Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rohit Bebarta
09BS 000 1940
IBS Mumbai
4th Semester
About the Two giants:
Most of these brands, including Bounty, Crest, Pringles, and Tide, are
global products available on several continents. Procter & Gamble
products are available in North America, Latin America, Europe, the
Middle East, Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand.
Productions
Procter & Gamble produced and sponsored the first radio soap operas
in the 1930s (Procter & Gamble's being known for detergents (soaps)
was probably the genesis of the term "soap opera") [citation needed]. When the
medium switched to television in the 1950s and 1960s, most of the new
serials were sponsored and produced by the company. The serial The
Young and the Restless is currently broadcast on CBS and is still
partially sponsored by Procter & Gamble. When As the World Turns left
the air on September 17, 2010, The Young and the Restless, became
the only soap left that is partially sponsored by Procter & Gamble.
Procter & Gamble also was the first company to produce and sponsor a
prime-time show, a 1965 spinoff of the daytime soap opera As the
World Turns called Our Private World. PGP also produced Shirley, a
prime-time NBC series starring Shirley Jones, in 1979; it lasted thirteen
episodes. They also produced TBS' first original comedy series, Down
to Earth, which ran from 1984 to 1987 (110 episodes were produced).
They also distributed the syndicated comedy series Throb. Procter &
Gamble Productions originally co-produced Dawson's Creek with Sony
Pictures Television but withdrew before the series premiere due to early
press reviews. It also produced the 1991 TV movie A Triumph of the
Heart: The Ricky Bell Story, which was co-produced by The Landsburg
Company. It also produces the People's Choice Awards.
Purico Crest
Star Zest
Perla Moncler
Sunshine Ivory
Camay
Health care
Mayon
PMC Vicks
Victor Fibresure
Ola Thermacare
Agro Pepto Bismol
Fresco
Hair care and laundry
Laundry and personal categories
cleansing products
Pampers
Tide Whisper
DariCreme Rejoice
Primex Tide
Safeguard Max Factor
Ariel Vidal Sassoon
Gain Ivory
Bonus Pantene
Dishwashing, fabric care and Antikal
food categories Ariel
Asacol
Joy
Attento
Mr. Clean
Aussie
Downy
Ava
Alldays
Ayudin
Pringles
AZ
Unilvelr Group
Unilever is an British-Dutch multinational corporation that owns many
of the world's consumer product brands in foods, beverages, cleaning
agents and personal care products.
Blue Band[2]
Dove
Flora/Becel
Heartbrand
Hellman's
Knorr
Axe/Lynx
Rexona/Sure Sunsilk
TIGI (haircare)[3][4]
Rin was the first national detergent bar in India; however, the market
saw the launch of Rin Powder White in the year 1994. Tide, on the
other hand, paved its entry in the year 1998. The 1990s was a period of
continuous innovations and product improvements for Rin where it tried
to position the product in the minds of the customers through
memorable campaigns like Uski saari, meri saari se safed kaise to
Safedi ka Shehanshah. During the same period, Tide was launched as
the premium detergent in the market. The launching price of the
product was Rs. 120 per kg. According to the analysts, Tide could not
catch up in the market mainly because of its launching price that acted
a deterrent and the existence of the other brand, i.e., Ariel of Procter &
Gamble that was doing quite well in the market during this period. Thus,
Tide was slow on growth in the Indian market; it could not manage
more than 0.3% share in the total detergents market in the 1990s.
January 2004 saw the advent of New Rin Powder with a unique double
whiteness proposition. Also, it maintained that unlike the other
detergents available in the market, the new Rin dissolved in water
completely leaving no mud like residue behind, the product also
promised enhanced fragrance. The product was priced at Rs. 42 for a
one kg pack. Rs. 80 for a 2 kg pack, Rs. 20 for 500 grams, Rs. 10 for
the 250 gram pack and Rs. 1 for the 25 gram sachet. This was a bold
and a confident move from HUL.
All these years, Tide had been pitted against Rin on the `whitening'
platform. Even P&G did not seem to be too aggressive for the brand,
however realizing that pricing being one reason for not being accepted
by the market, it slashed the prices and the product entered into the
mid-market segment rather than the premium segment. The price
slashing exercise was seen to bring in tremendous improvement in the
volumes of sales and the market share. The price was brought down to
Rs. 23 for 500 grams as against the previous price of Rs. 43, Rs. 50 for
750 grams as against Rs. 70 at which it was available earlier.
Therefore, the market saw a slash from 20 to 50% in case of the
Procter & Gamble product Tide. Thus, with these price slashes, the
market observed the two armies on the battlefield, being desirous to
fight.
2007-09
Since 2007, Tide has been steadily gaining share with Rin close behind
it. Tide had set the standards in delivering whiteness and cleansing
benefits unmatched by other detergents. The point of difference that it
suggested was that the powder would prevent dirt molecules from
setting on the clothes, thereby giving better cleanliness and whiteness
to the clothes. An additional augmentation was the pleasant lemon
flavor added to the powder to enhance the fragrance component. This
led to Rin losing out its leadership position in the market ground in
terms of whiteness also. The year 2009 saw a substantial gap in the
value share, where Tide was capturing 8% of the market share and Rin
only had 5.1% of the market share.
Pepsodent
Pepsodent advertisements spotlighted the toothpaste's distinguishing
features. It had a minty flavor that was derived from sassafras, an
ingredient found in some varieties of tea and such soft drinks as root
beer and sarsaparilla. Advertisements also pointed out the presence of
irium (otherwise known as sodium lauryl sulfate) as a mechanism for
fighting tooth decay, and to an ingredient known as IMP for preventing
tooth decay.
New product line as per customization:
COLGATE Vs PEPSODENT
Ever since the launch in 1993, Pepsodent has been trying hard to break
into the stronghold of Colgate in the Rs 3000 crore Indian Oral Care
market. Despite being a powerful brand with the powerful backing of
HUL, Pepsodent is still hovering at around 13 % marketshare
compared to around 52% share of Colgate.
Pepsodent so far has been very consistent with its positioning and
differentiation. Although the brand started its journey positioning on
Mouth Wash proposition, it quickly identified the flaw in taking that
stance. Soon the brand began to take the position of a germ killing
toothpaste. It had stuck to the positioning ever since.
The most memorable campaign of Pepsodent so far was the Dishoom
Dishoom campaign which catapulted the brand to the position of a
worthy competitor of Colgate. HUL has been tweaking the germicheck
advantage using various campaigns all these years.The brand also had
its range of variants like Pepsodent Complete and also Pepsodent
Whitening.
The recent campaigns of Pepsodent was centered around interesting
conversations among kids and also between Mother and Child. The
brand had earlier tried to attack Colgate directly through ads which
highlighted the claim that Pepsodent fights 10 tooth problems
compared to competitors’ 5 The other campaign highlighted the
common fear of mother about her child’s dental health.
In 2010, the brand had made a significant investment in bringing Shah
Rukh Khan as the brand ambassador for Pepsodent. The brand is
running two TVC featuring SRK.
COMPLAN Vs HORLICKS
Complan has never been an aggressive player compared to the market leader
Horlicks . This explains the reason why such a
powerful brand is languishing in a distant position of 15% market share
compared to the 60 % share of Horlicks.
While Horlicks has been breaking new grounds with a series of variants aiming
at the entire family segment, Complan was lying.
low all these years. The major happening for this brand in 2008 was the
launch of the new flavor KesariBadam . In the
promotional front, the brand was in a low key mode continuing with the
extension of its earlier campaign focusing on EXTRA
growth.
Today's newspaper had a stunner ad from this brand. It was a front page solus
advertisement in the news Dailies with a direct
comparative ad targeting Horlicks.
What was striking in that ad was that Complan has put a direct comparison
with Horlicks by showing Horlicks brand on the ad
and then comparing the various attributes. I have seen such explicit
comparative ads in automobile sector . In most of the
comparative ads, the name of competing brands will not be directly mentioned
to avoid litigation. The ads will either use letters
or dummies for comparison.
The ad copy asks the readers to chose between the " low cost health drink "
and " Complete Growth " . Then the ad talks about
why Complan is better than Horlicks by comparing both in the parameters
like :-
Main Ingredients
Protien Content
Protien Quality
Number of nutrients .
The ad also reinforces the new positioning " Grow Twice Faster ".
Complan is also running a TVC around the same theme. The TVC is almost a
Cut- Copy of the Horlicks' earlier campaign of "
Taller, Sharper, Stronger ". The ad shows the before-after results of two
samples and claim that Complan users grow two times
more than the non-users.
I was wondering why this sudden provocation. A google search indicated that
Horlicks has been running a campaign digging at
Complan's main attribute of ' 23 vital nutrients '. I have not seen that ad of
Horlicks.
The ad spoke of the high price of Complan and was claiming that Horlicks had
more than 23 nutrients but costs less than
Complan.
Complan had challenged this in Mumbai High Court but the ruling was not in
their favor. Hence the brand has taken the war into Price always have been
the weak point of Complan. Those who has used this brand know that its good
but was terribly expensive
compared to the other highly advertised brands. More over the brand was a
little confused regarding its positioning and
communication. However, the current spat has bought some life into this
brand.
It is a very undesirable way in which both of these mega brands are fighting
against each other. Washing dirty linens in public was never a healthy practice
but the public mud slinging which both of them has resorted to calls for
immediate action against these two companies who have no right to confuse
the public using the jugglery of language, essential nutrients and glossy
images about child nutrition. Hope, the concerned authorities would rise from
the slumber soon and take appropriate action