Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Leave License Agreement for Home in India

Leave License Agreement for Home in India

Ratings: (0)|Views: 221|Likes:
Published by 24x7emarketing
Leave license agreement
Leave license agreement

More info:

Published by: 24x7emarketing on Dec 24, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Sample draft of Leave license agreement for home in IndiaLeave and License Agreement why eleven months only 
There is a practice prevalent in Maharashtra that a Leave & License Agreement in respect of aresidential premises is, usually, entered into and executed for a period of 11 months. Thequestion arises whether it can not be for more than 11 months, if both the parties areinterested in a much longer period.A license has been defined in Section 62 of the Indian Easement Act, as a right to do or continueto do something in or upon an immovable property. It does not transfer the interest or createany interest in the immovable property, like a LEASE, as defined in Section 105 of the Transferof Property Act, as a right to enjoy property for a certain period in consideration of the pricepaid. Provisions of Section 62 of the Indian Easements Act do not prescribe, any minimum ormaximum period for which a license may be granted.A lease of an immovable property in Maharashtra used to be governed by the provisions of theBombay Rents, Hotel & Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Popularly known as BombayRent Act,) which did not provide, prior to 1.2.1973, for giving a residential premises on Leave &License basis. Nevertheless, a practice was in vogue to give the residential premises on Leave &License basis. An instrument creating a lease of immovable property for a term of one year andabove is required compulsorily to be registered by virtue of provisions of Section 17 (d) of theIndian Registration Act.Therefore, Leave & License Agreements were being executed for a period of 11 months withthe intention with the intention to avoid the stamping and registration of such agreements andtreating such. Agreements as a Lease of the immovable property. So that the occupiers of suchpremises could not invoke the provisions of the said Bombay Rent Act against their eviction.Secondly in respect of Flats in a registered Co-Operative Housing Society, period of sub-lettingwas restricted to eleven months with the provision of extension for similar period of partthereof, as per Bye-law 45 © of the old Model By-laws.In the year 1973 an amendment was carried out in the said Bombay rent Act by the State of Maharashtra, whereby section 15A was introduced therein providing that any person inoccupation of any premises as a License on 1.2.1973 shall be deemed to have become a tenantin respect of the premises in his occupation as licensee as on 1.2.1973, and by a stroke of pen
they all became the statutory tenants of the premises with the benefit of protection againstvacation of the premises, expect in accordance with the provisions of the said Bombay RentAct. Thus an illegal practice of creating Leave & License in respect of residential premises, whichwas contrary to the provisions of the said Bombay Rent Act. Thus an illegal practice of creatingLeave & License in respect of residential premises, which was contrary to the provisions of thesaid Rent Act, converted such occupation into tenancy. Therefore, the Landlords, who did notrequire the premises for their own use, were not willing to give the premises to others, whichcreated scarcity inasmuch as on the one hand sufficient real estate stock was available and onthe other, people were not getting the accommodation, albeit for temporary period. Thesewere being held back by the owners because of the apprehension of not getting the premisesback, when they needed in view of the protection provided to the tenants by said Bombay RentAct.In the circumstances and as a practical solution to this problem, a specific provision was madeby way of Section 13A2 in said Act for giving the residential premises on license basis, whichalso provided that in case of the failure of the licensee to deliver the possession of the licensedpremises on the expiry of the period of license, the licensee could be summarily evicted fromthe premises by the Component Authority as per the provisions of Section 31D of the saidBombay Rent Act. This Section 13A2 did not provide for any specific period of a license andfurther clarified that an Agreement of License in writing shall be conclusive evidence of the factof the License.Be that as it may. With a view to unify, consolidate the laws prevailing in the different parts of the State, the Bombay Rent Control Act of 1947, has been repealed and replaced by theMaharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, (Act No: 18 of 2000) w.e.f. 31st March, 2000, wherein aLicensee means a person in occupation of the premises under a subsisting agreement forlicense given for a license fee or charge and notwithstanding the protective provisions of thesaid Act, a licensee has to deliver possession of the licensed premises to the landlord on theexpiry of the period of license and failing which Section 24 thereof, empowers a landlord torecover possession of the premises through summary proceedings before the CompetentAuthority and till the date of dispossession, a licensee is liable to pay damages at double therate of the license fee or charge of the premises fixed under the Agreements of License.As per the provisions of the said Act in Section 43 and 44, a licensee in such proceedings has tofirst satisfy the Competent Authority about the grounds on which he seeks to contest theeviction proceedings and obtain the permission to contest the same. The order of recovery of possession of the premises made by the Competent Authority is non-appealable, though arevision application may be filed within ninety days with the State Government.
As there is a thin difference between a Tenancy Agreement and License Agreement, it isprovided in Section 55 of the Act, that such an Agreement has to be in writing and registeredunder the Registration Act and it shall be the responsibility of the landlord to register it, failingwhich the contention of the tenant or the licensee about the terms and conditions on which apremises has been give to him, shall prevail, unless proved otherwise. The failure of a landlordto register the Agreement may also attracts punishment of imprisonment up to three monthsor fine not exceeding rupees five thousand or both. The State Government has issued anNotification on the 8th June, 2000, prescribing the registration charges as Rs. 1000/- in respectof the premises in the limits of the Municipal Corporation and Rs. 500/- in other areasirrespective of the amount of the license fee or the term of the Agreement. In either the oldRent Act of 1947 or the present Act of 1999, there is no restriction on the term for which apremises may be given on license basis and Bye-law 43 © of the new Model Bye-laws of the Co-Operative Housing Societies, circulated by the State Government for adoption by the Societies,now also provides the period as eleven months or for more period, which may be extended forsimilar period or part thereof. Thus none of the legal provisions put any restriction of elevenmonths on the period of license agreement and it can legally be for a longer period or term andthe non-occupancy charges in respect of the premises in a registered Society has beenrestricted to 10% of the service charges (excluding property tax) by Government Notificationdated 1st August 2001, whose validity has been finally upheld by the Honble Bombay HighCourt on 2nd March 2007, in the case of Palm Beach Riviera CHS and other Societies.In addition to the Registration of an Agreements of License, it has be stamped as per theprovisions of Article 36-A of the Bombay Stamp Act at the rate depending on the yearlyamount, period of license and the location of the premises. In the said provision team of anagreement has been described as twelve months, but not exceeding sixty months with orwithout the renewal clause. Where the team of a Leave and License Agreement exceeds sixtymonths, it has to be stamped at the rate applicable to a Lease Agreement under Article 36 of the said Act.In the ultimate analysis, the period of eleven months has now no relevance and the way the lawhas evolved during the past three decades on the subject, it is entirely safe to give premises onleave and license basis for a longer period say up to sixty months, with renewal clause andoption of termination by notice, provided bot the parties agree and a proper Leave and LicenseAgreement is drawn, stamped and registered and nearest Police Station is apprised of aboutthe antecedents of the licensee, as per the Order issued by the Police Commissioner. Needlessto add that a little temptation in saving expenses on stamping and registration and giving thepremises by way of distorted agreements known as Care Taker Agreement and so on may landthe landlord in trouble, particularly, keeping in view the experience of the year 1973, asaforesaid.

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->