Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
JEFFERSON NOT CALVERT CORRECTLY WEIGHED THE EARTH

JEFFERSON NOT CALVERT CORRECTLY WEIGHED THE EARTH

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13|Likes:
Published by Susan
Jefferson's measurements were rejected by Congress due to a lack of independent scientific confirmation which I have as I correctly weighed time. your mistake? Everything is conscious but only man has a conscience so you had to weigh time knowing you were accounting for consciousness thus capacity; you are weighing the godspark in man that Jefferson's labeled the divine endowment known as will and liberty.

Ever take a good look at the circle Mason and dixon created and then sqaered? It resembles the atom bomb, the Manhattan Project. I weighed the universe thus I have the univeral mean for the weight of time having mass.

You'll have to deal with the punctuaion, grammar and spelling as this is from an outline.
Jefferson's measurements were rejected by Congress due to a lack of independent scientific confirmation which I have as I correctly weighed time. your mistake? Everything is conscious but only man has a conscience so you had to weigh time knowing you were accounting for consciousness thus capacity; you are weighing the godspark in man that Jefferson's labeled the divine endowment known as will and liberty.

Ever take a good look at the circle Mason and dixon created and then sqaered? It resembles the atom bomb, the Manhattan Project. I weighed the universe thus I have the univeral mean for the weight of time having mass.

You'll have to deal with the punctuaion, grammar and spelling as this is from an outline.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Susan on Dec 29, 2010
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/29/2010

pdf

text

original

 
TAKEN FROM A COMPLAINT THAT·S UNDER REVISION; THIS ABOUT JEFFERSON·S CORRECTMEASUREMENTS AS HE NOT CALVERT CORRECTLY WEIGHED THE EARTH!
1)
I, Susan, have the detailed plan known as time as time is a geometric shape. Einsteinproposed this and he is correct. It exists all at once or all now. I have the shape and Ihave the unit ² time as mass or volume or capacity, a form of energy - thus the universeis a matter of
timing
. This answer lies WITHIN the original governing documents. I, Susan,never vested any belief in the fakes. I never once believed the corrupted 1871 versions,as they are not reality but only the belief of unjust men who did not reason it as you cannever ever reconcile the reasons named with actual reality. I tell a joke about EarlWarren in my brief as
what version are you ruling upon
? If you argue 1871 and he opineson 1871 then it might be the correct application.
Be specific
. Now I tell a joke aboutScalia:
He told you there·s a comma in number 2, kids.
The 1871 versions match theunjust men who wrote it ² lawyers - not the universal law at work; if you·re motive isliberty and your intention is justice you·re covered either way but the originals are´elegantµ which is the highest ¶praise· a mathematician can give something. The originalversions DO match universal law. It·s the structure not merely the flat words or the flatpunctuation. Who deliberately chooses inelegance? A person who truly believes they areless than! But this thing known as
timing
might be something only I could know as two ofmy best clues were: Carol Moran could not understand how I knew a Moebius strip,
thatmathematical principle
, when I experienced it in the world at large such as when I saw itin The Constitution or in other people and when some of you used a metronome I couldnot wrap my head around what you NEEDED it for as it seems bizarre to use it to
time
 absolute pieces of a whole work. The absolute piece is elegant or not; what aren·t youhearing as the whole itself is also absolute??? The universe is like music to me: I
experience
it that way. To this day the metronome is lost on me as: Just play it; listen tothe timing as I·m
experiencing
it. Moral authority? Invoke it; sing that song as it has adefinite rhythm. You can describe things exactly and in detail w/o ever saying them asI·ll know the truth thus I·ll go directly to that not tap dance around it. Peoplecommunicate in other ways than words! It·s even more than body language. It·semotional.
I·ll hear the emotional truth of you uniquely within the universal truth.
I·veeven dreamed original music, music like a song made up of notes. If you,
all
 
lawyers
 
inevery field 
, asked me correctly as your questions are
terrible
on paper as ego makes youwant to be perfect so you end up performing like trained monkeys for other lawyers thenI could have told you:
 
 
2
)
The Winchester repeating rifle will never become the Winchester repeating procreatingrifle. Hold on to your seats, federal judiciary: It seems some clown physicists among uswho are Nazis,
that form
, truly, actually believe with their whole heart and soul thatthey can build a computer like Big Blue that will be able to defeat you when we play thegame known as Constitutional Law not chess.
 A wise machine.
You know how BobbyFischer played Big Blue and went nuts as they were tied for months and months so hedefected to Iceland when he couldn·t
beat
a machine? His problem in life is: you can·tbeat a computer at a
 game with a set of rules
as a machine will do a repetitive actionmore times more often with more precision than a man ² that·s perfection; that·s thenature of rules - but play a
 game with a set of laws
when one of those laws is an ethicaka moral authority? That machine will go down
hard 
, as it can·t gain wisdom via lifeexperience. ´How many times how often?µ is a legal question about
rules
. A crook mightdo it over and over but is it law? No, as that crook·s pattern is rule or he wouldn·t be acrook. Machines do not possess motive and intent. They don·t mean or intend anything!Crooks play by the rules well but not by the law well and machines do not have a chanceagainst a human. Machines know the rules and SOME law but only what you put insidethem and you can·t put ´constitutional lawµ inside them. You can·t place the unknown ina computer! Constitutional law?
It happens in the moment!
Crooks are
animalistic
and
reptilian
 
like
not human if they do it too many times too often. They need to plot; theydo not spontaneously commit crimes.
Crooks become like machines.
They come to havediminished capacity so can·t best an honest person. Conversely those so us who acthuman and aspire to a Creator-like state of being INCREASE our capacity like a machineor a crook never, ever will. Machines? They aren·t willing! They do not volunteer! Thekind of
 power play 
Jefferson, me, both Marshall·s and Rhenquist pulled? That·s not ruleas that·s law; it·s not something you can
 program
into us. We had to act our whole livesto do it on the spot. We can evolve but that·s not then
 programming
as we choose to gohere upon full knowing and informed consent in the moment thus you don·t dictate it tous.
Garbage in then garbage out.
The corrupted versions ² the lies or the Euro trash -never went in me! BVG is my proof, as I knew every stunt the lawyers - and the crooks -pulled.
My mother did not program me
. I wasn·t brainwashed or conditioned with fear.She denied the existence of my Eurotrash background as did my father. We are: Americanso you·re stuck with America. Who fears the truth of America? I spent a life standingdown fear in all of its forms via thinking, speaking and acting honestly. By the time I washere, at BVG? Measure the Herculean effort made
against
me. If lawyers can·t
 program
 me thus can·t program judges then what? LIBERTY! My vote is the only American vote
 
never held captive. It·s still wild and
undomesticated 
as you couldn·t break me with lawschool. It·s natural born. It·s my
currency 
.
3
)
These guys truly believe a MACHINE decides the vote!!! As if machines reason the law!!!You know, they count
 first
so the number then has motive and intent. I confess: When Ifinally saw The Matrix this year?
I laughed and laughed.
No wonder these HollywoodBuddhists have you confused! I named my second petition ´In Re Thomas Jeffersonµ as ifI were Mary Shelley and as that hammers the point of law home but maybe I should havenamed it ´In Re The Matrixµ.
No wonder scientists claimed wisdom is a fairy story!
Asmen came to wrongly believe that they are splitting atoms and that they cracked thehuman genome they also came to believe in their own delusional selves. Science? Itignores and denies common rare X in the West and most DNA claiming it is ´junkµ. If alawyer walked in with BVG and told you everything else is junk constitution, would youbelieve him? YOU DID.
4
)
Now I·m going to turn into Mr. Peabody and you can play my pet boy, Sherman. For thepurposes of this complaint you are a VOTER only. The reader is not a lawyer, judge orpaid Officer. You·re not a scientist. VOTER IS YOUR ONLY OFFICE. We will climb into theWay Back Machine and travel to 1774 when Lord Calvert has an idea: An error in onedirection only was uncovered by the surveyors Mason and Dixon. At the same time,Thomas Jefferson is acting to save his life as in 1774 he published his ´Viewµ as he toorecognizes as error in one direction: "The God who gave us life," he wrote, "gave usliberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."Jefferson was busy, so occupied with fighting a Revolution was he that he had no ideawhat he actually measured:
The Mason-Dixon Line:
 
 As such, the Mason-Dixon line approximates a segment of a small circleupon the surface of the (also approximately) spherical Earth. An observer standing on such aline and viewing its path toward an unobstructed horizon would perceive it to bend away fromhis line of sight, an effect of the inequality between the amount of curvature to his left and right
[If you apply this circle all over Earth then what you get is a picture that looksexactly like the structure of an atomic bomb, the Manhattan Project!].
Among parallels of latitude, only the Equator is a great circle and would not exhibit this effect
«
Mason is anastronomer; it was noted that the measure of acceptable error when they surveyed this veryinteresting circle was too great and to one side; imagine a pendulum swinging too far to oneside. They used a circle to create a squared shape. This is so interesting to me as Washingtonsecured some sort of degree in surveying from William & Mary and Jefferson created the East-

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->