Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A COOPERATION BETWEEN
VINAMILK & VIETNAM BELGIUM DAIRY PROJECT
2008
“ NORMALLY,
NORMALLY THE PRICE OF A PRODUCT SHOULD
BE COMMENSURATE WITH ITS QUALITY”
Processing
ocess g
Milk collection
ll ti
Farmers Point (MCP) companies
(PC)
This approach shows that PC work directly only
with
ith MCP –middlemen
iddl :
Signing purchasing contracts with MCP only
Providing feedback on bulk tank milk quality at the
end of p
payment
y period
p
Group payment (bulk tank quality)
Paying directly to the MCP only
1. Raw milk collection in the North
- Weak points:
Milk collectors is just middlemen (not producers)
but have too much power/privilege from the
contract with processors
p
Milk collectors are not trained in quality control
Æ risks
One milk payment for all farmers or the payment
made based on unreliable quality tests (density
(density...))
Group milk quality feedback is not valid for
individual farmers
1. Raw milk collection in the North
Target
- Transparent
Farmers
Processing
g
companies
MCP
This approach
Thi h makes
k a fundamental
f d t l change
h in
i
previous relationships in the milk collection matrix
Adapting this approach has brought about the
uniformity in milk collection of VINAMILK both in the
north and in the south
2. Incentive milk payment scheme:
Contents & Significance
Change in structure:
• Raw milk purchasing contract – Farmers sign
contracts to sell fresh milk to the processor
p
Price of 1kg of fresh milk = Basic price + %FAT x 17,000VND/kg + %SNF x
8,500VND/kg
Advantages:
d a tages
Supported by the leaders of the company as it
matches sustainable outlook of quality,
quality safe and
sustainable dairy development. Create a uniformity
in milk collection in the North and South
Supported and partly sponsored by Vietnam
Belgium
e g u Dairy
a y Project
oject when
e implementing
p e e t g tthe
e
scheme
Disadvantages:
No standard government legislation on raw milk
Æ loop-hole for cheating & unsound businesses
3. Incentive milk payment scheme:
Advantages & disadvantages
Q-A