Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bank of Hawaii E mails between Meek and Penny Tong

Bank of Hawaii E mails between Meek and Penny Tong

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 136|Likes:
Published by Nanci Meek
E mail between myself and Penny tong re Meek Probate and Estate She won't answer our questions Why is she so evasive?
E mail between myself and Penny tong re Meek Probate and Estate She won't answer our questions Why is she so evasive?

More info:

Published by: Nanci Meek on Jan 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/29/2015

pdf

text

original

 
1E MAILS from former co-trustee BANK OF HAWAII regarding previous Meek Probate and Trust litigations(only e mails in October and November 2010)
From:
PenelopeTong@boh.com
Sent:
11/8/2010 5:26:56 p.m. Pacific Standard Time
To:
nmeek48409@aol.com
Subject:
Re: Arkansas property
Dear Nanci Meek,As I have mentioned before, by Court Order, Bank of Hawaii was released and discharged for its administration as a co-trusteeof the Qualified Domestic Trust created under the Elvin R. Meek Family Trust. That same Order approved the payments to theGoodsill and McCutcheon firms. I am not aware of any fees being paid to Bank of Hawaii as co-trustee of the QualifiedDomestic Trust, and you will note that there is no payment of fees to Bank of Hawaii contained in the Order. I encourage youto obtain counsel who can advise you of the significance of this Court AOrder. Once you obtain counsel, kindly route your questions through him or her.In response to your other e-mail of November 6, 2010, I am confirming that I am in-house counsel for Bank of Hawaii.Penelope Wat TongVice President & Deputy Legal Division Manager Bank of Hawaii Law Department #252P.O. Box 2900Honolulu, HI 96846Tel: (808) 694-8946 Fax: (808) 694-4346e-mail:penelope.tong@boh.com
 
From:
Nanci Meek [mailto:nmeek48409@aol.com]
Sent:
Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:18 AM
To:
Tong, Penny
Subject:
Re: Arkansas property
If that is the case then why did the bank of hawaii paericipate in more than one real estate transaction, the IRS auditand receive compensation for acting as trustee also if the bank of hawaii was not acting as trustee or responsible for the estate what role did the bank of hawaii play. And why did the estate compensate the attorney law firms in hawaiiand california acting on behalf of bank of hawaii and elvin meek trust. Thank youSent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From:
"Tong, Penny" <Penelope.Tong@boh.com>
Date:
Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:57:00 -1000
To:
<NMeek48409@aol.com>
Subject:
RE: Arkansas property
Dear Nanci Meek,
 
2
Bank of Hawaii never received any assets as a co-trustee of the Qualified Domestic Trust set forth under the Elvin R. MeekFamily Trust. Therefore, Bank of Hawaii was not responsible for the Arkansas property nor was it responsible for any assetsowned by the Elvin R. Meek Family Trust or Elvin R. Meek individually.Penelope Wat TongVice President & Deputy Legal Division Manager Bank of Hawaii Law Department #252P.O. Box 2900Honolulu, HI 96846Tel: (808) 694-8946 Fax: (808) 694-4346e-mail:penelope.tong@boh.com
From:
NMeek48409@aol.com [mailto:NMeek48409@aol.com]
Sent:
Thursday, November 04, 2010 4:30 PM
To:
Tong, Penny
Subject:
Arkansas property
Dear Penny:The Arkansas property? I have documentation reflecting several conversationswith Todd Hoch and David Louie regarding thesale of the Arkansas property. If you recall the property was sold by Robert Grigger Jones and Elizabeth and half of theproeprty belonged to my great aunt Mary. A judgment was issued and just this week after 6 years and the threat of a benchwarrant, elizaabeth paid part of the debt incurred from the Judgment.So what was the Bank of Hawaii's role if any with the sale of that property in 2006 Thank you
Re: FW: Letter from Bank of HawaiiDate:
11/1/2010 6:00:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time
From:
To:
CC:
 
Hello Penny: I will certainly pass your response to those within the IRS who are handling the matter. Sorry you arereluctant to answer our questions. The attorneys involved on behalf of the Bank of Hawaii were certainlynot reluctant a few years ago when it came time to billing the estate for services rendered. Nor was theBank of Hawaii reluctant to appear in front of Judge Hirai requesting the money from the sale of theproperty at Waipuna in Honolulu be released to pay the fees for Bingham McCutcheon and GoodsillAnderson.You may want to reconsider speaking with me either in person or on the phone prior to my taking this tothe next level.Have a good day. Nanci Meek(760) 413-5660
 
3
Cc: Peter Ho, President Bank of Hawaii David Louie Bank of Hawaii
Subject:RE: FW: Letter from Bank of HawaiiDate:
11/1/2010 5:52:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time
From:
To:
Dear Ms. Meek,As I have informed you before, Bank of Hawaii was never appointed as a trustee of the Elvin R. Meek Family Trust. Althoughthe Court appointed Bank of Hawaii as a co-trustee of the QDOT, no assets were ever transferred to Bank of Hawaii from thetrustee of the Elvin R. Meek Family trust to fund the QDOT. Funding of any trust created under the Elvin R. Meek Family Trustwould have to be done by the trustee of the Elvin R. Meek Family Trust, as that trustee would have held all such assets.Your questions regarding the Court proceedings have already been resolved by Order of each respective Judge. Furthermore,may I remind you once again that by court Order Bank of Hawaii was
released and discharged for its administration as co-trustee of the QDOT.
Our involvement in this matter has concluded.PennyHave a wonderful day!
 
Penelope Wat TongVice President & Deputy Legal Division Manager Bank of Hawaii Law Department #252P.O. Box 2900Honolulu, HI 96846Tel: (808) 694-8946 Fax: (808) 694-4346e-mail:penelope.tong@boh.comStriving to provide outstanding service.
Subject: RE: FW: Letter from Bank of HawaiiDate: 11/1/2010 4:39:38 a.m. Pacific Daylight TimeFrom:
NMeek48409@aol.com
To:
Tong, PenelopePenelopeTong@boh.com
CC:
Subject:
Letter from Bank of Hawaii
Ms. Tong: Upon careful review of the income tax forms filed during the audit on my father's estate in 2007, several entries were observedon the form 706 specifically detailing accounts in the bank of Hawaii specifically in the amount of $250,000 as well as$117.064. These are the income tax returns filed after the tax audit performed on the estate. It is my understanding theaccountant Michael Gould took over 4 years to file the tax returns and only after being prompted by the IRS with an audit. Wehave never received from Mr. Gould an explanation as to why the filing took over 4 years.Most important the Exemption trust was never funded and yet the returns reflect that it was. This as you know knocks theestate down from 3.7 million (a figure we feel Attorney Robert Jones achieved by listing our father's properties undervalue) to2.7 million. As no doubt you are aware in 2007 an estate UNDER 3.0 million pays ZERO tax.We need to discuss these entries as well as the failure of the Bank of Hawaii to fund the Exemption Trust. While RhondaGriswold and James Ashford, Elizabeth Meek's counsel with the law firm of Cades Shutte has confirmed in recent e mailsthat the exemption trust was never funded due to the ongoing litigation, it does not relieve the Bank of Hawaii of its fiduciary

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->