metaphysical transcendence because their realm of certainty is procedural-problematic and uncontroversial,whereas their reserve of knowledge is empirical,refutable, repeatable, revisable, nonmystical and accumu-lable.There may be no ‘empirical’, procedurally approach-able mysteries – or mysterious problems – of the kindqabbalism guides itself towards. If so, it will approach thisfact in its own way – empirically, probabilistically,impressionistically, without any logical, transcendental orphilosophical meta-discourse ever having been positionedto put it in its place.
Traditional gematria (whether Hebrew, Greek, Farsior Arabic
) have distinctive typical features: (1) Theysubstitute letters for numerical values, overcoding numer-als where they exist. (2) They code for discontinuousnumerical values, typically 1-10, then 20, 30 ... chunkedin decimally significant magnitudes.The ocean in which qabbalism swims is notmathematics, but popular numerical culture. From amathematical perspective it remains undeveloped, evenineducable, since it cannot advance beyond the Naturalnumber line even to the level of the Rationals, let aloneto the ‘higher’ numbers or set-theoretical post-numericalspaces. Where counting ceases, qabbalism becomes273Land – Qabbala 101
1. See Incognitum, ‘Introduction to ABJAD’, in the present volume.