Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Co-chairwomen-2
Shaika Bawazire .Co-chairwomen .Marwa Farge Al-Kurbi-9
..Alaa Waleed Al-Aelah-3 .RajaAl-Haddad-10
..Abeer Al-Moqadam-4 .Reham Salah Al-Nahdi-11
.Hind Al-Somahi-5 .Ojbah Hassan Al-Bahassany-12
Azal Al-Amoodi-6 .Sarah Salmeen Bin Al-Zoo'a-13
.Eman Amer Al-Sa'adi-7 .Wafa Ashoor Damnan.-14
.Manal Al-Rawwas-8 . Yara Ausama Al-Hamamsy-15
2
OBJECTIVES
3
To asses knowledge ,attitude and practice to
wards blood donation among the men
General attending to the governmental blood banks in
:objective . Al-Mukalla city
5
enhance the production of new red blood cells, helps in fighting
hemochroitosis & an
Donating blood is burns calories
act that . Sothe
can save ourlives
study aimed is of
of thousands to
clear
peoplethe misconception,
worldwide. beliefs,
We have attitude
5-6 liters and fears
of blood about
flowing blood
through
developing
donors fallingappropriate
to 3 types : messages
voluntary to be usedand
,replacement during
paid
recruitment campaigns,
donors . Blood donation creating andhealthy
is actually strengthening
for us . positive
Health
attitudes
benefits oftowards blood
donating donation.
blood reduce the chance of heart diseases;
6
METHODOLOGY
7
The study include Yamani men attends to blood banks aged
A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed by a fourth
from (17-65) years with excluding all women. To ensure the
year medical students. The study was carried out in Al-
accuracy of data processing, the data were analyzed by using
Mukalla city among the men attend to the governmental blood
(SPSS) program. Data were presented in tables and graphs by
banks for blood donation or facilitation of blood donation .
using computer application of Microsoft Office 2007 (word and
The sample size was about 425 men. The sample was chosen by
excel) .Also we consider the ethical consideration in every step
a non-probability sampling method using structured
in our study and in dealing with every person we interviewed
questionnaire. The sample divided proportionally between 3
during the study.
banks.
.
8
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
9
Figure No(2):Distribution of target men according to heard or
.not about blood donation
heard; 92.20%
10
Figure No(5):Distribution of target men according to their
. knowledge about un excepted donators
Anemia;
AIDS; 78.3Hepatitis; 79.8 81.5
Syphilis; 66.8
Diabetes mellitus; 55
Malaria; 50.8 Hypertension; 49.2
Drug users; 44.7
Alcohol addiction; 40.9
women; 36.4
11
Figure No(4):Distribution of target men according to
knowing about side effects of blood donation .
No; 74.00%
12
Figure No(3):Distribution of target men according to their
sources of information regarding to Blood Donation.
13
Figure No(5):Distribution of target men according to their
attitude toward the importance of blood donation.
Agree; 65.3
Agree
Disagree
Disagree; 30.9
Not decide
Disagree 62.80%
Agree; 59.70%
Just for
relative
Agree 35.20% Disagree; 36.20%
Any person in
need for blood
15
Figure No(12):Distribution of target men according to
. their attitude toward voluntary blood
16
Figure No(1):Distribution of target men according to blood
donation practice .
63.5
donor
36.5
non-donor
0.00% 0
17
Figure No(7):Distribution of target men according to frequency
of their donation of the blood.
19
CONCLUSION
20
6-The
2-The
3-The
4-In
5-The
1-The
this
study
study
study
revealed
show
revealed
show
we
show
found
that
that
that
that
(65.3%)
that
the
the
mass
(63.5%)
(78.3%)
majority
main
of
media
men
reason
ofofand
men
whom
total
respondents
for
mosques
whom
not
heard
respondents
donating
familiar
about
were
heard
the
with
experienced
blood
most
blood
among
about
donation
common
donation
blood
non donors
were
donation
donation
source
,were
agree
wasof(92.2%)
with
considered
not
hearing
with
asked
(40.4%)
. about
the
them
blood
ofblood
blood
to
them
do
donation
.donating
donation
as
and represent
importance.
charity
blood three
work.time
about
or more
( 55.5%),(50.8%)
, and (36.5%)respectively.
don’t experience it.
21
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
22
THE END
23
Give Blood to Give
Life
24
25