Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Theory of Brain Function, Quantum Mechanics and Super Strings

Theory of Brain Function, Quantum Mechanics and Super Strings

Ratings: (0)|Views: 42 |Likes:
Published by John Smith

More info:

Published by: John Smith on Dec 20, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





arXiv:hep-ph/9505374 v1   24 May 95
Theory of Brain Function, QuantumMechanics and Superstrings
Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of PhysicsTexas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843–4242, USA;andAstroparticle Physics Group, Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC),The Mitchell Campus, The Woodlands, TX 77381, USA;andCERN Theory Division, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Recent developments/efforts to understand aspects of the brain function at the
level are discussed. MicroTubules (MTs), protein polymers constructing thecytoskeleton, participate in a wide variety of dynamical processes in the cell. Of spe-cial interest to us is the MTs participation in bioinformation processes such as
, by possessing a well-known binary error-correcting code [
5)]with 64 words. In fact, MTs and DNA/RNA are
cell structures that possessa code system. It seems that the MTs’ code system is strongly related to a kindof
Mental Code
” in the following sense. The MTs’ periodic paracrystalline struc-ture make them able to support a
of coherent quantum states, as ithas been recently conjectured by Hameroff and Penrose, representing an
mental order 
, for sufficient time needed for
quantum computing. Then thequantum superposition collapses spontaneously/dynamically through a new, string-derived mechanism for collapse proposed recently by Ellis, Mavromatos, and myself.ACT-08/95CERN-TH/95-128CTP-TAMU-22/95May 1995
Extended version based on an invited talk presented at the “
XV Brazilian National Meet-ing on Particles and Fields
”, Angra dos Reis, Brazil, October 4-8, 1994, and on an invitedtalk at the “
Physics without frontiers Four Seas Conference
”, Trieste, Italy, June 25-July1, 1995.
At the moment of collapse, organized
quantum exocytosis
, the simulta-neous emission of neurotransmitter molecules by the synaptic vesicles, embedded inthe “firing zone” of the presynaptic vesicular grids. Since in the superposition of the quantum states only those participate that are
to the “initial signal”,when collapse occurs, it only enhances the probability for “firing” of the
neurotransmitter molecules. That is how a
mental order 
” may be translated intoa
physiological action 
”. Our equation for quantum collapse, tailored to the MTsystem, predicts that it takes 10,000 neurons
(1sec) to dynamically collapse, inother words to process and imprint information. Different observations/experimentsand various schools of thought are in agreement with the above numbers concerning
conscious events
”. If indeed MTs, with their fine structure, vulnerable to our quan-tum collapse mechanism may be considered as the
microsites of consciousness
, thenseveral, unexplained (at least to my knowledge) by traditional neuroscience, proper-ties of consciousness/awareness, get easily explained, including “
backward masking 
referal backwards in time
”, etc. Furthermore, it is amusing to notice that the fa-mous puzzle of why the left (right) part of the brain coordinates the right (left) partof the body,
, the signals travel maximal distance, is easily explained in our pic-ture. In order to have timely quantum collapse we need to excite as much relevantmaterial as possible, thus signals have to travel the maximal possible distance. The
in the cerebral cortex of neurons related to particular missions, and therelated
unitary sense of self 
as well as
non-deterministic free will 
are consequences of the basic principles of quantum mechanics, in sharp contrast to the “sticks and balls”classical approach of conventional neural networks. The proposed approach clearlybelongs to the
school since quantum physics is an integrated part of ourphysical world. It is highly amazing that string black-hole dynamics that have ledus to contemplate some modifications of standard quantum mechanics, such that thequantum collapse becomes a detailed dynamical mechanism instead of being an “ex-ternal” ad-hoc process, may find some application to some quantum aspects of brainfunction. It looks like a big universality principle is at work here, because both inthe black hole and the brain we are struggling with the way information is processed,imprinted, and retrieved.“...
the Astonishing Hypothesis – that each of us is the behavior of a vast, interacting set of neurons
.”Francis Crick in
The Astonishing Hypothesis
what will they think? – What I tell them to think 
.”Orson Welles in
Citizen Kane
Theory of brain function, quantum mechanics, and superstrings are three fascinatingtopics, which at first look bear little, if any at all, relation to each other. Trying toput them together in a cohesive way, as described in this task, becomes a most de-manding challenge and unique experience. The main thrust of the present work is toput forward a, maybe, foolhardy attempt at developing a new, general, but hopefullyscientifically sound framework of Brain Dynamics, based upon some recent develop-ments, both in (sub)neural science and in (non)critical string theory. I do understandthat Microtubules [1,2] are not considered by all neuroscientists, to put it politely, as the microsites of consciousnes, as has been recently conjectured by Hameroff andPenrose [3,4]. Also, I do know that, the
one interpretation 
of non-critical stringtheory, put forward by Ellis, Mavromatos, and myself [5,6], which has led to
justan incremental change, but a total rethinking of the Quantum Mechanics
from the ground up, is not universally, to put it mildly, accepted. Leaving that aside,and time will tell, the emerging big picture “
when microtubules meet density matrix mechanics
”, as the reader hopefully will be able to judge for her(him)self, is ratherastonishing. It looks like the modified quantum dynamics [5,6] of microtubules [1,2] may indeed lead [3,4] to a rather concise, experimentally verifiable (presently and in the immediate future) theory of brain function [7]. Since this is a rather vast,multidisciplinary, and multidimensional subject, I kept in mind that
readersmay include (high-energy) physicists, biologists, biochemists, neuroscientists, medi-cal doctors, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychotherapists, etc. Thus,I have tried my best to obey the “
technical minimality 
” principle, and at the sametime, to make it as self-contained and informative, as possible, by not assuming thatpsychoanalysts know about “
quantum coherence
”, or formal string theorists knowabout the Freudian “
unconscious proper 
”, even if, in the latter case, they believe that
they know everything, and so why bother 
?!A concrete, technically elaborated proposal materializing some of the generalideas that I have tried to put forward here, has been worked out by Mavromatos andmyself [7], work that I strongly encourage the interested reader to consult. I am fullyaware of the rather speculative nature of the ideas presented here
of the sometimescircumstancial looking experimental evidence used to support them. Nevertheless,the way that different structures/mechanisms, from completely disconnected fields of knowledge,
fit and bind 
together to produce such a
, dynamical scheme of theBrain function, makes it very hard to ignore the whole thing, by just believing thatit is all coincidental, and nothing more than a grand illusion! It goes without sayingthat the responsibility for all views expressed here is completely mine.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
amvr liked this
ypyee liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->