Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Gay Adoption Research Paper

Gay Adoption Research Paper

Ratings: (0)|Views: 638|Likes:
Published by darksage850

More info:

Published by: darksage850 on Jan 03, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Chowdhury 1
Arjun ChowdhuryEnglish III (Honors)Tues, Dec 21Adoption by Gay ParentsWe have all heard the requirement that a child needs to be raised by both and a mother and a father. The qualities contributed by a man and a woman are each vital to raising a wellrounded individual and therefore the idea of having two mothers or two fathers is simplyunacceptable right? Well what about no parents? No mother? No father? That child is bound to be well rounded. Some answer ³NO´ flashes in bright, blinking lights however, there are many,including the majority of Americans, who disagree. Laws banning adoption by gay and lesbiancouples exist in multiple states across the country. These bans do more than prohibit same-sexcouples from starting families; they also sentence children to a lifetime alone in world where plenty of adoptive parents can exist. So now the real question emerges: Is parental guidance bytwo parents of the same sex really more harmful to a child¶s development than no parentalguidance at all?Since the dawn of United States history states have been given ³full faith and credit«tothe public arts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state,´ (Constitution 1) via theFull Faith and Credit clause of the constitution. This clause qualifies state officials to makedecisions about various matters not already decided by the federal government. Therefore thisarticle gives states the power to legalize gay adoption. Since it also says that states mustrecognize the judicial proceedings of other states, an adoption by a gay person or couplerecognized in one state must also be recognized in another state, even if said state bans gay
Chowdhury 2
adoption. Shockingly, while this right has been clearly stated since the formation of our country,it was not granted until the Adar v. Smith court case of 2010 (Lambda 1).The legal status of gay adoption varies across the country. Few are still outright banningit yet there are also few that fully accept it. Most states are ambiguous to the matter. Currentlycausing the most controversy over the issue is Florida- the only state that bans gay adoption of any kind, not just by couples. In affirming the law allowing this ban a federal court in Floridaclaimed that ³three HIV-infected children being raised by a gay man (who had been namedfoster father of the year) were better off in a home with two married, heterosexual parents,´(Sanchez 2). The American Civil Liberties Union or ACLU is fighting passionately to get this ban repealed.Other states with laws forbidding gay adoption include Utah which prohibits adoption by"a person who is cohabiting in a relationship that is not a legally valid and binding marriage,"(Sanchez 3). In Arkansas a law was approved to ban anyone co-habitating outside of a validmarriage from being foster parents or adopting children. Although the law could apply toheterosexual couples, it is believed to be targeted at gay couples due to the fact that same-sexmarriage is prohibited in that state, thereby making an adoption impossible. Single gay men andwomen are still allowed to adopt in Arkansas. Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Michigan also bansome forms of gay adoption.Until the 1970s, only middle-class, white, married, infertile couples in their late twentiesto early forties who were free of any significant disability were allowed to adopt. Since then,alterations have been made to allow lower class, disabled, and single people to adopt. Manyagencies realized that these groups of people were just as well qualified as any other to raisechildren and that placing a child should be done on a case by case basis without excluding entire
Chowdhury 3
groups of people (ACLU 1). If changes could be made for these groups who is to say that thingscan¶t change for gays and lesbians? Recent studies in social science have provided evidence thathomosexuals are no less fit for parenting than heterosexuals (ACLU 1) meaning the exclusion of this group would only result in reducing the number of loving homes for the children who needthem. With so many children currently in foster care, just waiting for a caring family to adoptthem, we cannot afford to rule out homosexual people as parents especially, when these peopleare perfectly capable of providing a happy, safe, life for their children.If a parent is going to be assessed according to their sexual orientation it might also seem justified to assess them according to race, ethnicity or culture, income, age, religion, appearance,differing life style, or anything else that sets them apart from the ³norm´. This is why applicantsshould be accepted based on their capacity to understand and meet the needs of a particular available child. Child welfare services believe that child placement decisions should be based onchildren¶s specific needs and parents¶ prospective ability to meet those needs (ACLU 2). In someinstances, the blanket exclusion of homosexuals as adoptive or foster parents means that a childcannot be placed with a family that best suits his or her specific needs. Ruling out families because of sexual orientation ties the hand of the caseworker by prohibiting them from makingwhat they think is the best placement for a child. For example, if a child eligible to be adoptedrequires constant medical attention it would only make sense that this child be placed with a parent who is capable of giving them this medical attention. Placing such a child with a parentwho is a doctor or nurse would certainly be ideal. However, what if this doctor or nurse happensto be gay? Do things change? Is the placement of this child still ideal or would it be more beneficial for him or her to be raised by straight parents who may not be as qualified to givethem adequate attention? Child welfare services and the ACLU would agree that the

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->