary to
Santiago, they are highly organized and protect their ‘own’ sites with force. The de-facto
right of their sites was recognized and respected by the fellow hawkers not by Council
workers whom they bribed (Mitullah 1991: 18 as cited in Beall and Kanji 1999:10).
Lack of infrastructure also hampers the poor to find an employment or commute for daily
work. If government makes any promises, it takes so long that people are frustrated by
that time and have to think of alternatives. For instance (see Ferguson 1992:63-65, 68-
69) a migrant Jamaican farmer diversified his income by making and selling crafts to the
tourists. Loosing income with excessive competition he switched over to making toys,
rugs and belts and then to selling Coca-Cola. Each gave little profit in the town and he
could not go far due to lack of roads and transport facility. Under his restricted means he
has to support his children’s education as education is not free. If late for transport or
some other reason, factory owners do not let them in or deduct their half-day salary,
saying, ‘it is not our problem.’ Poor workers have to walk long distances to get to their
workplace.
Investing in ROSCA5 is another survival strategy for the urban poor. Many a men and
women are known to subscribe with ROSCA throughout South Asia. They keep a rupee
or two aside from their daily income and circulate it in ROSCA members. It helps them to
get some money rotationally without interest. This amount is used for consumption or for
productive purposes. It also proves to be valuable in ceremonies or in crisis and helps to
build social network as well (Sethi R. 1995: 163, 174-176).
The poor urban families make their best to strengthen and develop social ties. Given the
lack of state security they depend on their relatives, neighbourhood and community
when sick or unemployed or suffering from a tragedy. People migrate from rural to urban
areas usually with cooperation of any relative in the city (Roberts 1995: 163).
5
ROSCA (Rotatory Social Credit Associations) is not confined to the poor in South Asia. Well off people
also set up ROSCAs. But there is a huge difference of scale.
State institutions rarely plan to accommodate migrant and the growing poor in urban
areas. Even the most fundamental problem of shelter is resolved6 by the poor
themselves. Most of them occupy deserted, fragile or dirty spaces around the city.
Waste embankments, city outskirts, dumpsites and flood prone areas are the common
choices. Gradually these locations convert into large squatters or slums. To settle into
these areas, they have to deal with brokers’ mafia or police who charge their own
commission. A vast majority of them installs their makeshift houses themselves. Despite
so many struggles, threat of demolition by the authorities hovers upon their heads
(Salway and Wood 2000: 675-676). According to a rough estimate 30-80% urban
population of underdeveloped countries lives in self constructed squatter settlements
(UN 1994, as cited in Roberts 1995: 158).
6
The word ‘resolve’ has been used in a very conservative context.
Soledad is thirty. She has a textile stall in La Paz center. Fourteen years ago she came
from a village to work as a housemaid. In the large house she had a mattress in a
cupboard, which housed electricity meter, brooms and buckets. She was at the beck and
call of the family round the clock. After a year, fed-up with spiteful outbursts of family
members she moved to another. It was no different from the previous one. By the time
The life of a poor Zimbabwean woman ‘Esther’, studied by Schlyter (2001: 3-14) is a
best example of women’s survival efforts. Her squatter settlement, which she built
herself, was bulldozed twice by the town Council. With her persistence struggle she
succeeded to build a suitable house with her own income. Low-cost-housing unit was
the only facility she got from the town Council. From vending to, sewing, poultry raising,
trading, lodging, running a welding-workshop and even a shebeen are all the various
occupations she adopted one after other to earn some money and raise her five
children. Council laws, property ownership and working rules, housing and zoning
regulations were rather a hindrance to Esther’s efforts.
Burman and Lembete (1995: 28-30) interviewed some low educated mothers in Cape
Town. Out of 19, three were divorced others were unwed mothers. Being discriminated
by their kinfolk, they had to depend entirely on themselves for their and their children’s
survival. Two of them were cleaners, one saleslady, one a bakery attendant and others
were trained nurses, teachers, secretaries and like that. Their income hardly ranged
from R.120 to R.1000/month. Almost all of them did work part time in shops or houses to
compensate their insufficient income.
To protect their source of livelihood women are not passive all the times. There are
number of female street traders in Mexico City whose only source of income are mini
stalls in the market (McVey 1997 as cited in Beal and Kanji: 1999: 11). Each of them has
occupied specific spot in the city center. To hold their trading space they actively
resisted the city authorities who tried to evict them. They succeeded to save their sites in
return of political support they promised to the councilors. They knew that losing their
spots meant losing their livelihood (ibid: 10).
Around 100 children work in Bogota quarries and brickyards. These enterprises operate
with primitive technology, involving intensive labour. On average, children work 9-12
hours/day and 7 days a week. They usually work as helpers to their parents or other
adults. In quarry, they assist extracting large rocks and feeding them into hoppers, then
shoveling material into crushers and at sieving. In brickyards, they transport and pile up
bricks. Having dried, they put them into the kiln for firing. Finally they load them into the
trucks. They also lead mules deriving the mill and carry coal to the kiln. About half the
children receive payment in kind and others are paid through their parents. Their daily
wage is less than 1US$.
Some poor children, as in Jamaica, pick up food from garbage and bottles or tins to sell
and reduce burden on their parents (Ferguson: 1992:66). Thousands of children work in
carpet and support industries in Pakistan to supplement their households’ income.
Conclusions:
As we have seen, the urban poor have to make numerous efforts just to survive in
antagonistic environment. They make efforts at individual, household or community level
as the circumstances demand. When governments fail to plan to accommodate them,
they settle in haphazardly wherever they find an empty space. Possessing a public land
or living on a dumpsite only reflects a fundamental necessity of having a shelter. Moving
from place to place or holding a squatter settlement is actually a struggle for a house.
They know that permanent housing is directly linked with permanent employment.
When there is no room for a descent employment either in public or private sector they
choose whatever occupation seems to help them survive. ‘Endeavours of Soledad and
Asther’ is a complete metaphor of the life of urban poor. Shifting occupations of the
Jamaican hawker is but to find a reliable form of income. Growing vegetable on public
space is a way to secure food.
+++++++++
References Cited:
Beall, J. and Kanji, N. (August 1999) Households, livelihoods and urban poverty, Urban
governance, partnership and poverty series, Theme Paper No. 3.
www.bham.ac.uk/IDD/acticities/urban/urbangove/theme_papers
Site-hit: (10 April 2002)
Berger, Marguerite (1989) Giving women credit: The strengths and limitations of credit as a tool
for alleviating poverty, World development, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 1017-1032, Printed in Great Britain.
Burman and Lemlembete (1995) Building new realities: African women and ROSCAs in Urban
South Africa, (in) Ardener and Burman (1995) Money-go-rounds: The importance of rotating
savings and credit associations for women (ed.), Berg publishers limited, Oxford.
Carter Michael, R. and May, Julian (1999) Poverty, livelihood and class in rural South Africa,
World Development, Vol. 27, No. 1, p. 1-20, Printed in Great Britain.
Ferguson, James (1992) Jamaica: Stories of poverty, Race And Class, Vol. 34, No.1
pp. 61-71
Gilbert, Allan. (1994) Third world cities: Poverty, employment, gender roles and environment
during a time of restructuring, Urban Studies, Vol. 31, Nos. 4/5, pp. 605-633.
House, William J., Ikiara G. and Mccormick, D. (1993) Urban self employment in Kenya: Panacea
or viable strategy?, World Development, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 1205-1223, Printed in Great Britain.
Mead, Donald C. and Morrisson, Christian (1996) The informal sector elephant, World
development, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1611-1696, Printed in Great Britain.
Amjad Nazeer Survival Strategies of the Urban Poor
10
Roberts, Bryan R. (1995) The making of citizens: Cities of peasants revisited, Hodder headline
group, Great Britain.
Schlyter, Ann (2001) Esther’s house-home, business and lodgers’ shelter: Multi-habitation in
Citungwisa, African urban economies series, Nordic African Institute, Uppsala.
Sethi Raj, M. (1995) Women’s ROSCAs in contemporary Indian society, (in) Ardener and Burman
(1995) Money-go-rounds: The importance of rotating savings and credit associations for women
(ed.), Berg publishers limited, Oxford.
Thomas, J.J (1995) Surviving in the city: The urban informal sector in Latin America, Critical
studies on Latin America series, Pluto press, London.
Thomas, J.J. (1992) Informal economic activity, LSE handbooks in economics series, Harevester
Wheatsheaf, Great Britain.
Wood, G. and Salway, S. (2000) Policy Arena: Introduction: Securing livelihoods in Dhaka slums,
Journal of International Development J.Int. Dev. 12, 669-688 (2000)