Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
What's Love Got to Do With It_ Scholarly Citation Practices as ..

What's Love Got to Do With It_ Scholarly Citation Practices as ..

Ratings: (0)|Views: 8|Likes:
Published by Aipod Green

More info:

Published by: Aipod Green on Dec 20, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Language and Learning Across the Disciplines34
Inexperienced academic writers, would-be members or initiates of scholarly disciplines, deviate from accepted practices for citing theliterature of a particular area of study in a number of ways familiar toteachers of undergraduates and beginning graduate students. Theyoften rely too much on their sources; they often do not provide necessarycitations, do provide unnecessary citations, or provide incomplete ones;they are unlikely to integrate these cited sources into the context of theirown work adequately or effectively; and they frequently use an uncon-ventional citation style. Teachers of these inexperienced writers mayfind it difficult to explain precisely why these deviations from theconventions of their discourse communities are so troubling or exactlyhow they might be corrected to conform to the expectations of experi-enced readers in the discipline.In this essay, I argue for adopting a rhetoric of identification forexplaining citation practices, viewing scholarly citation as a courtshipritual designed to enhance a writer’s standing in a scholarly discoursecommunity. The terms of this rhetoric challenge, without completelydisplacing, the capitalistic economic terms that currently prevail intextbook discussions of quotation, paraphrase, and other means of incorporating ideas from one or more texts into another. Adopting thisrhetoric of citation practice has a number of implications for teachers of writing across the disciplines.
Inadequacies of Typical Handbook Advice
Faced with student writers’ deviations from typical scholarlycitation practice, teachers might refer students to style manuals such asthose of the American Psychological Association or the Modern Lan-guage Association to remedy unconventional formatting, punctuation,
What’s Love Got to Do withIt? Scholarly CitationPractices as Courtship Rituals
Shirley K. Rose
Purdue University
Research on the Language of the Disciplines
and abbreviation practices, but these manuals rarely address the mostsignificant deviations from accepted citation practice. The adviceoffered in college writing handbooks and research manuals is usuallyinadequate as well. These texts, which are typically designed for use inintroductory writing courses enrolling students from diverse areas of study, are not only short on guidelines for making informed choicesabout when, where, and how to refer to which existing literature in anyfield of study; they also, in their attempts to be comprehensive, arelimited to offering only the most generalized advice. Further, as I willdemonstrate below, these handbooks often present scholarly citation interms limited to a view of ideas as intellectual property and of scholarlyproductivity as a factor in a capitalistic economy. Though these termsare familiar to educators, they are nonetheless troublesome to those whoare themselves involved in research projects more compatible withpost-modernist and post-structuralist critique.In the section which follows, I’ve provided an illustrative sam-pling of the explanations of citation practices from several widely-usedhandbooks designed for college student writers. After briefly reviewingwhat is said about citation in general and about plagiarism, I willconcentrate on discussions of word-for-word quotation, as space con-straints for this essay do not allow examination and discussion of paraphrasing and summarizing sources
(see Arrington, 1988), intro-ducing and framing citations, providing footnotes versus parentheticalcitations, or following conventions for punctuating and abbreviatingdocumentation. (In the following passages I have italicized words andphrases for emphasis.)On the nature of citation in general, the following statement istypical:A research paper requires a thoughtful balance between
 your own
language and the words and sentences you
from othersources. (Marius and Wiener 422)Because words and ideas are widely regarded as property in ourcapitalistic economy, our college handbooks for writers often placesomewhere near the section on citations a few choice words aboutplagiarism:You commit
whenever you present words or ideas
taken from
another person as if they were your own. . . . The prose
Scholarly Citation Practices
 Language and Learning Across the Disciplines36 
we write ourselves is so individual that when we write somethingin a striking way or express a new idea, we have producedsomething that always
belongs to us
. To call someone else’swriting your own is wrong and foolish. (Marius and Wiener 464-465)Plagiarism can result from not
giving credit 
to the person whothought of an idea, calculated statistics, made a discovery. Youcannot pass off as you own another person’s work. (Carter andSkates 482)[T]o plagiarize is to give the impression that you have written orthought something that you have in fact
borrowed from
someoneelse, and to do so is considered a violation of the professionalresponsibility to acknowledge
“academic debts”
(“Statement onProfessional Ethics,”
Policy Documents and Reports
1984 ed.,Washington: AAUP, 1984, 134.) . . . Even without considering thepenalties of plagiarism, the best scholars generously acknowledgetheir debts to others. By doing so they not only contribute to thehistoriography of scholarship but also help younger scholarsunderstand the process of research and discovery. (Achtert andGibaldi 4-5)Handbook advice about what ideas and information must be citedpresents quotation as a strategy for
authority:[Reserve] direct quotation for material that is especially wellstated or for points that might require the clout of a respectedauthority’s exact words. (Leggett, Mead, and Kramer 486).You should depend on other people’s words as little as possible,limiting quotations to those
to your argument or
for your readers. Reasons to use direct quotations includethe following.*To incorporate a statement expressed so effectively by theauthor that it cannot be paraphrased without altering meaning*To contribute to your own credibility as a writer by quoting anauthority on your topic*To allow an author to defend his or her position in his or herown words

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->