You are on page 1of 12

| 

Friday Brief Review

Chartered in June 2002, the goal of the Friday Brief Review is to


create a more cohesive, integrated view of all information
briefed by the D7 staff at the weekly Friday Brief.

Overall objective: greater visibility into the integrated meaning


of the information presented, what it means to our overall
mission accomplishment, what action, if any, is envisioned, and
what do we expect to achieve by doing so.

We expect lessons learned and progress made to help us


potentially achieve greater integration for any daily, weekly,
monthly, quarterly or annual brief.

Long term ± we envision this project to lay a foundation for


overall increased Maritime Domain Awareness, help define our
Integrated Command Center needs, and keep us in tune with the
³Information Battle Rhythm.´
| 
Friday Brief Review
(Here¶s where its headed«)

Activities Any action that consumes resources.

Cases Any group of Activities connected to a common incident.

Any intermediate measure, index or


Ratios correlation of data from Activities or
Cases.

pdditional longer term efforts we


enabled using this approach: Performance
Goal
- Risk considerations
- RSp connections
- RP & Program issues
- Performance Plan updates Strategic
- Business Plan updates
Goal
| 
Friday Brief Review
(Here¶s where its headed«)

Any action that consumes resources.


Activities Vactical Brief (daily)
Any group of Activities connected to a common incident.
Cases

Operational Brief (weekly)


Any intermediate measure, index or
Ratios correlation of data from Activities or
Cases.

Performance
Goal
Strategic Brief (monthly / quarterly)
Strategic
Goal
| 
Old ppproach (Stove-piped illustration of single data
points, no cohesion, little meaning, little
strategic ³big-picture´ value)

pudience

Data Data Data Data Data

(o) (m) (s) (dl) (dpa)


| 
ew ppproach (Integrated, cohesive, results-oriented,
³big picture´ presented with more
strategic value and meaning)

Strategic Goal pudience


Performance
Goal
(Programmatic
orientation designed with
Ratios Mission longer-range view in
mind, not intended for a
Cases daily brief)
Resources
Activity
pOR

(o) (m) (s) (dl) (dpa)


| 
ew ppproach

Strategic Goal pudience


Performance
Goal Strategic Quarterly ± Performance goal driven

Ratios Operational Bi-weekly ± Operation driven

Cases Daily ± Case driven


Vactical
Activity

Provide three (3) levels ± based on audience, timing


and briefing purpose
| 
Issues Considered

§ Offer more complete case visibility


§ Reveal causal factors
§ Highlight cross-program activity linkages
§ Create no additional stand alone systems
§ Use existing data
§ Consider future enterprise applications
§ Consider classification
§ Reduce staff effort ± enable redeployment

    


| 
Possible ew Information

ew presentation might depict information something like this«

‰   
ë Y   
  
è  

   V  À 


            
  
     
  
     

- ³What is current measure/quantity?´ (Single data point)


- ³What was done to achieve this goal?´ (pctivities & Cases)
- ³What resources were consumed?´ (Results, Cost)
- ³How does this compare with last wk, mo, qtr, yr?´ (Ratios)
- ³Did any intangibles come into play?´ (i.e. Political Index)
- ³What is the trend of this Goal?´ (Vrend - up, down, unknown)
- ³What is forecast for the future«will trend continue?´ (Forecasting)
- ³Does achieving this goal impact other goals? How?´ (Correlation)
- ³pny known roadblocks, issues or concerns to discuss?´
- ³Recommendation: Stay the course? Change? Why?´ (Future Plans)
ñxample of ew Slide | 
(Where possible ± retain brief focus on Mission, Resources and pOR)

Performance Goal ± ³Lives Saved´


’    ’   
!"#   ’  
Activity
$’    %  
!’&&'    %   
Group Key West 14 SAR cases (9 avg.)
Cases Group St. Pete 11 SAR cases (12 avg.)
Group Charleston 09 SAR cases (08 avg.)
8 Lives Saved from EPIRB cases (4 avg.)
20 Lives Saved from Vessel Adrift cases (18 avg.)
Ratios 52 resource hours per Life Saved (36 avg.)
$13,245 (AFC-30) per Life Saved ($12,665 avg.)

Performance 28 Lives Saved (25 avg.)


03 Lives Lost (01 avg.)
Goal

Saved 91% of Mariner¶s in Distress (85.2% avg.)


Strategic Goal Goal ± 85%
| 
Commandant Performance Goals
(Goals listed Constitute the Foundation of D7 Measurement ñfforts)
Conceive of method to best roll up Vactical Information into Strategic brief

‡ Search and rescue: save all mariners in distress and property in peril.
‡ Maritime Homeland Security: minimize potential for maritime terrorist incident.
‡ Maritime workers: eliminate crewmember fatalities.
‡ Passenger vessels: eliminate passenger vessel fatalities.
‡ Recreational boating: eliminate recreational boating fatalities.
‡ Drug interdiction: reduce the flow of illegal drugs.
‡ Migrant interdiction: reduce the flow of undocumented migrants entering the U.S.
‡ Foreign fishing vessels: eliminate illegal ññ encroachment by foreign fishing vessels.
‡ Military readiness: achieve and sustain complete military readiness for CG units as required by the
department of defense.
‡ Military operations: provide core competencies when requested by the department of defense or department
of state.
‡ pids to navigation: maximize vessel mobility in ports and waterways.
‡ Vessel traffic: eliminate vessel collisions, allisions, and groundings.
‡ Oil spills: eliminate oil discharged into the water.
‡ Plastics and garbage: eliminate debris discharged into the water.
‡ Marine pollution: minimize the adverse effects of pollution.
‡ Living marine resources: improve the health of fish stocks and other LMR.
| 
Logistics Goals
Include MLC component command measures

§ ISC
§ CEU
§ ESU
§ NESU
| 
Friday Brief Review
(Big Picture - how this D7 project can connect to HQ - long term)

Proposed D7 RSp CG Business Plan Strategic Issues


Information Process
Readiness
Management - Briefing
Homeland Security MDp
System Readiness Management DRSMP
Redesign Field Command prchitecture C4ISR
Integrated Command Centers (ICC) Intelligence
Activities
People
Cases Recruiting & Retention CG Vraining
Realign Reserve Program ñxpand Diversity
Housing alternatives Future Force 21 Factors
Ratios Lñ Security Competencies Intel Competencies
Personnel ñnhancements

Performance
Stewardship
Goal
VILp President¶s Management pgenda
ñ-Gov / ñ-CGStreamline pcquisition Processes
Strategic PlanBusiness Plan
Strategic Goal urture Innovation Marine Vransportation System
Competitive Sourcing Monitor Ongoing Initiatives

You might also like